Housing is one of the most important issues we've heard from people. Especially in mid Argyll. Restore Britain has already committed itself to this fixing this. You, your children, and future generations of Scots deserve the same ability as our parents and grandparents - to own your own home, and to be secure knowing you can heat it cheaply. This should be an unquestionable right, not a privilege being afforded to less and less each year. The living conditions we exist under are a choice being made by unelected robotic civil servants, disconnected politicians, or those who have no regard for human life. We don't have to live like this. Restore Britain will fix this country. Join George as part of the silent restoration of this nation. No other party is honest about the struggle we will face, and no other party has an honest solution to it. Scotland invented modern industry yet somehow we have forgotten how to build cheap, quality homes. That is a betrayal of our collective ability for no gain. 1 for George Love. restorebritain.org.uk/enviro…

🚨 THE SMOKING GUN: ANDY BURNHAM HIRED HOPE NOT HATE BOSS AS DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF! I have tracked the corrupt paper trail between radical activist lobbies and Number 10, and the evidence is worse than anyone imagined. Hope not Hate has spent years weaponizing local councils against patriotic Britons, smearing working class voters, and taking millions of pounds from billionaire trusts. Now look at who is actually sitting inside the heart of government pulling the strings for Prime Minister Andy Burnham. Alison Phillips resigned as a director of Hope not Hate on July 16, and barely four days later was installed directly as Burnham deputy chief of staff inside Downing Street. In that exact same week, Burnham promoted another former Hope not Hate director, Ruth Anderson, straight onto the government frontbench. At the very same time, billionaire heiress Sigrid Rausing funneled 1.8 million pounds into Hope not Hate while cutting a personal 150,000 pound cheque directly to the Labour Party. This is how the shadowy Westminster machine truly operates. Billionaire cash finances a radical activist outfit to police your speech, and then those exact same directors get parachuted into top state jobs to dictate national policy without winning an election. The very political lobby group that exists to crush working class dissent and shut down border debates is now literally running the Prime Minister office. Retweet this exclusive investigation immediately to expose the radical lobby group pulling the strings in Downing Street. 🇬🇧🔥

"I SWEAR BY ALMIGHTY GOD..." Those are the first words Lindsay Hoyle spoke when he took the Speaker's chair in November 2019. An oath of allegiance. A promise of impartiality. A vow to protect parliamentary democracy on behalf of every person in this country. He lied. Not through incompetence. Not through misjudgement. Through deliberate, sustained, documented betrayal of every constitutional duty his office demands. And he has done it while charging you £370,000 for the flights. This is not a political opinion. This is a public record. Read every word. THE MOST POWERFUL MAN YOU HAVE NEVER SCRUTINISED Everyone watches the Prime Minister. Nobody watches Lindsay Hoyle. That is the trick. The Prime Minister makes policy. Lindsay Hoyle decides whether that policy ever faces a single serious question. He controls who speaks. He controls what gets asked. He controls what gets buried. He decides whether the Prime Minister answers or evades. He runs the kill switch on British democracy and for seven years nobody has pointed a camera at the man holding it. Understand what that power actually means in practice. Since the 2024 general election, Reform UK has been the fastest growing political force in this country. At its peak, polling at 36 percent. The party that millions of British people turned to when they had nowhere else to go. Their leader, Nigel Farage, sits in the House of Commons with a mandate from those millions. Lindsay Hoyle has called him to speak at Prime Minister's Questions six times. Six occasions in over two years. A party representing more than a third of the country. A party whose voters want answers on rape gangs, open borders and the eight billion pound annual migration bill that every working person in this country pays for whether they voted for it or not. Six questions. Then silence. Then next week. Then silence again. That is not procedure. That is a decision. His decision. Nobody else's. THE LABOUR SLEEPER CELL Before you ask why, understand who Lindsay Hoyle is. He was elected as the Labour MP for Chorley in 1997. Labour Chairman. Deputy Speaker under a Labour government from 2010 to 2019. His father, Doug Hoyle, Labour MP, Labour peer, co-founder of the Labour Friends of Israel network in 1957. Lindsay Hoyle was born into Labour. Raised in Labour. Paid by Labour. Promoted by Labour. In November 2019 he took the Speaker's chair and relinquished his party affiliation. That is the convention. The costume change. The new robe over the same body. He never stopped being Labour. The evidence is in every decision he has made since the day he sat down. When Tories needed protecting, he looked away. When Reform needed a voice, he found reasons not to call them. When Labour needed saving, he broke 400 years of parliamentary law to deliver it. The proof is not an accusation. It is a pattern. And patterns do not lie. Why do the Tories