🇨🇦 🦍 Standing strong for fair markets. Still Hodling. I do not provide any financial advice. Use your own judgement and do your own DD.
Canada
Joined September 2019
- Tweets11K
- Following599
- Followers2.2K
- Likes12.2K
🇨🇦Retha retweeted
Citadel wants their trades hidden from retail investors. Particularly those around MMTLP - MMAT - NWBO stocks
They seem pretty worried 🚩🚩
🚨 $NWBO — NEW COURT FILINGS
⚖️ NWBO v. Citadel Securities LLC, et al.
🏛️ SDNY | Case No. 1:22-cv-10185-GHW-GS
📅 Filed September 21, 2026
⚠️ Not legal advice. Layman’s summary.
📄 Doc. 350
Defendants ask Judge Stein to keep limited portions of NWBO’s response and Appendix A sealed because they contain:
“trading data from Defendants’ internal systems that reflect how Defendants trade.”
🔥 Defendants also acknowledge that Citadel’s materials contain:
“granular details regarding how Citadel Securities’ proprietary electronic trading systems process, route, and execute NWBO orders.”
Virtu’s materials reportedly explain:
“the inner workings of Virtu’s proprietary trading systems for over-the-counter securities.”
Defendants call this information technical, proprietary and:
“of no legitimate public concern.” 🤔
🕶️ Doc. 350-1 — Sealed Exhibit
⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️
🤔 NWBO’s likely argument:
How can these systems be too limited or neutral to justify the requested discovery—but sophisticated and valuable enough that revealing their operation could cause competitive harm?
There is another sharp disagreement:
🔹 Defendants: The information is proprietary and “of no legitimate public concern.”
🔹 NWBO: The systems’ design and operation may be critical evidence of automated decision-making and intent.
📌 What’s potentially next: Doc. 350 was a response to NWBO’s motion to seal, not the anticipated merits reply. Entries should appear sometime on September 22, 2026.
🇨🇦Retha retweeted
THIS IS THE PROBLEM WITH TOKENIZATION.
If tokenized shares can be used to support REG SHO LOCATES while the underlying shares can ALSO be lent, pledged, or otherwise used…
HOW DO YOU PREVENT THE SAME SHARE FROM SUPPORTING MULTIPLE CLAIMS?
That's not a technical footnote. THAT'S THE ISSUE.
Investors: DON'T LET THIS QUESTION GET BURIED.
Demand answers from brokers, custodians, exchanges AND regulators:
CAN TOKENS SUPPORT LOCATES?
CAN THE UNDERLYING SHARES ALSO BE LENT?
HOW IS DOUBLE COUNTING PREVENTED?
WHO AUDITS THE SHARE-TO-TOKEN BACKING?
We don't need promises. We need TRANSPARENCY.
SHOW THE SHARES.
SHOW THE LOCATES.
SHOW THE AUDIT TRAIL.
INVESTORS: ASK THE QUESTIONS. DEMAND THE RECEIPTS. 🔥
🇨🇦Retha retweeted
🙊🙈🙉 LIAR LIAR NO NEW DAY AT THE SEC
The Impact for investors is catastrophic when the SEC turns a blind eye, ignores,doesn't enforce rules, and invites the criminals to a high profile roundtable to create the framework for 24/7 stealing.
THEY ARE HELPING COLLAPSE THE SYSTEM
IT'S AN UNSUSTAINABLE BUBBLE ‼️
🇨🇦Retha retweeted
i was wrong even higher 2.85 billion lets gooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
🇨🇦Retha retweeted
📣📣SEC CHAIRMAN DISMANTLING RETAIL PROTECTION ONE AT A TIME
When Atkins became SEC Chairman in Spring of 2025 be vowed to get beck to the core mission of the agency.
Instead he is dismantling protections that help protect Retail investors.
Where is holding accountable those who lie, cheat and steal❓️
Where is the"New day at the SEC."❓️
Promises made: MANY
Promises kept: ZERO
🇨🇦Retha retweeted
My issue is simple: AMC shareholders have every right to be angry and demand answers.
Robinhood says its AMC Stock Tokens are backed 1:1. Fine. Then prove it. The token itself is not an AMC share. Token holders don't directly own AMC stock and don't receive the normal rights of AMC shareholders. AMC also did not create, authorize, or endorse this product.
So where are the receipts?
Who holds the underlying AMC shares? How many shares are actually held compared with the number of tokens outstanding? Who independently verifies that 1:1 backing, and can investors see that verification?
And I want to know why AMC. Why create a financial product using AMC's name and ticker without AMC's involvement? What other publicly traded theater chains received the same treatment, and why or why not?
That's why AMC investors are angry. We're not asking for rumors or promises. We're asking for transparency and independently verifiable facts.
If it's truly backed 1:1, show us. It shouldn't be controversial to ask for the receipts.
🇨🇦Retha retweeted
♣️♥️AN ACE UP THE SLEEVE IS GOOD IN DEED ♠️❤️
Ken Griffin Citadel Securities has built an empire with political donations and supporting key positions.
Given him an Ace up the sleeve.
His business model isn't so spectacular and that is why he is successful.
IT'S BECAUSE HE HAS STACKED THE DECK🪳🪳
🇨🇦Retha retweeted
🖕 Fuck Robinhood and every brokerage that stole the buy button and profits from millions of people
They removed the buy button to save their hedge fund buddies VS allowing millions of retail investors to profit 🚩
🚨 RH force-sold peoples crypto many times over the years, declined users the ability to transfer their cryptocurrencies to outside brokerages, are issuing illegal synthetic derivative stock tokens with no regulatory oversight in the US, sell retail orders to Citadel & Virtu to front-run your trades, are often fined for breaking a myriad of securities regulations meant to protect retail...
