
@Ruminator1000i
iAccount based inUnited States
About this account
- Account based in
- United States
- Connected via
- United States Android App
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
I probably spend too much time ruminating.
Joined December 2024
- Tweets1.4K
- Following2.4K
- Followers153
- Likes53.2K
TheRuminator retweeted
"Elon Musk can't succeed in India because we Indians are here"
Sometimes they accidentally admit the truth when they think no one is looking
TheRuminator retweeted
I’m not sure most people realize that we are just one major flood event away from the Mississippi River permanently changing course in Louisiana. One that takes a new path to the Gulf, 120 miles west of its current delta.
In this post, I present the growing geological and scientific evidence for this looming avulsion. This isn’t some conspiracy theory, but a well studied and well documented course correction that is way overdue.
While the dynamics of such a geological shift have been building for a couple hundred years, we’ll start this story in 1927. It is then that Louisiana experienced one of the worst floods in its history, when the Mississippi River overflowed and inundated parts of Baton Rouge, New Orleans, and all the towns along its banks. This devastation prompted Congress to enact the Flood Control Act of 1928, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) proceeded to build a much bigger and stronger levee system along the river all the way to the Gulf. The Mississippi River does not like to stay in one place for too long, and has been planning its escape from these levees ever since. Just waiting for the right time to exit its current predicament and embark on a permanent journey down… the Atchafalaya River.
You see, the Mississippi River naturally changes course in Louisiana about every 800-1,200 years. In fact, southeast Louisiana is just one big alluvial valley of meandering deltas historically formed by this river.
The process goes like this - Sediment slowly builds over time on the bed of the river. The river elevation rises above its surroundings. Eventually, the law of gravity wins and the river chases the lower gradient. A new river path is forged and a new delta is formed. The pattern repeats itself. This is called an avulsion and can happen over time or in a single night.
So when was the last time the Mississippi River changed course? About 800 years ago.
Not only is it due for another switch, but this avulsion process has now been accelerated by the construction of levees, as even more sediment stays confined within its banks.
But it’s not just a calendar that suggests an avulsion is coming. There are at least 4 observable signals that the Mississippi River is ready, right now, to take the Atchafalaya route…
1) It already does flow down the Atchafalaya.
Back around 1900, about 12% of its water flowed naturally into the Atchafalaya River via an old river cut that was opened in 1831. By 1950, the flow was up to 30% and increasing. The Mississippi River Commission conducted a study at this time and concluded that the Mississippi River would be permanently captured by the Atchafalaya River in about 25 years. In response to this alarming study, the Corps hired Hans Albert Einstein to help design what is known as the Old River Control Structure (ORCS) at this old river cut to try and manage the situation. When completed in 1963, Congress set the maximum flow rate down the Atchafalaya path at 30%, and has held that controlled level ever since.
2) From a geological standpoint, it’s already a done deal.
The path down the Atchafalaya River to the Gulf is about 174 miles shorter than the path the Mississippi River is currently on. The Atchafalaya is also 20 feet lower in elevation at the ORCS connection. Only this man-made structure complex is preventing what gravity would have done a long time ago- send the water down the shorter, steeper path. Thanks to the ORCS and levees, the Mississippi river is being forced down a path that no longer makes any geological sense.
3) The sediment tells us so.
A team of LSU researchers have been measuring sediment build up in the Mississippi River for a few decades now and have learned that nearly 70% of the river’s sediment it carries never makes it all the way to the gulf. That’s about 70 million tons of sand falling to the bottom of the riverbed every year. This is because the long, flat path the Mississippi River is on slows the current down, allowing the sediment time to settle. This problem compounds itself as the river floor elevation continually goes up and gets higher and higher than the surrounding land. To be more specific, these LSU researchers found that the Mississippi River floor just downstream of the ORCS has risen nearly 35 feet in the last 30 years.
4) The Atchafalaya River is ready for it.
The Atachafalaya River has been doing the opposite of the Mississippi River. In the last 30 years this river has deepened by 12.5 feet and its banks have widened considerably. It’s long since captured all of the Red River’s waters from the Mississippi River and is now ready to fully handle and accept all of the Mississippi waters as well. The only thing intervening - the man made Old River Control Structure.
