
Nonpartisan strategic advocacy for #UAP awareness. #UFOTwitter
USA
Joined August 2020
- Tweets1.8K
- Following777
- Followers11.7K
- Likes5K
Pinned Tweet
I applaud @JohnBrennan for telling the truth about #UAP #UFO, without actually saying it. We need more journalists fighting for transparency on this subject. Kudos to @tylercowen
BIG STATEMENT today from Fmr. CIA Director @JohnBrennan to @tylercowen: "I think some of the phenomena that we're gonna be seeing continues to be unexplained... [1/2]
Agree fully with @DrPhil here. Skepticism is always warranted until you’ve laid eyes on the technology and @POTUS makes a formal announcement. This is our mission right now. In the interim, anyone who has done any research on this topic can say unequivocally that there are technologies far, far beyond what most humans can even conceive of, and they traverse our planet unencumbered by the physics we know.
“We do have spacecraft that… have either crashed or landed, and been retained in our possession.”
“They’re made up of metallurgical substances that we don’t have on this planet.”
“These aren’t drones.”
“They are flown by non-human intellectual biologics.”
Dr. Phil just revealed this bombshell allegation he was told by “credible sources” that he has “confidence in.”
“I said, ‘Are we talking one or two?’”
“And I’m told, ‘No, it’s more than 50.’”
“I’m told that there are people that have seen cadavers of pilots.”
“I’ve been told by some that we have had pilots that survived and were detained.”
“I want to see them.”
“And until I do, I don’t believe it.”
@DrPhil
Rogue UAPTF retweeted
Here’s my full interview with @ElizabethKPIX and @CBSNews, discussing my memoir, Out of the Shadows. Thanks for your support, Elizabeth!
Rogue UAPTF retweeted
"Avi was just, frankly, kind of dismissive of my colleague Jay Stratton." ~MH
Yesterday, @ProfAviLoeb said:
"I invited [@jaystratton] to speak with the UAP Science Advisory Council. Jay did not respond to my invitation. Why is it a higher priority for Jay to speak with Fox News than with the @UAPSAC council?"
And I said, "Fair question."
Then I listened to this from @MicahHanks this morning, and I think we may have found one reason why Stratton didn't respond to Avi.
"Anybody out there who's ever met [Jay Stratton], you probably will know that he's a really great guy."
(Count me in on that. ⬆️
This is not a good look for Avi. ⬇️)
Micah: "I had given my talk earlier that day. Jay Stratton was giving his talk, I think, the following day, and then we had the Disclosure panel on Friday. And so we had to go prepare for the Disclosure panel.
"While we were in preparation for the panel on Friday, Jay got a phone call, and somebody said, 'Yeah, Avi was over here at your table, and he was looking for you.' And so we thought, oh well, you know, Dr. Loeb wants to meet Jay Stratton, that's wonderful.
"So after we finish our prep, we head back over to the event center. We go in there. Unfortunately, Dr. Loeb had finished his talk, we didn't get to see that because we had other obligations. So we decided we'd try to go find Avi, and we went over to Jay's table. And they said, 'Oh, [Avi's] backstage right now, so you can probably still catch him.'
"And so, Jay and I head back there. I'm eager to introduce Jay to Avi. And sure enough, Avi's in the green room. So I say, 'Doctor Loeb, my friend Jay Stratton, I want to introduce you to.' And Avi looks at both of us, and the first thing he says, 'Did you listen to my lecture?'
"So I respond, 'Well, Dr. Loeb, unfortunately, we are here as speakers, and we are having to do work, and so regretfully we had other obligations because we have to do a Disclosure panel tomorrow, and we were preparing for that. So I apologize; we weren't able to see your talk.'
"Well, Avi, not really looking at us, he's kind of looking past us, kind of looking down at the ground. But he says, 'Well, if you're preparing a disclosure panel, you should be listening to the man who is working with the government on Disclosure right now. I'm literally going to Washington right now to go to talk to the people at the ODNI about Disclosure.'
"Well, yet again, as before, I am somehow detecting some irritation from Avi Loeb, and so I apologize. I say, 'Listen, I really do apologize. We weren't able to be here, but again, we just have other obligations. We have a bunch of things that we're responsible for this weekend.'
"And I will point out - and keep in mind, I'm paraphrasing here - but I mean, I said to Avi, 'Jay, of course, was the former director of the UAP Task Force, so I mean, he spent a good bit of time in government working on Disclosure as well.'
"And [Avi's] looking off past us, not making eye contact. But he sort of repeats, 'Well, if you want to know about Disclosure, you should have watched my lecture, because I am the man who is leading that effort. I am not merely talking about Disclosure, I am going to Washington and working on it.'
