Who runs MAGA-Town? Master-Blaster Trump runs MAGA-Town! Enter the MAGA-Dome!
MAGA-DOME, USA
Joined November 2020
- Tweets6.6K
- Following1.5K
- Followers696
- Likes34.4K
Pinned Tweet
"Fake News" jokes about a crisis situation where a professional corps of agents posing as main stream media is feeding Americans lies and propaganda 24 hours a day. This is unsustainable and unprecedented.
Media monopolies must be dismantled now! Rebuild it from ground up!
Stan Wojohowitz retweeted
Former CIA operator, plays the "how dare you, I'm a woman" card, after threatening 20 year old students.
No wonder our feckless CIA has been such an ineffective disaster for a generation...
Stan Wojohowitz retweeted
When Trump leaves office in January 2029:
1. All the Shadow Government fraud will have been ended; up to HALF of the annual federal government budget will no longer be a massive 'fraud tax' on the American tax payers and citizens.
2. Several hundred people, perhaps as many as 1,000, will have been shot by US military firing squads for treason after being convicted in a military tribunal. All kinds of cleverly disguised criminal/traitor shit you've grown up with all of your lives will never happen again.
3. American elections for federal offices [and many state level offices] will be transparent, secure, and not subject to corruption or remote intrusions.
4. The income tax apparatus will have been totally dismantled.
5. The vastly-reduced-in-size and reconsitituted US federal government and Executive Branch agencies will be funding themselves off of tarrif, trade and manufacturing revenues rather than citizens paying income taxes.
6. There will have been a US economic expansion like nothing ever seen before in world history. 50-60 trillion worth of new resources that can now be tapped into, and the return and expansion of new manufacturing/production capabilities will lead to profit margins/profit revenues previously considered to be impossible.
7. The US fiat/inflation/debt currency system will have been phased out [despite MASSIVE opposition from those deeply invested in it's survival] and replacing it will be an asset-backed currency.
8. The massive civilizational shift from the 'debt slave' model to the 'citizen shareholder' model will commence with the issuance of annual dividend checks to all verified US citizens. As the national resources are used to produce profits, citizen shareholders receive their cut of the profits in the form of dividend checks.
9. The alteration of the American lifestyle will be incalculable, as the country quickly moves from the 5 D's implemented on it by the US Shadow Government Franchise and the Transnational Crime Syndicate to the 5 R's.
The 5 D's = Demoralization, Deculturalization, Depopulation, Destabilization, Denationalization. All the goals of deliberate policies pursued by the Shadow Goverment, policies that targeted the native US citizen population.
The 5 R's: Remoralization, Reculturalization, Repopulation, Restabilization, Renationalization [this last includes defense of citizenship by removing all illegals from the country]
It will not take long for the results to manifest themeselves, when US citizens no longer live under the oppressive heel of a US Shadow Government franchise that was endlessly and relentlessly targeting them and seeking to demoralize, deculturalize and destabilize them to keep them weak, scared and easier to control.
When instead Americans have a US Patriot Government that is artfully and thoughtfully engaged in the vast enterprise of seeking to remoralize, reculturalize, repopulate, restabilize, renationalize the country and its great citizens, the difference between 'before' and 'after' will be very stark.
10. The Shadow Government Media Wings on both sides [the Fake Team Blue and the Fake Team Red] will be exposed and removed.
There is no possible chance that any surviving remnants of the US Shadow Government or the Transnational Crime Syndicate would ever be able to reconstitute themselves and reassert control.
Once American citizens see the life of a citizen shareholder in a country being run by an American Patriot government, any fantasies about tricking or suborning the US citizen population back into the debt slave model is a nonstarter.
Rejoice, little flock, for it is your Heavenly Father's great pleasure to give you this new Golden Age of America.
Stan Wojohowitz retweeted
In 2005, Oneida shut the flatware factory in Sherrill, New York.
A town that had made silverware for MORE THAN 100 YEARS was supposed to be finished.
Two men refused to let that happen.
Their names are Matt Roberts and Greg Owens.
Roberts had managed that factory. Owens was another former Oneida manufacturing manager. When the company ended U.S. production, they bought the plant and the equipment and reopened it the NEXT DAY as Sherrill Manufacturing.
