Magnetyc retweeted
What if letting go is the right thing?
London singer-songwriter Sienna Senate embraces emotional clarity and self-worth on ‘Do Your Thing’, a soulful reflection on knowing when to let go.
Watch the full show: colors.lnk.to/siennasenate
Magnetyc retweeted
ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE ROAD AT THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT
Sixty days later, still no charge sheet: Transport whistleblower Esethu Hasane barred from his office
This morning I reported for duty at the National Department of Transport. My 60-day precautionary suspension had lapsed. I was turned away and blocked from returning to my post.
The Department signed a notice of precautionary suspension on 8 September 2026 and served it on me on 9 September. My departmental email was disabled the same day.
What the suspension is really about
The notice gives four grounds. Each one is in the Department's own words:
1That I "raised allegations of procurement irregularities in Communication Chief Directorate in May 2026."
2That I "also filed a criminal complaint" with the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation (the Hawks).
3That I "allegedly leaked the department confidential information" to Sunday World.
4That I was "seen on television allegedly giving live interview on eNCA."
It concludes: "By your conduct, you have brought the department into disrepute."
South Africans should read those grounds slowly. Two of the four are simply descriptions of reporting wrongdoing. The other two describe answering the Department in public. None of them is a charge.
•I raised the allegations in May 2025, not May 2026. The notice gets the year wrong. That one digit hides a full year in which I reported internally to the very people who signed my suspension.
•I did not lay a criminal complaint. I made a protected disclosure to the Department of Public Service and Administration. The DPSA referred the matter to the Hawks because it took the view that my employer should have reported it under section 34 of PRECCA and had not. I co-operated with the investigators and told the Department every time they came. The law and section 195 of the Constitution require exactly that of a public servant.
•I have denied the leak on oath. The notice offers no document, no date and no communication to support it.
•The eNCA interview was a reply. On 6 September, at 08:15, on the written instruction of the Acting Director-General, the Department published a statement that named me and called my claims of victimisation "devoid of the truth." I gave the interview four hours later. I was then ordered to stop speaking. The Department's own statement was never taken
Still no charges
Sixty days have passed and I have received no charge sheet. Nobody has put a single allegation to me in a disciplinary process. Meanwhile, the Auditor-General has made an R6.8-million finding on the communications contracts I refused to approve.
The Department itself has appointed forensic investigators. Yet no disciplinary step has been taken against anyone involved in those contracts. The only person who has been suspended is me.
"Expect the department to be on the other side"
None of this surprises me. On 21 May 2025 I told the Acting Director-General that I was going to the Public Protector and the Public Service Commission. He replied in writing:
"I authorise investigations in the department, no one else… But once you decide to escalate beyond me, expect the department to be on the other side, and my role to that of the protector of its integrity."
On 3 September 2026, minutes after my request for records was refused, he wrote to a list that included the Minister's office and the forensic investigators:
"There will be consequences."
Six days later I was suspended. He has been as good as his word.
I call on the Minister of Transport to lift this unlawful bar on my return to work.
Since the Department insists on paying me to stay home, I will make good use of the time. I'm going back to preparing for my PhD defence, eating well, sleeping well, and being paid, for the eleventh time this year, to do absolutely nothing. Taxpayers, you're welcome. I would honestly rather be working.
Magnetyc retweeted
UP NEXT I London’s Sienna Senate isn’t going to force a thing.
Set a reminder for the premiere: colors.lnk.to/siennasenate
Magnetyc retweeted
Guys im not EFF but this made me shed a tear 😢 😭 💔
The work of ground forces is being undermined by the leader 😭
Magnetyc retweeted
Feels like a PERFECT morning for this, after all the BULLSHIT folks been droppin✌🏾
The party dyin in 4K 🎉🥳
TL cleanse.
40% or so of eligible voters didn't go out and vote, mainly Africans, and the DA base of voters went out in full force, while we out drinking and chilling and not voting just enjoying the holiday.
Magnetyc retweeted
Good Morning @JacintaNgobese 💚✊🏽
Good Morning @HermanMashaba 💚✊🏽
Good Morning Patriots 💚💚✊🏽
Until We Win 🇿🇦🇿🇦🇿🇦🇿🇦
#LGE2026 #Election2026
Magnetyc retweeted
It's a bloodbath!
