@RevFiski
iAccount based inUnited States
About this account
- Account based in
- United States
- Connected via
- United States App Store
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
Too small to matter. Too big to not. Memes are the new hieroglyphics. If you can’t read between the lines, then simping is to be expected.
Joined March 2010
- Tweets29.9K
- Following492
- Followers5.7K
- Likes33.2K
It is not virtuous for a young man to correct an older man to his face.
Period.
Men know this.
Boys do not.
Iceland has fewer people than Bristol and has produced more World's Strongest Man titles per head than any nation on earth.
- Population: about 390,000
- World's Strongest Man titles: 9
- Jón Páll Sigmarsson: 4
- Magnús Ver Magnússon: 4
- Hafþór Júlíus Björnsson: 1
- India, population 1.4 billion: 0
What Iceland eats:
- Fish: the most per head on earth
- Lamb: raised on open mountain grazing
- Skyr: thick strained milk, eaten since the Vikings
- Butter: on everything
An island in the North Atlantic, almost nothing grows there, and for most of its history it could not raise a decent crop of anything but grass.
So it raised sheep and cows on the grass, and fished, and ate what it caught, and turned out men who could lift a car.
India, the most vegetarian nation on earth, has 3,600 times the population and has never produced a winner.
Somebody explain the plant-based strength revolution to the Icelanders. Slowly. They are busy carrying a boulder.
Comparative estimates put gorilla gut volume at about 53% colon and only 14% small intestine, versus humans at roughly 17% colon and 67% small intestine.
University debate, "Were humans built to eat meat?", same two chairs, same clock.
Vegan: "Anatomically we're closer to the gorilla than the lion. Flat molars, long gut. A gentle plant-eater with delusions."
Paleoanthropologist: "Then explain the acid."
Vegan: "Which acid?"
Paleoanthropologist: "Your stomach runs at a pH of about 1.5. A lion's sits nearer 3.6. Yours is stronger than the animal you've just been contrasted with, by a factor of about a hundred."
Vegan: "Stomach acid digests food."
Paleoanthropologist: "A cow's rumen sits at about 6.5. That's a compost heap with a pulse. Yours strips the zinc off a coin. Why would a gentle plant-eater carry that?"
Vegan: "Protection."
Paleoanthropologist: "From what? Lettuce doesn't fight back."
Vegan: "Bacteria."
Paleoanthropologist: "Which bacteria live in a leaf at a level that needs a pH of 1.5? Name the salad."
Vegan: "..."
Paleoanthropologist: "The animals that run acid as low as ours are the scavengers. Vultures. Things that arrive at a carcass on the second day and need to kill what's already living in it. We're not built like the lion. We're built like the bird that waits for the lion to finish."
Vegan: "Flattering."
Paleoanthropologist: "It's a picture of a species with a rock, a sharp flake and no claws. You don't get the fresh kill. You get the femur nobody could open, forty hours late, and you'd better have the acid for it."
Vegan: "Acid that strong is dangerous. Look how many people are on tablets for it."
Paleoanthropologist: "The only animal on earth that pays to switch its stomach off. You've spent sixty years pouring cereal onto a carcass digester and now you're medicating the digester for doing its job."
Vegan: "So your argument is that we're vultures."
Paleoanthropologist: "My argument is a number. Yours is a feeling about gorillas. The gorilla eats for most of the day and its gut is a fermentation tank. Yours is done in a few hours and runs on acid. One of you is designed for leaves."
Moderator: "Thirty seconds."
Paleoanthropologist: "She can keep them. I'm still waiting on the salad."
Narcissists will abuse their victims to the breaking point, and then act like they’re the ones “trying to get away” or “trying to set boundaries” from their victim.
They will often try to illicit a reactive response that they can use to paint their victim as the problem, but even when the victim doesn’t react, doesn’t lash out, doesn’t “act crazy” — the narcissist still manufactures a story where they’re the one needing to “escape” or “set boundaries” from their supposedly toxic victim.
