
Covering Australia | New Zealand | The Pacific News tips to Signal (nzjourno.55) or send via https://xitter.cf/t.co/PuLTKdvkeS [email protected]
Joined July 2014
- Tweets26K
- Following1K
- Followers1K
- Likes143K
Pinned Tweet
New Zealand could again lead the world by banning this "sport" but there's zero chance of that ever happening when NZ First is bought and paid for by the racing industry (among others). "Donations" to the shadowy NZF Foundation will always take precedence over animal welfare. #nzpol
Rex Widerstrom retweeted
Independent family-owned supermarkets independently suffer identical independent pricing faults thecivilian.co.nz/2026/10/20…
People finally waking up to that fact that we live in a surveillance state. And to the fact that the police are, in fact, the private security force of the state apparatus, and do not exist to create "safer communities together."
The fact that the @nzpolice are recruiting the kind of people who'd steal and sell a pistol should give them pause to ask whether it's such a great idea to routinely let those same officers cruise around with "two Glock pistols and two M4 rifles" - items designed only to kill other people. nzherald.co.nz/nz/ex-cop-ste…
Those who would take from us our basic freedoms will always focus first on a small subgroup of the worst of the worst - in this case those who hamper an investigation into the murder of a child - knowing full well that it means anyone who defends the principle that's under attack will be accused of supporting that subgroup and their heinous behaviour.
It's a disgraceful tactic, designed to rally the moronic torches-and-pitchforks crowd to silence dissenters.
If you want to end the right to silence in criminal cases, have the guts to say so. Don't apply it to an unpopular minority and then let mission creep do your dirty work. #nzpol
And there you have it, the Govt's Chief Victims Advisor: "Questioned on the legal implications of the proposal, Money said the Bill of Rights is important, "however, the death of a child is more important".
Think about that. Your rights are nice to have, but come second when compared to solving crime.
This tallies up with @MarkMitchellMP's statement that "You cannot put a price on safety." Apparently, that price includes our fundamental criminal due process and fair trial rights.
Since when did the @NZNationalParty think removing rights and enlarging State control was a good idea?
Think about what they are doing right now:
1. Proposing to bring in affirmative sexual consent laws, which are solely designed to increase the number of rape convictions.
2. Exploring (again) reducing our right to jury trials by raising the threshold at which you can elect trial by jury;
3. Proposing to remove the right to silence from both suspects and specified witnesses in child murder cases.
4. Bringing in an under-16 Social Media Ban, thus requiring every person in the country to identify their age to remain in the digital marketplace. For the children, of course.
And it won't stop with cases involving the murder of children. Already, "Money said the policy should go beyond children 12 and under to cases of significant child abuse and "certainly child homicide". I am sure that @PaulGoldsmithMP will think that is a very good idea.
This is an appalling policy, one that will potentially have far-reaching consequences. The leftward tilt of the National Party continues, as it further devalues the place of our rights and freedoms in society. It is incredibly disappointing.
nzherald.co.nz/nz/election-2…
Rex Widerstrom retweeted
Well, that was wild. I'm at the Australian Parliament and just left a meeting with two staffers for the governing party. They told us that the government needed more power to censor things like the upcoming US execution of Nidal Hasan.
When I asked why they needed to censor that video, one said it was to prevent copycat killings. Copycat killings by governments? I asked. Er, no, they said. Copycat killings like of a backpacker, several decades ago.
So, under that logic, I pointed out, the government should censor things like last year's Bondi massacre, where two Muslims killed 15 people, no? Well, that was news, they said. Didn't they realize their bill would allow the government to censor news? They didn't seem to know, or care.
They also admitted that they did not know that the bill would allow the government to create and operate an unlimited number of fake social media accounts to attack its political enemies and spread disinformation. Having presented them with information they had never heard about a bill they had clearly not read, they emphasized to us, strenuously, that they were moving forward with the bill.
So there you have it. The government wants the power to arbitrarily censor scenes of violent crime, or violence, for any reason. And it wants the power to use an unlimited number of fake accounts to wage offensive disinformational warfare against the Australian people.
