@RsrchRabbit

Follow citations. Fall down research rabbit holes. Map your literature review.

researchrabbit.ai/
Joined December 2019
  • Tweets5.1K
  • Following3.7K
  • Followers29.5K
1.1KMedia
ResearchRabbit now flags untrustworthy papers before you cite them. Here's how Article Risk Badges work. 👇 youtube.com/watch?v=QZi35tGe…
1
4
9
3,362
ResearchRabbit retweeted
ResearchRabbit
@RsrchRabbitOct 7
You've probably got years of papers in Zotero, saved one at a time. Import them into ResearchRabbit and you see them as a map: which ones cite each other, the earlier work they all build on, and the newer papers that haven't saved yet. How to import your collection 👇 youtu.be/XArn8h5ewQY
12
51
3,183
You've probably got years of papers in Zotero, saved one at a time. Import them into ResearchRabbit and you see them as a map: which ones cite each other, the earlier work they all build on, and the newer papers that haven't saved yet. How to import your collection 👇 youtu.be/XArn8h5ewQY
12
51
3,183
ResearchRabbit can also help you explore the people behind the papers. See which authors appear most often, what else they published, and who they collaborate with to uncover wider academic networks. Watch: youtu.be/-spNwKVqi1k
1
1
7
1,571
A good reading strategy is not about speed (or AI summaries 🤖). It's about feeling confident knowing what to read first. 📚 Use ResearchRabbit’s citation map to spot foundational, influential, and emerging papers before diving into your reading list. Prioritize first. Read second. 🐇
Citation map showing how to prioritize research papers by publication date and citation count. Older highly cited papers may be foundational, recent highly cited papers may be currently influential, and recent papers with fewer citations may represent emerging research. Citation count should support, not replace, qualitative assessment.

ALT Citation map showing how to prioritize research papers by publication date and citation count. Older highly cited papers may be foundational, recent highly cited papers may be currently influential, and recent papers with fewer citations may represent emerging research. Citation count should support, not replace, qualitative assessment.

6
16
1,489
New session 📚 A literature review workflow with ResearchRabbit and @paperpile, live on Zoom. Wed 4 Nov, 21:00 UTC (21:00 London, 22:00 Berlin, 16:00 New York, 02:30 Thu Mumbai). luma.com/dv1vfa2y

A literature review workflow with ResearchRabbit and Paperpile · Zoom · Luma

Starting a literature review means solving two problems at once: finding the right papers, and keeping track of them once you’ve collected them. This session…

luma.com
1
5
1,164
Keyword search or citation search? You don’t have to choose. 🔎 Keywords help you find what matches your vocabulary. Citation networks help you explore beyond it. A stronger literature search uses both. 🐇 #LiteratureReview #AcademicResearch #ResearchRabbit
Infographic comparing keyword search and citation network search for literature reviews. Keyword search is fast and useful for current terminology but can miss older or cross-disciplinary work. Citation network search can surface connected, foundational, and cross-disciplinary papers but requires seed papers. Using both methods together provides broader coverage.

ALT Infographic comparing keyword search and citation network search for literature reviews. Keyword search is fast and useful for current terminology but can miss older or cross-disciplinary work. Citation network search can surface connected, foundational, and cross-disciplinary papers but requires seed papers. Using both methods together provides broader coverage.

1
4
1,002
Save the date 📅 Wed 21 Oct: Prof. Inger Mewburn (the Thesis Whisperer) on what good researchers do when they don't know what they're doing. Free, on Google Meet. Sign up at researchrabbit.ai/events. Not knowing is part of the method. 🐇
2
2
10
1,324
ResearchRabbit retweeted
Faheem Ullah
@Faheem_uhSep 28
Researchers spend 6 million hours/year screening papers. I found a way that can reduce this time to almost half. Here’s how: 1. Go to researchrabbit.ai/ 2. Enter the topic of your literature review 3. @researchrabbit will give you a list of papers 4. Select a few seed papers that are relevant to your research 5. ResearchRabbit will create a map of related papers - The further right, the more recent the paper - The higher up, the more cited the paper 6. Review the papers and select the ones relevant to your literature review 7. Click “Similar” to discover more related research based on citations and references 8. Keep selecting the papers relevant to your literature review 9. ResearchRabbit will keep expanding your search around the papers you select 10. Repeat the process until you’re no longer finding relevant new papers This process can reduce your screening time to almost half. Try ResearchRabbit today: researchrabbit.ai/
1
9
1
34
2,233
Ever followed one reference… then another… and forgotten what you were searching for? We tested ResearchRabbit @RsrchRabbit to see if mapping the literature can make discovery easier. 📚 Key papers 📂 Emerging work 🤝 Connections Watch: youtube.com/watch?v=-spNwKVq…
1
4
1,680
Your first literature review doesn't have to be overwhelming. In under 2 minutes, you'll see the workflow that turns your idea into a clear, connected map of your field. Grab a coffee (you won't even finish it) and watch here: youtube.com/watch?v=0jTRDxMS…

