Journal? (@RegularSanStan) header
Journal? (@RegularSanStan) profile picture

Anarchist who likes eco-socialism and philosophical cynicism. Whose boring? YOU'RE boring.

He/Him
Joined April 2020
Photo by Journal? (@RegularSanStan)Photo by Journal? (@RegularSanStan)Photo by Journal? (@RegularSanStan)Photo by Journal? (@RegularSanStan)Photo by Journal? (@RegularSanStan)Photo by Journal? (@RegularSanStan)Photo by Journal? (@RegularSanStan)Photo by Journal? (@RegularSanStan)Photo by Journal? (@RegularSanStan)Photo by Journal? (@RegularSanStan)
Gash Bell aka Zatch Bell CH285 Clear Note is the most Yoshihiro Togashi coded character design I've seen especially with the blue jeans & plain t shirt. If you didn't know better you'd assume this was from Hunter X Hunter.
27
78
4
766
38,355
I love the notion that artists sell their work because of an insistence on not becoming proletarians for unknown reasons and not because no one hires them.
Replying to @BoothsRiley
Sorry, thats too nuanced and rational for the Twitter marxists. The question is, to play devil's advocate, should you not support the further dissolution of the petite bourgeois (in this case, artists who sell their work) that are disenfranchised to be fully proletariat by this?
3
21
2
227
4,083
smear campaign and it's just posting her own words
Anyone know what’s going on with the very sudden smear campaign of @zei_squirrel?
20
171
1
2,980
47,482
The black panthers, Modibo Kidale, Walter Rodney and Franz Fanon would like to have a word.
Replying to @InDaFlesh07
honestly communism just doesn't mix well with black nationalism
2
18
1
129
3,778
any ancap with a brain here care to explain who stops the richest guy from hiring an army and declaring himself the gov?
10
2
1
27
860
This Zionist turd harassed a Palestinian coffee shop out of business in North Oakland. Fake victim, real legal harassment.
13
305
7
3,579
49,558
Dawg, why are my haters so weird about me? Genuinely strange, not like I'm a public figure lol
EcoTechBro never "groomed" me to defend Marxism what lol? Marxism is still communist, it's just inferior to anarchism and it's not a viable path to communism. It underestimates the danger of states and most Marxists are psychotic revisionists who poisoned their movement forever.
12
2
116
3,048
Journal? retweeted
Replying to @postmanShmerg
Ratards doing it again,Another video lying with misdirection. Its too easy proving this false.
5
4
79
2,729
Replying to @abdirahman_raw
You should consider ending it all
1
6
364
You want me to explain why something is immoral without using morals? lol you're a fucking dunce
1
1
28
271
Journal? retweeted
Replying to @chlorbee
That entirely depends upon the meaning of your term. If by Authoritarian you mean using force, yes. If by Authoritarian you mean centralizing structures of oppression and control, not inherently. The former would effectively make a slave authoritarian for rebelling.
5
4
2
43
1,733
Replying to @not__vee
It's not illegal to feed homeless people. It's illegal to give unsafe food to people, homeless or not. It's also why some places discard food in its packaging vs intentionally opening and destroying / spoiling it. It gives desperate homeless dumpster divers a chance at free packaged food without the legal risk associated with direct to consumer distribution.
1
2
7
556
Journal? retweeted
Muchos Marxistas-Leninistas creen que la única razón por la que una persona puede trabajar es solo por obligación, parten de la noción de que la gente es vaga por naturaleza, algo rebatido. No son comunistas, son liberales en negación. Están atrapados en el fracaso bolchevique.
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
13
53
2
299
14,745
Replying to @HoppeanGhoul
nothing i said was wrong, loser
1
1
15
171
Ancaps for some reason:
This Post is from a suspended account. Learn more
15
205
4
5,078
60,451
Earth absolutely can provide for more humans. It’s just that a certain harmful subspecies of human known as the “billionaire” contributes 1,000,000% more to the uninhabitability of the planet than the average human
Scientists are proposing halving the world’s population down to 4 billion by 2200 They argue Earth cannot provide for humanity’s explosive growth
218
14,237
98
91,913
1,174,769
Journal? retweeted
They cant refute what im saying so they must pretend im saying something else, many such cases!
The left-prags are now making neo-prag arguments but with “borders” replaced with “minimum wage.”
2
1
2
270