Pinned Tweet
Don't know how Supra protect you from MEV? Let’s talk about how they do it
1/5
On most blockchains, MEV is a hidden tax
Bots reorder or insert transactions to steal value front running sandwiching, you name the pros win regular users lose
@SUPRA_Labs is built to stop that🧵👇
Manager🐦🔥 retweeted
Missed being a founding star but I'm Rising Star #1222 @starlisting
Engage and earn. 👉 starlist.world
Good afternoon everyone
Hope you enjoy the Sunday just chill and vibe
Me enjoy my 🥰
Happy sunday mutual
Who Owns the Value Created by Real-World Data?
Have you ever thought about who benefits when data collected from the real world becomes valuable?
Imagine someone spends time capturing a warehouse, a street, or a building that an AI company needs to understand.
That capture takes effort, but it could also become useful to a business developing robotics or physical AI systems.
So where does the contributor fit into that value chain?
This is one reason @vangrid_io caught my attention.
Vangrid is building a network where people can contribute real-world spatial data, while buyers can post bounties for specific captures they need.
Instead of the process being limited to companies hiring their own data collection teams, contributors can discover opportunities and earn rewards for work that meets the requirements.
The buyer gets access to the data they need.
The contributor gets a chance to earn from their work.
And the network helps connect both sides.
Of course, payment depends on the bounty terms and acceptance of the submitted work. Not every capture will automatically generate income.
But the bigger idea is worth exploring.
As physical AI creates more demand for real-world data, there could be opportunities for ordinary people to participate in supplying it.
You don't have to build the robot to contribute to the infrastructure that helps it understand the world.
That's an interesting opportunity Vangrid is working toward.
Manager🐦🔥 retweeted
Happy sunday mutual
Who Owns the Value Created by Real-World Data?
Have you ever thought about who benefits when data collected from the real world becomes valuable?
Imagine someone spends time capturing a warehouse, a street, or a building that an AI company needs to understand.
That capture takes effort, but it could also become useful to a business developing robotics or physical AI systems.
So where does the contributor fit into that value chain?
This is one reason @vangrid_io caught my attention.
Vangrid is building a network where people can contribute real-world spatial data, while buyers can post bounties for specific captures they need.
Instead of the process being limited to companies hiring their own data collection teams, contributors can discover opportunities and earn rewards for work that meets the requirements.
The buyer gets access to the data they need.
The contributor gets a chance to earn from their work.
And the network helps connect both sides.
Of course, payment depends on the bounty terms and acceptance of the submitted work. Not every capture will automatically generate income.
But the bigger idea is worth exploring.
As physical AI creates more demand for real-world data, there could be opportunities for ordinary people to participate in supplying it.
You don't have to build the robot to contribute to the infrastructure that helps it understand the world.
That's an interesting opportunity Vangrid is working toward.
Manager🐦🔥 retweeted
Not everyone entering Web3 knows where to start
Wasu suna son koyo wasu suna neman opportunities, while others just need the right people to guide them.
That is why communities like @Hausa_Hub matter 🫂
Da yawan mu muna buƙatar wuraren da Hausawa suke domin koyo ko tambaya ko musayar ilimi kuma muyi growing together in Web3
Because the goal is not just to be in Web3 it is to understand what you are doing and why
Are you learning Web3 alone or do you have a community growing with you?
Manager🐦🔥 retweeted
Swap Campaigns Are Becoming More Than Just Reward Opportunities
One interesting part of @Sumex_Labs is how it uses swap campaigns and partner integrations to encourage users to explore different routes, liquidity sources, and trading opportunities within its ecosystem.
Through campaigns involving partners such as StealthEX, QuickEx, SilentSwap, XGram, and Coffer, Sumex is bringing more attention to the connections between swapping, rewards, and ecosystem participation.
These campaigns can include prize pools ranging from $1,500 to $5,000, daily rewards, Mystery Boxes, and incentives tied to trading volume.
But there is a bigger picture worth understanding.
