[RG911Team] How to expose 9/11 “skeptics” and “debunkers”, Part 1 SKEPTIC: “Jet fuel and office fires can’t melt steel, but they can weaken it. Steel loses half its strength at 1100F.” TRUTH: This argument intentionally ignores a key fact: Evidence of melted and EVAPORATED steel was found at ground zero after 9/11 by many investigators and first responders, even though the fires could not get hot enough to cause this. Eyewitnesses include: -Lead WTC structural engineer Leslie Robertson -Structural engineering professor Jonathan Barnett -Structural engineering professor Abdolhassan Astaneh -MIT Engineering Professor Ahmed Ghoneim -NY Dept of Design and Construction Director Ken Holden -FEMA 9/11 Investigation Team -Structural Engineer Richard Garlock -Architect Bart Voorsanger -Debris Cleanup specialist Richard Riggs -Firefighter Joe O’Toole -Firefighter Phil Ruvolo -Firefighter Lee Turner -Peter Tully, Pres of Tully Construction -NYT reporter William Langewiesche -NYT science writer James Glanz Their testimonies were featured in the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, The History Channel and other mainstream sources… but the NIST 9/11 investigation team ignored them all. What could cause melting and evaporating steel at the Word Trade Center - and why did NIST ignore it? That’s a question the “debunkers” don’t want to answer.