@Richardbishopi
iAccount based inUnited Kingdom
About this account
- Account based in
- United Kingdom
- Connected via
- United Kingdom Android App
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
Software development and testing, Scouting, Sailing, Cycling, Walking etc.
United Kingdom
Joined January 2009
- Tweets34.4K
- Following1.8K
- Followers1.5K
- Likes34K
Richard Bishop retweeted
Fuel Duty could have been stopped during the current Iran conflict and would have massively mitigated fuel cost rises for Brits, but Labour has illegals to pay for, not to mention its workshy voting bloc to buy votes from.
Pour faire face à l’urgence, l’Allemagne vient de décider ce soir une baisse massive des taxes sur les carburants.
Tous les gouvernements européens agissent avec détermination pour protéger le pouvoir d’achat de leur peuple.
Tous, sauf le gouvernement français : Emmanuel Macron est officiellement le dirigeant le plus impuissant et le plus déconnecté d’Europe.
Richard Bishop retweeted
The state of UK institutions right now. This is the Imperial War Museum (the clue is in the name)!
Asked if there was a veteran’s discount, the veteran’s daughter was told …
“We have nothing to do with the military - that's not who we are'.'
Seriously 🤡
Richard Bishop retweeted
This years Green party conference - not bothered personally.
But I am bothered about a fringe event, we all should be.
Which one?
A 45 minute session on "Resisting Migration Raids”, which is being run by Brighton and Hove Green councillor Nadia Barton Ahmad and Lewisham Green councillor Hau-Yu Tam.
Migration raids are part of the law and enforce the law. For the Greens to be overtly running sessions to work AGAINST the law cannot be allowed to go unchecked or unchallenged.
I don't "like" all the laws I am obliged to comply with.
But it's how a democratic society functions.
We all see day in day out in Britain now how the rule of law is slowly disintegrating.
Overt events like this only help to demolish it further and quicker.
Shameful, and unacceptable.
Richard Bishop retweeted
The world has a very specific kind of dead body it knows how to mourn. These are not it.
A Christian community in North Africa is putting its people into the ground after another Islamist massacre, and most of the West will never learn their names.
There will be no campus encampment, no urgent panel, no celebrity caption. The same institutions that can produce a slogan in an hour when the victims fit the script go quiet when the killers are men who actually say they are doing it for their “god”.
This is not a tragedy that fell out of the sky. It is a method.
Churches, villages, families, then a trench, then a burial, then silence until the next one. If your moral system only activates when Israel is in the frame, it is not a moral system. It is a filter.
Watch it. Then ask why this footage never travels.
Richard Bishop retweeted
Jim Ratcliffe grew up in a council house. He created a business which has paid the salaries of thousands of staff and millions in tax. You, by contrast, come from a comfortable middle class background. Your career has been in politics and think-tanks. He has done more for this country than you are ever likely to. I understand why, as a Labour MP, you seek to demonise “the Right”. But this is reductive shite.
Richard Bishop retweeted
The pound has lost ~40% of its purchasing power since 2020 (partly due to Covid money printing), so the number of UK millionaires “should” have increased to reflect the debasement and the increased money in circulation.
But the number of millionaires has actually declined by ~60% since 2021.
The wealth destruction taking place in this country is staggering.
The US is growing its number of millionaires at 1,200 per day meanwhile and over 1.6 million since 2020.
Richard Bishop retweeted
Eventually Labour will make the mansion tax about £500K.
You will be rinsed every year to pay for the Labour voting bloc to live with free rent.
Maybe do some due diligence and stop voting Labour just because your parents and grandparents did.
Leaks to the Times reveal that Labour is actively considering lowering the mansion tax threshold to £1.5m, more than doubling the number of homes affected.
Mark Pollack of London estate agents Aston Chase warned that reducing the levy to £1.5m would capture many families who would struggle to pay the surcharge.
“There is a real misconception that this would only impact the super-wealthy,” he said. “But in London there are many people living in homes worth over £1.5m who are only just staying above the surface. They’ve already got to cope with rising interest rates and energy costs and this could just be the straw that breaks the camel’s back.”
Lucian Cook of Savills noted that "people whose finances are stretched may find that they need to leave the property that they live in and are very emotionally attached to. That is one of the less palatable consequences."
Not only would this tax hike be a political disaster for Labour, it will also likely cause huge damage to the housing market.
Richard Bishop retweeted
MP pay is too high and too low at the same time.