I could continue listing the many ways they screw retail investors, but I have other things to do this week
A rose 🌹 by any other name would be as sweet — but in this case, a polished turd is still just a shiny 💩
🇨🇦Retha retweeted
Robinhood charged with fraud. now wait till they get charged for their ftx 2.0 scam tick tock bitches. meanwhile 3 billion domestic box office here we come AMC i like the stock.
🇨🇦Retha retweeted
Hey there @dangallagher, in the past week you and @vladtenev CEO of Robinhood have made public comments defending your use of and “standing behind” your relatively new Stock Token concept.
I think this practice is abhorrent. It defeats the very ethos of share ownership. Public financial markets were created so that companies could raise capital, and so that investors could share in the wealth created as a result. Not to turn investing instead merely into some gamified business-oriented casino.
If by your own admission you can’t offer or sell Stock Tokens to “U.S. persons” why does your U.S. web site talk about them so much and so favorably?
Vlad: How can a U.S. brokerage firm be proud of creating an offshore Channel Island operation in far off Jersey specifically with the intent to operate outside U.S. securities laws? Is there potential confusion that Stock Token purchasers are getting less than all the rights accorded to real shareholders, and if so do you care? If those tokens are theoretically backed 1:1 by real shares, but hypothetically some of those underlying real shares are in turn lent out to short sellers, are the Tokens really backed 1:1 in fact?
Dan: I think U.S. securities laws have protected the public very well over the past century. You spent much of your career at the SEC. Deep down, in your heart of hearts, how can you really think a world without the precautions imposed by U.S. securities laws creates a better, safer environment for investors?
Choose whatever descriptors you think best make sense under the circumstances: Non-regulated, derivative, synthetic, sham, debt-backed securities trying to simulate actual real stock, or pick your own words if these don’t fit.
Stock Tokens may make you an innovator in your own eyes. In my eyes, they bring your firm dishonor.
🇨🇦Retha retweeted
HOW is this being said on LIVE TV and not triggering an immediate investigation?
A stock price is supposed to be PRICE DISCOVERY buyers, sellers, SUPPLY and DEMAND.
If anyone is deliberately CONTROLLING the price of #AMC or #GME, that isn't a “free market.” If proven, that's the kind of conduct regulators should be investigating as MARKET MANIPULATION.
And now we're talking about TOKENIZED securities tied to these stocks?
Who controls the supply?
Who verifies the alleged 1:1 backing?
Where are the underlying shares?
Where are the independent audits?
And most importantly can any of this influence the price of the REAL stock.
These aren't conspiracy questions. They're MARKET-INTEGRITY questions.
Robinhood has already faced SEC enforcement actions over securities-law violations in the past. So why should investors simply take anyone's word for it now?
If investigators find that anyone intentionally manipulated stock prices or defrauded investors, STOP treating financial crime like a cost of doing business.
Fines aren't enough.
If criminal conduct is proven, PROSECUTE IT and if the law calls for prison, SEND THEM TO PRISON.
Retail deserves a market, not a rigged scoreboard.
INVESTIGATE. SUBPOENA. AUDIT. PROSECUTE.
#AMC #GME #Robinhood #TokenizedSecurities #MarketManipulation #SEC #CNBC #FoxBusiness @CEOAdam @vladtenev
Jim Cramer told everyone. Robinhood along with other bad actors are CONTROLLING, the Price of #AMC and #GME stocks. There is NO TRUE SUPPLY & DEMAND. They control the price using TOKENIZED SECURITIES.
NOT A FREE MARKET! Robinhood allegedly had committed securities fraud controlling the prices.
#CNBC #FoxBusiness #JimCramer #Tokenized #TokenizedSecurities.
Is Citadel somehow involved in this fraudulent offshore business and is Robinhood receiving PFTF (Payment for Token Flow).
Tokens should be trackable, just like stock is with the CAT system.
Can anyone out there track Tokens and provide some data?
@unusual_whales
In addition to my own comments back to @vladtenev about about my strongly-held concerns about Robinhood’s Stock Tokens, read what someone named Brad (who I don’t know) insightfully had to say on this topic:
🇨🇦Retha retweeted
And @vladtenev here is a similar view:
🇨🇦Retha retweeted
CEASE AND DECIST in all caps was my attempt at humor. It was a cross between Desist (which means to stop) and De-cyst (which would mean to remove a cyst, something that causes pain and discomfort).
What you know about U.S. securities laws apparently is that you are happy to ignore them if you simply disclose that you are ignoring them.
If your offshore Stock Tokens can not be offered or sold to U.S. persons, why are you touting them on your U.S. web site?
If it is not illegal, it should be. And in any case, it displays a terrible lapse of judgement on your part. Wisdom is displayed not just by obeying the strict letter of the law, but by doing what is right.
Shame on you.
🇨🇦Retha retweeted
My account has been set to restricted and my reach has been limited until I remove that post from vlad. In that case hey @vladtenev youre a fucking criminal. And your ftx 2.0 scam will blow up. We should have arrested you and hung you legally after you pulled the buy button. Your also a domestic terrorist and you and ken griffin lied under oath and should be behind bars or swinging from a branch for the legal death penalty after court.
Look into FTX and the number of illegal AMC tokens they sold. FTX was offering 1:1 and all real AMC retail shareholders should get all of that money FTX made and have it split equally amongst themselves. The U.S. stock market is a world wide joke. So is the SEC and FINRA.
🚨 AMC VS. ROBINHOOD JUST HIT CNBC
Adam Aron is publicly challenging Robinhood over unauthorized “AMC stock tokens” that carry AMC’s name but provide no voting rights, no direct ownership and no benefit to the company.
If it isn’t backed 1:1 by real AMC shares, then what exactly are they selling?
Apes deserve transparency. $AMC 🦍🍿 @CEOAdam