Ruth retweeted
You’re 400 million times closer in size to the observable universe than to the Planck length.
Let that sink in.
Ruth retweeted
📊 The 2016 Brexit electorate no longer exists.
Peter Kellner has updated the sums using YouGov and ONS data.
Since 2016:
🔹 Around 3.8m Leave voters have died, against 2.1m Remain voters.
🔹 Around 7m new voters have reached voting age, overwhelmingly pro-European.
🔹 Around 5m voters have changed their minds 👉roughly three-quarters of them moving from Leave to Rejoin.
His estimate of how Britain would vote now:
🇪🇺 REJOIN: 20.0m 👉 63%
🇬🇧 STAY OUT: 11.8m 👉 37%
A majority of almost 9 million.
Brexit happened. Britain has lived with it for a decade.
But democracy does not freeze the electorate in 2016 forever.
The question is what Britain wants now not what it indicated in 2016.
📊 The Brexit majority hasn’t just slipped 👉it’s vanished. Completely.
This chart from Peter Kellner/YouGov shows:
• 5 million 2016 voters have died
• New young voters back Rejoin by 5:1
• 29% of Leave voters now want to rejoin
• Net result: Rejoin 19.8m vs Stay Out 11.7m
➡️ An 8 MILLION majority for Rejoin.
Britain is now a pro-EU country.
The only people keeping Brexit alive are politicians who benefit from the damage.
Ruth retweeted
I wanted to explain to you directly my announcement on creating a National Care Service and the triple lock.
Fundamental change is needed to protect the NHS and give older people the support they need.
At Labour conference, I announced a plan to create a National Care Service in the next parliament. To fund it, I am proposing an adjustment to the triple lock on the state pension. This will form the basis of a new settlement for older people in our country. I want to explain why this is necessary and what it would mean for pensioners.
Everyone knows that our social care system is broken. And yet, for decades, politicians have failed to fix it. Shamefully, millions of older people have unmet care needs. Far too many see everything they have worked for – their home, pension and savings – wiped out by care bills. The personal cost can be devastating, but we should not make the mistake of thinking the price is paid only by older people and their families.
I am convinced that if we carry on as we are, our broken social care system will eventually break our NHS too. Every day, older people who should be receiving support at home or in care settings are unnecessarily admitted to A&E. Meanwhile, hospital beds are occupied by people who are fit to leave but have nowhere to go because the care they need is not in place. Go to any hospital and you will see the effect. Corridor care is no longer simply the result of winter pressures. It is a commonplace indignity suffered by thousands of patients every day.
It is time for fundamental change. The best chance we have of saving our NHS is to build a high-quality care service. The National Care Service I am proposing will be based on NHS principles: everyone contributes and everyone is covered. It will give people peace of mind about their care needs and protect what they have built up over their lifetime. It will provide free personal care – support with the most basic human needs: eating, dressing and bathing. And it will be integrated with the rest of the system, preventative in nature, and deliver care at home wherever possible, exactly where older people want and should be.
A National Care Service, I believe, would become as significant as the creation of the NHS itself. But we need to be honest about the changes that are needed to pay for it. And I do not believe it makes sense to preserve the current triple lock while so many pensioners face the risk of catastrophic care costs. We can give pensioners greater financial security.
I am proposing to adjust the triple lock. This is not an easy decision, but I believe it is the right one. We pledged in our manifesto that we would keep the triple lock throughout this parliament, and I will keep that promise. This means the state pension is set to rise by more than £2,000 a year, reaching around 30 per cent of average earnings by the end of the decade – its highest ever level.
From April 2030, under our adjusted triple lock, we will guarantee that the state pension rises every year by either inflation or 2.5 per cent, whichever is higher. It will also increase by more than this when necessary to ensure that it holds its value relative to average earnings.
This means that if inflation spikes, pensioners will be protected. If wages rise, pensioners will share in that rising prosperity, with the state pension tracking earnings over time. Nobody’s pension will ever go down. And the state pension will be put on a sustainable footing for decades to come.
I want to be upfront about what I am proposing because this adjustment will bring change. The state pension will not increase as quickly as it otherwise would if we kept the triple lock in its current form. However, the adjustment will enable us to fix social care for everyone by building a National Care Service that provides older people with free personal care at the point of need. I believe this is a better deal for pensioners.
I do not expect people to support this plan without seeing the full detail. We will start laying the ground now for the National Care Service and introduce it as soon as possible in the next parliament. Louise Casey’s review will advise us on exactly how and we will build the maximum consensus around her recommendations. It will be fully funded – and not through borrowing.
I appeal to everyone to engage in this debate responsibly and urge politicians to continue the cross-party talks that began over the summer. We need less point scoring and more problem solving. The situation is too serious for us to play politics. Care workers struggling on low pay, families stretched to breaking point, older people fearful of losing everything they have worked for. We need to give them reason to hope again.