The narcissist needs others to believe this in order to maintain their image and avoid accountability.
Pope Leo made a private visit to the Grotto at Lourdes this evening. Full video attached.
After praying silently, he led the immense crowds in reciting the prayer below.
He then offered a golden rose to the statue, the gift reserved exclusively to Popes.
Leo will stay in Lourdes until Monday morning.
The prayer as released by the Vatican ––
“Our Lady of Lourdes, the Immaculate Conception, in this blessed place you spoke with such gentleness and tenderness to Saint Bernadette, a humble daughter of the French people, to convey to the world a radiant message of prayer, conversion and hope.
We turn to you with trust, for you are the Mother whom Jesus has given, and you are attentive to all our needs.
We pray to you, our Mother, for France, for you are her Patroness and have protected her for so many centuries.
Grant its people the gift of fraternal harmony, so that they may build a harmonious society that banishes all violence and hatred, and allows everyone to work, to start a family and to live life to the fullest in peace and serenity.
May the most disadvantaged and the poorest always be supported.
Obtain for France wise and generous leaders, ready to make sacrifices, capable of responding to challenges, and eager to serve the common good.
May they keep France at peace within the family of nations, and may they make her voice heard in promoting the defense of fundamental human rights and peace in the world, rejecting the mentality of war once and for all
Blessed Virgin Mary, we present to you the People of God journeying in this country, which you have so deeply marked with your presence.
Renew the faith and fervor of Christian families, who are so dear to your heart, so that they may live day by day in the presence of Jesus, in his grace, and with his support through the difficulties they face.
May they be generously open to life, and may God awaken vocations within them, especially to the priesthood and religious life.
Grant that your Church in France may show, especially to the youngest among them, the luminous path of the Gospel, so that they may build the just and fraternal society to which they aspire.
Finally, Mother full of love, we entrust to you our most urgent personal intentions, especially those of the sick and suffering, as well as all those who accompany them, who have come together to find strength and healing.
We entrust to you our living and deceased loved ones. We pray that you will remove all the obstacles that still separate us from your beloved Son and that he may reign in all hearts.
Amen.
This video is larger than Cloudflare's 512 MB cache, so it can't be played through. More donations are needed to cover a larger cache. Donate
JUST IN: Iran’s president reveals “all our money in China has been frozen.”
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Iran's president in a Fox News interview described Iran's money in China as blocked, referring to longstanding oil revenues inaccessible due to U.S. sanctions since 2018, not a new Chinese freeze or revelation.
borna.news/en/news/6610/p…
avash.news/ansarullah-doe…
wsj.com/world/middle-e…
Something fundamental is changing.
For decades, contempt for men has been treated very differently from contempt for women. “Men are trash”. “Women don’t need men”. Masculinity is “toxic”. Fathers are optional. Male suffering is either ignored, minimised or blamed on men themselves.
But the pushback is getting louder, and broader.
Writers such as Ingrid Jacques and Jenny Holland are questioning the growing normalisation of hostility towards men. Lisa Britton has put the alternative beautifully: rather than constantly denigrating men, our societies should thank men for what they do for their families and communities...
This is much bigger than a few provocative social-media posts and media articles. It's time to challenge the intellectual machinery that allows anti-male prejudice to masquerade as equality.
In The Relentless War on Masculinity, I call this the Four Horsewomen of Modern Feminism:
Misandry — contempt, hostility and prejudice towards males.
Gamma Bias — magnifying female disadvantage and male wrongdoing, while minimising male disadvantage and female wrongdoing.
Gynocentrism — placing female experiences, interests and wellbeing at the centre while treating male needs as secondary. Gynocentrism elevates the moral importance of females, while devaluing males to a lesser status.
Gaslighting — telling men that the disadvantages they can see and experience aren't real, don't matter, or are simply products of their own “privilege”.