"Well, at this point, I got a little irritated myself. I have known Dr. Loeb for many years, we've always been very cordial to one another. And I never would have guessed in a million years that when I took my colleague, Jay Stratton, backstage to meet Dr. Loeb, he would stand there and insist that he and only he is leading the UFO disclosure effort. Despite the fact that, to my knowledge, he doesn't have a security clearance, even though he is heading up a very important advisory council on UAP to members of the Intelligence Community, and I applaud him for that.
"So I said to Dr. Loeb, 'Well, congratulations. I'm so glad that you and only you are able to achieve this, and that you are making such strides.' But then again, trying to lower the temperature, I said, 'You know, how's your family, Avi? I mean, I hope everybody's well.' And again, he just kind of says, 'Well, they're fine, but you should have listened to my lecture. I'm going to Washington right now.'
"So Avi leaves, he has a plane he's gotta catch, and I'm left with this, sort of, bad taste in my mouth. I mean, personally, I felt like, maybe not only this was a little awkward, but maybe there could have been a slightly more positive exchange in the first meeting between Avi and Jay Stratton.
"And I felt like, you know, Avi was just, frankly, kind of dismissive of my colleague Jay Stratton and I. But especially, that was the case regarding Jay. And I have a lot of respect for Jay, and that's why I took issue with this. Anybody out there who's ever met him, you probably will know that he's a really great guy on all fronts.
"In fact, he surprises me sometimes. What a great guy, what a great American he is. So that means a lot to me, and I want [Jay] to be shown respect. And I didn't feel like that was really happening in this instance. That was just my take.
"Anyway, we all get home, it was a wonderful event, and sure enough, I have an email waiting from Avi. And I thought, well, maybe he's, you know, got some sentiments to share or something, or maybe he wants to kind of smooth things over. And I open the email, and it is a link to his new article on Medium about the event that we were at in Vernal.
"And there's one line in the body of the email above the link. It says, 'Everyone who was there said that my talk was the best one at the entire event,' or something to that effect. Again, I'm paraphrasing. But I'm thinking to myself, reading the email: Ok, Dr. Loeb, I get it. Point taken. Yours was the best talk of the entire event. I'm really sorry I missed it.
"The article in question, dated September 12th, 2026, is titled 'Make History Better Rather Than Talk About It.' I'll skip ahead to the relevant portion because he talks a good bit about his talk there at PhenomeCon and various other things.
"Then he goes on to mention, 'For many years, I was jealous of accomplished bakers, who often have a long line of customers waiting for their creations. Through 40 years of publishing more than 1000 scientific papers, I never witnessed people waiting in line for my fresh, out-of-the-oven research insights. All of this, until two days ago, when dozens of conference attendees lined up to express gratitude about my work and take a photo with me.
"'After my keynote speech,' Avi tells us, 'I met Jay Stratton, who apologized for not being able to attend my talk as he was preparing his presentation about UAP Disclosure. By the time he gave his presentation, I was on my red-eye flight to D.C. thinking how much more fulfilling it is to be part of making history than talking about it.'
"Now, of course, you can see why I take issue with this, and in fairness, I think he's really just kind of paraphrasing. But in this version of the account on the Medium page there, I'm written out of the narrative. Which is problematic to me because it was actually me who had apologized, and Jay and I were talking about the Disclosure panel.
"Some of the facts are inherently wrong. But I see that, of course, wording it the way that he does, Dr. Loeb is, I think, able to frame this in terms of having this one-on-one interaction with Jay, and being able to come away from that meeting saying, 'Well, Jay goes and gives a talk about disclosure. I immediately left and went to Washington to get to work on it.'
"Well, Doctor Loeb, respectfully, and that's always what I mean because I genuinely do mean it. And Avi and I have always had great interactions in the past. But in this instance, Dr. Loeb, I respectfully take issue with your tone and your attitude. The way this was conveyed in the Medium post isn't exactly how it really happened.
"And you don't have to mention me, I know that's not important to you, but the very thing you're saying about being ignored by the bakers, you know, with his little analogy there? Well, not only are you doing that to me, but you're also trying to make light of the most senior official who ever investigated UAP for the United States government, the many years that he spent doing that, the security clearances he held while he was conducting those investigations, and the right I feel that he has earned as an American to get up there on that podium and to talk about whatever he wants to. His talk was excellent."
"I went and I asked people, I said, 'You know, listen, I'm so sorry we missed Avi's talk. What did he talk about?' The first thing someone told me was they said he spent the first 15 minutes showing pictures of himself with celebrities.'"
(I'll link to the audio in the replies and give you a timestamp if you wanna listen to the entire thing.)
Stratton confirms in “Out of the Shadows” that Sean Kirkpatrick, former director at @DoW_AARO, was compromised by the Legacy Program, was instructed to actively lie in interviews, and that classified intelligence reports proving these facts were presented to Congress.
