@RubyIndygo
Account based inAustralasia
About this account
- Account based in
- Australasia
- Connected via
- Australasia Android App
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
Joined November 2021
- Tweets11.3K
- Following163
- Followers829
- Likes4.3K
The scheming & desperation from Megs to be seen are beyond pathetic. She is having lunch with Kelly, look at the bag on her chair to what the bodyguard is carrying. Same? Where is Kelly in the video? She's the one filming so they can 'leak' a sighting with Ellen!!
The Lady of Glencoe Wood retweeted
She seems to have been there with her friend, madam saw Ellen and went to to her. She's still holding her coat. I think her friend Kelly was recording it.
The Lady of Glencoe Wood retweeted
Hell hath no fury like a mistress downgraded for a newer model at a global event.
When Chantal Collopy (mistress number 1) realised that Charles Spencer had not only replaced her, but had the audacity to bring his new mistress, Josie (mistress number 2), to Princess Diana's funeral and burial, the South African socialite decided that peace was never an option.
Realising that the only thing better than revenge is structured legal revenge, she immediately formed the ultimate "First Wives and Former Mistresses" coalition with Charles's wife, Victoria.
Charles then dumped Chantal over a short phone call and threatened to take back the house he had given her when she agreed to testify in Victoria's favour.
Chantal didn’t just pack her bags for the divorce court; she arrived armed with a devastating arsenal of love letters, texts ready to testify and turn his private antics into public record.
He buckled and settled millions out of court.
Proving that while Earl Spencer could manipulate the press, he was entirely unprepared for the combined wrath of the women he left in his cheating wake 🫢
The Lady of Glencoe Wood retweeted
If Diana said "he's in love with his valet", it is blindingly obvious to me at least that she was not saying he's gay, she was being sarcastic: "he 's neglecting me and spending more time with his valet." Why does the media almost never consider the possibility of irony and wit?
The Lady of Glencoe Wood retweeted
Thank you to everyone who welcomed The Duchess of Edinburgh to Zambia! 🇿🇲
Find out more about Her Royal Highness’s visit at Royal.uk
The Lady of Glencoe Wood retweeted
Don't forget how Earl Spencer treated his wife number 3. He didn't change as he got older, he has the same pattern of disgusting and cruel behaviour towards women.
Within Charles Spencer’s revolving door of marriages and his high-profile mistress relationships, there is another survivor Karen Gordon—a woman who didn't just survive the toxic breakdown of her marriage, but chose to walk away with her dignity firmly intact.
Karen is a true survivor of a calculated, cruel campaign of psychological warfare.
Imagine the emotional grit it takes to endure being blindsided with a divorce text from your husband while you are literally in Canada mourning the death of your father.
But that was only the beginning of the gauntlet Charles put her through.
Behind the scenes, Karen was subjected to intense emotional isolation while Charles engaged in a long-term affair with his podcast co-host, Norwegian archaeologist Dr. Catrine Jarman.
In early June 2024, Karen publicly announced that her father had passed away after a long battle with Alzheimer's disease.
She had travelled to Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada to support her mother and brother with his care.
The timing became a major focal point of the public breakdown of her marriage.
Only days after she posted about her father’s death, Charles Spencer publicly announced that they were divorcing.
Later, explosive court documents filed by Karen's legal team highlighted this exact timeline as an example of emotional insensitivity.
The filings alleged that Charles blindsided her with the divorce via a text message while she was in Canada.
Furthermore, the documents revealed that Charles's new partner, Dr. Catrine Jarman, pushed ahead with a high-stakes lawsuit against Karen during those exact hours of intense grief on Vancouver Island, explicitly telling lawyers that responding "should take no more than five minutes of her time. (KMT, talk about rude and insensitive)
When the truth came to light, Charles and his new partner didn't just walk away; they doubled down with systematic litigation.
Catrine continued to hit Karen with a massive, highly public High Court lawsuit for "misuse of private information" regarding her MS diagnosis.
The ultimate act of betrayal?
Court documents revealed that Earl Spencer actively funded his new mistresses £2 million lawsuit against his own wife of 13 years while their divorce was ongoing.
Karen's legal team openly condemned the "bullying and highly insensitive manner" in which the pair hounded her at her lowest point.