They did not have a giant rescue fund.
They did not have a Hollywood ending waiting.
They had a building, some machines, and a workforce that knew how to make forks, knives, and spoons.
At first they kept making product for Oneida.
Then Oneida pulled the remaining American work and sent it overseas.
That should have been the end.
It wasn’t.
They took government flatware contracts to keep the lights on. In 2010 they filed Chapter 11. They sold unused equipment. They sold space they could no longer fill. They leased back only the part of the factory they could still run.
They came out of bankruptcy in 2013.
Then they did the thing that saved the company.
They built their own brand: Liberty Tabletop.
They sold 18/10 stainless flatware straight to customers who wanted tableware MADE IN THE UNITED STATES.
Not through a department store that could drop them overnight.
Direct.
Today Liberty Tabletop is the only company still manufacturing stainless steel flatware in America.
Same town.
Same trade.
U.S. steel.
About 70 jobs.
They did not bring back 2,000 workers. Nobody did.
What they saved was the last line.
If you want American-made forks and spoons, this is the factory that still makes them.
Support Liberty Tabletop.
THIS is what keeping manufacturing in America actually looks like. 🇺🇸
Stan Wojohowitz retweeted
🤔The Treasury Secretary Ran the Room
The G20 finance ministers' meeting opened in Asheville, North Carolina on August 29. Twenty of the world's largest economies. Finance ministers. Central bank governors. The most important multilateral economic forum on earth.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent spoke first. Five minutes. Set the agenda. Five priorities. Then introduced the Fed Chair.
"I want to welcome Chairman Warsh, who is joining the G20 finance track for the first time in his new role. Kevin, it's great to have you here."
Kevin. It's great to have you here. The Treasury Secretary welcomed the Federal Reserve Chairman as a guest at a table the Treasury Secretary was already running.
Warsh's response: "It's also a privilege to be back doing my public service alongside Secretary Bessent."
Alongside. Not above. Not leading. Not setting the agenda. Alongside.
Bessent spoke for five minutes and laid out five priorities for the global economy. Warsh spoke for three minutes and repeated what he'd said at Jackson Hole two days earlier. The Fed Chair was the supporting act at the world's most important economic meeting.
But the priorities are the real story.
Bessent told the G20 that economic growth would come from private enterprise not government spending, not central bank stimulus. He said the United States would modernize financial regulation by streamlining rules and reducing burdens. He said the G20 would confront global trade imbalances. He said sovereign debt restructuring for emerging markets would be made faster and more transparent. And he announced "Trump Accounts" financial literacy programs so that working families can, as he put it, "understand what a piece of the action feels like."
Growth through private markets. Regulation streamlined. Trade imbalances confronted. Sovereign debt restructured. Financial literacy for working families.
Every priority belongs to Treasury. Not one belongs to the Federal Reserve.
Then Bessent closed with the line that should have been the headline.
"I want to thank the EU and the ECB for their strong statement of support for our economic operations against the Iranian regime, and together this group will end this 47-year horrendous reign that they have had."
Read that again. The Treasury Secretary of the United States, at a finance ministers' meeting, declared that the G20 would collectively end the Iranian regime.
Not at a United Nations Security Council session. Not at a NATO summit. Not at a defense ministers' conference. At a meeting of finance ministers and central bank governors. A meeting about money.
Because money is how you end regimes now.
Operation Economic Outcast launched four days earlier. The largest Iran sanctions package in history. UAE banks targeted. An Egyptian bank's operations severed from the dollar system. A Hong Kong front company designated. And now the Treasury Secretary is standing at the G20 telling the room which includes China, Russia, India, Saudi Arabia, Brazil, and Turkey that the economic operation will end a 47-year regime.
He said it at a finance meeting because this is a financial operation. The regime won't end with an invasion. It will end when every revenue source is cut, every banking corridor is closed, every relay network is dismantled, and every intermediary is forced to choose between Tehran and the dollar.
Bessent thanked the EU and the ECB specifically. The European Central Bank endorsed the operation. That means the dollar system and the euro system are aligned against Iran's financial infrastructure the two reserve currencies acting in concert.