Dr. Loeb, respectfully, I have a few challenges with how you’re posing this question. 1) @jaystratton is a friend of mine, and he often doesn’t respond to me either. He’s not ducking me. He’s just busy. 2) You’ve authored several books yourself. You know how hectic things can be during publishing and release. Your publisher wants you to get on every news network and sell, baby, sell. Jay doesn’t like doing this, and I suspect we’ll see far less of him on TV than we did you during the release of your last couple of books. Nevertheless, the demand for an author’s attention and time is incessant. This is Jay’s first go at this, and he deserves a little grace and patience. 3) the @UAPSAC is a political formality. While its stated goals are admirable, it lacks the teeth necessary to declassify any meaningful information about UAP. Jay is a mission-oriented operator. It may sound harsh (apologies - not my intention) but speaking with the Advisory Council at an unclassified level doesn’t move the ball. Anything Jay says has to be approved by both PCRB and DOPSR - a monumental, time-consuming undertaking. Anything he’d say to you would solely be a regurgitation of what’s been cleared for his book. 4) A member of your council recently took to X to lambaste Jay for not just “disclosing where exactly” recovered UAP technologies are kept. Such a statement betrays either blatant ignorance about national security and protecting our equities from foreign spies, or a troubling agenda. Jay has briefed the necessary people about the what’s and where’s in an appropriately secure environment. He is not going to do a monkey dance on X to appease him. I suspect this individual’s association with the Advisory Council doesn’t exactly get Jay skipping with joy into your next meeting. 5) Have you read Jay’s book yet? It JUST came out. Today. Odd timing to take to X and opine about Jay not taking a meeting with you. I’m reading it today. So far, there’s been a lot of valuable information, and you and the Advisory Council might find some of it useful in your efforts.
On Fox News, former UAP Task Force Director, Jay Stratton, was asked, "Does the government have non-human craft in its possession?" He answered, "Yes, it does."
I want to see evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that UAP, are linked to non-human technologies. After meeting Jay, I invited him to speak with the UAP Science Advisory Council. Jay did not respond to my invitation. Why is it a higher priority for Jay to speak with Fox News than with the @UAPSAC council?
Rogue UAPTF retweeted
USING A SUBMARINE AS BAIT: "Throughout history, Bret, the secrets sometimes are so impactful to our national security that steps have been taken to remove the problem... and the people." @jaystratton
Stratton explains how he successfully used a U.S. nuclear submarine and Navy P3 aircraft as bait to capture data on UAPs. He also recounts chilling accounts of top military admirals witnessing unexplained craft hover over facilities, only to be intercepted and silenced by a hidden network determined to protect the 80-year secret at any cost.
Rogue UAPTF retweeted
1989. Army infantry basic training. Young and excited to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic. No idea the journey I was beginning would lead to dealing with craft of non-human origin violating sensitive restricted airspaces, evidence of non-human intelligent life interacting with humankind, running the first whole-of-government UAP investigation, and the discovery of a massive cover-up involving elements of the U.S. Government that have been retrieving and reverse engineering crashed craft of non-human origin since at least the 1940s. The world deserves to know the truth.
Rogue UAPTF retweeted
Department of War Issues Legal Waiver to Authorize Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) Disclosures to PURSUE
war.gov/News/Releases/Releas…
Rogue UAPTF retweeted
NEW: Journalist Says Congressional Staffer Revealed “Recovered Crafts And Recovered Beings”
liberationtimes.com/home/jou…
Rogue UAPTF retweeted
unquestionablyskeptical.com/… A year and a half ago @Halsrethink was breaking the internet. Then came @AlchemyAmerican's masterful documentary. More has come to light, and with the recent remembering of Hal I'm glad to offer even more to the story. Thx @DrPippaM!
Yes. 100%.
Replying to @SunOfAbramelin
Credibility matters. Character attacks do not.
A person can be flawed, unconventional, or unpopular and still be telling the truth.
Instead, stay focused on what matters:
What did they claim?
Did they have access?
What evidence supports or contradicts them?
When the conversation turns to gossip, ask: what were we talking about before the smear started?
More often than not, that is what bad actors want to distract you from.
invisiblefrontiers.substack.…
🇺🇸🦉
Agreed. Thus far, these releases have damaged our efforts. It’s “the boy who cried wolf” phenomenon in action. It’s of great service to the gatekeepers.
At what point do these UFO tranche releases serve the cover-up and confuse the public about what's been happening for the last eighty years?
At what point are we all being trolled and manipulated?
This is a constitutional crisis. Nobody wants to be lied to about their place in the universe. Not congress. Not the public. Not anyone.
Let's end this once and for all.
FREEDOM, not tyranny
@LueElizondo @SunOfAbramelin @TheDylanBorland @realDonaldTrump @POTUS
Well said. Ignore the “UFO politics”. It’s a psyop, and you’re the target. We all know what we’re fighting for, and it’s not more internet beef.
