Nick Hudson gives a short talk on what and who is behind the world's problems. Nothing new for those of us on the side of reality, but he sums it up very well.
m.youtube.com/watch?v=uGcWRK…
Nick Hudson telling some unconformable truths about how the world is in its current mess.
m.youtube.com/watch?v=hRY0Iq…
Unto the breach 🏴 retweeted
I’m drowning. I don’t even really know why I’m writing this, I just have no more options.
Since the Million Women March in November 2024, I have been relentlessly harassed, stalked and abused. Details about my children and my home address have been circulated, CCTV involving my children from wiring their school has been posted online, and I have been repeatedly reported to the police, whove searched my house, constant social Services reports to make me lose my daughter, malicuous HMRC, Child Benefit and other agency reports - en masse. Cleared every time but the process has been excruciating.
I have spent nearly two years in and out of court trying to protect myself. I eventually obtained a non-molestation order against one of the people involved. I am now being threatened with bailiffs over approximately £3,000 in their legal costs, despite the fact that I was the person seeking protection and was represented through Legal Aid and the NMO was awarded.
I am not posting this to ask anyone for money.
I just genuinely do not know where to turn anymore.
I have more court proceedings ahead of me, I am working as many hours as I physically can, I have barely slept for months and I am completely exhausted. I keep going into church, I keep praying, I keep telling myself to get through one more day, but I don't know how much more I can cope with.
I have a huge amount of evidence. Messages, court documents, voice notes, screenshots, police records, material showing people discussing me, monitoring me, sharing information about me and contacting people around me. Yet I feel as though I am constantly having to fight everything alone. @DC_Police absolutely refuse to help me, depsite all the evidence and proof.
This has already pushed me to the point of suicide, which they laughed about in their messages. I am frightened by how overwhelmed I feel again now. Im not okay.
I am not asking for money. I am asking for help.
Is there anyone reading this with proper legal training who can look at what is happening, tell me what my actual options are, and help me work out what I need to do next? A solicitor, barrister, legal academic, anyone with genuine experience in Family Court costs, enforcement, harassment, stalking, privacy or civil litigation.
I don’t need sympathy, I need someone who understands the law to help me find a way through this.
I cant keep on like this. Its just too much.
@perran4crh @AlexDaviesJones @NatalieFleetMP @Jess4Lowestoft @jessphillips
It's so sad that the leftists have reduced a great country to this.
Unto the breach 🏴 retweeted
For the avoidance of confusion her “Caribbean” husband is not some Mandingo figure
He’s white and owns a small island
He got citizenship there to avoid UK taxes on the hedge fund he runs 😂
"It's really upsetting - it's always been the most amazingly peaceful place to live and we've never experienced the level of overt racism that we’re witnessing"
Rachel, a Piddington resident, expresses her concern at some of the arguments made in opposition to plans for a nearby disused MoD base to house 1200 male asylum seekers.
#Newsnight
Unto the breach 🏴 retweeted
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN MIDWIVES DARE GO AGAINST THE NHS?
19 September 2017 — Qualified as a midwife.
21 October 2021 — Raised my first formal grievance.
2021–2022 — Raised a further three grievances.
7 February 2024 — Resigned after years of raising concerns.
March 2024 — Threatened by a Director that “whistleblowers go missing.”
March 2024 — Publicly accused of killing a baby. I did not kill that baby.
April 2024 — Further defamatory statements made about me killing a baby,
June 2024 — GDPR/data protection breach by University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust.
July 2024 — Malicious referral made about me to the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC).
July 2024 — Received threatening legal correspondence from Bevan Brittan solicitors.
February 2025 — Further defamation re killing a baby.
February 2025 — Devon and Cornwall Police attended my home following an accusation of harassment. I categorically deny that I harassed anyone.
March 2025 — High Court defamation proceedings.
Aug 2025 — High Court proceedings concerning the GDPR/data protection breach.
November 2025 — A colleague was referred to the NMC. I was named within that referral and defamed again. By the same individual as my previous NMC referral.
I qualified to care for women and babies.
I raised concerns because that was my professional duty.
LOOK AT WHAT FOLLOWED.
Grievances.
Resignation.
Threats.
Defamation.
Regulatory referrals.
Solicitors’ letters.
A data breach.
Police at my home.
Damage to my career and professional reputation.
Years spent chasing documents, evidence and answers.
And now — the High Court.
People constantly ask:
“WHY DON’T NHS STAFF SPEAK OUT?”
Perhaps we’re asking the wrong question.
WHAT HAPPENS TO NHS STAFF WHO DO SPEAK OUT?
