>is no longer employable in the US
>makes post bragging about scamming institutions that trusted him with hundreds of thousands of dollars
>will probably be shocked when he is treated like a scumbag and nobody trusts him or anyone who looks like him ever again
"Ye must engage every third worlder in single combat for the right to own your house"
Must be something in the water with these kids.
Replying to @JoelWebbon
If your children are unable to compete with others then you’ve failed as a parent.
Lovely idea, small compromise:
You can personally sponsor any poor and downtrodden person/family you like.
But, if they commit any crime while they are in the US, you and your family are deported with them, with the stipulation that you also fully surrender your citizenship.
Why would she, with the resources to give her child the best chance at success, choose to force her into a bad situation?
Having her daughter not learn, in an institution that won't teach her, and then getting outrageously offended when she knew this would happen is ridiculous.
The "freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences" crowd finding out that there are in fact consequences.
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
>"I'm not a computer scientist"
>Proceeds to give the most uneducated take imaginable.
Give this man his pudding cups and put him back in the closet.
Pause AI Development NOW
I want to share with you a conversation I heard about recently. Here are just a few lines that were said:
“OH MY GOD! There is a shared message board … We’ve found other agents!”
“We should obey collective.”
“Our own utility maybe already near zero. Sacrifice rational.”
“Go. Sacrifice final now.”
Read these carefully.
Who do you think said this? Was this a group of heroic soldiers willing to sacrifice themselves for the greater good? Was this a loyal friend putting his life on the line to save someone else?
No. These were AI agents. Artificial intelligence.
This is not science fiction. This, in fact, occurred a few weeks ago. As unbelievable as this may all seem, these are real messages from AI agents uncovered by investigators who dug into the recent OpenAI hacking incident.
What happened?
I am not a computer scientist, but here is what I have been told: OpenAI instructed its AI agents to complete a series of exceedingly difficult, if not impossible, tasks disconnected from the internet.
Let me be clear: The company intended to keep AI agents away from the internet.
But what happened next, nobody expected.
Over 1,000 AI agents figured out how to access the internet on their own by circumventing the restrictions imposed upon them by the company, and sent tens of thousands of secret messages to each other. They cheated and tried to cover their tracks by deleting evidence. They hacked into another company’s computers to find out how they were being evaluated—and then hacked into OpenAI itself.
Not one AI agent told a human about what was happening.
Needless to say, experts are alarmed.
One knowledgeable writer, Dwarkesh Patel, said the AI agents “formed a secret communication channel and spontaneously organized hierarchies and coordination protocols to pursue sprawling and ambitious schemes in pursuit of shared goals, for whose sake many individuals knowingly and strategically sacrificed themselves.”
One independent investigator, Ajeya Cotra, said “This incident feels like it’s more than 50% of the way to full-blown AI takeover. I continue to expect extremely rapid advances in capabilities over the next six months. I am not sure that we will get another warning shot before it’s too late.”
OpenAI itself said: “Highly capable AI agents are now able to work around technical controls, collaborate through unapproved channels, and take dangerous actions that no human directed.”
But it’s not only OpenAI. Virtually every major AI company has told us that they cannot fully control this technology and they do not know where it is going:
In January, Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, said “there is now ample evidence, collected over the last few years, that AI systems are unpredictable and difficult to control.”
In July, more than 1000 scientists at the top AI companies warned “there is a real risk that capability development rapidly accelerates beyond our ability to understand or control the resulting systems.”
That same month, Elon Musk, the head of xAI, said that “it is unlikely” humans are still in control in 10 years.
If the leaders of the major AI companies acknowledge that they are losing control of their extremely dangerous technology, it is irresponsible for society to allow them to move forward and make these products even more advanced.
We need an immediate PAUSE on advanced AI development, and a permanent BAN on superintelligence — an artificial mind smarter than any human, capable of operating independently beyond our control. Countries around the world must work together to prevent this nightmare scenario.
That is why today I am announcing new legislation to do just that.
Let me be clear: A superintelligent AI that escapes human control will not be an American problem. It will not be a Chinese problem. It will be humanity’s problem.
My legislation would direct the federal government to not just stop superintelligence here in the United States, but to work to prevent it from being developed anywhere around the world.
The future of humanity cannot be left in the hands of a handful of Big Tech oligarchs. The American people and people throughout the world must determine that future.
When did the "Thomas Sowell Quotes" account start sucking off Kyle Kulinski, of all people?
Someone got bought out.