Building your first ResearchRabbit search workflow (in under two...

Nathan from ResearchRabbit helps you get started on your first sear...

youtube.com
1
5
1,498
Which database should you use for your literature review? 🔎 Start with your field’s database, add a multidisciplinary one for broader coverage, then explore citation networks for what search may have missed. Different tools find different parts of the literature. 🐇 Full guide: researchrabbit.ai/articles/h…
Infographic comparing literature review databases by field: PubMed for health sciences, PsycINFO for social sciences, Web of Science for natural sciences and engineering, and JSTOR for humanities. It recommends starting with a subject database, adding Scopus or Web of Science, then using ResearchRabbit to explore connections between papers.

ALT Infographic comparing literature review databases by field: PubMed for health sciences, PsycINFO for social sciences, Web of Science for natural sciences and engineering, and JSTOR for humanities. It recommends starting with a subject database, adding Scopus or Web of Science, then using ResearchRabbit to explore connections between papers.

7
27
1,651
“Universities should retain coursework but stop grading it” In a world of AI, the point is to prepare students for a more attributable demonstration of competence at sparser checkpoints, says Simona Aimar What do you think? timeshighereducation.com/opi…

Universities should retain coursework but stop grading it

The point is to prepare students for a more attributable demonstration of competence at sparser checkpoints, says Simona Aimar

timeshighereducation.com
2
2
5
1,169
ResearchRabbit retweeted
ResearchRabbit
@RsrchRabbitSep 21
We've got @MushtaqBilalPhD doing a live session on Thursday where he starts a literature review from scratch. 👇
2
1
9
1,023
We've got @MushtaqBilalPhD doing a live session on Thursday where he starts a literature review from scratch. 👇
2
1
9
1,023
It runs for an hour on Google Meet at 3pm London, 4pm Berlin, 7:30pm Mumbai and 10am New York, and we'll send the recording to everyone who signs up. ResearchRabbit.com/events
226
You're allowed to not understand the abstract. That's what the other 30 pages are for.
1
3
17
1,124
Starting a PhD, a master's dissertation, or your first big research project in 2026? Exciting stuff. ​Join Mushtaq Bilal, PhD, one of academia's most trusted voices on AI, as he starts a literature review live, from scratch. Sign up to the event: researchrabbit.ai/events
1
7
1,140
Some of the most important papers can be the easiest to miss. 🔎 Keyword search may overlook: 📚 Foundational work 🔀 Cross-disciplinary research 🔗 Papers with non-obvious titles 🆕 Recent papers with few citations Sometimes the next paper is found through connections, not another keyword search. 🐇 Read more: researchrabbit.ai/articles/m…
Infographic showing four types of research papers that keyword searches can miss: foundational papers with outdated terminology, cross-disciplinary papers, influential papers with non-obvious titles, and recent papers with few citations. It also shows how ResearchRabbit’s References, Similar, and Citations features can help researchers discover these papers through citation networks.

ALT Infographic showing four types of research papers that keyword searches can miss: foundational papers with outdated terminology, cross-disciplinary papers, influential papers with non-obvious titles, and recent papers with few citations. It also shows how ResearchRabbit’s References, Similar, and Citations features can help researchers discover these papers through citation networks.

1
3
1,054
Thanks for the love, Ryan! 🐰
𝙍𝙮𝙖𝙣@realryansummersSep 10
Replying to @RsrchRabbit
@RsrchRabbit the best thing since sliced bread! 🙏🤝
1,150
Load more