InternetSafetyLabs retweeted
Part 2 of our series on real-life harms of AI during the spookiest month of the year! 👻
Are you thinking of dressing up as Barbie this Halloween? Don't ask AI for costume inspo... In an article published (and later deleted due to the ensuing backlash) by @BuzzFeed, 194 images (produced by the generative AI model Midjourney) of Barbie from "every country" exposed the harmful racial stereotypes and biases embedded in AI technology.
There were numerous instances of whitewashing, offensive representations, and cultural inaccuracies within the images: South Sudan Barbie had a gun. Lebanon Barbie stood on rubble. Several Middle Eastern Barbies wore a ghutra, a traditional headdress worn by men. Multiple Asian Barbies, including Tajikistan and Thailand, were given blonde hair.
It's certainly scary to witness the proliferation of AI imagery produced by AI algorithms that reduce cultures to harmful, false stereotypes and erase diversity.
Read more here: businessinsider.com/ai-gener….
InternetSafetyLabs retweeted
The FTC's latest investigation found giant tech companies collect way more data than users expect and share it widely without oversight. Federal privacy legislation is long overdue.
eff.org/deeplinks/2024/09/ft…
InternetSafetyLabs retweeted
📢 AI Snake Oil is out today! I have too many feelings because this book has been five years in the making. In 2019 I gave a talk on AI Snake Oil and tweeted out the slides. I had no idea my career was about to change. Within a couple of days I had 30 or 40 invites to write a book or an article. I said no to all of them because I felt I needed to do more research to be able to write a book. So when @sayashk joined my team I knew this was the topic we were going to work on. The book is based on our research on limits to prediction, the dangers of predictive decision making, the reproducibility crisis in machine learning based science, the limits of large language models, and the risks of social media algorithms.
The book is not an anti-technology screed. If our point was that all AI is useless, we wouldn’t need a book to say it. It’s precisely because of AI’s usefulness in many areas that overhyped claims and outright snake oil have been so successful in the market. It’s hard for people to tell these apart, and we hope our book can help. And while we think the tech industry should have much more accountability, the harms we describe are usually not solely due to tech, and much more often due to AI being an amplifier of existing problems in our society. A recurring pattern we point out in the book is that "broken AI is appealing to broken institutions" (Chapter 8).
Since our book talks about what AI can’t do, AI boosters often tell us it’s going to be outdated soon. If you think so, I’d love to have a friendly bet! Read the book and tell us what you think will be wrong in two years or five years. (You can start with the intro chapter, which is available online; the link is in my pinned tweet.) The reason we’re confident of our assessments is that they are not based on limitations of the technology. Instead, they are based on inherent limits to prediction grounded in our sociological analysis. (The book owes a huge debt to Princeton sociologist @msalganik; our collaboration with him informed and inspired the book.) We also talk a lot about what we shouldn’t use AI for, even if we can.
We’ve had many moments of hope and trepidation for the book as we worked on it over the years. We’re so grateful for the early interest the book has had, especially to the 40,000 people who subscribe to the AI Snake Oil newsletter, and the many podcasts that have had us on to talk about the book. We’ve had great reviews in The New Yorker, Publishers' Weekly (featured in the Top 10 science books for Fall 2024), and many other outlets. And we’ve had such a wonderful experience working with Princeton University Press. We’re also fortunate to have received incisive peer reviews from @MelMitchell1 , @mollycrockett , @chris_bail, and three anonymous reviewers. The book is so much better as a result.
What's in the book
Chapter 1: Introduction. We begin with a summary of our main arguments in the book. We discuss the definition of AI (and more importantly, why it is hard to come up with one), how AI is an umbrella term, what we mean by AI Snake Oil, and who the book is for.
The entire introduction is available online. See the link in my pinned tweet.
Chapter 2: How predictive AI goes wrong. Predictive AI is used to make predictions about people—will a defendant fail to show up for trial? Is a patient at high risk of negative health outcomes? Will a student drop out of college? These predictions are then used to make consequential decisions. Developers claim predictive AI is groundbreaking, but in reality it suffers from a number of shortcomings that are hard to fix.
Chapter 3: Can AI predict the future? Are the shortcomings of predictive AI inherent, or can they be resolved? In this chapter, we look at why predicting the future is hard — with or without AI. While we have made consistent progress in some domains such as weather prediction, we argue that this progress cannot translate to other settings, such as individuals' life outcomes, the success of cultural products like books and movies, or pandemics.
Chapter 4: The long road to generative AI. Recent advances in generative AI can seem sudden, but they build on a series of improvements over seven decades. In this chapter, we retrace the history of computing advances that led to generative AI.
Chapter 5: Is advanced AI an existential threat? Claims about AI wiping out humanity are common. Here, we critically evaluate claims about AI's existential risk and find several shortcomings and fallacies in popular discussion of x-risk. We discuss approaches to defending against AI risks that improve societal resilience regardless of the threat of advanced AI.
Chapter 6: Why can't AI fix social media? One area where AI is heavily used is content moderation on social media platforms. We discuss the current state of AI use on social media, and highlight seven reasons why improvements in AI alone are unlikely to solve platforms' content moderation woes.
