In February I published a full documented account of Higgsfield's behavior. Non-consensual sexual deepfakes of real actors. Sexualized children's content. Bigoted deepfakes. A feature they literally named "Steal." Documented scam behavior. All of it with receipts. I assumed that would be enough for people to draw their own conclusions. Since then I have learned what is happening on the inside. And it is worse. Here is the new layer. When they launched "A WHOLE MONTH of UNLIMITED SEEDANCE" and called it "real unlimited Seedance," users took that at face value. What they were actually running was a purpose-built Seedance 2 family variant with a confidential model name, capped at 480/720p, that their own internal documentation describes as a lower tier than full Seedance 2.0. Their mod team was scripted in advance on how to deflect user questions about it. The word "real" in that advertising was doing a lot of work. All the while, advertising and showing off Seedance 2 in 4k ad naseum giving the impression the two are one in the same... they are not. That alone would have been enough to walk away a second time. But the internal culture is what I need you to understand. Private mod channels were/are being used to mock and pathologize users. A staff member made an inappropriate public comment about a moderator. Moderation standards collapsed to the point that longtime mods described the team as unrecognizable. And the CEO, by multiple accounts, was being kept in the dark about all of it by the admin layer beneath him. That admin layer is the part I take most seriously. At least one person in a position of significant platform power has a publicly documented, multi-year history of targeted harassment, cyberstalking, and impersonation across multiple platforms. That person has access to user data, private channels, and controls what information reaches leadership. The CEO being uninformed is not dysfunction. It is a structural vulnerability that appears to be working exactly as someone intended. This is not a company making mistakes. This is a company whose public behavior was documented in February, and has been over and over since then, whose internal behavior is now documented here, and whose governance structure appears designed to insulate the people causing harm from any accountability. My work, my community, and my reputation are things I protect. I will not run my pipeline through a platform where the governance layer poses a direct risk to creators. If you promoted them in February without knowing, you had an excuse. You do not have one now. I'll attach one of the screenshot in the comments...