Red retweeted
Pour moi, c'est l'image la plus horrible de ce 17 octobre:
Un couple d'octogénaire dépouillé de tout, en pleine rue, laissé à moitié nu.
Comme si les Rolex, les Vuiton, les Hermès, les Dior, les Sephora pillés n'étaient pas suffisants pour la revente.
L'image qui devrait être un signal d'alarme pour tout l'occident.
L'image d'un pseudo président qui a perdu le contrôle. Qui a totalement échoué envers son peuple.
L'image d'une gauche radicale qui a sacrifié votre propre identité pour faire de votre pays une zone de guerre, aux arrières-plans culturels qui n'ont rien à voir avec les vôtres.
Cette image est effrayante!
These people are invaders and the people supporting them are invaders.
Red retweeted
Célestin le gauchiste part à la rencontre de Karl Marx et quelque chose d'incroyable se produit.
Red retweeted
Generally, FSD does a great job on county roads/dirt roads. In the clip below, Tesla FSD 14.3.7 was active on this narrow dirt with loose gravel road. I believe that road speed limit is 20 MPH. FSD chose to go an inappropriate speed. It reached 30 MPH on a straight part of the road...not ideal. What really was uncomfortable, FSD was going too fast around curves. Around one of the curves, FSD was going 27-28 MPH, and slid slightly, causing the traction control symbol to appear on the screen. FSD was in Standard Mode, ended up going Sloth because FSD sentience just wasn’t learning.
FSD needs to identify, adapt, and have better speed management on hazardous roads and different terrain.
Speaking of hazardous road conditions and speed management...with our past experiences with the last couple winter seasons, FSD isn't there just yet mastering the snowy/icy road conditions. In the 2024 winter season, we rarely used FSD because it didn't drive appropriately. In the 2025 winter season, FSD started out driving poorly on snowy and icy roads. Towards the end of the season, FSD started to change it's behavior in a good way, but FSD still had some bad moments. What we noticed is FSD would drive the posted speed limits, and as if it were normal dry roads even though slushy/light snowy/icy patches on the road were present. FSD still had troubles with all that, especially not taking caution when going downhill and curvy roads (look back at clip footage in our past X posts or our YouTube Channel for reference if you wish).
We are really anxious to see what abilities and improvements @teslasi gives FSD (hopefully V15) this winter season. We hope FSD is better at identifying light snow, slush, and ice to adapt to a more appropriate driving behavior, and better speed management. I remember how people got excited, I did too because it is impressive, when FSD would counter-steer in the snow. The problem there, if FSD is counter-steering, it means it was going too fast. And the other problem with that, FSD never learned "I'm sliding, I need to slow it down and be more cautious." Again, speed management is necessary in the winter season. And to the "you need snow tires to not slide around!" crowd, you don't. Can it help, yes. But even in snow tires, people still slide around. I never put snow tires on any of my own vehicles, nor the Tesla Model Y 2025 or Model Y 2026. When driving manually, having like new condition all-season tires, adapting to the road conditions, and speed management gives you a safer, less sliding all over the place drive. @elonmusk @aelluswamy
Tesla Self-Driving generally does good in the heavy snow. In this particular spot FSD doesn’t slow around this tight curve and slides into the other lane. FSD attempts to correct, but fails by not slowing down. FSD told me to take over immediately. Kinda sucks it put us in a bad situation, and had me fix it. It’s like FSD said, “Oops, sorry. Good luck!” @elonmusk @aelluswamy @teslasi
Red retweeted
Replying to @TeslaNewswire
Was driving yesterday on the freeway going about 75mph on FSD. The car in front of me ran over a blown 18-wheeler tire in our lane. FSD immediately reacted to the debris by swerving to the right lane. Obviously it saw that there wasn’t a car beside me. Instantaneous reaction. When I looked in my rear view mirror, the car behind me couldn’t react in time and ran over the blown tire as well. Both the human driver in front of me and behind me weren’t quick enough to react yet FSD did! I can’t thank the Tesla AI team enough! This most likely prevented thousands of dollars in potential damages to the car
Red retweeted
Replying to @ThomasSowell
Communication is impossible across a 30-point IQ gap. Each thinks the other is speaking gibberish.
Only one of them is correct.
Red retweeted
It was shocking and appalling to hear french officials make the case to delay life saving self-driving technology.
Their proposed changes, to require hands on the wheel and to not allow speeding, could, of course, be implemented but would actually make the software less safe. Millions of people are now using this software all over the world, including in Europe. The design has been honed over the years to be incredibly safe. Rather than demanding software changes for the French market, I recommend regulators try to understand why their suggestions would actually decrease safety.