Folks, don't pay attention to the theatrics. Despite all of our differences, when it comes to UAP disclosure we are all on ONE team.
#TheGoodTroubleShow
A ton of work was put into this encyclopedia of a book by David Burkett. Excited to see it finally released.
I finally got my own personal copy of the first book I have ever edited!
Lies Above: How the Pentagon Misled Congress and Cost America its Skies, is the THE definitive primer on the 80+ year UAP disinformation campaign.
amazon.com/dp/B0H5QDFS4Z
Absolutely. Actively ignoring the past is foolishness. We cannot move forward until we come to terms with it. Loeb and Puthoff’s brazen arrogance whenever @UAPGERB brings it up should be extraordinarily telling. Trust is earned. Neither Loeb nor Puthoff has ever had mine.
This has been my sentiment for years. I’m all for civilian scientists organizing and doing their best to get answers. But the answers they may or may not be able to uncover are not the answers that the American People need to hear.
I agree with Burlison.
What I don’t like about civilian UAP science initiatives is that it’s defeatist:
It says: “You know what? We have lost. We’ll never get disclosure from IC, from contractors, we’ll never see craft, biologics, we’ll never hear details. So let’s get “better data” with passive radar and cameras, and pretend like there aren’t ~1000-2000 people who have all the fucking answers. Let’s start over from Square 1.”
Yeah, I’m with Burlison: uh, no thanks.
Civilian science isn’t gonna ‘catch up to the program’. C’mon.
If any civilization anywhere in the universe has *ever* created a Von Neumann probe at a distant enough point in time, it follows that Von Neumann probes are all around us, and likely very interested in our planet. I believe this to be the case.
Gerb said it better than I did. Agree completely.
Mr. Mellon,
While many, including myself, appreciate your tenacity here, this is a perplexing tweet...
You are calling for the release of UAP space data, satellite data, and detection from the Ballistic Missile Early Warning System; however, you yourself have commented on several occasions on the existence of both the legacy programs and recovered materials/biological samples.
The number one example that comes to mind is this redacted Signal messaging screenshot you released in 2024 in response to Sean Kirkpatrick voluntarily offering Signal exchanges between you and him for a FOIA release.
This redacted exchange with an unknown individual not only confirms you know the management structure, security control systems, and ownership of the crash retrieval portfolio, but that you are also aware of a highly classified memo by SecAF in the 1950s that is still in effect to maintain cover for the legacy programs.
Indeed, you also in this exchange confirm you are aware of the Air Force legacy SES-2 gatekeeper (likely Russel E. Wyler) and state the 1953 Kingman, Arizona UFO crash was indeed real and recovered.
So why exactly is this memo by a former SecAF or the release of the Kingman wreckage and biologics not a priority for you? These have lower precedence than your listed IMINT/SIGINT data?....
You have said similar things on several occasions regarding UFO retrieval and exploitation, including a 2023 NewsNation appearance with Chris Cuomo where you stated: "I’ve been told that we have recovered technology that did not originate on this Earth, by officials in the Department of Defense and by former intelligence officials."
newsnationnow.com/cuomo-show…
This feels like a bizarre pivot back to your and Mr. Elizondo's ~ 2017-2023 narrative of discussing an amorphous non-human presence on this planet without breaking into the fine details of recovered technical vehicles or biologics.
At the same time, I find it bizarre that your list is excluding maritime UFO sensor data encounters. We know, all the way back to the days of Project Blue Book, USO/maritime UFO encounters are often strikingly anomalous and occur almost more frequently than any space-based UFO monitoring and tracking.
Others and I share the concern that within the Age of Disclosure documentary, Jay Stratton, who retired as a Defense Intelligence Senior Executive (DISES) from the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), purposefully excluded Navy elements from the film's "Legacy Program" outline to protect his Naval interest or prior exposure to Naval Legacy Elements. Mr. Mellon, are you doing the same? Admiral Gallaudet has advocated for the study of UFO/USO in maritime environments tirelessly. Why do you not also advocate for release of such data?
An additional worthy pursuit, as I have publicly requested, is for you to comment on your former SSCI coworker, Mary K. Sturtevant. As I have stated, I am aware that whilst Sturtevant was Lockheed Martin VP of Government Affairs and VP for Intelligence, Joint and Science & Technology Progams, she aided in the blocking of the Kona Blue PSAP UFO materials transfer between Lockheed Martin and the AAWSAP. My public request to you can be found here:
xitter.cf/UAPGERB/status/1971960…
Why is UFO retrieval, exploitation, and reverse engineering, for which you have advocated transparency in the past, taking a backseat to a handful of specific sensor data?






