I have wanted to fix social care for a long time. As health secretary in 2009, I tried to find a cross-party solution. Since then, I have watched the challenges grow more acute and the consequences become more severe. It is a profound failure of politics that we have known about this problem for so long and yet failed to act. I would never forgive myself if I did not try now.
This is the settlement I am offering to pensioners: a state pension that rises every year, no care charges and a high-quality National Care Service to give peace of mind in later life. I do not pretend this will be easy. But in the end, politics is about finding a way. I gave my word that I would do everything in my power to build a care system worthy of the people who provide it and all those who depend on it. This is how we can achieve it.
Ruth retweeted
I want to be honest about how we’ve got to a place where British billpayers are paying some of the highest energy costs in Europe.
Over the past 40 years, we’ve given up control of our necessities, outsourced our essentials and privatised the basics. Water, transport, housing. And of course, energy.
Now the public are paying the price. We haven’t invested in the infrastructure we need. Conflict overseas has pushed up energy costs and it’s hurting our businesses and families.
That’s why we need to take back greater control of our energy system.
This week, I announced Great British Grid, which will speed up connections and push down bills.
We’re also giving mayors, local leaders and communities a stronger role. With funding for People’s Power projects, communities will be able to build solar panels on libraries and town halls, hydro schemes in rivers or publicly owned windfarms on local land.
But it’s not just energy we need stronger public control over. It’s also water, housing, transport and care.
So we’re repealing the ban on public ownership of water companies. We’re building more council homes than this country has seen since the end of World War Two.
We’re reforming the leasehold system so families aren’t squeezed for every penny. And we’re opening up home ownership for first time buyers who can’t rely on the bank of mum and dad.
This week I also announced my determination to introduce a National Care Service, to put people above profit and to give pensioners peace of mind.
Together, we’ll rewire the country from top to bottom so that it works for all people in all places.
That is the only way to put Britain back on the right path. It’s the only way to put power back in people’s hands. And it’s the only way we will bring hope again.
Ruth retweeted
I don't care what anyone says, I believe we can end rough sleeping in Britain.
Today is World Homeless Day, and I don't think anyone in this country should be sleeping rough on our streets. Certainly not tonight.
That's why one of the first commitments I made as Prime Minister was to end rough sleeping. Not manage it. Not reduce it. End it.
And I'm putting over £400 million behind a national drive to get everyone in for Christmas.
And to put my own money where my mouth is, I'm making my latest salary donation from my PM salary to The Passage in Victoria, an amazing charity I visited on my very first day in Downing Street.
All this will help make sure that every person sleeping rough is offered a route off the street and a safe place to stay because, in one of the wealthiest countries in the world, people should not be left to sleep outside with nowhere to turn.
This isn't the finish line. We'll keep building the homes, creating the jobs, and reforming the services to stop people reaching crisis point in the first place.
But today, I wanted to say this: we should never accept rough sleeping as normal. Not in Britain, not in 2026, and not while I'm Prime Minister.
Ruth retweeted
It’s not just the government that covered up Russian interference in Brexit. The press also played its part. This is one of the only times I was ever interviewed on the subject… by US media.
Here it is. This is the clip from yesterday's @CNN interview where I'm asked - for first time ever - about Brexit-Trump-Russia.
"These vital questions of national security have been interpreted as about politics. And it's not about politics. It's about power. And about Putin."
Ruth retweeted
Alastair Campbell, "The gov has not been honest about the reality of Brexit, that we've been in this la-la-land pretending we could make it work, pretending it wasn't damaging, pretending the Russians weren't involved"
Andy Burnham, "Brexit has done more harm than good to UK growth, and to other things as well"
"I'm going to argue for closer integration as that will improve growth prospects. Also collaboration on immigration"
"One of the big lies of the 2016 campaign was that we would 'take back control' and it would be much easier - the reality is you need collaboration to take control of immigration"
"If we want more growth, we want better control of immigration, we have to be honest about that and what it means in terms of the relationships we make with Europe"
"I do think it has to be done with consent of the public"
"Public opinion has moved more quickly than political. The political class is behind on this issue and the opinion polls show that"
"We have to have a process of looking at the options"
My view: Alastair Campbell is right: for years, governments have tried to keep Brexit in a kind of “la-la-land” - pretending it could be made to work, pretending it wasn’t damaging, and avoiding an honest discussion about Russian involvement in the referendum debate.
Andy Burnham is now spelling out what that evasion has cost us. Brexit has done more harm than good to UK growth. If we want stronger growth and better control of immigration, we need to be honest about how much those goals depend on cooperation with Europe. “Taking back control” was one of the big lies of 2016: the suggestion that Britain could manage shared challenges more easily by standing apart.