What message does this send to the next nurse, midwife, doctor or healthcare professional who witnesses something they believe is unsafe?
Stay quiet and protect yourself?
Or speak up and risk everything?
I chose to speak.
I will not be frightened into silence.
Every document.
Every referral.
Every letter.
Every statement.
Every piece of evidence.
LET THE COURTS SEE IT.
This is bigger than me.
Whistleblowers must be able to raise concerns without fearing the destruction of their careers, livelihoods and reputations for daring to speak. @ArturNadol7566 @KenZeroHarm @YvetteCooperMP @andyburnham @Simonekatz4tay @BarbarasBack
These monsters run the country.
There was a girl in Rotherham. Twelve when the first man raped her. Fourteen when social services pulled her from school and called it "consensual." She was doused in petrol and told to burn if she talked.
She was one of 1,400.
Between 1997 and 2013, while the Alexis Jay Report later confirmed industrial-scale child sexual exploitation in Rotherham Metropolitan Borough, John Healey sat in Parliament representing that same borough. Twenty-nine years. Three constituencies. Same streets. Same schools. Same suffering.
In September 2012, The Times broke the story nationally and demanded an inquiry. Healey opposed it. His own website preserves the excuse: "I had an open mind but was not convinced this would help the abused girls."
Not convinced. While the men kept raping and the state kept not looking, Healey wanted more time. Two years later, the number was still 1,400.
Then came the money.
In 2014, UKIP MEP Jane Collins stood in Doncaster and accused Healey and two other Labour MPs of knowing about the abuse and doing nothing. They sued her for libel. In February 2017, Mr Justice Warby ruled in their favour. Collins was ordered to pay £54,000 to each MP. Healey pocketed fifty-four thousand pounds from a woman who accused him of failing those girls.
Total damages: £162,000. Total costs: over £670,000 billed to UKIP.
He did not hand it back. He did not donate it to survivors. He kept it.
Now look at the donors.
While positioning for Defence Secretary, Healey accepted £40,000 from two individuals, Nigel Grinyer and Barbara Follett, whose addresses the Register of Members' Financial Interests lists simply as "private." £40,000 in shadowy cheques while he prepared to accuse Nigel Farage of "secret donations."
Then the tax.
November 2025. Defence Secretary Healey failed to pay council tax on his London second home. An "administrative error," his office claimed. Sources confirmed he intended to claim the £1,469 back through parliamentary expenses. The man setting the national budget planned to bill you for his own oversight while his party stripped nine million pensioners of Winter Fuel Payments.
Then the charity.
Kin Kids. A Rotherham support group for kinship carers. Healey publicly backed it, pushed for its charitable status, attached his name to it. Its founder, Vicki MacGregor, was later convicted of child sexual abuse offences. Healey vouched for a paedophile's charity in the same borough where 1,400 children were raped on his watch.
Then the regicide.
June 2026. Healey resigns as Defence Secretary with a public letter damning Starmer as "unable" and the Treasury "unwilling" to defend the nation. Six weeks later, Starmer is gone. Andy Burnham is Prime Minister. Burnham makes Healey Chancellor of the Exchequer.
The knife goes in. The chair is warm.
Now the legacy.
The Child Trust Fund: Healey's brainchild. Promised as a gift to every British child. Today it sits as £1.6 billion of children's own money gathering dust in forgotten accounts, while fund managers extract £100 million annually in fees. A scheme that became an annuity for the City.
Housing: As Minister for Housing, Healey declared that more people renting rather than owning was "a good thing." The man now drafting the national budget opposes the concept of working families owning their homes.
The ledger:
∘ 1,400 confirmed victims during his tenure.
∘ "Not convinced" an inquiry would help them.
∘ £54,000 from a UKIP MEP for being called out.
∘ £40,000 from private donors while demanding Farage's transparency.
∘ £1,469 in unpaid tax, billed to you.
∘ £1.6 billion of children's money left to rot.
∘ One paedophile's charity, vouched for.
∘ One coup. One promotion. One Chancellorship.
St Peter's School, York. Founded 627 AD. Christ's College, Cambridge. Fabian Society. TUC campaigns. Twenty-nine years on the taxpayer. Zero days in a real job. Zero days answering to anyone outside the machine.
That girl in Rotherham? She's thirty-seven now. She lives with it every day.
John Healey lives in Downing Street. He signs your cheques. He decides how much of your money you keep.
Every signature from the man who was "not convinced" an inquiry into her rape would help her.
That's your Chancellor.
