Used to do a lot with SPACs. Now back to doing a lot with SPACs. I also post things to make myself chuckle. If you are amused, it is a nice bonus.

Not Investment Advice, USA
Joined February 2017
$TCGX sure went from a darling to an arb play in a hurry
9
474
SPAC targets getting more savvy to dilution. Two main ways to tackle dilution. A) Come up with a nosebleed valuation so insane that it is a moot point (founder's shares and warrants crater upon merger). B) Have a SPAC structured appropriately up front. I try to own more of B.
15
814
In honor of $PAII merger with Sakuu, I will write a Haiku. Pyrophyte dreams crumble Warrants bleed red in the street Bagholders weep now
5
14
914
I'd tweet about a SPAC, but I'm not sure if anyone would care. Frankly, I'm not sure that I care.
2
30
1,276
Even having been through these cycles before - I forget how bad SPACs can suck when they suck.
3
24
1,717
Credit cards? Come on now. $CCXI $AGLT has a much better way to raise funds to make more Digits
I had Grok analyze the $CCXI $AGLT investor presentation from this week. Do you realize that to fulfill their $300m in orders they will need to finance over $2B to build the robots, probably on credit cards?
1
8
1,119
The creation of this video probably cost some heretofore undiscovered lizard species in West Texas its existence and consumed eight million gallons of water, but aside from that, it is quite remarkable what a few prompts can do
Seinfeld AI: Jerry dates Sydney Sweeney Jerry starts dating Sydney Sweeney, but will Elaine like her?
6
2,196
Of SPACs trading 1% or more above NAV; 6 have a target. 15 do not. I'm not even sure what this tells us, but it is interesting. Personally, I'm very heavily weighted in SPACs above NAV that don't have a target. We'll see if that is wise or not.
1
7
855
So by my count, we've had 13 announced SPAC deals in the last month, and every single one is trading at a discount to NAV. We could use a slumpbuster soon, or SPACs will slumber back into a lack of relevance. Last deal announced that is above NAV is $NTWO
2
1
15
1,786
This is an excellent summary of one of my pet peeves; PIPEs that let the investor have their cake and eat it too. Substantial downside protection along with, usually, extra upside juice as well. Definitely worth looking at PIPE terms whenever a merger agreement is announced.
For retail, make sure to understand what type of PIPE is attached to a SPAC deal. It can have a significant impact on outcome. Convertible preferreds are linked below. spacinsider.substack.com/p/c…
1
7
1,527
Really interesting insights here from some knowledgeable SPAC players; 45 minute podcast. Thanks @spac_insider for making this kind of info available.
Podcast: The State of the SPAC Market, from the Floor of the NYSE For our first-ever video podcast episode, we headed to the floor of the @NYSE to speak with Allyson Satin, COO of the Ares SPACs, and Paul Wood, Co-Head of SPAC Investment Banking at BTIG. 2026 has already been a breakout year for SPAC issuance, and deals are moving through the pipeline faster than they have in years. We discuss what’s driving the rebound, why sponsor quality is rising to the top, and how SPACs are competing with a strong traditional IPO market. Plus, we look ahead to the fall and Q4 for any positive or negative catalysts that could affect the SPAC market. Give it a listen. spacinsider.com/news/intel/p…
1
8
1,452
I do like a CEO that has a sense of humor.
Replying to @fintechfrank
You are posting this just to brag that you have a gf
3
1,010
Replying to @RandianCapital
@RandianCapital and I disagree on WHY we like $EMPD, but we come to the same conclusion. Personally I'm a fan of the optionality of the data center partnership with Hunt, and see the stock being "cheap" as a bonus. Nice I'm not alone at least in owning the name!
I believe $empd is one of the most overlooked DAT’s in the market, with an upcoming catalyst next month. We built our own live estimate of NAV: empddiscount.com. The shareholder vote is less than a month away.
1
3
851
I've said it before, and I'll say it again - I trade actively. I'm currently substantially long the stock, but trade aggressively around the position to take advantage of the volatility - especially as it has correlation to bitcoin price moves, which will become increasingly less relevant over time.
2
162
$EMPD takes a lot of work to understand the dynamics at play; no quarterly conference calls doesn't help matters. That said, this podcast (7 min to 25 min mark) sheds a LOT of light on their datacenter "pivot". Worth a listen, if you care on the name. blockspace.media/podcast/ion…
1
3
713
Also on $EMPD; nice to see the CEO, Ryan Lane, eating his own cooking; his investment firm (Empery Asset Management) bought 1.9 million shares in the open market (in excess of 6% of the shares OS) over the past 5 weeks. The last 500,000 was at an average of $3.58 earlier this month, 18% higher than current levels. sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/… sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/…
3
579
I think this morning's press release is the first acknowledgement that the Hunt family owns $EMPD stock. Path forward is coming into focus with activist @ATG_Capital dialing back their proxy fight. Also interesting that the CEO of Cardinal Data Power had been CEO of $IOND businesswire.com/news/home/2…
1
4
1,071
I continue to be long the name, but trade around it actively. Anytime I start to lose patience with it, I usually see something that sucks me back in. Still trading sharply below NAV ($4.67 per share today if we use $EMPD data from their August 25th press release and adjust bitcoin price)
1
2
335
There's definitely risks here, but I still envision scenarios where this could justify a premium to NAV, not a discount -- and if that occurs, the ability to use the common equity as a vehicle to fund more data center growth along with Hunt family. . . this could be a different company
2
178
A bit of a rant; but these preferred equity PIPEs with SPAC deals are pissing me off. $ACGC the latest example today. Why even bother raising hundreds of millions in a trust if, as a sponsor, you aren't going to even pretend to price a deal at a reasonable valuation? (1/4)
3
12
2,191
Don't get me wrong, SPACs still offer a great fixed income substitute, and occasionally lightning strikes and there's some upside before a merger, but. . . yuck (3/4)
1
2
362
I continue to find the most attractive opportunities in warrantless SPACs. Kudos to $RACC for example; look at that deal structure to see how a SPAC can be used. Too bad a competitor drug study took the wind out of the sails there, but still, great structure (4/4)
2
7
329