Burnham is also right that closer integration must have the public’s consent. That means setting out the options and having a serious, open debate about what each would mean. Public opinion may be moving faster than the political class, but people deserve more than slogans and evasions.
It’s time to stop pretending Brexit is working and let the country consider where we go from here.
Ruth retweeted
🚨 Another Brexit myth collapses.
We are repeatedly told that Europe would never take Britain back.
The evidence says otherwise.
🇪🇺 66.2% of EU voters support the UK rejoining
🇩🇰 Denmark: 75.6%
🇳🇱 Netherlands: 75.3%
🇸🇪 Sweden: 72.2%
🇪🇪 Estonia: 71.6%
🇵🇹 Portugal: 70.2%
🇪🇸 Spain: 67.7%
🇩🇪 Germany: 65.1%
Even France 🇫🇷 described as among the most hesitant, backs our return by 58.6% to 19.4%.
Britain is not being kept outside by a hostile Europe. We are being kept outside by our own political class’s fear of admitting that Brexit failed.
Europe is ready. A majority of Britain is ready. The remaining obstacle is political courage at Westminster.
🚨 Britain could rejoin the EU within a single Parliament.
A new @BestForBritain report demolishes the claim that rejoining must take a decade.
The UK would not be starting from scratch. We are a former member, remain closely integrated with the European economy and have retained much of the EU’s regulatory framework. Finland completed accession in under three years.
Senior European figures agree that, with political alignment and sustained will in London and Brussels, British membership could be restored within five years.
Polling now shows:
🇬🇧 52% would vote to rejoin
🚫 Just 27% would vote to remain outside
🔄 More than one-fifth of 2016 Leave voters would now vote to return
But speed requires clarity. Britain would need a democratic mandate, a formal Article 49 application, regulatory alignment and an unequivocal commitment to full membership,
not another attempt to demand all the benefits while rejecting the obligations.
Questions over the euro, Schengen and budget contributions would require negotiation, but they are not insurmountable. EU members already participate in these arrangements differently.
The greatest obstacle is no longer EU law. It is Britain’s political courage.
If @andyburnham seeks and wins a clear mandate, Britain could be back at the European table before the end of the next Parliament.
Ruth retweeted
🔥 At last, a Prime Minister prepared to identify the architect of Britain’s lost decade.
@andyburnham says Nigel Farage bears significant responsibility for ten years of division and drift and he is right.
Farage promised Brexit would deliver economic freedom and control of our borders. Instead, it weakened growth, erected barriers with our largest market and destroyed the European cooperation Britain relied upon to manage migration.
Farage now says reopening the Brexit debate is a gift to him. Good. Let him defend the damage.
This time, he cannot campaign against an imaginary future. He must answer for the country Brexit actually created.
Andy Burnham says he holds Nigel Farage 'significantly responsible' for UK's miserable decade
mirror.co.uk/news/politics/n…
Ruth retweeted
🟣 SUBSTACK
‘A Clear Answer’: Russia Intervened in the Brexit Vote
Prime Minister Andy Burnham has broken ten years of establishment omertà over Putin’s plot to get Britain out of the EU, reports @peterjukes
bylinesupplement.com/p/a-cle…
Ruth retweeted
Congratulations to Carole Cadwalladr, @carolecadwalla, who together with colleagues first revealed this story.
Ruth retweeted
😱😱😱 And just like that, it’s completely VANISHED from the media.
A sitting congressman, Ted Lieu, said on the record the Epstein files are being blocked because they show Trump raped and threatened to kill children.
Lets make this viral again 👇
Ruth retweeted
Nobody did more to block the truth than Boris Johnson whose first act as PM was to ennoble the Baron of Siberia but he did not act alone. Nor did Keir Starmer make any attempt to disclose what the govt knew.
But now the govt must tell us what it actually knows.
2/
Ruth retweeted
NEW: Ten years on, Prime Minister @andyburnham tells @campbellclaret & @RoryStewartUK that there was ‘clear’ Russian interference in the Brexit vote.
FINALLY after years of cover-ups & denials from the highest levels of the UK govt. That in itself deserves an inquiry.
1/
Apparently Russian servers have been hit by a Ukrainian strike and immediately massive online hard right chatter has collapsed.
This particular chatter was in support of Germany’s AFD, their equivalent to Reform, but similar patterns are being seen in hard right movements everywhere, including the UK.
If anyone needed anymore evidence that Russia are driving a massive wave of hard right propaganda in Europe, this is it.
So, all you “patriots” - you’ve been duped by Russia, and you are about as far from patriotic as anyone can be. You are easily brainwashed though. This is how propaganda works.
I voted for I. HADJAR as @salesforce #F1DriveroftheDay. Make your vote here: formula1.com/en/page/vote?_s… df0603krefnld.cloudfront.net…





