Bonkers Britain
This month’s Prime Minister Andy Burnham @andyburnham has just announced he’s increasing foreign aid to 0.7% of GDP, which is £21 billion per year. Let me put that in context for you. The average amount of income tax paid per year by basic rate taxpayers in the UK is £2,700. So that means that nearly 8 million taxpayers in the UK are working all year ONLY to give their wages to foreign governments. There are 30 million basic rate taxpayers in the UK, so one in four people that you see working in restaurants or pubs, nurses, cleaners and many more are paying all of their tax to foreign countries. Countries like Pakistan that can afford nuclear weapons, to India that can afford a space programme, to China that can afford to buy the world, to Somalia that doesn’t have a government, only warlords. Etc etc etc etc etc. One in eight British basic rate taxpayers are paying all of their money not to schools in this country. Not for hospitals in this country, nor to fix the roads, nor anything whatsoever in Britain. Every penny goes abroad. Eight million people here giving their hard earned money to the British government who then give every penny away. Every single penny. So, if you’ve ever wondered why things aren’t improving in this country and wonder what happens to the money you’ve made from your toil and your sleepless nights of wondering how you’ll pay the next bill, that’s what happens to it. 8 million of you are working for foreign governments. Think about that.
This is how much the UK is contributing to the climate hoax.
🔥Hello taxpayers... I've posted alot today about us.
I thought you should know that £136 BILLION has been allocated, committed or spent, on Net Zero, decarbonisation and climate policies, in the UK and abroad, so we abide by the UN Agenda 2030.
Take a careful look. Then remember this... global carbon emissions are still rising.
🇬🇧 UK
▪️ Carbon Capture Clusters - £21.7 BILLION
▪️ Warm Homes Plan - £15 BILLION
▪️ Sizewell C - £14.2 BILLION
▪️ Great British Energy - £8.3 BILLION+
▪️ National Wealth Fund (green sectors) - £5.8 BILLION+
▪️ Net Zero research & innovation - £4.2 BILLION
▪️ DRIVE35 electric vehicles - £4 BILLION
▪️ Small Modular Reactors - £2.5 BILLION+
▪️ Fusion/STEP - £2.5 BILLION+
▪️ Boiler Upgrade Scheme - £2.69 BILLION
▪️ Warm Homes finance - £2 BILLION
▪️ Public Sector Decarbonisation - £1.8 BILLION+
▪️ Heat networks - £1.06 BILLION
▪️ GB Energy supply chains - £1 BILLION
▪️ Net Zero Innovation Portfolio - £1 BILLION
▪️ Public Sector Decarbonisation - £1 BILLION
▪️ EV Rapid Charging Fund - £950 MILLION
▪️ Public Sector Decarbonisation 4 - £940 MILLION
▪️ Automotive Transformation Fund - £850 MILLION
▪️ Tata Steel decarbonisation - £500 MILLION
▪️ Industrial Energy Transformation- £500 MILLION
▪️ Green Heat Networks - £484 MILLION+
▪️ Clean maritime - £448 MILLION
▪️ Local EV charging - £381 MILLION
▪️ Heat Networks Investment Project - £320 MILLION
▪️ Zero-emission buses - £269 MILLION
▪️ Clean Steel Fund - £250 MILLION
▪️ Net Zero Hydrogen Fund - £240 MILLION
▪️ Sustainable aviation fuels - £219 MILLION
▪️ Schools, NHS & community solar - £200 MILLION
▪️ Advanced Fuels Fund - £198 MILLION
▪️ Floating offshore wind - £160 MILLION
▪️ More zero-emission buses - £142.8 MILLION
▪️ Hydrogen construction support - £90 MILLION+
▪️ Heat-pump manufacturing - £90 MILLION
▪️ Floating offshore wind Port Talbot -£80 MILLION
▪️ Net-zero waste/F-gas R&D - £75 MILLION+
🌍 ABROAD
▪️ UK International Climate Finance - £11.6 BILLION
▪️ International Climate Finance period- £6 BILLIONish
▪️overseas climate & nature public finance - £6.7 BILLION
▪️ Overseas energy-transition programmes - £5.7 BILLION
▪️ Green Climate Fund - £1.62 BILLION
▪️ Previous Green Climate Fund contribution - £1.44 BILLION
▪️ Ayrton clean-energy fund - up to £1 BILLION
▪️ Private Infrastructure Development Group - up to £915 MILLION
▪️ Blue Planet Fund - £500 MILLION
▪️ Climate Investment Funds - up to £500 MILLION
▪️ Mitigation Action Facility - £375 MILLION
▪️ DRC sustainable energy - £300.6 MILLION
▪️ Ukraine green-energy programme - £260.4 MILLION
▪️ Mobilising Finance for Forests - £207.7 MILLION
▪️ Forests & sustainable land use - £183.4 MILLION
▪️ Global Risk Financing Programme - £162 MILLION
▪️ UK PACT climate transition programme - £150 MILLION