So how long can the ORCS hold the river from completely switching course? It nearly didn’t in 1973.
Following excessive spring rains in the Midwest, the Mississippi River rose to near record levels and was moving more water through the 10 year-old structure than what it was designed to handle. An eddy formed on the back side of the structure and started pulling sand from under it. Parts of the ORCS began to collapse and a hole formed underneath it that was 300 feet wide and 60 feet deep. The situation unfolding was so catastrophic that the Corps of Engineers, using barges, dumped rocks into the hole for weeks starting on that day. The foundation was gone and the structure’s piers were the only thing preventing a total collapse. Miraculously the ORCS was able to keep standing through this event, though the situation was “touch and go for some months” according to the Corps District Engineer. Some historic accounts state that we were within hours of losing the Mississippi River to the Atchafalaya.
To this day, the ORCS has not been fully restored from the 1973 flood. It was so compromised that the Corps instead built an auxiliary structure next to it to take pressure off it. The ORCS, still to this day, is rated to handle 15 feet less head of water than what it was rated for at the time of the 1973 flood.
This was the Mississippi river’s test. Had it destroyed the ORCS in 1973, it would have permanently switched course down the Atchafalaya River. There is no way to reverse that much water at that elevation gradient. The Mississippi River as we know it through Baton Rouge would be reduced to nothing more than a small bayou. Saltwater from the gulf, no longer being held back by the river, would come up all the way to New Orleans. Studies show that the city’s drinking water would be toast in 2 weeks. Global shipping that use the river would be halted. On the Atchafalaya side, Morgan City would be completely underwater, perhaps permanently. The economic cost of such an event is hard to comprehend, though the State of Louisiana has been studying such a scenario ever since the 1973 flood.
Since then, the Corps has built a couple of contingencies at the ORCS to help thwart such an event from happening again. Aside from adding the auxiliary structure that we previously mentioned, a hydro power plant was also built in 1990 to take more pressure off of the old ORCS.
These 3 man made structures at this vulnerable spot – the ORCS, auxiliary structure, and power plant- are all there is to stop the worst economic disaster in the U.S. history from happening. A spot known in the scientific community as the Achilles heel of our country.
But here is the final twist… While all this focus and attention has been on the ORCS complex area, the Mississippi River may have it’s eyes set on making this jump somewhere else. It’s called the Widow Graham Bend and it’s a small section of levee about 13 miles upstream from the ORCS. This is the other door that is being overlooked (at least in the mainstream media). This Bend is a sharp turn in the river with a cross-valley slope that is 3 times greater than at the ORCS.
The Mississippi River easily took out this section of levee in the 1927 flood. Back then the river wasn’t ready to make the full jump like it is now, and the levee was reconstructed. We haven’t had a flood of the 1927 magnitude since…
If this story interests you, I encourage you to read or listen to “Beyond Control” by James Barnett. The latest edition just came out in 2024. James goes into much more detail of the LSU research and the dynamics that are shaping this coming avulsion. He also makes a very compelling case for the switch happening at the Widow Graham Bend. I find it all very fascinating.
If you made it this far, thank you for reading. This was fun to write and I hope I made it worth your time 🙂
🤖 Made with AI
TheRuminator retweeted
Art Deco didn't die from being exhausted, it got blacklisted.
Its three main phases - Zigzag, PWA / Stripped Classical, & Streamline - weren't exactly sequential, they overlapped all throughout the 30s. But what happened after 1929 wasn't just that zig zag Deco became too expensive, it was evolving from the 'Return to Order' (WW1) beginnings towards a more robust machine age adapted classicism.
Earlier funding collapsed from private elites to the state, and a more civic form emerged - Stripped Classical/Classical Moderne. It was transatlantic, global. The American WPA, PWA, democracies and authoritarian regimes across the West all embraced it because the goal was the same: instill optimism, civic-mindedness, and resilience. Put your skilled artists & artisans to work.
It was seen as worthy recieving state funding for its public face - blending both classical & modern, a forward facing embrace between design, industry & craft.
That more colorful zig zag form was made logistically difficult to revive after 29, then that difficulty was made permanent. Deco needed a 50-year Beaux-Arts ecosystem - terracotta kilns like Gladding McBean and Atlantic Terra Cotta, plasterers, metal foundries, carvers, mosaicists - & that ecosystem took two hits.
