What really happened with $FLOYDEX my side of the story, with on-chain proof. Over the last few days, I’ve been tagged in posts saying “rug by Aman and Samya.” I want to explain what happened from my side, honestly, and let the blockchain speak for itself. I met Aman at the Stellar Builder Residency in Jaipur. We got along as builders. Later, he approached me with an idea that port my perps infrastructure to Solana, build tokenised stock perps, enter upcoming hackathons, and launch a token alongside it. I was uncomfortable because I didn’t understand how these launches worked behind the scenes. I agreed anyway. That was my mistake. $FLOYDEX launched on Sep 29 through ClawPump or pump.fun. I did not deploy the token or control the launch wallets. After migration to PumpSwap, the price dropped roughly 90% in 90 minutes. I was told the project made roughly $430 in creator fees and paid roughly $448 to DexScreener essentially no profit. I was also shown that OpenGap had made around $4.2k in fees. When the accusations started, I decided not to take anyone’s word for it including mine. I pulled 5,000+ FLOYDEX transactions and traced the wallets myself. Here’s what I found: 1. The publicly named team wallet held the 0.88% dev buy and never sold. 2. 4.24 SOL in creator fees went to that wallet. 3. 436 USDC/SOL equivalent was sent from the project fee wallet to what appears to be the DexScreener payment address shortly before the “Dex paid” post. 4. OpenGap’s fee wallet received ~35 SOL in creator fees. But there was also activity I had not been told about. Four other wallets traded FLOYDEX in a coordinated looking pattern. Three bought in the same block shortly after launch, sold together, re-bought the same amounts, and exited within seconds of each other. Their sells happened shortly after major project posts. Together, those wallets made roughly 4.7 SOL. More importantly, on Sep 30 between 15:06–15:16 UTC, 13 wallets deposited into the same address: 7FDKrGXeMSb7mXMYgr9XGuEH2Rmpu7hNSd3tWBmEhEJ7 That address is associated with @amaanbiz exchange activity. The deposits included the four traders, the launch-funding wallet, and the fee collector address referenced in FLOYDEX’s code. The team wallet’s creator fees also ended up there. The same address also received funds from OpenGap’s fee wallet and wallets associated with other token launches. What does this prove? Not ownership. An address behaving like an exchange deposit address does not prove who ultimately controls it. Only the exchange can establish that. I’m not accusing anyone of a crime. But the on-chain activity raises questions that I cannot reconcile with the statement that the team “never used side wallets or hidden holdings.” And for me, that’s the core issue: transparency and trust, not the size of the profit. I did not control these wallets and I did not receive trading profits from FLOYDEX. I trusted what I was shown. I should have asked harder questions before putting my name behind it. I’m sorry to everyone who bought because they trusted the names attached to the project, including mine. I’m no longer working with the product. That’s all from my side. The transactions are public. Judge for yourself.