Requiring people to keep their hands on the wheel sounds like a great idea, until you realize that NHTSA cited accidental disengagement as a top reason for ADAS crashes. When people are required to touch / pull on the wheel to satisfy the torque sensor, they sometimes accidentally turn the system off and don't realize it. That can cause a crash.
That's why Tesla and the rest of the industry have moved away from requiring users to pull on the wheels. Instead, they now use advanced camera-based driver monitoring systems that can check whether the user is looking at the road and whether their hands are free and ready to take over. This is much safer than requiring them to pull on the wheel every few seconds. Requiring hands on the wheel also dramatically decreases usage of the feature, which reduces the positive safety impact.
Insisting that the system follow the speed limit also sounds reasonable at first, until you start to think about it. Cruise control and lane keeping system can already be set at a higher speed than the speed limit today. Why should a more advanced ADAS be held to a different standard than a primitive lane keeping assist? Will users actually turn off self-driving and use cruise control or lane keeping assist features that are less safe so that they can set the speed they choose?
The problem is, these systems can sometimes pick up the speed limit incorrectly. The model will choose the speed by looking at the speed limit, the road conditions, and the speeds of other cars on the road, so it can maintain safe driving even if the speed limit is off much like a human. But if you force the system to never drive faster than the detected speed limit, a minor error could become a disaster.
Let's say there is a highway with a speed limit of 70 mph. Earlier in the day there was construction and a temporary construction sign that said Slow speed limit 15 mph. If someone accidentally left that sign behind, for example, but construction had ended and traffic had cleared up, the car might incorrectly register the speed limit as 15 mph. If the system is forced by law to never exceed the speed limit, it would slow down to 15 mph on the highway abruptly and possibly cause a crash. It's important that the driver ultimately retains control and makes a decision about what speed a car should travel — not the legislature. This is a supervised ADAS system and the driver maintains legal liability for any speeding that happens. They still get to set the speed, and if they make an unsafe decision you can enforce that the same way you always have — through speed cameras, police officers, etc. But don't cripple the system in a way that will dramatically reduce usage, and increase crashes.
Just look at the examples in the clip below. Are you seriously going to justify delaying this technology for your citizens when your neighboring European countries are using it safely? If a kid is about to get hit by a car, like in some of the examples below, does it matter if the driver had their hand on the steering wheel or not when the AI stopped the car and prevented the crash?
The only explanation for such a backwards policy stance is protectionism. Simply put, the French are purposefully delaying life saving technology to protect their local industry and unions — even if it means letting their own citizens get injured and killed in the process. I hope there is still some sense left somewhere in the European Union. All you have to do is try the software for one hour to understand its potential to transform road safety.
xitter.cf/Tesla/status/208008766…
Red retweeted
🚨WOW!!!
A mother suffered a medical emergency going 60mph, totally unresponsive, with her little boy strapped in the backseat...
...a total stranger saw what was happening and used HIS OWN CAR to pin her SUV against the barrier and bring it to a stop, SAVING THEIR LIVES!!!
His name is Paul Jackson.
On Tuesday, Paul was driving down I-5 near Fife when he saw a white SUV cut across THREE lanes of traffic and start bouncing off the concrete divider...
Over and over.
He pulled up next to it and looked inside.
The driver was out cold, eyes rolled back in her head, completely unresponsive at highway speeds.
In the backseat he saw a TERRIFIED little boy strapped into his car seat.
"Somebody had to do something."
So Paul did what almost nobody would do: he used his own car to gently pin her SUV against the barrier and slowly squeezed it to a stop.
He slowly and carefully... glided her car to safety.
Then he jumped out, threw the car in park, got the little boy to safety, and stayed with the mother until EMTs arrived.
Paul was on his way to pick up his wife's BIRTHDAY CAKE when all this happened.
He sent her pictures from the scene as proof he wasn't making up an excuse for being late. 😂
"Had to have proof for my wife."
When asked why he did it, Paul didn't hesitate:
"God put me there to do that, I knew I was going to stop this vehicle no matter what."
THIS IS THE AMERICA I KNOW!!! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Red retweeted
Confidence that elections are secure
🇺🇸 America: 40%
🇳🇴 Norway: 89%
Voting method:
🇺🇸 America: widespread mail-in voting, electronic voting machines
🇳🇴 Norway: in person, paper ballots

