The 29 crash bankrupted the firms & dissolved the apprenticeship pipeline, then the war shifted what was left to war industries. By 1948 a fully crafted lobby was hard to build like 1926 even if you wanted to.
Hard isnt impossible. With a regular cycle craft revives with demand, but revival was blocked.
Tax codes, FAR, federal budgets, and curtain-wall specs all rewarded flat, uncrafted surfaces, so there wasnt much incentive to maintain the ateliers.
The firmest lockout was ideological. To make High Modernism the post-war approved standard, its promoters had to discredit what came before.
Politically, Stripped Classicism was rebranded as "fascistic" because Hitler, Mussolini and Stalin had used identical forms. Culturally Deco, especially Streamline, was the 1930s World's Fair spirit: mass-produced household objects made beautiful, futuristic, optimistic, commercial & everyday.
High Modernism was austere, 'European' & highbrow, it treated that populist optimism as kitsch. That created a self-fulfilling loop: disincentivize the decorative, let craft firms die, then accuse dead craft as proof decorative design is infeasible.
Hence the narrative that Deco simply "fell from public taste" is fake.
It was slowed by the war, logistically hollowed out by '48, then ideologically blacklisted afterwards - making way for [indirect] tacit state support through modernist capture this time with the opposite design ethos: (mid century)"modernism".
The people never chose the glass modernist box over Deco. The people were simply never asked.
Replying to @oldbooksguy
Simply moderne.
"Jazz" is hindsight & it effectively ends with the 1929 crash. Classical Moderne thrives afterwards side by side with Streamline Moderne - the whole thing isnt stopped until late 1940s.
TheRuminator retweeted
My low key conspiracy theory is that we are living in the dark ages in the post-apocalyptic ruins of a once great Civilisation. Like a Roman-Briton in 400 AD, still living in their villa, still taking their crops to market along the Roman road. It's not like it was back in my day you might think, as you hire another man to guard your caravan. Nobody ever told them Rome had fallen did they?
TheRuminator retweeted
The Kellogg experiment raised a baby and a chimp together.
The result was that the chimp acted more human, and the human acted more chimp.
For example, The human baby suffered verbal retardation—potential ending the experiment due to harm.
Whereas the chimp stopped short of acting fully human due to genetic limitations.
Sound familiar?
smithsonianmag.com/smart-new…
最近、フランスの暴動と絡めてフランス革命の話してる人いるけど、俺がフランスの体質の極北として挙げたいのはWW1だね。
WW1は最高にフランスがフランスした件。
まずフランスは戦費調達が難しかった。これはいつもの話。借金踏み倒しの常習犯だからね。そこでフランスはイギリスを保証人にしてアメリカから借金してドイツと戦った。
「勝ったらドイツに支払わせればいいし、負けたらそもそも払えない」
という算段が見え見え。最初から自分で払う気はないのである!!
ところが計算違いが起きた。1917のロシア革命である。当時のフランス銀行はロシア国債を大量に買っていたのでこれが一夜にして灰になったわけ。
なのでフランスはなんとしてもドイツに勝って賠償金を取らないといけなくなった。
1919年、フランスはアメリカの資金のおかげでドイツに勝てた。そこでドイツに押し付けたのが、あの悪名高いベルサイユ条約である。
320億マルクという天文学的な賠償金、つまり戦費+アメリカへの借金+ロシア革命の損失をドイツに付け替えた。
しかし、皆さんご存じの通り、ドイツは破綻してしまい、アメリカは「借金返せよ」と言ってくる。
金?そんなものはない。誰も貸してくれない。借金踏み倒しの常習犯だから。
困ったフランスはポアンカレ・プランでフランの価値を5分の1に切り下げて帳尻を合わせる事に。
国を救うために戦時国債を買ってくれた国内の地主や中産階級の資産をインフレによって合法的に8割カットしたのである。
これが!!国を信じて!!!債券を買った人間にすることか!!!!
これで国内向けの借金は事実上焼却しきった。愛国者達の財布を焼くことでな!!
でも対外向けの借金はこれじゃ焼けない。フランスはどうしたか?