But Karen refused to be broken.
She stood her ground in court, completely vindicated by a final settlement that forced Charles to swallow millions in legal fees.
Today, she is writing a beautiful new chapter completely free of the toxic drama of Althorp House.
Her focus is entirely on the future and fiercely protecting and raising her daughter.
Through the chaos of a messy public eviction and finding a new home for their family, Karen has remained a beacon of strength for her daughter, ensuring her life remains filled with joy, horses, and stability far away from her father's toxic pattern.
Charles Spencer can keep his ancestral estate and his headline PR dramas.
Karen Gordon walked away with the ultimate prize: her peace, her freedom, and her daughter.
The ink was barely dry on the messy court proceedings before Charles officially made Catrine Jarman his fourth wife, marrying her in a private ceremony.
I would wish Catrine luck but she seems as vile and cruel as her new husband Charles Spencer.
The Lady of Glencoe Wood retweeted
THE CHARLES SPENCER FILES: WIFE NUMBER TWO
Charles Spencer’s second wife, Caroline Hutton, was not a stranger who simply entered his life after his first marriage ended. She had previously been married to PR executive Matthew Freud—Charles’s friend and a member of the same privileged social circle.
Reports say Caroline began seeing Charles in the spring of 1999, while her divorce from Matthew had not yet been finalised. The divorce was completed in 2000, and Charles married his friend’s former wife on 15 December 2001 in a quiet ceremony attended by approximately 80 guests.
Caroline became the new Countess Spencer and stepmother to the four children Charles shared with Victoria Lockwood. She helped establish the Althorp Literary Festival and had two children with Charles: Edmund “Ned” Spencer in 2003 and Lady Lara Caroline Spencer in 2006.
But yet another Spencer fairytale soon collapsed.
Only months after Lara’s birth, reports claimed Charles abruptly left the family home, leaving Caroline heartbroken. Around the same period, he was linked in the press to Australian television presenter Coleen Sullivan, whom he reportedly met when she interviewed him about Diana. The precise nature and timing of that relationship were disputed—but once again, another woman’s name appeared as another Spencer marriage disintegrated.
Caroline reportedly became so devastated and distrustful that she asked mutual friends to choose between her and Charles. On 23 March 2007, she was granted a divorce on the grounds of his “unreasonable behaviour.”
So let us understand the sequence: a friend’s former wife, another wedding, two more children, another devastated woman, another broken home—and yet another reported female companion hovering around the collapse.
Victoria’s title had simply passed to Caroline. Unfortunately, the pattern appeared to follow it.
And this is the man now positioning himself as an authority on other people’s marriages, grief and family failures?
Before Charles Spencer lectures the King, William or anybody else, perhaps he should finish explaining the wreckage he repeatedly left behind in his own home.
#CharlesSpencer #CarolineFreud #PrincessDiana #RoyalFamily
The Lady of Glencoe Wood retweeted
THE CHARLES SPENCER FILES: WHAT VICTORIA ENDURED
Behind Charles and Victoria Spencer’s beautiful wedding photographs was a marriage reportedly filled with infidelity, humiliation and cruelty.
Victoria was struggling with anorexia, alcohol dependence and addiction—conditions she later discussed publicly with remarkable honesty. During one of the most vulnerable periods of her life, her husband was allegedly pursuing other women.
Their 1997 divorce proceedings exposed an extraordinary pattern of behavior. Contemporary reports referred to as many as 12 alleged mistresses, with Victoria and one of those women reportedly preparing to testify before the case ended in a settlement.
The court also heard a particularly cruel allegation. Charles’s father reportedly reminded him that marriage meant remaining together through “thick and thin.” Charles was said to have replied that Victoria was “thin and certainly thick.”
This was allegedly said about a woman suffering from anorexia.
The court also reportedly heard that Charles had described himself in a letter to another woman as a “vicious, cruel bully” toward Victoria.
Then came Diana’s death in August 1997, while Charles and Victoria were still legally married and their divorce remained unresolved. Victoria stayed in Cape Town with their four children while continuing her recovery. Charles was reportedly accompanied during Diana’s funeral period by his mistress, former model Josie Borain—not by his legal wife.
Think about that.