And the Fed Chair? The Fed Chair said it was a privilege to be there. He talked about secular stagnation being over and a global investment surge underway. He spoke for three minutes and sat down.
The Treasury Secretary ran the room. The Fed Chair was grateful to be in it. And the world's finance ministers heard the United States declare, through its Treasury, that the financial architecture would be used to end a government that has stood for 47 years.
That's what the G20 is now. Not a talking shop. Not a photo opportunity. A room where the Treasury Secretary sets the agenda, the Fed Chair supports it, and the financial architecture is deployed against sovereign governments.
Timelines. Patterns. The general's words, not mine. All I did was read the receipts.
I am the guy on the couch, and you have been debriefed.
🤔WE’VE BEEN WATCHING THIS "GANGSTA" TIMELINE FOR MONTHS AND NOW THE LANES ARE SEPARATING IN PLAIN SIGHT.
First came the Treasury architecture:
Sanctions.
Enforcement.
Seizures.
Reserve policy.
Market plumbing.
Strategic assets.
Liquidity backstops.
At the same time, we kept saying the Fed’s footprint would have to get smaller, not larger.
Then Warsh goes to Jackson Hole and says:
Less forward guidance.
Less market hand-holding.
Short-term rates as the primary tool.
Unconventional policy only for genuine crises.
A quieter Fed.
That is exactly the institutional division we’ve been tracking.
Not “the Fed disappears.”
The Fed goes back toward rates, inflation and employment.
Meanwhile Treasury keeps operating across the rest of the financial battlefield.
And look at the timing:
Asian leverage washed out.
Hedge funds de-grossed.
Japan and the yen required intervention architecture.
Treasury stepped into long-end liquidity.
Berkshire sat on hundreds of billions in pre-positioned dry powder.
Gold and Bitcoin strengthened.
China accelerated yuan internationalization.
And now the Fed Chair publicly narrows the Fed’s role.
That is why timelines matter.
Any one of these events can be explained away by itself.
Put them on the same timeline and a structure starts appearing.
The Fed controls the rate lever.
Treasury increasingly controls the architecture around it.
And Warsh’s Jackson Hole speech may be the clearest public description yet of where that institutional boundary is being drawn.
We’ve been calling it a transfer of function.
Now we’re watching the roles get defined in real time.
LOCKSTEP.
DIFFERENT LANES.
SAME TIMELINE.
@Homeranger17 @CouchGuy17 @drawandstrike @Great_Upset @ScottZPatriot @WillReagan11 @BeerCan45 @RadicalForLiber @THEDuaneCates @Thucydides17A @AFANGChief @Spaceshot76 @MRSRedVoteR @AstuteActual @jwcollins1955 @JeskoRiot
Stan Wojohowitz retweeted
Canada—and every other trading partner—needs to understand the distinction.
The United States isn’t withdrawing from global trade.
We’re changing the terms of participation.
American market access is an enormous privilege. The days when other countries could depend on it while protecting their own markets and hollowing out American production are over.
Build with us. Invest with us. Work to balance trade with us. Or watch us build it ourselves. 🇺🇸
Canada will match the new U.S. tariffs dollar for dollar.
In addition, we are introducing $7.5 billion in new and enhanced measures to support Canadian workers and businesses. That builds on the nearly $25 billion in supports introduced since the implementation of the U.S. unjustified tariffs.
Defending Canadian jobs, industries, and families.
Read more:
canada.ca/en/department-fina…
Stan Wojohowitz retweeted
BREAKING: Today’s Franco Friday just saw a surprise special guest take the stage - it’s Senator Joseph McCarthy!
“Ohhhh McCarthy was right!”
Wow!
Stan Wojohowitz retweeted
Credit Where It’s Due
It’s been a month since I joined Dina Powell-McCormick to announce America’s Workforce Academy, an accelerated training program from @Meta that guarantees people a job in the skilled trades. The details are here, but one month in, I can tell you the results are already very, very encouraging.
Here for instance, we have Lanyia Brooks and Ethan Blake. Until recently, Lanyia worked as a custodian in a data center, where she spent her days maintaining the facility while watching tech professionals build the infrastructure around her. Brooks said that perspective changed completely when a data center technician noticed her work ethic and sent her a link to America’s Workforce Academy. Despite waiting two anxious months to hear back, Brooks was accepted, conquering her fears to take her very first airplane flight to Indianapolis for the opportunity.
