Hosts of technical/developer-focused bitcoin meetups in San Francisco. Videos of previous talks: https://xitter.cf/t.co/6AclpkVO04

San Francisco
Joined November 2014
SF Bitcoin Devs retweeted
Bitcoin Optech newsletter #423 is here: - summarizes an analysis of mining pool difficulty controllers stranding slowed miners - describes a proposed improvement to Utreexo’s initial block download - links to a draft BIP for specifying unspendable taproot internal keys - summarizes changes to services/client software - Optech Newsletter #423 Podcast
2
5
14
1,060
SF Bitcoin Devs retweeted
Join us this evening at @PresidioBitcoin for @SFBitcoinDevs! We have a great agenda planned. sfbitcoindevs.org/socratic-7…
2
1
5
851
SF Bitcoin Devs retweeted
Rob Hamilton (@Rob1Ham), PortlandHODL (@PortlandHODL), Chandra Pratap, and fabohax (@fabohax) joined Optech to discuss Newsletter #416: Action items ● Move funds secured by COLDCARD-generated keys (1:07) News ● Wallets generated by COLDCARD at risk of theft (2:18) ● Disclosure of two DoS vulnerabilities in Core Lightning (36:26) ● Proof of concept for a zero-knowledge proof of reserves (49:54) Selected Q&A from Bitcoin Stack Exchange ● What is Bitcoin's objective definition of transaction neutrality? (1:03:07) ● Why does BIP110's decentralization benefit not outweigh its impact on transaction neutrality? (1:05:17) ● Why does BIP110 require a 55% signaling threshold if its nodes reject non-signaling blocks? (1:09:46) ● Why use ElligatorSwift encoding in BIP324? (1:17:12) ● Was the OP_SUCCESSx reservation in BIP342 designed with specific opcode families in mind? (1:25:36) ● What is the difference between the long-term feerate and the discard feerate? (1:29:14) ● What is the quickest method for migrating a legacy wallet to a descriptor wallet on a pruned node? (1:32:40) ● Is there historical data on orphan/stale block rates during high-fee periods? (1:36:09) Releases and release candidates ● BTCPay Server 2.4.1 (1:41:25) ● Eclair 0.14.1 (1:42:14) Notable code and documentation changes ● Bitcoin Core #34628 (1:44:26) ● Bitcoin Core #28463 (1:49:49) ● Bitcoin Core #32800 (1:54:18) ● Bitcoin Core #34683 (1:56:54) ● Bitcoin Core #33014 (1:58:09) ● Eclair #3325 (1:59:31) ● BOLTs #1346 (2:00:57) ● BOLTs #1344 (2:02:10) ● BOLTs #1343 (2:04:14)
14
1
38
5,138
SF Bitcoin Devs retweeted
🌉 Huge news! Announcing our inaugural Golden Gate Bitcoin Conference, this Nov 6 & 7 at the College of Marin! This is a community & education-focused event built by bitcoiners, for bitcoiners. Save the date! 🧵👇 (1/3) conf.bayareabitcoiners.com/ #Bitcoin #GoldenGateBitcoin
2
5
2
19
1,299
SF Bitcoin Devs retweeted
Liam Eagen joined Optech to discuss Newsletter #390: News ● Argo: a garbled-circuits scheme with more efficient off-chain computation (0:48) ● LN-Symmetry update (26:05) Selected Q&A from Bitcoin Stack Exchange ● What is stored in dbcache and with what priority? (34:21) ● Can one do a coinjoin in Shielded CSV? (24:02) ● In Bitcoin Core, how to use Tor for broadcasting new transactions only? (36:47) ● Brassard-Høyer-Tapp (BHT) algorithm and Bitcoin (BIP360) (38:31) ● Why does BitHash alternate sha256 and ripmed160? (39:24) Releases and release candidates ● Libsecp256k1 0.7.1 (41:09) Notable code and documentation changes ● Bitcoin Core #33822 (42:59) ● Bitcoin Core #34269 (44:50) ● Core Lightning #8850 (47:38) ● LDK #4349 (49:16) ● Rust Bitcoin #5470 (50:54) ● Rust Bitcoin #5443 (51:26) ● BDK #2037 (52:51) ● BIPs #2076 (55:49) ● BIPs #1500 (59:39)
2
7
16
1,985
SF Bitcoin Devs retweeted
Anthony Towns (@ajtowns) and Mikhail Kudinov (@kudinov_mikhail) joined Optech to discuss Newsletter #386. A notice about the wallet migration bug in Bitcoin Core was discussed at (56:30) News ● Building a vault using blinded co-signers (1:04:09) ● Peer feature negotiation (1:40) Changing consensus ● Year 2106 timestamp overflow uint64 migration (1:07:47) ● Relax BIP54 timestamp restriction for 2106 soft fork (1:11:36) ● Understanding and mitigating a CTV footgun (1:16:30) ● CTV activation meeting (1:21:00) ● `OP_CHECKCONSOLIDATION` to enable cheaper consolidations (1:23:11) ● Hash-based signatures for Bitcoin's post-quantum future (20:47) Releases and release candidates ● BTCPay Server 2.3.0 (1:28:29) Notable code and documentation changes ● Bitcoin Core #33657 (1:30:25) ● Bitcoin Core #32414 (1:33:23) ● Bitcoin Core #32545 (1:39:18) ● Bitcoin Core #33892 (1:42:13) ● Core Lightning #8784 (1:44:35) ● LND #9489 (1:45:54) ● BIPs #2051 (1:50:09) ● BOLTs #1299 (1:56:39) ● BOLTs #1305 (1:59:46)
8
16