allow it? Ask the 50 MPs who signed no confidence motions after the Gaza vote. They had the numbers. They had the cause. The response from Tory leadership was to bury the motion. Penny Mordaunt, the Conservative Commons Leader, stood up and called him a decent man. Government sources briefed the press they were not pushing for removal. They had the votes. They chose protection over principle. Because when Tories win, they want a Hoyle too. The Speaker's chair is not an office. It is a mutual protection racket for the two-party cartel. They protect him now. He protects them later. You get left outside. THE CONSTITUTIONAL COUP February 21st, 2024. The SNP tabled a motion for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza. Parliament was ready to vote. The Clerk of the House, the most senior constitutional expert in the building, advised Hoyle to follow 400 years of parliamentary precedent. He ignored her. Instead, Hoyle broke convention to allow a Labour amendment that killed the SNP motion outright. Not adjusted it. Killed it. The government walked out. The SNP walked out. Over 50 MPs signed formal motions of no confidence in the Speaker of the House of Commons. He cried at the despatch box. He apologised. He kept his job. Because this is the critical thing to understand. He did not make a mistake. He made a delivery. Keir Starmer was facing the most dangerous rebellion of his leadership. Hoyle ended it. The tears were theatre. The result was a Labour leader protected from his own party by the man who is constitutionally required to be neutral. That was not a one-off. That was a demonstration of function. THE HIDDEN HAND August 2025. Journalists filed a Freedom of Information request. Simple enough. Show us the Speaker's emails with the Israeli Embassy, with members of the Knesset, and with Labour Friends of Israel. Hoyle blocked them personally. Claimed the disclosure would prejudice the effective conduct of public affairs. His father founded Labour Friends of Israel. Hoyle visited Israel in November 2023 as a guest of the Netanyahu government while the bodies were still being counted. He came home. He manipulated the Gaza vote. He blocked the emails. You do not hide correspondence you are proud of. You hide the hand that feeds. THE QUESTIONS HE BURIES While Reform sits in near silence, while the party of millions is called six times in two years, ask yourself what questions are not being asked. The rape gang inquiry. Decades of industrialised child sexual abuse in Rotherham, Telford, Rochdale, Oldham and 149 other districts across England. Thousands of victims. Years of institutional cover up. A national statutory inquiry that only began work in April 2026 after years of political obstruction. The survivors are still waiting. The chamber stays quiet. The eight billion pound migration bill. Asylum support costs the British taxpayer between four and eight billion pounds every single year. Every year. While NHS waiting lists grow. While pensioners freeze. While working families choose between heating and eating. 627,000 non-EU migrants entered the UK between December 2024 and December 2025 alone. The questions that would demand answers for this do not get called. The police. Hoyle presides over a parliament that has not had a single meaningful PMQs exchange on two-tier policing. On the documented reality that protesters on one side of an argument are arrested within hours while those on the other face nothing. That ordinary British people have been prosecuted for social media posts while violence on the streets goes unpunished. The police are never held to account in that chamber. The Home Secretary is never pressed. The question never gets called. London. The capital city of the United Kingdom has become a place where the murder rate makes international headlines, where businesses close, where families leave, where violence is the background noise of daily life for millions of people. At Prime Minister's Questions, London's destruction is not spoken of. It is managed away. Swallowed by procedure and the Speaker's choice of who stands up next. Two-tier justice. The most corrosive accusation in British public life. That the law is applied differently depending on who you are, where you come from and what you believe. That one group protests and goes home, another is kettled, arrested and charged. This demands the floor of the House of Commons more than almost anything else alive in British politics today. It does not get the floor. Because Lindsay Hoyle controls the floor. And the floor stays clean. THE MAN WHO SHOULD BE HOUNDED Here is what common sense tells you. The Prime Minister answers to Parliament. Parliament answers to the public. But Lindsay Hoyle controls what Parliament is allowed to ask. Which means Lindsay Hoyle, in practical terms, controls what the Prime Minister ever has to answer for. He sits one step above the entire chain of accountability and nobody is pointing at him. He is not the Speaker of the House. That title flatters him with neutrality he abandoned years ago. He is the man who decides which questions about the running of the United Kingdom are permitted inside the only building in this country with the constitutional power to demand answers. That man should face more scrutiny than the Prime Minister. More pressure. More public attention. After every single PMQs, every person in this country who watched a question go unasked, who saw Reform sit silent, who watched the Prime Minister dodge