@Revive_Britaini
iAccount based inUnited Kingdom
About this account
- Account based in
- United Kingdom
- Connected via
- Web
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
Promoting a new Renaissance: re-applying the values of The West to the modern world to offer a positive vision out of decline.
UK
Joined April 2020
- Tweets11.6K
- Following322
- Followers5.5K
- Likes1.8K
Pinned Tweet
This account is concerned with reversing the decline of the values which made the West great.
This is not a 'going back' to some imagined golden era, our past had its dark side. We want a Revival: re-applying our values to the modern world and offering a positive vision out of decline.
Revive Britain retweeted
Men do not need to be fixed. Our approach to their mental health does. It’s time we stopped blaming them for the failures of a system that isn’t expanding with them truly in mind and started building something better. The men in our lives deserve it.
lisabritton.substack.com/p/m…
Revive Britain retweeted
More lenient sentencing for those from a certain culture!
19yo Talib Khan did 151mph on the M65 with two children in the car.
Police stingered him. He kept going on burst tyres, then bare rims, still over 100mph, four people stuffed in the BMW.
No licence. No insurance.
12 months suspended sentence. 2.5 year ban.
Imagine those kids were yours.
This is not a “mistake.” This is an absolute danger to society.
Revive Britain retweeted
Women's groups fought to dismantle men's clubs, fraternities, the Boy Scouts, the YMCA. Now they're surprised men are isolated — and that it's women who pay for it.
“A lot of women tell me this is new,” writes Monica Corcoran Harel. “Their spouses weren’t always so withdrawn. They married fun men who had fun friends. Their husbands used to hang out, even text, with those dudes. They had lives outside their romantic relationship. Somewhere along the way, though, they quit making the effort.”
If you look closely, you’ll see these women everywhere. The “wing wife,” who talks her husband up at social events because he doesn’t say much or engage; the “take-flight wife,” who literally pushes her spouse toward a group of men, as a bird urges her fledgling out of the nest; the “not-now wife,” who refuses to play the game and simply resents her introverted husband.
Here, Harel explores how — and why — so many married women say they have unwillingly become the managers of their husbands’ social lives: the-cut.visitlink.me/zW3i9F
Revive Britain retweeted
SCHRÖDINGER’S FEMINIST
Perhaps the greatest credibility challenge facing contemporary feminism is remarkably simple:
Does it believe in equality even when equality benefits men?
“Schrödinger’s Feminist” describes the perceived contradiction.
Women are strong, independent and fully autonomous, but sometimes simultaneously portrayed as uniquely vulnerable and requiring special protection...
Equality when women are disadvantaged.
Asymmetry when women are advantaged.
Female success is celebrated as individual achievement; male success is attributed to structural privilege.
Female disadvantage demands systemic reform; male disadvantage is reframed as something that men must fix themselves.
Women entering traditionally male professions is progress; but men disappearing from teaching and other caring professions attracts little concern.
Girls being slightly behind in maths is a national problem; but boys massively falling behind in literacy is mere background noise.
Violence against women rightly demands compassion and action; but male victims are shown no humanity.
Many people are asking whether feminism is now about genuine equality or female supremacy.
This is the challenge of deeply ingrained hypocrisy that contemporary feminism must confront.
Feminism is diverse, and some feminists sincerely believe in universal equality. But a movement cannot credibly claim equality as its governing principle while applying that principle selectively.
The real test of equality is whether you defend it when it helps the other sex.
If feminism wants to ever regain credibility, the path is straightforward: one standard for women and men. Equal dignity. Equal agency. Equal accountability. Equal compassion. Equal opportunity.
No moving goalposts. No convenient exceptions. No gaslighting or propaganda of men and boys.
Because if the principle changes according to which sex benefits, then people will increasingly flock away from identifying as feminist.
#SchrodingersFeminist #Equality #GenderEquality #Fairness #MenAndBoys #WomenAndMen #Accountability
Revive Britain retweeted
Strictly Education is OUT!
