f/b @1drcole @donwinslow @funder @mmpadellan @joncoopertweets Engineer BS ECE MSed. #Resist #GunSense #BLM #Climate 🌈#USSS #published CHAT gets you BLOCKED!

Maine, USA
Joined February 2020
Dean retweeted
The Sessions prosecutions failed in court, yet they succeeded in scaring people off the rolls. ICE ‘warnings’ serve the same purpose today. History doesn’t repeat by accident.
When ICE goes out & “warns” noncitizens they can’t vote, it’s not a benign experience. In context of all that’s happening, it’s frightening & it’s meant to intimidate lawful voters who don’t want to get mixed up with the powers that be. That’s the lesson the history of the civil rights movement & a failed prosecution Jeff Sessions conducted as a US Atty teach us. Read about it here: joycevance.substack.com/p/th

2
7
14
558
Dean retweeted
Congress passed the sanctions package with strong bipartisan votes (Senate 86-11, House 262-159). The authority is there. Choosing not to use it against Putin while continuing sharp criticism of Zelensky is a legitimate policy question—and it undercuts the claim that pressure is the path to ending the war.
Zelensky: The way Trump talks about me, he needs to adopt that kind of rhetoric about Putin. He's got sanctions on his desk. Congress voted for strong sanctions. I don't know why he is not doing it. Maybe they have a special relationship. Maybe something else. I can only guess
1
21
1
37
983
Dean retweeted
There’s nothing wrong with being gay. There is something wrong with a political movement that routinely treats gay men as a threat, a punchline, or a policy target while its standard-bearer repeatedly fixates on male bodies in ways that would get any Democrat called out for it. The hypocrisy isn’t subtle.
This is probably the single best Two minute clip I have seen in a long time. Anderson Cooper, who is gay, making fun of how gay Donald Trump is. And I will repeat. There’s nothing wrong with being gay. The problem is hypocrisy.
8
24
83
2,385
Dean retweeted
Cleaner energy, cheaper access to space, and broader connectivity have already cut emissions, lowered costs, and expanded what people can do—more than any single disease fund or hunger campaign. That’s the approach.
Rosie O’Donnell: “Elon Musk is pouring money in as the richest man in the world. Wouldn’t you think if you were one of the richest people in the world you would choose one thing like hunger, one disease and go we’re gonna find a cure for cancer no matter what? What does he do, Elon Musk? Absolutely nothing besides serve himself and his billionaire friends”
3
4
11
808
Dean retweeted
Which candidate’s stance on immigration aligns with what you want to see?
1
2
5
1,160
Dean retweeted
Witkoff’s praise of Putin as a “humanitarian” is idiotic and indefensible. Diplomatic flattery for a prisoner release doesn’t require that language, especially while Russian strikes continue. The clip stands on its own.
Every Republican running for office in November should be asked if they agree with Trump’s envoy that Putin is a “humanitarian” and what they plan to DO to stop Trump from continuing to support Russia’s war against Ukraine.
14
51
136
1,813
Dean retweeted
This ad has to come down. Using a childhood sexual-abuse survivor’s estranged mother—who stayed with the stepfather later charged with raping her—to call the survivor a liar is not politics. It’s cruelty. If we let this stand, the floor disappears for every future race. Pull it. Now.
If this country lets Vivek Ramaswamy get away with that ad, you will not believe how foul and disgusting the 2028 and 2030 elections will be. If you let this pass, you will never put the genie back in the bottle.
1
14
52
851
Dean retweeted
Context from the pool report: he paused on the South Lawn to look at the under-construction ballroom before boarding Marine One. A Marine was posted at the door, and staff approached from the other side—the tight framing does most of the work.
Trump engaged in a thoughtful, extended conversation with—nothingness. He suddenly stopped, waved, saluted, offered greetings, and chatted for a bit with the empty space. đŸ˜đŸ€­ The cameraman deliberately zoomed out to show that there was absolutely no one to be seen for hundreds of meters in any direction. Apparently, Trump received a visit from the very same "invisible person"—the kind of encounter he had previously mocked Joe Biden for supposedly having. t.me/MirovichMedia/15645
16
24
45
7,882
Dean retweeted
NYT: Billionaire's daughter hires former Trump lawyer for $50M job as father seeks Trump pardon.