実はイギリスもアメリカもWW1でフランスに借金踏み倒された被害者である。
1929年に大恐慌が始まるとフランスは「ドイツが払わないなら俺たちも払わねーよ」と一方的にアメリカに通告してバックレ。
ブチ切れたアメリカはジョンソン法作って「借金バックレたやつには二度と金をかさない」としたが、フランスはフルシカト。
ここでイギリスはフランスの保証人だったのでアメリカへの支払い義務が生じた。イギリスは借金の約束は守る国である。その為、コツコツと借金をアメリカに返し続けた。イギリス没落の原因の一つである。
この時の恨みがイギリスとアメリカの対仏不信となり、その後のヒトラー融和政策の元となったのである。これを知ってないとイギリスとアメリカが何で最初ヒトラーからフランスを助けなかったのかがわからない。
当時、覇権国のイギリスと世界最大の債権国アメリカの両方のメンツをぶっ潰す暴挙にでた国はフランスだけである。
どうです?これがフランスです。どんな相手だろうと踏み倒す。それが覇権国だろうと世界一の債権国だろうと。ぶれない。本当にぶれない。
奴らはいつもこうなんです。だから次もやりますよ。
TheRuminator retweeted
From the ejection expanse you can tell today’s eruption was big. Mega shockwaves. Full update coming before bedtime in the USA.
What actually makes it high stakes is that a thousand year old civilisation is about to be washed away by a few decades of immigration for some unarticulated reason, everything else is a sideshow
TheRuminator retweeted
So, basically, imagine it's 1960 and Michigan is about to elect the son of Hitler's personal assistant as senator because after WWII we relocated hundreds of thousands of practicing Nazis to Dearborn.
I exaggerate only slightly.
TheRuminator retweeted
Scoop: I have heard from a source familiar with the RAF Fairford story that the US feared a drone a attack similar to Ukraine’s Operation Spiderweb last year which destroyed 10 Russian aircraft. They fear Iran might copy the tactics and that drones might even already be in UK, hence abrupt departure of B1s.
TheRuminator retweeted
"Boomers ran a highly technical, multi-decade macro arbitrage. They sold the future cash flows of their own children and grandchildren to the global bond market, took the lump-sum payout in Year One, spent it all, and left subsequent generations to bear the structural inflation, high carrying costs, and economic serfdom of a completely leveraged nation"
TheRuminator retweeted
My son is a network admin changing locations, backfilling his old position which they posted. Looking for an onsite CS grad.
Can you guess what happened?
Result > 900 resumes from India. They found their American applicant to fill the role, but a bunch of talented American IT dudes that they are...decided to run them through HR and AI software found nearly all of them were fake. Credentials didn't match colleges, colleges didn't offer degrees, 2 yr master's with no undergrad, etc.
Meanwhile, we have Americans who must provide transcripts and background information repeatedly passed over for positions where H1B are hiring other H1-B.
It's an illusion. It's largely all corruption. It's a chip on a poker table for our politicians to trade for international agreements.
TheRuminator retweeted
Paglia's point is that women have been raised in a way that makes them naïve. They believe that the suburban, middle-class setting is the default condition of the world, and that the rights they have go with them anywhere, even to a foreign country or a bedroom during a drunken party. And this is the part I think about a lot...
Written history is only about 2% of all human history. And this post-1945, "rules-based order" we're living in is only about 2% of written history. And written history comprises things like mountains of skulls, banners made from the skins of enemies, torture as part of the legal system, defiled corpses, and cities given to soldiers for three days of rape and plunder with no rules.
The World Wars industrialized it. None of the progress of the 200 years of "enlightenment" prevented it, either. Keep in mind that Germany and Japan signed the Hague Conventions in 1899 and 1907. Paper rules burn easily. That's what makes the "oh, we've evolved past all of this" argument a load of nonsense.
This postwar order, this illusory anomaly we've lived in for 80 years, was built by people who were scarred by two World Wars in 33 years. Orders are never permanent. Every previous order fell, and this one will too, except we'll have drones and AI to make even bigger mountains of skulls next time.
And this is where Paglia's statements become more important because in a real breakdown, the people with weapons and the will to use them will control the food, fuel, and shelter first. You know who does that the most? Men. The tech level doesn't matter, either. It never has. From melee weapons, through missile weapons, to firearms, to drones, conflict has been the province of men. Testosterone and its resulting aggression reign supreme. They end up dominating everyone who doesn't have resources, and eventually you get stability.