On Victimhood and why it is so harmful to kids.
Have a look and subscribe! 👇
youtu.be/Jo-oP7K-BTQ?is=kJlD…
Revive Britain retweeted
Three recent articles deserve much closer scrutiny before their findings are allowed to shape public policy concerning boys and young men:
Fisher et al. (2026), Masculinity Content Classification Framework
Sara Meger (2026), Misogyny, Online Radicalisation, and Youth Extremism in Australia
Baker, Ging & Andreasen (2024), Recommending Toxicity
These studies address legitimate concerns. Misogyny, violence and genuinely extremist material should be taken seriously. But precisely because this research can influence education, online regulation and even counter-extremism policy, the methodological bar should be exceptionally high...
Baker et al. used simulated “sockpuppet” teenage-male accounts rather than observing actual young men's behaviour. Their broad definition of “toxic content” is particularly important to interrogate: it included all coded categories except generic content from known actors.
Fisher et al. provide an illuminating contrast because they analysed donated TikTok data from real young men. Their researchers also commendably disclose that principal coders align with left-wing political perspectives and are critical of aspects of online masculinity content, while acknowledging potential subjectivity and bias.
Meger raises still bigger questions because the research moves toward national-security policy. It describes anti-feminism as providing ideological justification for misogyny and legitimising male grievance, while recommending recognition of misogyny and anti-feminism within counter-extremism frameworks.
Rather than accepting or dismissing these studies according to our politics, we should subject them to adversarial methodological scrutiny...
Are comparable female online communities measured? Are identical standards applied to anti-male and anti-female rhetoric? Can male grievances ever be empirically valid within their theoretical framework, or are they interpreted principally as entitlement, backlash or victimhood? Are loneliness, educational failure, family breakdown, social isolation and other competing explanations seriously tested?
Are constructs such as patriarchy, male privilege and hegemonic masculinity actually falsifiable within the research design? Are correlations being interpreted cautiously? Do samples justify broader claims about boys and men? And does an objective of changing male attitudes, regulating platforms or influencing government policy affect what researchers classify as problematic?
These questions aren't an attack on academic research.
They are what rigorous academic research requires.
And when taxpayers fund research that strongly influences schools, regulators, legislation and counter-extremism policy, then transparency, methodological symmetry, competing hypotheses, replication and intellectual diversity become much more important.
It's time to hold the activist academics accountable, and stop using taxpayers' money for bogus research...
Revive Britain retweeted
Helen Andrews recently made an observation that stopped me mid-scroll.
She pointed out that in the late Soviet Union, the 60s and 70s, not the Stalin era, no one was being thrown into gulags anymore. But it was still oppressive. Why?
Because the government had a clear, specific ideology, and it embedded that ideology into every institution. Every factory, every academic institute, every workplace had a commissar whose entire job was to enforce the Party line.
Her argument: We have that today. It's just called HR.
Any institution with more than 10 employees likely has an ideological enforcer on staff. The government doesn't just ask for legitimacy anymore, it demands acceptance of a specific ideology. It's evangelical about it. And that, Andrews argues, is fundamentally incompatible with what America was founded on: freedom of thought and freedom of philosophy.
Whether you agree with her or not, the structural parallel is hard to ignore:
• A mandated belief system
• A dedicated enforcer in every institution
• Dissent treated as a disciplinary matter
Her conclusion: You cannot have solid, independent, Republican citizenship if the government has an ideology it feels compelled to enforce on you.
Do you think workplace ideological enforcement has gone too far, or is it a necessary part of running a modern institution?
Is this true? The difference between what it takes to make a man vs a woman happy. youtube.com/shorts/xr6ZTxaoo…
Revive Britain retweeted
Twenty-five Care Packages. One Purpose: helping Australia’s boys and young men to flourish through education...
Over recent weeks, I’ve assembled and sent 25 substantial care packages around Australia. From Perth to Brisbane, Melbourne and Sydney, and to Members and Senators of the Australian Parliament in Canberra.