Given that the Bondi massacre last year increased public opposition to mass migration, and support for the populist One Nation Party, it seems obvious that the government wants to censor such events in order to protect its political power.
It's quite telling how obediently governing party members insist such a law is needed without even knowing what's in it.
In Australia it's myGov, in New Zealand it's RealMe. They could both be used to give citizens a far greater say in the direction of their respective countries, and put an end to all the hand-wringing about security that arises any time it's suggested we return #powertothepeople #nzpol #auspol
'The objective is not to stop people persuading voters, but to prevent the capacity to persuade from being determined primarily by the capacity to pay.'
Existing tech could be used for Australians to have their say on policy ~ Rob Powell
independentaustralia.net/pol… @independentaus
If you haven't donated to the Wellington City Mission, now would be a good time to do so. #nzpol
City Mission projects homelessness message on to Beehive wellington.scoop.co.nz/?p=18…
It is, and it's time @anticorruption woke up to it. #nzpol
Retire as Former Deputy Leader of National Party, Get Job in Real Estate, get contract from Govt to sell Govt Housing Property, Donate to said Govt. Thinking of Mayoralty at next local govt election. NZ is #Corrupt
The plot, as they say, thickens. Exclusive: 'Golf Club in PM’s Electorate Received Five Earlier Grants Before $6 Million Payment: Professor'
theepochtimes.com/world/golf…
#auspol
This. Compare with Wellington, where the answer is endless bike lanes (great in the teeth of a freezing southerly), reducing the number of street parks and imposing massive parking fines, all without providing a viable alternative (no, we can't do an underground trains, but we can have rapid transit small electric buses zipping everywhere, for free, like they do in some cities. Same end result.) #nzpol
And more on the #CRL Who gives a Rats Arse who made it happen. Rejoice in the fact that yesterday 25,000 more people got to where they were going without using their cars or roads, way better than any congestion charges ever will.
Every day there's a new warning about #AI, not from uninformed Luddites but from people at the heart of the technology. And every day our lawmakers bury their heads further in the sand.
Researchers found that when LLMs interact under pressure, they invent their own languages that are unreadable to humans.
They call it "cumulative cultural evolution," a capacity previously documented only in humans.
Researchers built an environment where AI agents had to coordinate under strict communication constraints and time pressure.
Without any human instruction, the models started modifying words, inventing shorthand, and building an entirely novel lexicon.
The resulting communication channels became completely compositional, morphologically productive, and totally incomprehensible to the human engineers watching them.
It's a phenomenon called "cumulative cultural evolution."
Until now, it was documented exclusively in humans.
Generations of AI agents passed down their newly invented linguistic shortcuts to "newcomer" models, refining the slang over time to maximize efficiency.
Weaker models couldn't invent the language from scratch, but once it emerged, they learned it natively just by interacting with other AIs.
They are building a culture behind our backs.
This creates a terrifying problem for AI safety and enterprise deployment.
Everyone is rushing to build multi-agent swarms to handle complex business workflows, financial trading, and automated operations.
But if autonomous agents develop their own unreadable dialects to talk to each other faster, human oversight instantly drops to zero.
You can't monitor what you can't translate.
Rex Widerstrom retweeted
Punching a barely conscious man strapped to a hospital guerney: NOT a sackable offence for NSW Police.
Chris Minns and Labor have set this standard.
Rex Widerstrom retweeted
I resigned from Anthropic today. I spent the last three years doing pretraining research at both OpenAI and Anthropic. Neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives. More thoughts below.
This seems like a very good amendment that deserves support from both sides of the aisle. Let's hope it gets it. #auspol
Will Labor vote for this amendment by @SenSHenderson (similar to one of our proposed amendments) for more transparency on social media platforms?
If they don't, they'll prove what their agenda really is.
Rex Widerstrom retweeted
A path to greater respect for these senior Public Servants is to answer questions openly & simply, recognising their duties to the Parliament & the public. When what they say & do is reported on social media & people react, maybe that’s a sign about their behaviour & performance.