He stood before the world condemning the people who had failed Diana. He presented himself as the protective brother and moral voice of the Spencer family while his own wife was in South Africa recovering from serious illnesses, caring for their children and enduring the collapse of a marriage reportedly involving numerous other women.
Today, Charles Spencer is selling a book criticizing how King Charles treated Diana. But before he appoints himself judge of another husband’s behavior, perhaps he should explain how he treated his own wife.
Victoria survived. She recovered, spoke openly about her experiences and later helped establish a treatment centre supporting people affected by addiction.
Charles moved on to another woman—and then another marriage.
Victoria Lockwood was not merely “Earl Spencer’s first wife.” She was a woman who endured his alleged infidelity and cruelty while fighting for her health and caring for their four children.
Before Charles Spencer lectures the world about the suffering of women, the world should remember what Victoria reportedly suffered because of him.
#CharlesSpencer #VictoriaLockwood #PrincessDiana #RoyalFamily
The Lady of Glencoe Wood retweeted
Princess Catherine looked absolutely stunning and deeply moved as she accepted a bouquet of handpicked flowers from thoughtful local residents.
📍 Isle of Bute, Scotland
📅 September 17, 2026
🎥 @KingsGuardTours
The Lady of Glencoe Wood retweeted
THE CHARLES SPENCER FILES: WIFE NUMBER THREE
After two failed marriages and six children, Charles Spencer married for a third time.
Karen Gordon, born Karen Villeneuve, was a Canadian social entrepreneur and the founder of Whole Child International, an organisation dedicated to improving the care of vulnerable children. She also had two daughters from a previous marriage.
Charles and Karen married at Althorp on 18 June 2011. Their daughter, Lady Charlotte Diana Spencer, was born in July 2012, with “Diana” chosen in memory of Charles’s sister.
Karen did not merely acquire a title and pose beside the Earl. She devoted years to Althorp, documenting its history, overseeing restoration projects and helping bring the estate to life for the public. She stood beside Charles while he confronted the childhood trauma described in his memoir A Very Private School.
Then, after nearly thirteen years of marriage, the familiar Spencer pattern returned.
In April 2024, Charles reportedly informed Althorp staff that the marriage was ending. When the separation became public that June, Karen said she was “just processing” what had happened.
By then, another woman was already part of Charles’s life: Norwegian archaeologist Cat Jarman. She had met Charles at Althorp in 2021, worked on archaeological projects at the estate and later became his podcast co-host.
Charles and Cat maintained that their relationship remained platonic until March 2024. However, allegations of an affair emerged during the bitter divorce proceedings, and both denied them.
What followed was not a dignified private separation but an extraordinary legal battle. Cat sued Karen over the alleged disclosure of Cat’s multiple-sclerosis diagnosis. Karen denied wrongdoing, and the eventual settlement involved no admission of liability. The court proceedings revealed legal costs exceeding £2 million—and Charles was required to cover the settlement and indemnify Karen for the related costs.
Charles and Karen’s divorce was finalised in December 2025.
Five months later, in May 2026, Charles married Cat Jarman—wife number four.
So once again, a woman entered Althorp, supported Charles, raised a child with him and invested years of her life in his family home. Once again, the marriage ended amid reports involving another woman. And once again, Charles quickly moved forward while an ex-wife was left to deal with the emotional and legal wreckage.
Victoria. Caroline. Karen.
Different women. Different decades. A remarkably familiar ending.
Yet Charles Spencer now wants to lecture the King and publicly judge other people’s marriages, grief and family relationships. Perhaps he should explain why the same destruction has followed him through three marriages before presenting himself as anyone’s moral authority.
#CharlesSpencer #KarenSpencer #CatJarman #Althorp #RoyalFamily
The Lady of Glencoe Wood retweeted
An admitted drug user who also never denied drugging a journalist is put around kids. Are you people CRAZY??? Why TF is this being allowed ?
The Lady of Glencoe Wood retweeted
Here is one of Meghan Markle's original Marxist Sussex Squad. This cluster online terrorists promoted racism and division. These are the worst of the worst vile roaches on the web. You can see this one is trying to justify Meghan Markle returning to the UK and walking back the racism claims. NOPE...Meghan accused the Royal Family of racism. There is no misunderstanding of what she wanted the audience to think.
