Mint Anything, Own Everything | Devs: https://xitter.cf/t.co/DBr3rhMWwE | Support: @RelayX_Support | Links 👉 https://xitter.cf/t.co/EQSms1mTHY
Joined April 2019
- Tweets4K
- Following1.4K
- Followers8.2K
- Likes3.6K
Acktually, you just need BSV to pump
The amount of energy necessary to successfully hijack the #Bitcoin network is far beyond the reach of any single organization or nation-state. Since the Bitcoin network consensus rules cannot be unilaterally changed, it is most likely that all players will simply adapt to its rules. As the old adage says: "If you can't beat 'em, join 'em." Clip from WiM314 w/ @saylor
Instead of innocent until proven guilty
The new policy from the fake BSV association is seizure until proven innocent
Well presumably the aim would be to reduce cost - so if there’s some disruption to the network that seems like it may be illegal activity then there are two options:
1. Act immediately to prevent further disruption, and take on the risk of BSVA being sued by the entity causing it, perhaps having to pay this entity damages is they were doing nothing wrong as decided by a court of law.
2. Do nothing, leaving the businesses who built on BSV with an unstable network. Sue the entity for disruption. Eventually a court may agree, then it seizes the assets of the entity causing the trouble which stops them from continuing. By that time most businesses will have perhaps found other tech to build on or have gone bankrupt.
It’s not up to me, but I’d pick 1.
Both options are idiotic
How about you just build a business that still profits despite network disruptions
Instead of trying to change the network
Imagine blaming the network for your business incompetence
Well presumably the aim would be to reduce cost - so if there’s some disruption to the network that seems like it may be illegal activity then there are two options:
1. Act immediately to prevent further disruption, and take on the risk of BSVA being sued by the entity causing it, perhaps having to pay this entity damages is they were doing nothing wrong as decided by a court of law.
2. Do nothing, leaving the businesses who built on BSV with an unstable network. Sue the entity for disruption. Eventually a court may agree, then it seizes the assets of the entity causing the trouble which stops them from continuing. By that time most businesses will have perhaps found other tech to build on or have gone bankrupt.
It’s not up to me, but I’d pick 1.
RelayX retweeted
Hollywood is officially dead as of 2 hours ago.
Prompt: “A stylish woman walks down a Tokyo street filled with warm glowing neon and animated city signage. she wears a black leather jacket, a long red dress, and black boots, and carries a black purse. she wears sunglasses and red lipstick. she walks confidently and casually. the street is damp and reflective, creating a mirror effect of the colorful lights. many pedestrians walk about.”
RelayX retweeted
i think we can all agree BSV has the most creative, productive entrepreneurs and developers — hence the success with Ordinals. owning a little BSV is having a stake in that future success
BSV ASS is not in the whitepaper
Trolls
📣 JUST IN: The @BSV_Assn is thrilled to announce the launch of the Network Access Rules (NAR), which govern the relationship between the Association and nodes on the BSV Network.
Dive into details here: hubs.la/Q02lckZT0
RelayX retweeted
I never said anything about this before
But a lot of people are asking me how BSV people front-ran Ordinals
I'll just say
The amount of misinformation out there about BSV
I've seen over the past couple years
Smart people who never even looked into it
Dismissing it because of "faketoshi"
Is mind-blowing