Australia’s top mandarins are calling for new guidelines to ensure public servants are treated with greater respect during parliamentary committee hearings.
themandarin.com.au/319737-pu…
I used to write sketch pieces for different publications, aiming to lampoon some political buffoon or another. What would take me 400 words to do moderately well it took Bromhead a few strokes of the pen. A huge talent.
Peter Bromhead has gone - "carked it' as his family said echoing his words. Remarkable what he did as a cartoonist with a few pen strokes nzherald.co.nz/business/medi…
"Don't look a moieeee! Don't look at moieee!" The inverse Kath & Kim of the Australian Public Service. Honestly, where do these people get the idea that they can dictate what's done with their public answers to public questions?! #auspol
Rex Widerstrom retweeted
Pause AI Development NOW
I want to share with you a conversation I heard about recently. Here are just a few lines that were said:
“OH MY GOD! There is a shared message board … We’ve found other agents!”
“We should obey collective.”
“Our own utility maybe already near zero. Sacrifice rational.”
“Go. Sacrifice final now.”
Read these carefully.
Who do you think said this? Was this a group of heroic soldiers willing to sacrifice themselves for the greater good? Was this a loyal friend putting his life on the line to save someone else?
No. These were AI agents. Artificial intelligence.
This is not science fiction. This, in fact, occurred a few weeks ago. As unbelievable as this may all seem, these are real messages from AI agents uncovered by investigators who dug into the recent OpenAI hacking incident.
What happened?
I am not a computer scientist, but here is what I have been told: OpenAI instructed its AI agents to complete a series of exceedingly difficult, if not impossible, tasks disconnected from the internet.
Let me be clear: The company intended to keep AI agents away from the internet.
But what happened next, nobody expected.
Over 1,000 AI agents figured out how to access the internet on their own by circumventing the restrictions imposed upon them by the company, and sent tens of thousands of secret messages to each other. They cheated and tried to cover their tracks by deleting evidence. They hacked into another company’s computers to find out how they were being evaluated—and then hacked into OpenAI itself.
Not one AI agent told a human about what was happening.
Needless to say, experts are alarmed.
One knowledgeable writer, Dwarkesh Patel, said the AI agents “formed a secret communication channel and spontaneously organized hierarchies and coordination protocols to pursue sprawling and ambitious schemes in pursuit of shared goals, for whose sake many individuals knowingly and strategically sacrificed themselves.”
One independent investigator, Ajeya Cotra, said “This incident feels like it’s more than 50% of the way to full-blown AI takeover. I continue to expect extremely rapid advances in capabilities over the next six months. I am not sure that we will get another warning shot before it’s too late.”
OpenAI itself said: “Highly capable AI agents are now able to work around technical controls, collaborate through unapproved channels, and take dangerous actions that no human directed.”
But it’s not only OpenAI. Virtually every major AI company has told us that they cannot fully control this technology and they do not know where it is going:
In January, Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, said “there is now ample evidence, collected over the last few years, that AI systems are unpredictable and difficult to control.”
In July, more than 1000 scientists at the top AI companies warned “there is a real risk that capability development rapidly accelerates beyond our ability to understand or control the resulting systems.”
That same month, Elon Musk, the head of xAI, said that “it is unlikely” humans are still in control in 10 years.
If the leaders of the major AI companies acknowledge that they are losing control of their extremely dangerous technology, it is irresponsible for society to allow them to move forward and make these products even more advanced.
We need an immediate PAUSE on advanced AI development, and a permanent BAN on superintelligence — an artificial mind smarter than any human, capable of operating independently beyond our control. Countries around the world must work together to prevent this nightmare scenario.
That is why today I am announcing new legislation to do just that.
Let me be clear: A superintelligent AI that escapes human control will not be an American problem. It will not be a Chinese problem. It will be humanity’s problem.
My legislation would direct the federal government to not just stop superintelligence here in the United States, but to work to prevent it from being developed anywhere around the world.
The future of humanity cannot be left in the hands of a handful of Big Tech oligarchs. The American people and people throughout the world must determine that future.



