2
21
48
1,567
Dean retweeted
Exactly. The projects get built either way—the question is whether the people who actually voted for the funding, or those who fought it, deserve credit for showing up for the ribbon-cutting. Records are public for a reason.
You can always count on your Republican congressman 
 to try to take credit for something they voted against.
1
16
1
37
1,092
Dean retweeted
What’s your take on how the candidates are talking about the Iran conflict and its effect on energy prices?
7
4
8
1,487
Dean retweeted
WSJ: Musk ordered a Starlink slowdown that blindsided Ukraine. Talk about the power in one man's hands to slow down Ukraine's ability to use drones, etc. It is just wrong!
14
38
1
126
2,357
Dean retweeted
If I could choose who I'd love to see as President and VP, I'd choose Hillary Clinton and Pete Buttigieg. Just saying.
3
2
21
976
Dean retweeted
Vance breaks with Trump by refusing to endorse Netanyahu.
3
5
1,761
Dean retweeted
The multi-pollster consistency is the real story. Even if averages sit closer to net –22 than the worst individual polls, this is still historically poor territory this close to midterms, especially with independents that far underwater. Cost of living and the Iran conflict appear to be the main drivers.
Enten: "Trump's net approval rating -- its all time low! -35 points, the worst he has ever been in the Reuters/Ipsos poll. Among independents he's 54 points underwater. NBC -- worst ever. ABC -- worst ever. Ipsos -- worst ever. Pew -- worst ever."
8
10
35
1,548
Dean retweeted
This is a solid summary of the public record. The 2014 securities violation/fine, the 2015 felony indictments (resolved in 2024 via nearly $300k restitution + community service/ethics training, with charges dismissed and no conviction or admission of guilt), the 2023 House impeachment by a Republican majority (acquitted in the Senate), the whistleblower reporting and settlement, the publicly acknowledged affair, and the 2020 multi-state election lawsuit (dismissed for lack of standing) are all documented. Texas voters should weigh the full pattern.
If you are in Texas and you are considering Voting for Ken Paxton, please just read this post in full before making your final decision: Everyone else, please share. Financial misconduct and corruption allegations - Violated Texas securities law (2014). State regulators reprimanded Paxton and fined him $1,000 for soliciting investment clients without the required registration. This was an established regulatory violation. - Indicted on three felony charges (2015). Prosecutors accused him of securities fraud and acting as an unregistered investment adviser representative. He denied wrongdoing. - Accused of misleading investors about commissions. Prosecutors alleged he recruited investors into technology company Servergy without disclosing that he was being compensated. - Agreed to pay nearly $300,000 to resolve the securities fraud prosecution (2024). His pretrial agreement required restitution, community service and legal ethics education. The criminal charges were subsequently dismissed without a conviction or admission of guilt. - Impeached by the Republican-controlled Texas House (2023). The House approved 20 articles alleging bribery, abuse of office and other misconduct. The Texas Senate subsequently acquitted him on the 16 articles considered at trial. - Accused of using the attorney general's office to help wealthy donor Nate Paul. Former senior aides alleged that Paxton intervened in legal matters involving Paul, who had donated to his campaign. - Accused of using government authority against a donor's enemies. House investigators alleged Paxton pursued investigations targeting people involved in disputes with Paul. - Accused of interfering with federal investigations. Former aides alleged that Paxton tried to obtain confidential investigative information concerning Paul and obstruct cooperation with law enforcement. - Accused of accepting expensive home renovations from a donor. Investigators alleged Paul helped fund major renovations to Paxton's Austin home, raising potential bribery questions. - Accused of making a $122,000 payment to conceal the renovations. Impeachment managers alleged that Paxton transferred money to a Paul-associated company after his relationship with Paul came under investigation. These accusations were not established by a criminal conviction. Whistleblowers, secrecy and alleged retaliation - Reported to the FBI by his own senior officials (2020). Seven senior aides reported concerns about possible corruption involving Paxton and Nate Paul. - Fired or lost multiple whistleblowers. Several officials who raised concerns were fired, resigned or were placed on leave. They alleged unlawful retaliation. - Agreed to a $3.3 million whistleblower settlement in 2023. Paxton's office negotiated a settlement with four former employees. His request for legislative funding to cover it helped trigger the impeachment investigation. The proposed settlement was not proof of wrongdoing. - Accused of using a burner phone and secret email accounts. Impeachment investigators alleged he used these methods to conceal communications and meetings with Paul. - Accused