A swap campaign is not only about the rewards available to participants. It can also introduce users to new protocols, expose them to alternative liquidity routes, and encourage them to explore how different services fit into a broader trading environment.
For users, this creates an opportunity to interact with partner integrations while potentially earning rewards for eligible activity.
For the ecosystem, it creates a reason for users to return, explore more features, and build familiarity with the available connections.
Sumex also has its Sigma Points (SP) system, which connects participation with its broader rewards structure ahead of the planned token generation event.
This makes the Rewards Hub an important part of the experience.
Rather than treating every interaction as an isolated event, the system creates a framework where eligible activities can contribute to ongoing participation.
However, users should understand the distinction between points and guaranteed financial value. Sigma Points should not automatically be treated as tokens with a confirmed conversion rate, listing price, or guaranteed allocation unless Sumex officially establishes those details.
The same applies to campaign rewards. Eligibility requirements, trading-volume calculations, campaign periods, and distribution rules matter just as much as the advertised prize pool.
There is also a practical consideration: chasing rewards without understanding fees, slippage, liquidity, or transaction risks can easily defeat the purpose of participating.
The smarter approach is to evaluate each campaign independently, understand its rules, and participate only when the underlying activity makes sense.
What interests me about Sumex is the possibility of connecting partner integrations, liquidity access, and a unified rewards experience rather than making users navigate every opportunity separately.
If executed well, this could make ecosystem participation more accessible while giving users additional reasons to explore different routes.
The real measure of success will be whether these campaigns create lasting engagement beyond the rewards themselves.
Because incentives can attract attention, but a genuinely useful product is what gives people a reason to stay.
Explore: app.sumex.io
Not financial advice.
🤖 Made with AI
Not everyone entering Web3 knows where to start
Wasu suna son koyo wasu suna neman opportunities, while others just need the right people to guide them.
That is why communities like @Hausa_Hub matter 🫂
Da yawan mu muna buƙatar wuraren da Hausawa suke domin koyo ko tambaya ko musayar ilimi kuma muyi growing together in Web3
Because the goal is not just to be in Web3 it is to understand what you are doing and why
Are you learning Web3 alone or do you have a community growing with you?
Manager🐦🔥 retweeted
Have you ever wondered how many capable people get overlooked in Web3 simply because they dont have a big following?
That is one problem @NucleusCodes is trying to tackle
Think about it someone might have solid DeFi experience understand NFTs deeply or consistently help a community grow, but their contributions are not always easy for projects to identify.
@NucleusCodes brings onchain activity and social footprints into the picture to help users understand their reputation and discover relevant opportunities.
For projects that could mean finding contributors based on their actual activity and interests rather than relying on popularity alone.
For contributors it creates another way to make their experience visible.
Web3 has plenty of people doing meaningful work. The challenge is helping that work connect with the right opportunities.
Have you ever wondered how many capable people get overlooked in Web3 simply because they dont have a big following?
That is one problem @NucleusCodes is trying to tackle
Think about it someone might have solid DeFi experience understand NFTs deeply or consistently help a community grow, but their contributions are not always easy for projects to identify.
@NucleusCodes brings onchain activity and social footprints into the picture to help users understand their reputation and discover relevant opportunities.
For projects that could mean finding contributors based on their actual activity and interests rather than relying on popularity alone.
For contributors it creates another way to make their experience visible.
Web3 has plenty of people doing meaningful work. The challenge is helping that work connect with the right opportunities.
Happy sunday mutual
Who Owns the Value Created by Real-World Data?
Have you ever thought about who benefits when data collected from the real world becomes valuable?
Imagine someone spends time capturing a warehouse, a street, or a building that an AI company needs to understand.
That capture takes effort, but it could also become useful to a business developing robotics or physical AI systems.
So where does the contributor fit into that value chain?
This is one reason @vangrid_io caught my attention.
Vangrid is building a network where people can contribute real-world spatial data, while buyers can post bounties for specific captures they need.