One week into the intensive program, Brooks says she is thriving in a high-energy environment alongside a deeply positive and ambitious cohort of classmates. “My immediate goal is to master my training and learning the ins and outs of physical servers and networking — with long-term plans to transition into an advanced technician role within a year,” she said. Backed by supportive instructors and employer-provided accommodations, Brooks said, “This opportunity is my direct path to achieving the American dream.”
Ethan Blake didn’t have to fly to get here, but he said that he felt just as stuck working in retail sales with little opportunity to move up. “I felt a growing desire to move beyond customer service and explore my true interest in technology,” he said.
Despite the 26-year-old’s efforts to break into the field, Blake said he hit a discouraging wall when searching for local employment and faced the daunting reality that his only visible career paths required relocating across the country to tech hubs such as California. “This workplace training program provided the critical local bridge I needed and bypassed the need to relocate and unlocked a clear career in the industry that will drive the future of this country."
This article, bit.ly/4htDXQA, another must-read by the indispensable Salena Zito, confirms something I’ve suspected for a long time – namely, that the skills gap will not close with one effort from one entity, but rather, from a series of efforts like this one, led by companies with the most to gain by reinvigorating the trades on a national level. More such companies are entering the fray everyday, including @Ford, @Walmart , @Carhartt, @BlackRock, @Lowes, @HomeDepot and many others, all of whom are launching programs and seeing positive results. Good for all of them.
To recap, Meta’s program is a six-week course currently in four states that covers every associated expense and guarantees a job on the other side, working on a Meta job site. Details here.
bit.ly/4fUlA5dIt’s a big step in the right direction, and one that I hope other companies take.
Stan Wojohowitz retweeted
Todd Rose graduated from high school, sort of, with a GPA of 0.9. Somehow, he went out to become a professor at Harvard, and today, he runs the most consequential think tank in America. Populace specializes in private opinion polling, and their work today is more important than ever. Why? Because the extent to which we’re being manipulated online is worse than you think. Much, much worse. Hundreds of millions of bots, (literally) have infected every social platform, and led to a long list of “collective illusions” that have reinforced to a “manufactured consensus” around myriad issues that are tearing us apart. In short, we’ve been turned against one another, by an enemy that’s determined to see our county collapse from the inside out.
According to Todd, the most serious, manufactured consensuses plaguing Americans revolve around societal values, political polarization, and interpersonal trust. For instance, Americans widely believe that society fundamentally prioritizes wealth, status, luxury, and fame. But in private polling, individual Americans overwhelmingly rank personal fulfillment, being a good parent, character, and doing work with a positive impact at the top of their personal values. Because people chase what they think others value, they pursue hollow benchmarks of fame and money, inadvertently teaching their children to do the same.
Likewise, the overwhelming public consensus suggests that Americans are fiercely divided over cultural, institutional, and political issues. But data from Populace (and I mean, LOTS of data) reveals that roughly 90% of Americans actually agree on the vast majority of controversial issues. Our brains use a deeply flawed shortcut that assumes the loudest voices are the majority. Because a tiny fraction of extreme users dominates most social media platforms, and because foreign bot armies, (mostly from China,) have weaponized these divides to an unprecedented level, we are awash in false consensuses. Which leads us to self-silence out of fear.
According to Todd, the largest collective illusion in society today concerns mutual trustworthiness. In truth, the vast majority of Americans privately believe that they are trustworthy and value integrity. However, they simultaneously believe that most other Americans are dishonest and do not value trust at all. This manufactured mismatch causes people to treat their neighbors with a level of suspicion that oftentimes, isn’t warranted. It also leads people to fall in line with all sorts agendas that are not in fact, nearly as popular as they assume them to be. Defund the Police, for instance, or Black Lives Matter, (no kidding), or the current panic around data centers, or the resistance to nuclear power, or much of the public pressure around cancel culture, DEI, ESG, and lots of other issues that never really had the support that people thought. Bottom line, school boards, corporations, and politicians implement policies that almost nobody actually wants, driven entirely by the fear of opposing a false majority that doesn’t really exist.