5
55
48,280
Let’s Gooooo Holiday Party 12/13 12:00-3:00 meetu.ps/e/PDjx3/b9bFd/i
1
8
2
14
2,658
SF Bitcoin Devs retweeted
Friends, I’m hosting another Programming Lightning workshop at the stunning @PresidioBitcoin! During this 1-day workshop, we'll build a Lightning channel from scratch. Along the way, we'll leverage the following educational tools to ensure that participants come away with a deep understanding of topics such as asymmetric commitment transactions, revocation keys, HTLCs, and more: - Coding exercises - Socratic method (question-driven learning) - LOTS of diagrams - Small-group discussions, where participants teach each other to reinforce concepts collaboratively
3
16
2
55
7,787
SF Bitcoin Devs retweeted
Welcome to our live show! xitter.cf/i/broadcasts/1ynJOlZMO…
1
8
855
want to take a second and help cross-pollinate the local bitcoin groups that are active in the Bay Area. There are 4 primary brands running in-person Bitcoin meetups: Bay Area Bitcoiners SF Bitcoin San Francisco Bitcoin Developers San Francisco Lightning Devs
1
5
2
23
2,246
Bitcoin Las Vegas Conference Pre-Party!!!! Saturday 5/24 in SF 12:00-4:00 @cluborange @presidiosf @TheyaBitcoin meetu.ps/e/P1Pbx/b9bFd/i
4
3
2
12
1,482
Replying to @SFBitcoinDevs
Thursday!!!! 5/15 meetu.ps/e/NZkTl/b9bFd/i
1
1
1
5
1,419
The Localhost Research team is committed to transparency. We will be regularly publishing in-depth reports that showcase our contributions to the Bitcoin FOSS ecosystem. Check out our first report here: lclhost.org/blog/transparenc…
8
18
3
68
14,961
SF Bitcoin Devs retweeted
Last week Murch and Harding spoke with Sebastian Falbesoner (@theStack), Ruben Somsen (@SomsenRuben), and Abubakar Sadiq Ismail (@sadeeq_ismaela) about Newsletter #349: - IBD using SwiftSync - Bitcoin Core fee estimation - And more! Catch up: bitcoinops.org/en/podcast/20…
11
26
2,321
SF Bitcoin Devs retweeted
Catch me for a fireside chat on April 10th in San Francisco! I promise to ramble and bloviate at great length on a wide variety of stupefyingly uninteresting topics 😂 lu.ma/jauphcnp?tk=8VFQMT
5
4
24
3,708
SF Bitcoin Devs retweeted
Bitcoin Optech newsletter #345 is here: - looks at an analysis of P2P traffic experienced by a typical full node - summarizes research into LN pathfinding - describes a new approach for creating probabilistic payments - recaps the "Stricter internal handling of invalid blocks " PR Review Meeting - Optech Newsletter #345 Recap on Riverside bitcoinops.org/en/newsletter… Developer Virtu (@vir7u) posted to Delving Bitcoin an analysis of the network traffic generated and received by his node in four different modes: initial block download (IBD), non-listening (outbound connections only), non-archival (pruned) listening, and archival listening... bitcoinops.org/en/newsletter… Sindura Saraswathi (@btcsindura) posted to Delving Bitcoin about research she conducted with Christian Kümmerle about finding optimal paths between LN nodes for sending payments in a single part... bitcoinops.org/en/newsletter… Robin Linus (@robin_linus) replied to the Delving Bitcoin thread about probabilistic payments with a conceptually simple script that allows two parties to each commit to an arbitrary amount of entropy that can later be revealed and xored together, to produce a value that can be used to determine which one of them receives a payment... bitcoinops.org/en/newsletter… 'Stricter internal handling of invalid blocks' is a PR by mzumsande (@Lightlike1) that improves the correctness of two non-consensus-critical and expensive-to-calculate validation fields by immediately updating them when a block is marked as invalid... bitcoinops.org/en/newsletter… Bitcoin Optech will host an audio recap discussion of this newsletter on Riverside.fm Tuesday at 15:30 UTC. Join us to discuss or ask questions! riverside.fm/studio/bitcoin-…
1
20
2
33
5,774
And we are back, first LitDevs of 2025 1/30 @ 6:30 meetu.ps/e/NPrRy/b9bFd/i
1
7
1
10
1,364
SF Bitcoin Devs retweeted
Earlier today @murchandamus and @bitschmidty were joined by vnprc to discuss Newsletter #337: - Continued discussion about rewarding pool miners with tradeable ecash shares - LDK v0.1 and more Catch up: bitcoinops.org/en/podcast/20…
11
4
19
4,218
SF Bitcoin Devs retweeted
Bitcoin Optech newsletter #334: 2024 Year-in-Review Special is here: - notes Bitcoin developments during each month of 2024 - Vulnerability disclosures - Cluster mempool - P2P transaction relay - Covenants and script upgrades - Major releases - Optech bitcoinops.org/en/newsletter…
5
34
6
84
34,959