Chapter 7: Why do myths about AI persist? Companies, researchers, and journalists all contribute to AI hype. We discuss how myths about AI are created and how they persist. In the process, we hope to give you the tools to read AI news with the appropriate skepticism and identify attempts to sell you snake oil.
Chapter 8: Where do we go from here? While the previous chapter focuses on the supply of snake oil, in the last chapter, we look at where the demand for AI snake oil comes from. We also look at the impact of AI on the future of work, the role and limitations of regulation, and conclude with vignettes of the many possible futures ahead of us. We have the agency to determine which path we end up on, and each of us can play a role.
-------
We hope you find the book useful and look forward to hearing what you think.
InternetSafetyLabs retweeted
Ok, I'm so sick of the "data is the new oil" thing being used to justify totally unhinged practices, so let's agree and fight.
Data IS the new oil - in that it's constantly, voraciously consumed for wild profit without any thought to safety or impact.
InternetSafetyLabs retweeted
School surveillance software claims to protect students, but the adverse mental effects of pervasive monitoring are well-known. It’s time for schools to step up and implement proven social measures to keep students safe. eff.org/deeplinks/2024/09/sc…
InternetSafetyLabs retweeted
📣 Join Us for a Deep Dive into Digital Privacy!
Are you curious about how your data is tracked online? 🧐 Register for our upcoming live webinar "The Worldwide Web of Commercial Surveillance: Identity Resolution & Customer Data Platforms" on Sept 12 at 9AM PST.
/1
InternetSafetyLabs retweeted
We're thrilled to announce that ISL is in the running at SXSW EDU 2025 with our PanelPicker proposal, "Adventures in K-12 EdTech Data Privacy Accountability." Help us bring this crucial conversation about K12 EdTech safety to the forefront!
Vote here 👇: panelpicker.sxsw.com/vote/15…
InternetSafetyLabs retweeted
The list of #Excoded continues to grow. If you've experienced harm due to an AI system, we want to hear your story. Visit REPORT.AJL.ORG to share your experience.
InternetSafetyLabs retweeted
We stand with PBS's mission but urge them to prioritize young viewers' safety and remove the tracker ASAP!
Read more about our findings in the link below ⬇ :
internetsafetylabs.org/blog/…
#PBSKIDS #ProductSafety
/2
InternetSafetyLabs retweeted
📢 Attention Parents: If your kids are using #EdTech apps for school, you NEED to know what's happening under the hood!
App Microscope (appmicroscope.org/) is your one-stop shop to investigate the safety and privacy concerns tied to the tech your child is using for school.
InternetSafetyLabs retweeted
How many Apps has your child’s school asked you /your student to download? Do you know what data is being tracked or what the Privacy Policies cover? @SafeTechLabs did a comprehensive research study on EdTech that resulted in very disturbing findings. internetsafetylabs.org/resou…
InternetSafetyLabs retweeted
📢@SafeTechLabs launched the App Microscope, a new webservice that generates mobile app safety labels: appmicroscope.org/.
Safety Labels can be used by everyone to better understand risky behaviors of mobile apps.
👏 Well done to the whole ISL team for making this happen.
InternetSafetyLabs retweeted
A new resource from the nonprofit @SafeTechLabs, available to anyone, provides safety ratings based on risk assessments of 1,722 of the most commonly used mobile applications in K-12 schools.
govtech.com/education/k-12/i…
InternetSafetyLabs retweeted
We're thrilled to announced the launch of Appmicroscope.org today and the introduction of independently tested product safety labels for mobile apps. finance.yahoo.com/news/inter…
InternetSafetyLabs retweeted
Following safety tests at schools in every state, the nonprofit @SafeTechLabs found student data making its way to advertisers and social media sites by way of apps used in schools, with parents largely unaware.
govtech.com/education/k-12/i…
InternetSafetyLabs retweeted
Are Most Apps Schools Use Really 'Unsafe' for Children? Product Safety Group Says Yes edwk.it/3j33XWM
InternetSafetyLabs retweeted
A staggering 96% of apps used in #k12 #schools share #student information with third parties without the consent of users or schools, says @SafeTechLabs . What does this mean for student safety? #education #edtech #technology #edu #k12education
bit.ly/3j2aSzr
InternetSafetyLabs retweeted
96% of the apps used in K-12 schools share kids' personal data with third parties — including advertisers — often without the knowledge or consent of users & schools, according @SafeTechLabs. @TonyaJoRiley explores the implications for student #privacy.
cyberscoop.com/apps-expose-s…
InternetSafetyLabs retweeted
Zach Edwards (@thezedwards) is a STAR – he’s done so much work on uncovering illicit data schemes like these (among other things). It’s great to see his research exposed in major publications like @FT.
Read the thread – this is what the tip of the iceberg of app SDKs looks like.
🚨Scoop in @FT 🚨
Millions of American and European smartphone users are unknowingly sending user, device and IP address information to servers in Russia.
From there, researchers worry it might be accessed by the Kremlin.
Wait whhaaaat???
*Tweet thread follows*
InternetSafetyLabs retweeted
ICYMI, last night during the State of The Union, President Biden called on Congress to “strengthen privacy protections, ban targeted advertising to children [and] demand tech companies stop collecting personal data on our children.”
Watch this section @
c-span.org/video/?c5004034/u…

