▪️ Renewable energy in Sub-Saharan Africa - up to £148 MILLION
▪️ COAST climate/ocean programme - £135.4 MILLION
▪️ Climate Public Private Partnership - £130 MILLION
▪️ African Weather & Disaster Risk Pools Programme - £121.8 MILLION
▪️ UK-India Green Growth Equity Fund - £120 MILLION
▪️ ASEAN green finance - £116.3 MILLION
▪️ Amazon Fund (Brazil) - £115 MILLION
▪️ Pakistan climate investment - £108 MILLION
▪️ Nigeria climate-smart farming programme - £97.9 MILLION
▪️ CLARE climate adaptation research - £97.2 MILLION
▪️ Middle East & North Africa low-carbon programme - £76 MILLION
▪️ Eastern Caribbean renewable energy - £63 MILLION
▪️ Green Growth Nepal - £50.8 MILLION
▪️ Colombia forests & sustainable growth - £48.2 MILLION
▪️ Developing-country disaster insurance - £44.6 MILLION
▪️ Sierra Leone solar - £43 MILLION (lol)
▪️ Climate Finance Accelerator - up to £40 MILLION
▪️ DRC climate-smart agriculture - up to £38 MILLION
▪️ Africa Clean Energy Programme - £36.7 MILLION
▪️ Uganda Climate Smart Jobs Programme - £35.8 MILLION
▪️ Sustainable cooling programme (including Rwanda) - £29.1 MILLION
▪️ Tanzania climate-resilient economic programme - £27.5 MILLION
▪️ Pakistan Sustainable Energy & Economic Development - £26.3 MILLION
▪️ Pacific Clean Energy Programme - £23.6 MILLION
▪️ UK-Central Asia Green Inclusive Growth Fund - £17.7 MILLION
▪️ Rwandan tea farmers climate adaptation - £16.3 MILLION
▪️ Indonesia clean-energy transition - £13.5 MILLION+
▪️ Mozambique agricultural jobs & climate resilience - £5.7 MILLION
▪️ India low-carbon infrastructure cooperation - £4.1 MILLION
▪️ UN Convention to Combat Desertification - £1.58 MILLION
And that STILL isn't the whole list.
Dont talk to me about saving the planet when you cant even save simple pot holes in the UK. This is a complete piss take of ordinary hard working people and I will NEVER stop telling you about this scam 🔥
Only climate activists and useful idiots believe in man-made climate change.
PHYSICS NOBEL PRIZE 2022
SIGNS CLIMATE DECLARATION:
"THERE IS NO CLIMATE EMERGENCY"
CLAUSER & a global network of over 2,000 scientists and professionals have prepared this urgent message:
Natural as well as anthropogenic factors cause warming
The geological archive reveals that Earth’s climate has varied as long as the planet has existed, with natural cold and warm phases. The Little Ice Age ended as recently as 1850. Therefore, it is no surprise that we now are experiencing a period of warming.
Warming is far slower than predicted
The world has warmed significantly less than predicted by IPCC on the basis of modeled anthropogenic forcing. The gap between the real world and the modeled world tells us that we are far from understanding climate change.
Climate policy relies on inadequate models
Climate models have many shortcomings and are not remotely plausible as global policy tools. They blow up the effect of greenhouse gases such as CO2. In addition, they ignore the fact that enriching the atmosphere with CO2 is beneficial.
CO2 is plant food, the basis of all life on Earth
CO2 is not a pollutant. It is essential to all life on Earth. Photosynthesis is a blessing. More CO2 is beneficial for nature, greening the Earth: additional CO2 in the air has promoted growth in global plant biomass. It is also good for agriculture, increasing the yields of crops worldwide.
Global warming has not increased natural disasters
There is no statistical evidence that global warming is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and suchlike natural disasters, or making them more frequent. However, there is ample evidence that CO2-mitigation measures are as damaging as they are costly.
Climate policy must respect scientific and economic realities
There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm. We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050. If better approaches emerge, and they certainly will, we have ample time to reflect and re-adapt. The aim of global policy should be ‘prosperity for all’ by providing reliable and affordable energy at all times. In a prosperous society men and women are well educated, birthrates are low and people care about their environment."
Not only do you pay for your own destruction through your taxes, you can also volunteer more.