Just because Meghan did not explicitly say "The Royal Family is Racist" doesn't mean the world did not understand what she was saying without using the actual word. This online Sussex Marxist agitator understood, promoted, and amplified the message of the Royal family is racist for Meghan.
Semantics are not going to work this time. The damage caused by these cancerous scumbags can't be walked back as if it never happened.
The Lady of Glencoe Wood retweeted
In the day and age of social media, where children this age are constantly filming themselves, they are used to being on camera one way or another, but it's very obvious from the body language that these children are giving off, that they are not happy and are not feeling comfortable.
When I was at school and an outsider would come in to talk to us, especially with cameras, or even recording equipment for radio, we were always excited, because it meant a change from normal lessons and we could play around! This is now the second clip that I have seen, where these children are not only looking disinterested, but they don't even want to make eye contact with him. They are not comfortable at all and do not want to engage with Harry. He is very fidgety, rocking back and forth and clearly behaving a bit manic, the kids are not getting good vibes.
This is the same man that preaches about the harms of putting your children on social media, but here he is again, using other peoples children for media releases to promote himself.
The Lady of Glencoe Wood retweeted
What kind of school allows a private citizen #PrinceHarry self confessed drug user with a camera crew in tow to film students in the classroom then post the images online therefore invading their privacy? Did you get their permission & were the parents told?
@Ninestiles
The Lady of Glencoe Wood retweeted
Princess Diana talking about James Hewitt’s book where she says she was very distressed that someone she trusted made money off of her and that she worried for her children and that Prince William saw she was hurt so he gave her chocolates to make her smile.
The Lady of Glencoe Wood retweeted
Sent this to the school. Everyone should flood their in box with complaints.
Email: [email protected]
Direct enquiries to: Sally Rowlands, PA to the Principal and
Vice Principals
Should this school persist in its partnership with Invictus and permit Harry to introduce a camera crew onto school premises in order to film and intimidate students, it ought to face the immediate revocation of its accreditation.
The recorded footage depicts a visibly agitated Harry—appearing possibly intoxicated or under the influence—moving erratically about a classroom while students exhibit clear signs of distress and discomfort.
Were parents informed in advance that their children might be exploited for social-media content, and were only consenting volunteer students filmed? If not, every affected parent should pursue legal action against the school, Harry, and his production crew, withdraw their child from the institution, and demand that Invictus cease any further association. The children were used for commercial gain—an unlawful practice.
Harry professes deep concern regarding the dangers of social media for his own children, yet shows no hesitation in exposing other people’s children to public scrutiny, thereby placing them at risk of identification and potential targeting by traffickers, drug dealers, and other harmful actors.
The school must compel Harry and Invictus to remove all such footage immediately and must publicly ban reporters, Invictus, and Harry from any further affiliation with the institution.
This constitutes hypocrisy of the highest order. The school has exposed its students to an individual who is a private citizen lacking professional credentials, a self-admitted former drug user, and a figure whose credibility on matters of mental health is open to serious question.
Parents should contact Charles, this is not on. @WeAreInvictus @WellChild, you have this idiot as your Patron. Drugged up, says stuff to the kids that is not on. There ask pics of kids hands in front their mouths and some blushing. Not a good patron, keep these 2 away from kids.
The Lady of Glencoe Wood retweeted
Why are the squad trying to doxx this child ?
How disgusting to be threatening a young boy who just wants to get on with his lessons.
His parents must be furious. SS are saying all sorts of ‘raycist’ stuff about him.
I don’t know if he told harry to fock off, but
as the squad are losing their minds over it, I hope he did.
harry “don’t put your kids on SM” MW is happily subjecting an innocent child to harassment from his vile supporters.
@WeAreInvictus
Go read the #VileSussexSquad comments about this boy, maybe tell your patron to call his pack dogs off. That young boy could be in danger thanks to your organisation.
Disgraceful.
The Lady of Glencoe Wood retweeted
Invictus is a money laundering scam, should be boycotted Unless they change patron and become transparent abt where the funds are going
@ShabanaMahmood Keep druggie Harry away from school kids of Birmingham, how are U allowing this? Boycott Invictus @RoyalFamily