something that was never even put, should be on his account on X demanding to know why. Which questions he buried that day. Which MP he did not call. Which scandal he let pass without a single moment of sunlight. He has hidden behind the procedural robes of his office for seven years. He has relied on the public not knowing what he controls. On the assumption that scrutiny stops at the despatch box and never reaches the chair above it. That assumption ends here. Lindsay Hoyle is accountable to every person in this country for every question that died in that chamber unasked. For every rape gang victim whose story never forced a minister to their feet. For every Londoner whose city rotted while the chamber debated safer ground. For every person watching two-tier justice play out on their phone who looked at Parliament and saw silence. He chose that silence. Week after week. Session after session. He should be treated accordingly. THE THEFT While he runs the kill switch on your democracy, he extracts the maximum personal benefit available. Three hundred and seventy thousand pounds in taxpayer-funded foreign travel. First-class flights. Five-star hotels. Eight hundred pounds a night in Qatar. Five hundred pounds to ship an extra suitcase to South Africa. Errors in the official expense logs he was forced to correct after journalists filed Freedom of Information requests. When the Daily Mail exposed the scale of it, he did not apologise. He changed the rules. Reduced expense publication from monthly to quarterly. Less transparency. Less scrutiny. More darkness. His wife, Catherine Swindley, employed on the public payroll as his part-time constituency secretary. The same wife who succeeded him as Labour councillor for Adlington when he became an MP. The same public money. The same family. Different job title. He earns one hundred and sixty thousand pounds a year. He lives in a grace-and-favour apartment inside the Palace of Westminster. He keeps nearly three hundred gifts accumulated over four years. And in February 2026, while on yet another taxpayer-funded trip abroad, he telephoned the Metropolitan Police and tipped them off that Peter Mandelson was a flight risk, triggering the former Labour peer's arrest. The Met apologised for revealing he was the source. He volunteered nothing. He was caught. THE SHAPE OF IT Look at what is documented here. Not rumour. Not inference. Documented, Hansard-confirmed, FOI-verified, Register of Members Interests-recorded fact. A Speaker born into Labour, promoted by Labour, who spent 22 years as a Labour MP before taking a chair that demands absolute neutrality. Who broke 400 years of parliamentary convention to save a Labour leader from his own party. Who blocked Freedom of Information requests about his private correspondence with foreign officials. Who called the leader of the fastest-growing political party in Britain six times in two years. Who shortened Prime Minister's Questions from 71 minutes to 33. Who refuses to judge whether the Prime Minister answers truthfully. Who changed his own expense rules when the public found out what he was spending. Who employed his wife on public money. Who tipped off police from a foreign hotel room and hoped nobody would find out. Who has accumulated three hundred and seventy thousand pounds in travel expenses and counting. Who buried questions on rape gangs, two-tier policing, London's collapse and open borders week after week while calling it procedure. The question is not whether Lindsay Hoyle is compromised. His own record answers that beyond any serious argument. The question is why this is the first time you are reading it. The Speaker can be removed by a motion of the House. The Standards Committee has authority to investigate. The Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards can receive complaints today. The 50 MPs who signed no confidence motions in 2024 had the numbers and the cause. They chose to protect him. Because he protects them. Because the system protects itself. Because the questions that would destroy them on rape gangs, on open borders, on the eight billion pound annual bill you never voted for, those questions die in Lindsay Hoyle's inbox every single week. He is not a failed Speaker. He is a successful one. The measure of his success is what survives. He survives. The corruption survives. The unanswered questions survive. The buried inquiries survive. The silenced opposition survives. And you pay for the flights. The evidence is in the public record. It has always been there. The question is whether enough people in this country still have the courage to read it, say it out loud, and refuse to look away. All facts are drawn from Hansard parliamentary records, the Register of Members Financial Interests, Freedom of Information responses, GB News, BBC News, The Guardian, The Telegraph, The Daily Mail, Declassified UK, Politico and contemporaneous reporting between November 2019 and October 2026.

I mean; I knew leftists were retarded, but....

This is just not true. As soon as I became foreign secretary I asked the security services the same question and they replied that there was no evidence of any successful interference in the 2016 referendum, by Russia or any other power. Either the security services have changed their view - which would be very odd - or Burnham is lying about what he has been told. After all Starmer was in power for two years and had access to exactly the same information. theguardian.com/technology/2…