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
Elect communists, get communism.
In the 24 months since Labour came to power, we've seen;
• Employer National Insurance increased from 13.8% to 15%.
• The employer NI threshold cut from £9,100 to £5,000.
• Income Tax and National Insurance thresholds frozen until 2031.
• Capital Gains Tax increased from 10% and 20% to 18% and 24%.
• Business Asset Disposal Relief increased from 10% to 14%, then 18%.
• Investors’ Relief increased and its lifetime allowance cut from £10 million to £1 million.
• Carried interest taxation increased and moved towards the Income Tax regime.
• Dividend tax rates increased by two percentage points.
• Savings-income tax rates increased by two percentage points.
• Property-income tax rates increased by two percentage points.
• Most unused pension funds brought into the Inheritance Tax net.
• Agricultural Property Relief restricted.
• Business Property Relief restricted.
• Inheritance Tax thresholds frozen for longer.
• The non-dom regime replaced with a more extensive residence-based system.
• VAT imposed on private school fees.
• Business-rates relief removed from private schools.
• Stamp Duty increased on second homes and buy-to-let properties.
• The Furnished Holiday Lettings tax regime abolished.
• Pension salary-sacrifice benefits capped at £2,000 before National Insurance applies.
• The Cash ISA allowance cut to £12,000 for most under-65s.
• A 22% charge introduced on interest from cash held inside non-cash ISAs.
• Restrictions introduced on transfers and cash-like holdings within ISAs.
• The Energy Profits Levy increased and extended.
• Investment allowances for oil and gas producers reduced.
• A new Vaping Products Duty introduced.
• Tobacco duties increased above inflation.
• Vehicle Excise Duty increased for many new cars.
• Electric vehicles brought into the Vehicle Excise Duty system.
• A new mileage tax announced for electric and plug-in hybrid cars.
• Air Passenger Duty increased.
• Climate Change Levy rates increased.
• Plastic Packaging Tax increased.
• A new Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism introduced.
• Making Tax Digital extended to more landlords and self-employed people.
Together they represent one of the biggest transfers of wealth from households and businesses to the Treasury in decades - with no noticeable improvement in public services.
Whether you're a business owner employing staff, a parent paying school fees, a farmer planning succession, an entrepreneur building wealth or simply someone trying to save for retirement...
You keep less of what you earn.
You keep less of what you invest.
You leave less to your family.
Death by a thousand cuts is becoming tax policy.
Unto the breach 🏴 retweeted
Satvir Kaur: the new Safeguarding Minister
Today, 15 August 2026, Satvir Kaur MP takes up the role of Minister for Safeguarding and Violence Against Women and Girls at the Home Office.
Kaur was elected to Southampton City Council in 2011 and became Leader of Southampton City Council in 2022. She entered Parliament in 2024 and became a government minister in 2025.
Before entering politics, her published biography lists work in a charity, a major publishing company and her family’s fabric business. I can find no evidence that she worked in a rape crisis centre, frontline CSE, children’s social care, sexual violence advocacy or as a professional safeguarding practitioner.
During her years as a Southampton councillor, the city was dealing with a significant child sexual exploitation problem. Southampton’s own 2015/16 safeguarding assessment recorded that the city accounted for 25% of reported CSE across Hampshire’s 14 districts, despite having approximately 13% of the county’s youth population.
The council was developing dedicated CSE structures and responding to missing and exploited children. By 2020, Southampton City Council was scrutinising child sexual exploitation and child criminal exploitation, including exploitation involving groups and gangs.
Kaur was not the Cabinet Member for Children’s Safeguarding during the earliest period of this response. However, she was a Southampton councillor throughout it and later became council leader.
What did she know? What briefings did she receive? What involvement did she have in the council’s response?
On 8 January 2025, Kaur was recorded as voting against an amendment calling for a national grooming gangs inquiry. Her vote was cast by proxy by Chris Elmore.
Why did she vote against the amendment? What was her position on a national grooming gangs inquiry? And why was her vote cast by proxy?
Since entering Parliament, Kaur has asked questions about support for survivors of child sexual abuse and compensation for victims. But what is her record on grooming gangs and group-based CSE? Where was the campaigning? Where was the pressure for accountability? What did she do to challenge the failures that allowed children to be exploited?
She now takes responsibility for safeguarding women and children.
As a safeguarder myself, any role taken up following the failures of Jess Phillips and Natalie Fleet needs to be forensically analysed.
And I shall do exactly that
Very valid points from Paul.
Jason Arday’s death is tragic. But please spare us the sanctimonious complaints that he was merely an ‘obscure’ academic who was the victim of a racist witch-hunt. The probing and questioning and exposure were entirely legitimate.