Serves 'em right! They took our people for granted, ignored why they were elected, and forgot the history, legacy and role of the liberation movement.
Magnetyc retweeted
Wandile Sihlobo’s post below, and his pivotal point about “graduation” from AGOA, is an essential read.
SOUTH AFRICA’S GRADUATION OUT OF AGOA DOESN’T MEAN WE WON'T HAVE ACCESS TO THE U.S. MARKET. WE WILL HAVE ACCESS, BUT WITH SLIGHTLY HIGHER TARIFFS.
While we are now in a different political climate, I think it’s important to remember that aside from the issues the U.S. raised about South Africa’s eligibility to be part of AGOA, there have been some conversations for some time. For example, back in 2014, the focus, amongst other things, was on the reality that South Africa is an upper-middle-income country and should have graduated from AGOA to a full bilateral trade agreement with the U.S.
Of course, we had our own complications, both because of the Southern African Customs Union (SACU), which we can’t sign bilateral trade agreements without, and because we lobbied to keep benefiting from this unilateral approach (AGOA).
Looking back, if we had found a way to graduate out of AGOA, as we were pressured to do then, and started conversations about a trade agreement, we would be in a different climate than what we are seeing now.
Of course, this doesn’t mean countries with trade agreements are spared from drastic changes in U.S. trade policy; we see those changes affecting countries like Canada.
Beyond South Africa graduating out of AGOA, I think there is also confusion about the implications. Others frame it as a complete ban from the U.S. market, which is not the case.
Simply put, as South Africa transitions out of AGOA, the country would face an additional Most Favoured Nation tariff of around 3.4% on top of the existing tariffs the current U.S. Administration added to various countries.
Currently, some South African products enter the U.S. market at 12.5% tariffs (Liberation Day tariff). Without AGOA, these tariffs would rise to 15.9%, slightly reducing the competitiveness of some South African products in the U.S. market.
Still, one could argue that while this would be a challenging path, it would not necessarily be as catastrophic as we have faced in the past, when we faced much higher U.S. tariffs and still managed to compete.
Consider South Africa’s agriculture: in 2025, the South African farming sector faced tariffs of around 30%. Still, agricultural exports to the U.S. were strong.
South Africa’s agricultural exports to the U.S. in 2025 totalled US$504 million, down 3% from the previous year.
During the higher “Liberation Day Tariffs”, some South African agricultural exporters took advantage of the 90-day pause in the second quarter of 2025 and exported more volume than usual.
After this pause, exports cooled in the third and fourth quarters of 2025. Notably, South Africa’s agricultural exports to the U.S. fell 11% in the third quarter of 2025, compared with the same period in 2024, to US$144 million. In the last quarter, South Africa’s agricultural exports to the U.S. fell sharply by 39% to US$81 million. Still, the overall annual exports were encouraging.
Even this year, South Africa’s agricultural exports to the U.S. were strong. For example, South Africa's agricultural exports to the U.S. increased by 56% from the first quarter of 2026 to the second quarter of 2026, to US$123 million. The decline in U.S. tariffs, from 30% to 12.5%, among other factors, has been the major contributor to the increase in South Africa’s agricultural exports to the U.S.
The U.S. remains an important market for South African agriculture, accounting for about 4% of our agricultural exports. Main exports include citrus, berries, grapes, raisins, wine, fruit juices, apples, pears, apricots, and nuts.
Again, South Africa's graduation from AGOA must be viewed in context and may not mean a catastrophe. This is not to understate the impact some industries may feel as the increase in tariffs slightly reduces their competitiveness. Still, we must manage the sentiment and narrative around this issue well.
Above all, this yet again reminds us of the need to work hard to diversify South Africa’s export markets to growing regions such as Asia and the Middle East.
But export diversification must be framed correctly; it is not a replacement for the U.S., EU, UK, Africa, and other markets. These remain key, and we must work to retain our access to them.
--Wandile



