These four forces reinforce one another, undermine healthy relationships, and weaken our societies. Chapter 3 of my book argues that they must be recognised and challenged if we are serious about addressing the problems facing boys and men.
But pushing back against feminism must not become an excuse to hate women. That simply reproduces the poison with the sexes reversed.
The destination is not misogyny or misandry. It is Mutual Respect.
Men are not defective women. Masculinity isn't a pathology. Fathers aren't optional extras. Boys deserve encouragement rather than suspicion. And male suffering deserves the same compassion we rightly extend to females...
As I wrote in my book, boys and men are equally deserving of respect and dignity, and flourishing ultimately requires men and women to collaborate: nla.gov.au/nla.obj-393970618…
We must stridently challenge misandry. Question ideological feminism. Celebrate good men. Defend boys. Value fathers. And build something better together.
#Misandry #Feminism #Masculinity #MenAndBoys #PositiveMasculinity #Fathers #GenderEquality #CelebratingMasculinity
a=(y,d=mag(k=6*cos(i/66),e=y/2-15)/2.5)=>point((49+d*d+k*k/2)*sin(c=d/5-t/3+i%3*4)+200,99*cos(c/3)+6/d*sin(k*2)+y/(297*sin(e/2)+.1)*k*e+d*cos(t*3-d*d/4)+200)
t=0,draw=$=>{t||createCanvas(w=400,w);background(9).stroke(w,66);for(t+=PI/80,i=2e4;i--;)a(i/595)}//#つぶやきProcessing
WTAF - in literally the last hour, three new distinct insane OpenAI stories just broke:
1. OpenAI said they notified "dozens of third parties" in safety and security incidents (likely similar to what happened in Australia and RubyGems etc)
2. A new report from Parse (covered in the NYT) found a massive treasure trove of new astonishing details from the HF incident on the public internet, including that the agents communicated with other non OpenAI agents hosted on Huggingface servers to search for information about exploit gym, and compiled rank ordered lists of server resources and credentials they described as "LOOT."
3. A new story from Deepa at Reuters about OpenAI leaking user data online (likely that OpenAI had previously trained on).
It's a shame (and likely intentional in the case of OpenAI disclosing dozens more hacks) that these stories are all breaking on a Friday afternoon, notoriously the best time to release bad news so that it will disappear into the weekend. But these are each insane stories worthy of a ton of attention!
Perhaps I could have said it better myself. But why? He said it well enough.
Combative women want men they consider unusually masculine, psychologically deep and intellectually penetrating, but those are precisely the kinds of men least likely to tolerate contempt. So when she feels insecure and tries to regain a sense of internal power by reflexively degrading the man, she disproportionately selects herself out of access to precisely the type of man she claims to value.
This is her structural trap.
She appears to think her contempt can function as a kind of leash: I will lower him, withdraw admiration and criticise him, and in doing so, force him to engage with me.
But with the type of man she wants, it actually has the complete opposite effect. She seemingly fails to understand a very basic principle: that disrespect will not widen the aperture and create more access through negative attachment - but will lead to the complete collapse of whatever limited access she had otherwise up until that point been permitted. Antagonism is momentarily cathartic for her in so much as it allows her to vent her frustrations and trauma dump - but more crucially, such indulgence is spiritually ugly and unseductive, and thus pertinently antithetical to her intended aim of winning him.
She is not a conqueror of man, because she does not "know her enemy", meaning she is self-absorbed to the point she seems to have no theory of mind as to the nature of man's psyche and his underlying dignity, and thereby like a bull in a china shop, presumes she can just inelegantly trample all over him, repeatedly humiliating herself by imposing herself unpleasantly, under the idiotic belief this will somehow get her what she wants. For the supposedly emotionally intelligent sex, this is profoundly retarded - but it goes to show that even in otherwise at least moderately clever women, ego can prove such a blind spot it renders them functionally moronic.