For me, Todd’s research does two things. It encourages tolerance and offers hope, because it proves we’re not really as divided as we seem. But it also encourages brutal honesty, even if it means getting thrown out of your own club. I’d be curious to know what it inspires in you.
Our whole conversation is here: bit.ly/TWIHI495ToddRose
A short clip is below. His latest initiative, Be The People, is also worth a look. bit.ly/4yv9gAD
Stan Wojohowitz retweeted
The gun is the most misunderstood object in Western civilization. Not a weapon. A technology. The technology that made the idea of equality physically real.
1. The longbow democratized warfare – a peasant could kill a knight with a stick and a string, and Agincourt proved it. The gun completed the process. The armored warrior class whose claim to social dominance rested on physical superiority became obsolete. The aristocratic monopoly on violence ended not with a philosophy but with a mechanism. The gun is the physical enforcement of the idea that all men are created equal. Which is why the American founders put it in the second amendment – not as an afterthought, but as the guarantee of everything else.
2. The Roman citizen had the right to bear arms. The Greek citizen had it. The English yeoman had it. The Swiss canton built its entire civilization on it. The disarming of the population has always been, in every civilization, in every century, the first act of the government that intends to stop being answerable to that population. Show me a disarmed population and I will show you a population that lost something else shortly after.
3. The Second Amendment is not about hunting. It is not about sport. It is about the relationship between the armed citizen and the state – the explicit constitutional acknowledgment that the citizen’s right to defend himself, his family, and his civilization against any threat, including the government itself, is not granted by the state and cannot be revoked by it. Power flows upward from the armed citizen, not downward from the armed state.
4. The gun defends the family. The woman alone with her children. The farmer on the edge of civilization. The shopkeeper in the neighborhood the police no longer patrol. The gun is the equalizer – the technology that makes the physical difference between a large man and a small woman irrelevant. Every argument for disarmament is, at its core, an argument that the state will protect you better than you can protect yourself. The evidence for this proposition is not encouraging.
5. In Europe, the disarmament is now nearly complete – and it happened precisely as the state’s ability and willingness to protect its citizens began to decline. The timing is not coincidental. A population that cannot defend itself must trust the state to defend it – which is a population that cannot effectively question whether the state is doing so. The dependency is the design.
6. The gun is a civilizational technology in the deepest sense: it requires responsibility, judgment, and the willingness to accept the consequences of your decisions. You cannot outsource it. You cannot have a committee fire it. It is the most anti-bureaucratic object ever invented – a direct, personal, consequential instrument that puts the full weight of the decision on the individual holding it. Which is precisely why the administrative state finds it intolerable. Not because it is dangerous. Because it is sovereign.
7. The family that can defend itself does not depend on the state for its most fundamental security. The civilization that can defend itself has not yet outsourced its survival to an institution that will negotiate the terms of that survival on its own behalf. The gun determines who controls violence – and therefore who controls everything that violence can threaten. Which is everything. The Sobieski who rode down the hill had a sword and sixty thousand horsemen. The equivalent today is the armed citizen who understands what he is defending and why. Every civilization that forgot this discovered it the hard way. The ones that remembered it are still here.
The French knights at Crécy and Agincourt were full of honor and panache.
Beautiful horses, beautiful armor, beautiful feathers – formidable. Magnificent.
The English were efficient.
Guess who won?
The longbowman was a peasant. No noble blood, no chivalric code, no magnificent plumes. He trained every Sunday by royal decree until he could put an arrow through armor at two hundred yards. He was not impressive to look at. He was devastating to face.
The French knights found it offensive. To be killed by a commoner with a stick and a string – it violated the entire aesthetic of war. They charged anyway, because the code demanded it, because the horses were magnificent, because retreating was unthinkable for a man of honor. The arrows didn’t care about the code.
This is the oldest story in Western civilization, told every century in a different costume. The beautiful system versus the efficient one. The one that looks right versus the one that works. The French had the better uniforms at Crécy, at Agincourt, at Waterloo, and in 1940. The pattern is not a coincidence. It is a civilizational tendency – the preference for the magnificent gesture over the effective one, for the noble form over the brutal function.