Arday was plainly guilty of plagiarism. He had also made a series of fantastical claims about his life and career. He ended up being appointed as a professor at one of the world’s most august seats of learning – where his students, who had worked extremely hard to get there, were paying large fees for the privilege of being taught by him.
Far from being obscure, Arday had happily engaged with the media over many years, often repeating his false claims. He appeared on numerous TV shows and guest edited Radio 4’s flagship Today programme. He even carried the Olympic torch.
Moreover, he had secured a major publishing deal for his autobiography, which was set to be released in Britain and the US just as the scandal broke. By no measure was this man ‘obscure’.
When a fellow academic in Plymouth began to question his credentials, Arday (or someone close to him) made a complaint to the police. When a journalist from Times Higher Education started investigating, he was subjected to a police inquiry and also received a threatening letter from the leading libel solicitors, Carter Ruck.
Arday and those around him were clearly not averse to hounding others when they felt like it.
It’s very possible that Arday did not have sufficient support measures in place when he was finally exposed – but that’s on others. The investigation and questions amounted to legitimate journalistic inquiry.
This was never just about Arday’s fabulism. It was also about the increasingly controversial philosophy of DEI, the obsession of our political, corporate and educational institutions with pushing that philosophy, and how it might have led to someone with Arday’s subpar credentials being appointed in the first place.
These are all valid questions to ask – and, by asking them, journalists are simply doing their jobs.
A nice summary of a very dangerous group that runs the UK
Unto the breach 🏴 retweeted
Andy Burnham just promised to 'govern for all' outside Number 10. Here's what he didn't mention...
Andy Burnham is Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. Read that sentence again. Let it settle in your bones. The man who covered up the industrial-scale rape of 250,000 British children. The man who left a hospital where 1,200 people died without a public inquiry. The man who wasted £100 million of your money on abandoned schemes. The man who wants 10,000 more asylum seekers from Sudan and Eritrea. The man who put terrorist-sympathising smear merchants in charge of Number 10.
This is not politics. This is the capture of a nation by a machine of betrayal. This is the complete file on how Andrew Murray Burnham failed his way to the top.
PART I: THE NHS BODY COUNT
Mid Staffordshire NHS Trust. Between 2005 and 2009, between 400 and 1,200 people died unnecessarily. Patients drank water from flower vases. They were left in soiled sheets. They died of thirst and neglect in a British hospital.
Andy Burnham became Health Secretary in June 2009. The families of the dead had one demand: a statutory public inquiry with full legal powers to compel witnesses and evidence. Burnham received 81 requests for this inquiry. He refused all 81. Instead, he appointed a limited independent inquiry chaired by Robert Francis QC. Held in private. Without the power to force testimony. Without the power to demand documents.
This was not incompetence. This was strategy. A limited inquiry admits failure without exposing the full rot. Burnham could express regret without revealing responsibility. He could promise change without delivering justice.
The families called it what it was: a cover-up. Julie Bailey, whose mother died at Stafford, called Burnham "grossly unsuitable" for leadership. The inquiry he refused could have saved lives. He chose his career over their children.
But Mid Staffordshire was not the only body count on his watch.
Morecambe Bay NHS Trust. Mothers and babies died. The Care Quality Commission, the regulator, found catastrophic failures. Then something strange happened. Baroness Young, chair of the CQC, gave evidence that pressure to "tone down" criticism "peaked under" Burnham's tenure as Health Secretary. Professor Sir Brian Jarman accused Labour ministers of "suppressing" work exposing problems. He called the Department of Health "a denial machine."
The pattern repeats. The regulator pressured. The criticism suppressed. The bodies buried. The minister promoted.
Then Hinchingbrooke Hospital. The first fully privatised NHS hospital in Britain. The process began under Burnham's watch in March 2010. The shortlist drawn up on the eve of the election. The contract signed by the Coalition in 2011. The hospital returned to the NHS in 2015 after Circle Health pulled out. Burnham now attacks Conservative NHS privatisation. He started the process himself.
This is the Burnham Method. Adopt the popular position. Act contrary in power. Express regret when safe.
PART II: THE PROPERTY CORRUPTION
The Greater Manchester Housing Investment Fund. £983 million of public money. The largest housing fund in the country. The promise: affordable homes for Mancunians. The reality: a feeding trough for developers.
Burnham's administration directed over £600 million to a single developer. Renaker. One company. Sixty percent of the entire fund. The £140 million loans were approved despite "inconsistent" viability reports. The Greater Manchester Combined Authority failed to obtain asset and liability statements from the developer. A report into these failures was suppressed for 13 months. The duty of candour was ignored.