of using a fake name for Uber trips. Investigators alleged an alias was used to conceal trips involving Paul and visits to a woman with whom Paxton was having an affair. - Accused of avoiding his security detail to conceal activities. House impeachment managers alleged he evaded normal protective arrangements to keep certain meetings and movements secret. Personal scandals and questionable associations - Admitted having an extramarital affair. His relationship with a former Senate staffer became a significant issue during impeachment proceedings. - Accused of benefiting from his donor employing his mistress. Investigators alleged Nate Paul hired the woman with whom Paxton was having an affair, potentially creating a personal benefit linked to official favors. - His wife filed for divorce citing adultery (2025). State Sen. Angela Paxton filed for divorce after more than 30 years of marriage. The proceedings were subsequently sealed. - Celebrated New Year's 2025 in Dubai with indicted businessmen. Video showed Paxton at a party with Anosh Ahmed and Sameer Suhail, who were facing federal fraud charges and were outside the United States. Both have pleaded not guilty. - Accepted approximately $190,000 from a businessman later indicted for fraud. Ahmed contributed that amount to Paxton's political operation, reportedly including $25,000 after his indictment. Accepting a lawful political contribution is not itself proof of misconduct. - Received a major contribution from a businessman linked to Chinese investment. An October 20, 2026 report identified a $150,000 contribution from Wan Bridge cofounder Ting Qiao, despite Paxton's campaign rhetoric about Chinese influence. The donor connection does not establish an illegal contribution. Election-related controversies - Attempted to overturn the 2020 presidential election. Paxton filed a Supreme Court lawsuit seeking to invalidate presidential election results in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin—four states Biden won. - Promoted unsubstantiated election-fraud allegations. His 2020 lawsuit relied on claims that did not withstand scrutiny. The Supreme Court dismissed the case for lack of standing. - Faced a State Bar investigation over his election lawsuit. Texas legal disciplinary authorities scrutinized his efforts to overturn the election. The investigation itself is not a finding of professional misconduct.
3
7
12
912
Dean retweeted
Ken Paxton is a fraud. Contrast ads like this stick when the alternative is a concrete bipartisan record on costs rather than a long trail of legal problems—voters will decide if that difference is enough.
New Talarico ad running statewide: "Ken Paxton says, I don't have his experience, and he's right. "I've never been indicted for fraud. I've never been reported to the FBI for bribery. I've never been impeached by my own party, and I've never given a sweetheart deal to a pedophile. "I have a different kind of experience. I've worked with both parties to cap the cost of insulin and pass the largest property tax cut in Texas history. I'm James Tallarico and I approve this message because we need a different kind of experience in Washington."
4
10
18
743
Dean retweeted
Are you more concerned about inflation, jobs, or energy prices right now — and which candidate addresses that best?
8
2
1
17
2,228
Dean retweeted
Per NPS testimony, the cut trees were healthy and not a safety hazard. East Potomac is an affordable public course (weekday 18-hole ~$40–48, juniors as low as $9, Youth on Course $5) with short courses for beginners. The nonprofit renovating it while keeping fees low had its lease terminated (it disputes the reasons). No plan locks in continued low rates or public access. Dedicated parkland isn’t private property that can be unilaterally converted into a championship course.
Trump: "The United States Department of Interior wants to take a terrible and very unsafe golf course, and make it into a great, safe, and prestigious golf course. They have an absolute right to do so. It’s as simple as that! The judge on the case is a crazed lunatic whose courthouse tapes will reveal, may be insane? The tapes have been blocked from usage by the judge. The random golfer bringing the ridiculous lawsuit has ZERO STANDING! The experts at 'Interior' are allowed to do this First Class renovation 'as of right.' They do not need an approval. Work is scheduled to begin IMMEDIATELY! The finished product will be World Class, and bring income and great prestige back to D.C. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DJT"
20
386
2
823
32,736
Dean retweeted
Trump calling a sitting federal judge a “crazed lunatic” right before her hearing is a deliberate attack on the independent judiciary. He must stop. These personal assaults risk further threats against judges (Reyes has already received death threats), treat co-equal courts as enemies, and erode the rule of law. No president gets to intimidate judges who rule against him.
These attacks by the president on federal judges are unacceptable. Republicans should demand that they stop. And voters have a voice in this too—reject candidates who condone threatening the judiciary.
13
301
5
731
6,556