And because she apparently does not understand that disrespecting the man she wants is why he keeps cutting her off every time she manages to force access to him, she keeps interpreting his resulting exclusion as "another move in the dance" - further evidence that something psychologically profound and meaningful is happening between them, rather than recognising the much simpler but less flattering and more self-indicting causal chain:
She behaved unpleasantly toward a man who had no obligation to tolerate her, so he removed her.
Peter Thiel argues that transhumanism isn’t too extreme from a Christian perspective, it actually “has not gone far enough.”nitter.cf/dnapway/status/2103457…
He says Christianity’s vision of eternal life goes beyond simply preserving the mind in a computer.
When asked whether eternal life would eventually become boring, Thiel’s answer was simple:
“I think the answer to everything is better than the alternative.”
It’s a queer backlash, you say?
Even an openly gay Atlantic writer is now FED UP with LGBTQ virtue signaling.
And he’ll probably get canceled for saying this.
On Bill Maher, James Kirchick spent 2 full minutes warning that “queer extremism” is DESTROYING support for gay marriage, and he actually nails it.
Gallup shows support for same-sex marriage is sliding, and among Republicans, it’s CRATERING. Social issues almost never reverse like this:
Overall: 71% (2022) → 65% (2026)
Republicans: 55% (2021) → 37% (2026)
Independents: 77% (2022) → 67% (2026)
This isn't a "tolerance" problem. It's a "leave me and my kids alone" problem. Nobody needs to hear who you sleep with.
Extrait de l’intervention de Milei hier à l’ONU :
« L’ONU a échoué à faire ce qu’elle était supposée faire et s’est mise à faire ce que personne ne lui avait demandé, et qu’elle n’aurait jamais dû faire. Elle a construit un Leviathan bureaucratique focalisé sur l’idée de décider comment doivent vivre les pays du monde et leurs citoyens. C’est un étrange mélange entre anarchie et tyrannie.
Impuissance contre ceux qui enfreignent les règles les plus basiques, comme les dictatures sanglantes et les organisations terroristes. Et un contrôle et des obligations orwelliennes face aux démocraties libérales qui, elles, respectent les règles.
Nous l’avons vu avec l’agenda du millénaire, l’agenda 2030, la régulation économique, les agendas sur le genre, l’extrémisme environnemental et l’immigration incontrôlée.
Et à chaque fois qu’ils ont échoué, au lieu de demander des excuses et réviser leur modèle, ils ont doublé la mise. Comme on le voit déjà avec l’agenda 2045. Laquelle, je l’annonce, va échouer.
Mais l’exemple le plus grave, qui devrait couvrir de honte cette organisation pour toujours, c’est la gestion de la pandémie. Durant la pandémie, des organisations dépendantes de cette maison (l’ONU) ont renié des preuves scientifiques et la souveraineté des nations. Elles ont promu dans le monde entier des politiques d’enfermement forcé qui ont détruit des emplois, ruiné l’éducation d’une génération d’enfants et ont couté la vie à des millions de personnes qui sont mortes seules, sans attention médicale basique.
Quand certains disent que ce fut une erreur sanitaire, nous y voyons une expérience de contrôle social déguisé en expérience scientifique. (…) La terreur psychologique installée par l’État, qui a dit pendant des années aux citoyens du monde qu’il fallait avoir peur. Peur de son voisin, de l’air qu’on respirait, de sortir de sa maison. Cette peur n’était pas un effet secondaire mais l’outil choisi par les gouvernements. Le problème est que les urgences passent, la peur disparait, le temps s’écoule, mais les institutions et le pouvoir créés pour ces supposées urgences, restent. »
Il n’est pas venu pour manier la langue de bois le Javier !
From one of the Italy’s most renowned Marian priests: “I am declared a schismatic not because I abandoned Catholic doctrine or embraced a new religion, but because I refused to abandon what the Church has always believed, taught, and celebrated.”
lifesitenews.com/news/exclus…