Instead of the process being limited to companies hiring their own data collection teams, contributors can discover opportunities and earn rewards for work that meets the requirements.
The buyer gets access to the data they need.
The contributor gets a chance to earn from their work.
And the network helps connect both sides.
Of course, payment depends on the bounty terms and acceptance of the submitted work. Not every capture will automatically generate income.
But the bigger idea is worth exploring.
As physical AI creates more demand for real-world data, there could be opportunities for ordinary people to participate in supplying it.
You don't have to build the robot to contribute to the infrastructure that helps it understand the world.
That's an interesting opportunity Vangrid is working toward.
Manager🐦🔥 retweeted
Good morning fam
Why one wallet score shouldn't decide everything
Imagine a wallet with a strong trading history.
Does that automatically make it a good candidate for a DeFi loan?
Not necessarily
Being a consistent trader doesn't automatically prove that someone can repay borrowed funds. In the same way, providing liquidity doesn't automatically make a wallet the best choice for a token launch.
The right signal depends on the decision you're trying to make.
This is an important part of @zerufinance approach.
Its system combines a broad understanding of wallet behavior with domain specific models.
For example
Trading How reliable and meaningful is the wallet's trading activity?
Liquidity Does the wallet provide liquidity that stays over time?
Credit What does its borrowing and repayment behavior suggest?
Airdrops Does its activity show contribution beyond simply chasing rewards?
Screening Are there risk indicators that deserve further investigation?
These are different questions, so they need different signals.
@zerufinance isn't just trying to label a wallet as good or bad. It's building behavioral intelligence that protocols can use for specific decisions.
And that is a more useful way to think about onchain reputation.
A wallet doesn't need one score that answers everything. It needs the right context for the decision at hand.
Manager🐦🔥 retweeted
GOOD SUNDAY MORNING, FRIENDS OF NYATENG WERE!
May this beautiful Sunday bring you peace, good health, happiness and renewed hope. May every heart find peace, every home experience love and every soul find strength for the journey ahead. Regardless of our faith or background, may we choose kindness, unity and compassion.
May your Sunday be blessed, your hearts be joyful, and your week be filled with new opportunities. Stay blessed, my dear friends.
Good morning fam
Why one wallet score shouldn't decide everything
Imagine a wallet with a strong trading history.
Does that automatically make it a good candidate for a DeFi loan?
Not necessarily
Being a consistent trader doesn't automatically prove that someone can repay borrowed funds. In the same way, providing liquidity doesn't automatically make a wallet the best choice for a token launch.
The right signal depends on the decision you're trying to make.
This is an important part of @zerufinance approach.
Its system combines a broad understanding of wallet behavior with domain specific models.
For example
Trading How reliable and meaningful is the wallet's trading activity?
Liquidity Does the wallet provide liquidity that stays over time?
Credit What does its borrowing and repayment behavior suggest?
Airdrops Does its activity show contribution beyond simply chasing rewards?
Screening Are there risk indicators that deserve further investigation?
These are different questions, so they need different signals.
@zerufinance isn't just trying to label a wallet as good or bad. It's building behavioral intelligence that protocols can use for specific decisions.
And that is a more useful way to think about onchain reputation.
A wallet doesn't need one score that answers everything. It needs the right context for the decision at hand.
Manager🐦🔥 retweeted
gm
the 2x on @quipnetwork is real, but it's narrower than it sounds
deposit a Quantum Echo and the multiplier applies to two things
points from swaps
points from value secured
mining, referrals and daily sign-ins stay at 1x
my takeaway isn't "echo = more points everywhere"
it's that the boost is pointed at the actions quip wants more of, real swaps and real value held
swaps only count above $0.01 and settled onchain, so the boost can't be farmed with dust
but i don't think "what's my multiplier" is enough of a question anymore
now i'm also thinking:
➛ how much of a typical points total is swaps and value secured
➛ whether node runners get their own boost later
➛ how the boost changes who climbs the leaderboard
check the point rules: points.quip.network
Good morning ct
A Score Is Useful, But What Happens After the Decision?