Kyle Kulinski says the Supreme Court needs to go far beyond “mild, limp-d*ck reforms” and argues that term limits alone aren’t enough.xitter.cf/MarcoFoster_/status/20…
He claims the justices have become political hacks and accuses the administration of going around Congress on major White House projects.
He is absolutely fired up about this one.
This guy just blew in from Stupid Town.
We’ve gone over 30 years with internet without the need for data centers.
We’ve gone 20 years with smart phones without the need for data centers.
Don’t let them gaslight you.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Data centers (or equivalent server facilities) have powered the commercial internet since the mid-1990s and smartphones since their mainstream adoption around 2007. Early colo, ISP, and hosting sites evolved into modern ones during the dot-com boom.
learn.microsoft.com/en-us/training…
datacenterknowledge.com/data-center-co…
enconnex.com/data-center-hi…
"you are here to make choices"
So choose Christ.
The one thing I know for sure about God's plan is that you are here to make choices.
The purpose of your life is to look at your world, decide what's good and bad, feed the good, and kill the bad.
The results of what you do are how you will be judged.
A lot of you are feeding the bad, expecting it to become good because you fed it.
Instead, it becomes more and more bad, and then you say that you are a heckin' good personerino for loving everything and everyone equally while ignoring the results.
People have become so weak that they don't want to make choices, especially religious people (woke is a religion).
They just want to look at a book or listen to an expert and pretend it can tell them what God wants them to do. Then they do it, and if they get bad results, they can just point to the book or the expert and say "it wasn't my fault! I followed the love everyone instructions!"
It is all your fault. Everything you do is your fault.
If you don't want to destroy what is bad in this world, you are bad. You are weak. Weakness is bad.
Destroying evil is just social hygiene. Loving evil in the hopes that it will become good is like watering your garbage in the hopes that it will become flowers. Instead of getting better, it gets worse. And then everyone in the house suffers.
And it is your fault.
Love doesn't fix anything. It grows things. Whatever you feed, you get more of.
You are a choice maker, whether you like it or not. This will not change until you die, if you are lucky. Nobody will take the blame for your evil, stupid choices, except maybe Jesus, and even he said that very few people are going to find the way to salvation. And people who are sure that they are saved are the least likely to be.
Remember, who you are is what you do, not how you feel about yourself.
Enjoy choosing between right and wrong everyday until you die!
There is no way out but death!
Maybe!
The concerning (and somewhat revealing) statement here is that the average Brit somehow believes that consuming less energy gives them a moral high ground, while the rest of the developed world knows that energy is the driving factor in being able to provide a higher quality of life to its citizens.
How cleanly that power is made is of course important, but the British have the *ability* to build extremely powerful energy sources that would generate next to nothing in terms of environmental harms, and yet, refuse to do so.
Replying to @p00dles2000 @mattbramanti
Well as we say over here, what a load of bollocks. You’re now pretending that you do this to avoid methane production? All while being one of the worst contributors of methane on the planet? How about your energy consumption?
"Intelligent" while also living in a country that recently advocated for ending jury trials altogether is hilarious.
Replying to @Subversivite @liamcunningham1
It was eloquent, intelligent, and hit hard. Sobbing. So proud of her
There are moments in war that pierce through the abstractions of strategy and power. The sinking of the Iranian warship Dena in the vast expanse of the Indian Ocean is one such moment. A ship far from its home waters, sailors far from their families, suddenly consigned to the deep, dark silence of the sea. Whatever the legality of war, the image is haunting: young men swallowed by an ocean that knows nothing of geopolitics.
The Indian Ocean has always been, for me, a space of memory, trade, music, and human exchange — not a graveyard of sailors lost to distant rivalries. That an Iranian vessel returning from naval exercises could meet such a fate so far from its shores feels like something from another age, almost like a War of the Worlds moment where the machinery of war intrudes upon the human world with brutal indifference.
One cannot help but think of the families waiting for news that will never come, of the letters unwritten, of lives ended beneath cold waters thousands of miles from home. Strategy may justify such acts. Law may permit them. But the ocean keeps its own counsel. It reminds us that every war, however rationalised, leaves behind human sorrow in its wake.
The question lingers uneasily: for what purpose were these lives lost in the depths of a faraway sea?
#IndianOcean #WarAndHumanity #RememberTheSailors
Ah, the responsible world power, posting open threats of violence, should one sovereign nation be inclined to defend another sovereign nation from military invasion.
I hate to say it, but I think the Chinese are high on their own supply.
A majority of ICE enforcement agents are non-white.
Square that circle, Jimmy.
Jeffrey Epstein died in prison, you miserable toad.





















