Mark retweeted
Interesting finding is that nuclear energy declined massively in both democratic and non-democratic countries post-chernobyl, no evidence that "dictators are able to overrule irrational public opinion"
I always associate Les Halles with the CRS. They were a fixture there when I lived in the city a long time ago
They gave off such a menacing air I used to cross the street to avoid them
Mark retweeted
Periodic reminder that Bessent had nothing - nothing whatsoever - do to with the vaunted Soros currency cross trade.
I was closer to that trade than Bessent & all that made me was a spectator proximate to the 🐐 making his greatest trade.
He’s been selling that lie for 3+ decades. Over same period he blew up a hedge fund twice & then became an under accomplished FoF marketing guy.
WELKER: Zelenskyy just said he believes the US government slowed Starlink. Can you definitely say no one in the Trump administration ordered restrictions?
BESSENT: President Trump and Secretary Rubio have categorically said that no one in the Trump administration did that. President Zelenskyy should be very careful about making reckless statements like that
Anthropic calling the top on themselves here: they know they've peaked
We’re committing a portion of Anthropic’s shares to the Anthropic Public Benefit Fund, a new wholly owned entity dedicated entirely to the public benefit.
It will start off with 5% of our shares. For every 50% increase in the company’s value over a set baseline, we can contribute up to an extra 2%, subject to our board’s discretion.
In total, this means that roughly 20% of Anthropic’s shares are committed to the public good. Our co-founders have already pledged to donate 80% of their equity, and around half our employees are donating a portion of their equity as part of a donation matching program we’ve run since our founding.
In the post below, we share more details about our new fund.
anthropic.com/news/public-be…
Mark retweeted
America: We need to kill the humanities so we don’t lose the AI race to China
China: Every child shall read Jane Eyre
Mark retweeted
The perfect storm for a decline in data center construction is on the horizon if the GOP gets blown out in midterms
There’s an inverted pyramid of voter opposition that starts from the ground floor (municipal and county) level that doesn’t even make the news beyond local flyover state papers
I still expect the Trump Admin to try & nationalize some of the buildout (thru pentagon, tax $, etc) and Jensen always has tricks in his leather jacket to keep us on our toes about how long the music can continue to play
It’s basically another commodity cycle with these things, but unique in being (really) the only nominal growth driver
Mark retweeted
Appears to be absolutely MASSIVE protests all across the US yesterday and this platform is so skewed to the Trump/Putin side that this is the first I've seen or heard of it.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The montage uses recycled footage from larger 2025 and March 2026 No Kings protests, not Oct 17 2026 Vote Early events. Those were smaller localized gatherings (hundreds to thousands per city) focused on early voting, not the massive crowds shown.
nytimes.com/2026/10/17/us/…
abc7ny.com/post/no-kings-…
minnesotareformer.com/2026/10/17/hun…
npr.org/2026/10/17/nx-…
Mark retweeted
I don’t enjoy Match of the Day anymore. There, I’ve said it.
I grew up watching Desmond Lynam, and it was brilliant. Then came Gary Lineker, with Alan Hansen and Mark Lawrenson. More recently, we had Alan Shearer and Micah Richards, but still with Lineker holding it all together.
I used to watch Match of the Day as much for the personalities as for the football. These were familiar faces who turned up week in, week out, and you actually looked forward to hearing what they had to say.
I disagree with Lineker’s politics on a number of issues, but he was a terrific presenter. Warm, funny, personable, and somebody who’d actually been there and done it.
And now? It’s just rubbish.
I barely even listen to the analysis anymore. The BBC has completely misunderstood what made the programme so enjoyable in the first place.
It’s a bit like Top Gear. People didn’t just watch it for the cars. They watched it for Clarkson, May and Hammond. It took the BBC ages to realise that it was the personalities that drove the programme. (Pun intended.)
And yet the penny still hasn’t dropped with Match of the Day.
There’s nothing particularly wrong with the people presenting it now. They’re perfectly competent. But there’s no charisma. No chemistry. No sense that you’re watching a group of people who genuinely enjoy one another’s company.
Nobody sits down on a Saturday evening thinking, “Oh, I can’t wait to hear Mark Chapman’s take on today’s big game.” (And the less said about Wayne Rooney, the better.)
Of the three current presenters, I think Gabby Logan is the only one with any real charisma. But even she can’t recreate what the programme used to have.
And that’s what the BBC seems incapable of understanding. You can replace presenters, refresh the format and modernise the production, but you can’t manufacture chemistry. You can’t simply swap out personalities and expect viewers to feel the same affection for the programme.
Match of the Day used to be an essential part of my Saturday night. Now it’s something I can take or leave.
The football hasn’t changed. Well, apart from the wretched VAR.
But the programme has lost its personality. And with it, much of its appeal.
Mark retweeted
A bulldozer burying retired Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) General Dynamics F-111 fuselages at the Swanbank landfill in Ipswich, Queensland, Australia 🇦🇺
The General Dynamics F-111 was a fast, long-range strike jet first developed for the U.S. military in the 1960s. Its swing wings could sweep back for high-speed flight or spread out for takeoff and landing.
Australia ordered the jet in 1963, but delays meant it didn’t arrive until 1973. The Royal Australian Air Force went on to fly it for 37 years, and Australians nicknamed it the “Pig” for the way its nose seemed to root along the ground during low-level flight.
When the jets were retired, a handful were saved for museums. The rest were cut up and buried in 2011 at a landfill near Ipswich, Queensland.
The reason: the U.S. required sensitive military technology to be securely destroyed, and some parts contained hazardous materials like asbestos. Burying the jets turned out to be cheaper and simpler than other options.
The F-111 became famous at Australian air shows for its “dump and burn,” releasing fuel and igniting it with its afterburners to create a huge trail of flame. It even performed one at the closing ceremony of the 2000 Sydney Olympics.
#drthehistories
Immature take, immature media and an immature polity: you can commit to joining *with no intention to do so* as has been done elsewhere.
Mark retweeted
Cool stunt. Great hype marketing.
Time for me to be that guy everyone hates - It's a scam and this will never ship.
The external compressor and cooling system to charge the tank once, likely cost more than the car. A multi-stage compressor and heat echanger setup that would fit in a car, would take several days to the better part of a week of constant running for a single charge.
250kg of 10,000psi air in a composite tank, with all the potential failure points of complex plumbing and valves in a human occupied confined space... If your sphincter didn't just make a diamond reading that sentence, you're not comprehending it.
Go ask grok about the physics involved just in compressing, cooling, storing and controlling a compressed air system with these specs, and what's possible with typical industrial equipment. This is just a cool gimmick to pump fans and stock.
Id bet money, the car in the demo didn't have a full size battery in it. Wouldn't be surprised if someone isn't currently doing analysis on the video to calculate the vehicles weight.
Sorry.
"These are not very bright guys, and things got out of hand"
BREAKING: The US asked Iran for permission to strike Iran's Pickaxe Mountain nuclear site without retaliation, and Iran rejected the request, per IRIB state media correspondent Morteza Ghoroghi.
He said "Trump's statements today point to war within the next 24 hours," and that Iran's military forces are "in a state of complete readiness."
Ah, good, so we _can_ deport criminals. Good to know.
Man convicted of arson attacks against Sir Keir Starmer deported from UK, Home Office says trib.al/dwiV1lK




