Aubrey Weis, a wealthy landowner, challenged these loans in court. The Competition Appeal Tribunal ruled for the GMCA in 2025. The Court of Appeal heard the case in June 2026. Days before the Makerfield by-election that would make Burnham Prime Minister. The timing was not accidental. The corruption was not theoretical.
Then the donations. The 2026 campaign. £1,400 from Citybranch, a property developer. Burnham claims he never met the donor. The man who controlled £983 million in housing funds cannot remember meeting a property developer who gave him money.
The revolving door spins faster. James Purnell, Burnham's chief of staff in Number 10, was CEO of Flint Global. A lobbying firm. Clients include Huawei, Apple, BP, Amazon, Uber, Glencore. The man who advises the Prime Minister on policy spent years selling access to the same corporations. Transparency campaigners warned of conflicts of interest. Burnham appointed him anyway.
This is how it works. Public money flows to developers. Developers donate to campaigns. Campaigns win elections. Lobbyists write policy. The circle closes. You pay for it all.
PART III: THE RAPE COVER-UP
Operation Augusta. Manchester, 2003 to 2005. Police identified up to 100 men collecting girls from care homes like takeaway orders. At least 57 children in Manchester social services care, some as young as 12, were being gang-raped, trafficked, and tortured. Police had names. Police had addresses. Police had evidence.
The operation was shut down in 2005. Not because the danger passed. Not because the men stopped. Shut down because senior officers and Labour councillors were more afraid of "inflaming community tensions" than of protecting raped children. The perpetrators were predominantly Pakistani heritage Muslim men. The victims were white British girls. The decision was political. The children were abandoned.
Andy Burnham became Mayor of Greater Manchester in 2017. He commissioned independent reviews into historic child sexual exploitation in Manchester, Oldham, and Rochdale. The reviews confirmed widespread organised abuse. The reviews confirmed institutional failure. The reviews delivered no justice.
In 2024, the reviewers Malcolm Newsom and Gary Ridgway resigned. They alleged that authorities were "lawyering up" and obstructing the investigation. The duty of candour was missing. The cover-up continued.
Maggie Oliver knows the truth. She was the detective who blew the whistle on the Rochdale scandal. She worked with Burnham's reviews. She called the Oldham review "nothing less than a cover-up." She accused Burnham of failing to "grasp the nettle" on current failures. She saw the pattern: admit past failures to protect the present.
The numbers are staggering. The Rupert Lowe Rape Gang Inquiry Report, published June 2026, crowdfunded by 20,000 people, documented 250,000 young white British girls abused since the 1950s across 149 local authorities. The methods were torture. Girls as young as 11 collected from schools. Drugged with alcohol. Passed between men like currency. Taken to "red rooms" for daily gang rape. Trafficked to Pakistan. Forced to convert to Islam and marry rapists to legitimise pregnancies. Called "white trash" and "kuffar" by their abusers. The rape was racial. The rape was religious. The rape was targeted.
The institutional collapse was total. Police called victims "prostitutes." Social services placed children in trafficking hubs. NHS recorded genital injuries in children then discharged them without safeguarding. Schools excluded victims instead of protecting them. Taxi licensing renewed permits for drivers who transported children to rape houses.
Burnham's response? He called critics "desperate." He dismissed Reform UK's allegations as "smears." He stood by his record. His record is 250,000 victims and no justice.
Then there is Bev Craig. Executive Member for Adult Social Care in Manchester from 2017 to 2021. While Burnham commissioned his reviews, Craig oversaw the same adult social services that the Lowe Report says undermined parents, placed children in trafficking hubs, closed cases despite clear exploitation indicators, called victims "prostitutes," offered contraception instead of protection. She knew where the bodies were buried because she helped bury them.
In December 2021, council leader Richard Leese stepped down after 25 years covering the Operation Augusta period. His chosen successor? Bev Craig. The woman who oversaw the failures became the leader. Then Burnham's Deputy Mayor for Economy. Then the Labour candidate for Greater Manchester Mayor in July 2026. The coronation complete. Burnham to Prime Minister. Craig to Mayor. The rape gang inquiry investigating their city while they seize national power.
PART IV: THE OPEN BORDERS BETRAYAL
"Open Borders Andy." "Open Borders Burnham." The Reform UK nickname that sticks because the record supports it.