Do you know what's downstream from that? Patriarchy.
That's the irony facing the women that Paglia's discussing here: what they despise the most is the only thing that will save them when this order is gone someday. If you don't believe me, then look at how many patriarchal societies still exist in the world today, or read about the sack of Berlin in 1945.
Paglia is right: women should be treated as adults. And that includes women understanding what their rights are protected by.
TheRuminator retweeted
History didn’t begin in 1848, dumbass.
Hammurabi fixed wages and capped debt servitude c. 1750 BC. Egyptian workers struck over late pay c. 1159 BC. Solon abolished Athenian debt bondage c. 594 BC. Roman plebs seceded in 494 BC and won tribunes. Medieval guilds regulated wages, apprenticeships, and working conditions. Britain limited working hours and required education for young factory workers c. 1802.
Marxists did not descend from heaven with the revolutionary insight “maybe don’t treat workers like cattle.” They showed up thousands of years into the argument, shat a hammer and sickle on it, made everything worse, and then had the audacity to claim they they invented the whole thing.
Replying to @RefinedPopulist @MoronMining
Bro, workers rights literally are something that Communists invented. Capitalists invented the 72-hour work week and child labor and we'd still have those if they were lawful
TheRuminator retweeted
It is infuriating realizing how much these mobsters cost us.
If they died off and we got automated ports, we could be so much wealthier, so much more resilient, and so much less at risk of being held hostage by these evil men again.
On vit déjà dans les ruines de notre civilisation. Nous sommes juste des Syagrius qui s'ignorent.
Syagrius, c'est un commandement romain qui tenait politiquement encore le nord de la Gaule jusqu'en 486, 10 ans après la "chute" de Rome.
La réalité, c'est qu'en 476, quand le dernier empereur est renversé, aucun Romain n'a eu conscience que Rome avait disparu. La vie continuait son cours bon gré mal gré. Le droit latin s'appliquait encore, la religion était la même, on parlait la même langue.
Après tout, entre 455 et 476, 9 empereurs différents sont tombés, presque tous renversés par un général barbare. C'était presque une habitude.
Le sac de 410 était la vraie date de la chute de Rome. L'Empire s'était déjà défait de l'intérieur, dépendant politiquement des barbares.
Aujourd'hui, c'est la même chose en France. Nous vivons dans les ruines de notre civilisation sans le savoir. Peut-être que des historiens du futur acteront symboliquement la chute de la France à 2002, 2008, 2020... Qui sait.
Ça fait 40 ans qu'on entend dire "ça va péter", "ça va mal finir", "on a franchi un cap" etc.. C'est un peu comme les gens qui croient que la chute de Rome a eu lieu du jour au lendemain.
En fait tout est en train de mal finir depuis des décennies. Simplement on s'habitue. Et la marge de progression est encore très large.
TheRuminator retweeted
Amazing.
These researchers found that there's a spike in Bitcoin activity around the time foreign aid money goes out.
Somewhere between 2 and 6 cents of every dollar of World Bank foreign aid disbursements got siphoned off into crypto wallets:
TheRuminator retweeted
When the Soviet Union collapsed, the guys who took power were the gangsters and secret police and businessmen who already had power. Hollywood lies to you with zombie movies and postapocalyptic shows like "The Walking Dead". The big power fantasy of a zombie movie is a "status reset", that civilization collapses and now it doesn't matter if you were a loser because you can be a tribal barbarian chieftain with a shotgun fighting zombies and getting hot girls. Well, that's not how this works.
Let me explain our actual win condition. The Boomers are going to keep doing everything they can to kill Western civilization. We are stalling for time and organizing. Around 2030-2034 the Boomers will retire and young white men will attempt to seize the power vacuum that results. Our opponents will be the 100 million foreign barbarians which Boomers imported. It's a vicious struggle. Until then, we are trying to survive, and we are trying to organize and entrench our men to get ready for the coming fight. Part of that is seeding our narratives across social media in order to promote a shared worldview to guide the young men who are getting ready to take power.










