The market is the longbow. Unglamorous, democratic, slightly disreputable in polite company – and devastating to any system that faces it while still believing that looking correct is the same as being right.
The arrow doesn’t care about your panache. It never did.
Stan Wojohowitz retweeted
Reality Denied
Elon Musk’s interview with The Economist exposed a political absurdity: basic common sense now sounds radical because the elite progressive left has spent years treating reality as a nuisance rather than a guide. Secure borders, safe streets, fiscal restraint, and institutional competence are not fringe positions. They are the minimum requirements of a serious society.
That is why the debate has become so warped. Too much of the progressive left now operates in a post-factual universe, where ideology is treated as evidence and evidence is treated as negotiable. In that environment, ordinary standards of order and accountability are recast as oppression, while failure is excused with slogans.
The same argument would be celebrated as wisdom if Obama made it and denounced as extremism when Trump does.
The result is a public discourse detached from consequences. If you point out that uncontrolled migration strains public services, that crime affects working families first, or that governments cannot borrow and spend forever, you are no longer making a practical argument. You are accused of hostility, ignorance, or worse.
Musk’s real value in this conversation is not that he is universally right. Which he is. It is that he forces the confrontation between reality and rhetoric. And once that confrontation happens, the weakness of the left’s worldview becomes obvious: it can explain feelings, but it cannot reliably explain facts.
The middle of the political spectrum has not become more extreme. The left has simply moved so far from reality that common sense now looks like rebellion.
Stan Wojohowitz retweeted
People who are incapable of creating advanced civilizations are equally incapable of maintaining them.
Stan Wojohowitz retweeted
🇵🇱 The store said "buy as much as you can lift." They did not expect this 😂
Writer: Monica
Stan Wojohowitz retweeted
washingtonexaminer.com/opini…
The reaction to yesterday‘s announcement from @Meta and mikeroweWORKS has been rather astonishing. More to come…
Stan Wojohowitz retweeted
Where Trump Fits Among America’s Most Consequential Presidents
If Bessent is Hamilton, then Trump is the most consequential president since McKinley, and in some respects since Theodore Roosevelt, because he is the first to overturn the basic post 1945 consensus on trade, borders, and the permanence of American global primacy. He is not a costume drama Jackson, he is a late imperial figure who challenges the architecture built by Truman, Johnson, and Kennedy, using the tools of mass culture rather than white papers and summitry, yet with a Jacksonian instinct to pit the people against entrenched financial and political elites, just as the United States approaches the 250th anniversary of its founding.
Jackson had the frontier, McKinley had the industrial revolution, but Trump has the long tail of deindustrialization and the digital revolution. He enters politics after NAFTA, China’s WTO accession, the Iraq War, and the financial crisis, at the end of a 30 year experiment in neoliberalism, and he turns that record into an indictment. Where mid century presidents sold “liberal internationalism” as destiny, Trump treats it as a bad bargain imposed from above, and he does so in the idiom of television and tabloid combat rather than Senate floor oratory, echoing Jackson’s willingness to smash polite consensus in the name of a rough popular will.
Here the Clay analogy bites. Henry Clay’s American System tried to reconcile sectional interests through tariffs, internal improvements, and finance, binding a fractious republic into a national market. Trump, facing a different fracture line, attempts something analogous in reverse, welding Rust Belt whites, non college Hispanics, black working class voters, and downwardly mobile professionals into a common front against the credentialed overclass. Clay’s coalition was regional and economic, Trump’s is cultural and economic at once, but both are explicitly system building projects rather than mere mood politics.
If Bessent is Hamilton rewiring the circuitry of state finance, Trump is the late stage republican strongman who, like Jackson, McKinley, Theodore Roosevelt, and Clay in their moments, forces a comprehensive rethinking of what the American state is for, and who it serves, yet he does so with a media native, late imperial style that has no real precedent in the American canon.
That combination, a Jacksonian populist instinct, a Clay like system building ambition, a McKinley style economic nationalism, and a Rooseveltian appetite for combat, marks President Trump as a genuinely unique figure in United States history, a singular character to preside over the republic as it approaches its 250th birthday.