Each is labelled:
“Care package for our precious boys, their schooling, and the education of young men.”
The packages contain eleven books and four major reports, bringing together more than 25 years of research, policy, parliamentary inquiry, practical experience and thinking about boys and education.
They are accompanied by my Proposed Recommendations for the House of Representatives Inquiry into the Factors Driving Educational Attainment.
Among the proposals are:
• A national initiative to lift the literacy of boys and young men, recognising that reading, writing, comprehension and expression are foundational to almost everything that follows.
• Earlier identification and intervention when children begin falling behind.
• Better recognition of boys experiencing multiple and intersecting disadvantages, so that those students who are most in need don’t disappear between policy categories.
• A national strategy to recruit and retain more male teachers and educators, alongside greater involvement by fathers, mentors and positive male role models.
• More physical activity, movement, recess and sport throughout the school years.
• Genuine parity of esteem between university and vocational, technical, trade and apprenticeship pathways.
• Better measurement of what actually works, and scaling successful approaches.
• An enduring national body to represent boys and men, including the capacity to examine boys’ educational outcomes across government.
Importantly, this isn't boys versus girls. Supporting boys who are struggling doesn't diminish our commitment to girls. Every child deserves the opportunity to flourish.
For those interested in reading further, the packages contain:
- Boys, A Rescue Plan by Sean Kullman & Michael Gurian
- Boys Adrift (September 2026 edition) by Leonard Sax
- The Boy Crisis by Warren Farrell & John Gray
- Yes He Can! by Mike Bell
- Building Schools for Boys by Phil Cummins & David Atkinson
- Boys’ Education and the Gender Attainment Gap by UK's All Party Parliamentary Group on Issues Affecting Men and Boys
- Boys: Getting it Right from the Australian House of Representatives in October 2002
- Boy Troubles by Jennifer Buckingham
- Lost Boys: State of the Nation by the Centre for Social Justice
- The War Against Boys by Christina Hoff Sommers
- Boys & Girls Learn Differently! by Michael Gurian
- Oh Boy! by Michael Nagel
- He’ll Be OK by Celia Lashlie
- Of Boys and Men by Richard Reeves
- Some Things About Boys by Maggie Dent
The recipients span parliamentarians, government policymakers, education leaders, and some of Australia’s leading education journalists. This morning I was at Parliament House in Canberra for the third time this fortnight, and I saw the care package in two offices.
My hope is simple: that these care packages encourage decision-makers to look carefully at the evidence, listen to boys and young men, learn from schools and programs that are succeeding, and approach the challenge with both high expectations and genuine compassion...
Our boys are precious. When they struggle, we should notice. When something works, we should learn from it. And when boys flourish (educationally, socially and personally) families, communities and Australia as a whole benefit.
#BoysEducation #Education #BoysAndMen #Literacy #Teachers #MaleTeachers #VocationalEducation #Apprenticeships #AustralianEducation #EducationalAttainment
@DavidMaywald
Chair of the International Council for Men and Boys (ICMB)
@menandboysnet
Revive Britain retweeted
Women's rights are represented by organisations with massive grants, huge numbers of members, mass media access, representation in governments, and influence over law and every aspect of culture.
So, asks Raymond Cuttill, where is the men's movement?? centreformalepsychology.com/…
Revive Britain retweeted
Britain is allowed to be proud of itself. 🇬🇧
The Italians are proud of Italy. The Jamaicans are proud of Jamaica. The Polish are proud of Poland. As they should be.
And so should we.
Proud of the miners. Whose pennies built the NHS, decades before Whitehall had the idea. The nurses who ran it.
The shipbuilders of Belfast. The engineers who threw a bridge across the Forth.
The men who wired the world from a Greenwich wharf.
The mothers who kept this country standing when the men were gone.
A small, wet island that gave the world its language, its laws and its football. 🇬🇧
That isn't against anyone. Pride isn't hate. It never was. It's just gratitude, said out loud.