From April 2026 the basic salary is £98,599. Against a UK full-time median of around £39,000, that is a fortune. For someone who would otherwise be a local councillor, a party staffer, a mid-ranking official or a professional who never quite made it, it is the best job they will ever have. Safe, status-rich, and paid like a senior manager.
For a high achiever it is a pay cut. A decent private-sector director, a good lawyer, a consultant, a founder, a specialist doctor or a senior operator can earn more than that without the public abuse, the two homes, the lost weekends or the certainty that one bad clip ends the career.
IPSA itself benchmarks the job against police superintendents, NHS consultants and army colonels and still wants to inch toward £110,000 because even that is not competitive with what capable people can make outside.
So you get adverse selection. The salary is lavish if you are ordinary and modest if you are exceptional. The people for whom it is a step up apply. The people for whom it is a step down often do not. Then we act surprised that the Commons is full of dross.
You cannot simultaneously pay like a public-sector sinecure and expect private-sector talent. That is the whole problem.
Richard Bishop retweeted
Compared with conventional technologies, wind power requires vastly more raw materials for the same installed capacity: up to 15x more concrete, 90x more aluminum, and around 50x more iron, copper and glass.
Each 2 megawatt turbine uses about 1700 tons of material: around 1300 tons of concrete, nearly 300 tons of steel, plus iron, fiberglass and copper.
The foundation alone uses hundreds of tons of concrete. Concrete is one of the world's largest CO2 sources, responsible for 8% of global emissions.
Then there are the rare earths. Just one ton of rare earth elements generates 2000 tons of toxic waste.
Worse still, all of this ends up in landfill every 15 to 20 years, with the entire process repeated.
Wind is not the clean energy it is sold to be.
In the past, when the powers that be wanted to go to war - perhaps because they'd spent all the taxpayers money and borrowed even more and couldn't pay it back, or because the public was very unhappy and civil unrest was a threat, so the government needed a distraction - they could generally rely on having:
(a) a population which loved its country and was willing to fight for it
b) some inspiring leadership and
(c) a highly effective propaganda machine capable of persuading the public that the war was a cause worth fighting for.
The powers that be don't have any of those things now.
If they decide to go to war and expect public support, they may be in for a shock.
Richard Bishop retweeted
Most of them at £2m have already dropped 25% so this was predictable.
This will create a market-distorting cliff edge and is a demonstrably bad idea. Either tax the whole market proportionally, or leave it. This is meddling with a huge market to raise trivial sums.
🚨 NEW: John Healey is considering extending the "mansion tax" to nearly 300,000 homes which are worth more than £1.5m
The levy is currently set to only apply to homes worth more than £2m
[@thetimes]
Nero debased the Roman currency in 64 AD and lit the fuse on an inflation that burned for two centuries.
He reduced the silver content of the denarius from roughly 90% to 75%, and shaved gold coins down in weight simultaneously. The state needed money to rebuild Rome after the fire, fund military campaigns, and finance imperial vanity projects. Minting debased coin was faster than taxation, and it transferred the cost to every Roman holding savings.
Prices rose. Merchants adapted. Roman price edicts from later emperors confirm what market actors already figured out: more coins chasing the same goods means each coin buys less(something children are able to grasp, but your local government econoists still denies). You held denarii; the imperial treasury held real goods purchased with freshly debased metal.
By the third century, emperors like Gallienus pushed silver content below 5%. Diocletian then issued the Edict on Maximum Prices in 301 AD, threatening death for merchants who charged above his approved rates. Merchants simply stopped selling. Price controls attack the symptom while the debasement continues, producing scarcity as a result.
Every move the Roman state made, modern governments copy: outspend revenue, conjure money from nothing, dismiss the fallout, then prosecute anyone who prices accordingly. Inflation is taxation by deception.
Rome is but one case in a long historical pattern, running across three thousand years. Only one thing has changed: how fast the currency gets destroyed.
Richard Bishop retweeted
Since the 1980s, the Sahara has shrunk by roughly 8%. Satellite data show widespread greening, a pattern that is playing out across the planet.
Around 50% of Earth's vegetated land has become significantly greener, an area roughly three times the size of the United States.
The dominant driver is not rainfall or land use change, it is rising atmospheric CO2. Higher CO2 lets plants photosynthesize more efficiently, they lose less water, they tolerate heat and dryness better.
The effect is strongest along desert margins - across the Sahel, the Middle East, Australia's interior and the southern edge of the Sahara.
