Passionate HR leader, focused on the #employeeexperience & shaping the #futureofwork through #bigdata #innovation #technology #wellbeing #benefits #totalrewards

USA
Joined August 2015
Rob Bacher @Intersection of People & Risk retweeted
Leaders seeking a more engaged team often start by listing what the team does poorly. In our coaching work, the more useful starting point is what each person already does well. Teams focusing on their strengths are 12.5% more productive.
1
72
Rob Bacher @Intersection of People & Risk retweeted
Since 1997, hospital boards have been accountable for the quality of care. Five foundations follow, in order: board accountability, prevention, the patient voice, system-wide governance, and finally AI for safety, once the other four hold.
1
1
1
79
Rob Bacher @Intersection of People & Risk retweeted
The AI boom is increasingly being built on borrowed money. AI-related bond issuance has surged to $419 billion so far in 2026, 90% higher than all of 2025. Every equity bubble inevitably becomes a credit bubble before it bursts.
114
161
26
628
64,631
Rob Bacher @Intersection of People & Risk retweeted
ELON MUSK: “It's going to be pretty wild that you can have a rocket car. The car has attitude control thrusters and main thrusters in the rear, so it can basically fly like a rocket. It could do rolls. It could do crazy gymnastics. Whatever you want, really. This is not necessarily a safety-optimized car, but it takes the fun meter to 11 out of 10. This will be an actual car that’s on the roads. I’m not sure it’s necessarily legal in all jurisdictions. The car can recharge its air tank, so it’s not like you need special propellant or anything like that. It literally is just going to pop itself up and be able to do these maneuvers whenever you’d like.”
843
3,994
493
28,698
1,453,377
Rob Bacher @Intersection of People & Risk retweeted
🛰️ @elonmusk wants 10 gigawatts of compute by the end of 2027. @JensenHuang says Nvidia now counts @SpaceX alongside its cloud provider customers, and the two companies' engineers are designing a server for space: "In the two parts of our chart, Elon used to be under enterprise. That's the way we reported the numbers. Now he's part of our CSPs... They're massive. He's using our technology for his own AI in training models and such, deploying models, of course... And the demand for GrokBot, the consumption for GrokBot is really skyrocketing. And then, of course, he rents it. And so the combination of these three things, he's fairly unique in doing that... He loves the intersection between computing and the physical build-outs... And nobody knows more about energy than he does. And one particular new market that we're going to go explore together is putting data centers out in space. So our two engineering teams are working super closely together to create a new type of server, a new type of architecture that might be super good... in space and on Earth." — @JensenHuang, CEO of @nvidia on @BG2Pod with @altcap
148
649
76
5,640
1,788,151
Rob Bacher @Intersection of People & Risk retweeted
Replying to @FedorovMykhailo
Starshield systems are owned and controlled by the US government. Any limits on speed or usage are decided by the US military and ultimately POTUS. Starlink is a commercial service owned and controlled by SpaceX. Usage of Starlink is limited to civilian or defensive activities and cannot be used for offensive military action, as doing so would be inappropriate for a commercial company.
3,718
6,916
1,984
53,374
4,634,999
Rob Bacher @Intersection of People & Risk retweeted
Elon Musk often says: "Patents are for the weak." Why does he say that? In 2014, Tesla opened up all its patents. Anyone could use them. Everyone thought it was a PR stunt. It was actually a declaration of war. Elon's point was that patents mostly serve to slow down progress, protect the positions of giant corporations, and make lawyers rich. Not to innovate. His logic is simple: if your competitive advantage lives inside a legal document, you're already dead. The only real moat is your speed of innovation. If you move faster than everyone else, you don't need patents. If you need patents to survive, it means you've stopped moving fast enough. The strong build. The weak file. And AI is about to make that sentence true for the entire economy. Take biotech. For 50 years, starting a biotech company meant a PhD, ten years in a lab, access to closely guarded knowledge, millions before your first proof of concept, and a network in the right academic and regulatory circles. Knowledge was scarce, access was scarce, and that scarcity was worth billions. That scarcity is dying. I genuinely believe we're entering a world where anyone will be able to start a biotech company. A 19-year-old with AI agents will be able to explore molecular spaces that entire labs used to spend years mapping. Trade secrets, credential rents, access rents, positional rents: all of it is about to blow up. And look at what's already happening. Some of the first calls to "urgently regulate AI agents" are coming from established biotech players. Coincidence? When your business model depends on scarce knowledge and knowledge becomes free, you're left with only two weapons: the patent and the regulator. The two weapons of the weak. Here's what's coming. A wave of panic. Dozens of labs and incumbents retreating behind their patents, filing lawsuits, and above all pouring money into regulatory capture. They won't try to build better. They'll try to make it illegal for anyone else to build. Because the truth is, a lot of people in business were never strong. They were protected. They never won on product, on innovation, on speed of execution. They won because the market was locked. Because attacking their industry required hundreds of millions of dollars, years of approvals, and armies of lawyers. The wall was never their talent. The wall was regulation. And when the wall comes down, we find out who actually knew how to build. This isn't just biotech. Banking. Insurance. Law. Healthcare. Energy. Hardware. Education. Defense. Almost every industry where incumbents were sleeping behind barriers to entry is about to get hit by thousands of founders able to attack their business from every angle at once. With teams of 5 people and an army of agents. Everyone gets to play now. My conviction, and I'll say it plainly: a huge chunk of the S&P 500 could be completely flushed in the next 5 years. Not because those companies will make mistakes. Because their competitive advantage was never real. It was built on how hard it was to get in, and that difficulty is disappearing. The weak will cry danger. They'll talk about safety, risk, disaster. Sometimes they'll be right on a specific point. But most of the time, what they're protecting isn't the public. It's their rent. What's coming isn't a collapse. It's a renaissance. The biggest explosion of value creation in history, driven by people who were always told they weren't allowed to play. Patents are for the weak. And the weak are about to have a very bad decade.
They are afraid. AI will disrupt and "open source" everything, not just games and software. It will also go after almost all hardware and drugs. Basically everything. Some things sooner, some later. Everything will change. Current ways of doing things must/will change. Economy will look very different by 2030s.
231
889
100
4,229
512,226
Rob Bacher @Intersection of People & Risk retweeted
Just two months ago, small caps were outperforming large caps by 10 percentage points this year. Today, large caps have taken the lead. What changed? Rising rates and higher borrowing costs are taking a much bigger toll on smaller companies. Video: youtube.com/watch?v=5LUZatUE…
33
19
2
169
37,084