Imagine a protocol uses wallet data to decide who receives rewards.
The campaign ends, tokens are distributed, and everyone moves on.
But here is the important question
Did the decision actually produce the result the protocol wanted?
Did the recipients continue using the product?
Did liquidity remain after incentives ended?
Did some wallets claim rewards and immediately sell?
And did the campaign attract the kind of users the project wanted in the first place?
These questions matter because making a decision is only one part of the process. Understanding the outcome is just as important.
@zerufinance approach connects wallet-behavior signals with allocation workflows through products like Zaps and its API stack.
The idea is to help protocols evaluate activity before a campaign and examine outcomes afterward, using those insights to improve future decisions.
Of course, not every user who sells tokens is a bad participant, and no single metric tells the whole story.
But looking at what happens after a campaign can reveal things that transaction counts alone might miss.
Better allocation isn't just about choosing recipients. It's also about learning from the results.
Good morning everyone
Happy weekend
Good morning fam
The Next Big Data Network Might Not Be in a Building
Here is an interesting thought
What if collecting data for physical AI didn’t require building a huge facility first?
Today, companies can use specialized labs, equipment, and trained workers to collect data for robotics.
That approach has its place, especially when robots need to learn how to handle objects or perform specific movements.
But what happens when AI needs information about thousands of streets, shops, buildings, and other real-world environments?
Sending teams everywhere to capture those places can be expensive and difficult to scale.
This is where @vangrid_io takes a different approach.
Instead of relying only on centralized collection facilities, Vangrid allows contributors to use smartphones to capture real-world environments.
Those captures can then be processed into structured spatial data for potential use by robotics and AI companies.
Think about the difference.
Rather than depending on one team to map every location, a distributed network can bring together contributions from many people in different places.
Of course, the captures still need to meet quality requirements, and not every environment can be mapped with a phone alone.
But the idea opens up an interesting possibility.
The infrastructure for physical AI could be built not just in laboratories, but through a network of people helping map the world around them.
That is the bigger picture I see in @vangrid_io .
Manager🐦🔥 retweeted
Good morning fam
The Next Big Data Network Might Not Be in a Building
Here is an interesting thought
What if collecting data for physical AI didn’t require building a huge facility first?
Today, companies can use specialized labs, equipment, and trained workers to collect data for robotics.
That approach has its place, especially when robots need to learn how to handle objects or perform specific movements.
But what happens when AI needs information about thousands of streets, shops, buildings, and other real-world environments?
Sending teams everywhere to capture those places can be expensive and difficult to scale.
This is where @vangrid_io takes a different approach.
Instead of relying only on centralized collection facilities, Vangrid allows contributors to use smartphones to capture real-world environments.
Those captures can then be processed into structured spatial data for potential use by robotics and AI companies.
Think about the difference.
Rather than depending on one team to map every location, a distributed network can bring together contributions from many people in different places.
Of course, the captures still need to meet quality requirements, and not every environment can be mapped with a phone alone.
But the idea opens up an interesting possibility.
The infrastructure for physical AI could be built not just in laboratories, but through a network of people helping map the world around them.
That is the bigger picture I see in @vangrid_io .
Manager🐦🔥 retweeted
GM , rise and shine.
TOKEN2049 Singapore was a good reminder that building in Web3 goes beyond the technology. The right conversations and partnerships can be just as valuable.
During the event, Agenticscredit connected with teams and industry players including Polymarket, coinbase and mysten_labs.
For me, this is where networking becomes meaningful. Connecting with serious players creates room to exchange perspectives, explore synergies and understand how different parts of the industry can work together.
As AI agents take on more financial responsibilities, credit, risk assessment and trust will become increasingly important. Building that future requires collaboration across the ecosystem, not isolated efforts.
Glad to see @agenticscredit investing in these connections. The conversations happening today could help shape what gets built next.
🤖 Made with AI






