Rising CO2 is making the deserts, and the planet as a whole, greener.
Richard Bishop retweeted
Funny that, were we not told that the situation in Ceuta had been resolved and all the invaders had been sent home?🤔🤔🤔
So yet more lies from the Leftist and globalist governments including our own.
Thousands of migrants charge through Ceuta.
Police fire shots into the air and use tear gas in attempt to control the crowds.
telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2…
Richard Bishop retweeted
FACTS ABOUT INHERITANCE TAX AND WHY SCRAPPING IT IS A GOOD IDEA
- 18 out of 38 OECD countries do not levy any inheritance tax on direct descendants.
- The UK has the fifth highest inheritance tax in the OECD.
- The effective UK IHT rate is three times the global average and two times the EU average.
- The US levies IHT but it only cuts in if your estate is worth over $12.92 million. A married couple doesn't pay the death tax unless their assets exceed $26 million...
- The inheritance tax threshold has been stuck at £325,000 for 17 years since April 2009.
- Inheritance reduces inequality. OECD 2021 report pointed out: "While lower-wealth households receive smaller inheritances and gifts, these are typically large as a share of net wealth."
- The claim that only 4% of estates are liable is out of date. HMRC figures released in 2023 showed that within 10 years 1 in 8 people (12%) will have IHT due on either their own or their spouse's death, rising to 23% in London. That was before Labour brought pension pots, business and agricultural assets and AIM stocks into scope.
- Administering IHT directly costs the taxpayer approximately £66 million per year.
- For those countries which still levy IHT, the rate is often modest. 4% in Italy if the estate goes to children, 15% in Denmark, 10% in Iceland...
- By 2027 average priced properties in 77% of local authority areas will be liable to inheritance tax.
- Sweden's left-wing govt scrapped the inheritance tax in 2004, boosting economic growth. Capital flowed in with Ikea founder Ingvar Kampland moving back to Sweden and Finnish financier Björn Wahlroos moved in...
- Abolition would raise GDP per capita by 1.4% by 2044.
- Removing the tax on bequests leaves more wealth intact to be saved and invested, lifting the economy's total capital stock by 0.78%.
- In 2022/23, IHT raised 0.89% of total tax revenues.
- Austria, Portugal, Sweden and Norway have all abolished inheritance taxes in the last 20 years.
- At least 83 countries do not levy inheritance tax at all, including Norway, Sweden, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Mexico, Austria, Cyprus, Slovakia, Israel, China, India and Singapore. A further 20 or so exempt assets passed to direct descendants, so a majority of countries either do not levy IHT or do not levy it on assets passed to children.
- Inheritance is a critical source of business funding. Research by Charles Stanley found 20% of new businesses rely on inherited money, only 1% less than bank funding, and 19% of start-ups are financed by parents. Only 8% are funded by venture capital. 15% of business owners use inheritance for further growth investment.
- The obvious consequence of the policy is that profits are hoarded to pay the tax bill rather than ploughed into investment. CBI Economics found 55% of BPR-affected and 49% of APR-affected businesses have paused or cancelled planned investments, an average fall of 16%. More than 60% expect to cut investment by more than 20%.
- Around half of family businesses and farms foresee lower headcount or have paused recruitment, with an average headcount cut of 9% per firm and a similar 9% fall in turnover.
- Abolition would add 300,000 to the workforce.
- CBI Economics estimate reduced activity will cost £14.8 billion in GVA over the five years to 2030, of which £6.5 billion is family businesses and the rest supply chain. They put the result for the Exchequer at a net fiscal loss of £1.9 billion over the period, likely an underestimate.
Richard Bishop retweeted
A 13-year-old girl was raped. Police had CCTV of two men they wanted to identify. The public sees it TWO YEARS later.
That is not good enough.
If police cannot identify suspected rapists themselves, put the images out and let the public help identify them. That should be an urgent part of the investigation not an appeal two years down the line.
Every day you wait is another day for suspects to disappear or offend again.
And this isn’t happening against some backdrop of rare offending. Rape is being reported in London at the rate of one every hour.
Meanwhile this girl, who was just 13, has spent two years living in fear. Her family says she no longer feels safe being alone.
Two years is far too long. The Met has to be better at this.
Suspected rapists need to be identified and found. When police have exhausted immediate identification routes, get their faces in front of the public quickly.
If you recognise either man, call Crimestoppers anonymously on 0800 555 111. There is a £10,000 reward for information leading to an arrest and conviction.