Somewhere along the way, you were told to be quiet about it. We're done being quiet.
Because people who know their history stand a little taller. And once we know how this country was made great in the first place, together, we can do it again.
Everything we make is free to learn from: proudofus.co.uk/teach
If you can afford to, help us write the next chapter: proudofus.co.uk/support
Be Part Of Us. ☝️🇬🇧 Be Proud Of Us. 🙏🇬🇧
Revive Britain retweeted
Fantastic to see the Parliamentary Friends of Men's Wellbeing continuing to build traction, due to Sarah Game and her office in the South Australian Parliament...
Today was the fourth forum, featuring Tom Docking (CEO of Dads Group) and Jonathon Hart (Founder, Glass Half Empty & The Whisperer Team). This forum was also addressed by the Minister for Health and Wellbeing (Hon Blair Boyer MP) and the Shadow Minister (Mr Jack Batty MP).
The Parliamentary Friends of Men’s Wellbeing is an excellent initiative, creating a dedicated space within the South Australian Parliament for serious, constructive discussion about men’s health, connection, fatherhood, suicide prevention and community participation. Today’s fourth forum demonstrates that this is developing into a sustained parliamentary conversation rather than a one-off event...
Enormous credit is due to the Honourable Sarah Game MLC for championing men’s wellbeing and helping bring parliamentarians, community leaders and practitioners together. Her advocacy has consistently included men’s health and the honest recognition of male victims, with forums such as this helping to translate concern into practical ideas and stronger community networks.
It's particularly encouraging to see speakers such as Thomas Docking and Jonathon Hart bringing frontline experience in fatherhood, suicide prevention and community connection directly into Parliament... 👏👏
@MLCGame
Revive Britain retweeted
Labour inherited a failing economy and destroyed it further with sixth form socialist ideas.
If you think it bad today, wait until tomorrow.
Revive Britain retweeted
LET'S GET CHILDREN MOVING AGAIN, ESPECIALLY OUR BOYS
One of the simplest ways we can improve childhood is to get children moving more: at school, at home and throughout their communities.
More active play. More Physical Education and sport. More recess and lunch. More walking, cycling and scooting to school. More outdoor adventures. More movement breaks. Less unnecessary sitting.
The evidence increasingly tells us that movement supports the whole child: physical health and motor development; attention, memory and executive function; classroom behaviour and engagement; mental wellbeing; friendships, teamwork and belonging (as well as modest improvements in academic achievement).
Crucially, giving children more opportunities to move generally doesn't come at the expense of learning.
The successful Say YES to RECESS campaign in America shows what parents can achieve. Founded by three Tennessee mothers, the grassroots movement helped secure a major change in their state: elementary schools must now provide at least 40 minutes of physical activity each school day. Their movement has since expanded across the US...
Australia and other countries should embrace the same spirit.
- Protect generous daily recess and lunch breaks.
- Never routinely withhold healthy movement or recess as punishment.
- Strengthen quality PE and organised sport.
- Preserve genuinely unstructured, child-led outdoor play.
- Build safe routes for walking, cycling and scooting to school.
- Use short movement breaks during long classroom periods.
- Give teenagers meaningful opportunities for movement too.
- Make active childhoods a priority for families, schools and communities.
And let's pay particular attention to boys and young men...
Boys are struggling with engagement and educational attainment in many settings, so we should seriously examine whether increasingly sedentary childhoods and school days are serving them well. Sport and physical activity can provide movement, challenge, mastery, friendship, teamwork, mentoring, belonging and purpose.
Children aren't simply brains sitting at desks.
Their bodies, brains, behaviour, relationships and learning develop together.
Let them run. Let them play. Let them compete. Let them cooperate. Let them explore...
More movement. More play. More connection. Healthier children.
Revive Britain retweeted
Please repost so the world can see what the "Far Right " is like.
Normal families that want the invasion stopped and safe country for our kids to live in... 👍👍