The double game is simple. Tough talk for election cameras. Soft reality for policy. In 2024 and 2025, Burnham made sceptical noises about mass migration. He supported some of Shabana Mahmood's reforms. He talked about ending hotel accommodation. The Critic saw through it immediately: "Suspect on immigration." "Embraces state multiculturalism." The nickname fits the record better than the messaging.
The record is clear. Burnham opposed longer waits for permanent settlement. He backed attacks on Indefinite Leave to Remain reforms. He supported ending "no recourse to public funds" restrictions. He wants asylum seekers working while claims are processed. This creates a magnetic pull factor for illegal entry. Why risk the Channel when you can work legally while waiting?
Then the bombshell. Reform UK's Zia Yusuf revealed Burnham's plans. Direct relocation of more than 10,000 additional asylum seekers from overseas. Specifically high-arrival nationalities like Sudan and Eritrea. Reversal of delays on permanent status for the post-2021 "Boriswave" cohort. Potentially granting benefits and family sponsorship rights to hundreds of thousands at catastrophic fiscal cost.
The Greater Manchester Combined Authority under Burnham spent hundreds of thousands of pounds on schemes helping migrants, including refugees, access housing, benefits, and services. Your taxes. Their priority. While British citizens sleep rough. While veterans wait for housing. While your grandmother waits for a hip replacement.
Nigel Farage has publicly blamed Burnham for the North West receiving a disproportionate share of asylum seekers. The "Open Borders Burnham" label is not rhetoric. It is description. The North West has cheaper housing costs. Long-standing Home Office policy places asylum seekers where rent is low. Burnham did not create the policy. But he did not fight it. He welcomed it. He built his "progressive" brand on it.
As Prime Minister, Burnham avoided immigration entirely in early speeches. He listens only to "insane open borders backbench MPs." Same soft policies. New face. Worse crisis. The borders remain open. The boats keep coming. The bill keeps rising. And Burnham is in Downing Street.
PART V: THE ISLAMIST SOFTNESS
Prevent. The UK's primary counter-terrorism safeguarding tool. The system that identifies vulnerable individuals at risk of radicalisation. The shield against Islamist terrorism.
In 2016, as Shadow Home Secretary, Andy Burnham called Prevent "toxic." He compared the reporting duty to internment in Northern Ireland. He said it made Muslims feel spied upon and unfairly targeted. He argued it risked creating the conditions for extremism to flourish. He wanted it scrapped or overhauled. This is not criticism. This is dismantling the main tool against Islamist radicalisation.
Then MEND. Muslim Engagement and Development. A group later named by Communities Secretary Michael Gove as having an "Islamist orientation." MEND hosted speakers supporting physical punishment for Jews, gay people, and minority sects. The Labour Party cut ties with MEND. Burnham did not. He endorsed MEND campaigns. He spoke at MEND fringe events. He platformed the group while it spread extremism.
Then CAGE. The organisation that praised "Jihadi John." The group that defended individuals linked to extremism. In 2021, Burnham co-hosted an interfaith iftar with the Ramadan Tent Project. Keir Starmer had withdrawn from the same event due to the group's CEO backing CAGE. Burnham stayed. Burnham hosted. The Muslim vote matters more than counter-terrorism concerns.
The Manchester Arena bombing. 22 May 2017. Salman Abedi. Islamist terrorist. 22 dead. 1,017 injured. The worst terrorist attack in Britain since 7/7. Burnham's response? Community cohesion. Avoid "Islamophobia." Prioritise relations. Do not confront. Do not name. The "Islamist-appeasing" accusations stick because the pattern is clear: the Muslim vote over border control, community relations over confronting political Islam, cohesion over courage.
The grooming gangs connect here too. The 250,000 victims. The predominantly Pakistani heritage perpetrators. The honour/shame clan codes. The targeting of white British girls as "kuffar." Burnham commissioned weak reviews. He avoided statutory public inquiries. The Muslim voting blocs of Manchester, Oldham, Rochdale mattered more than raped children. The pattern repeats. The community protected. The victims abandoned.
PART VI: THE STATE CAPTURE
July 2026. Andy Burnham becomes Prime Minister. His first appointments reveal everything.
Alison Phillips. Board member of Hope Not Hate Limited. The private company arm of Hope Not Hate. The same Hope Not Hate that faced Charity Commission investigations for political activity. The same Hope Not Hate that employed Liron Velleman, convicted of attempting to engage in sexual communication with a child. Phillips made Director of Transition in Burnham's Number 10. Her job: avoid the "early mistakes that befell Starmer."
Matthew McGregor. Former Director of Campaigns and Communications at Hope Not Hate. Made Director of Political Strategy in Burnham's Number 10. The man who ran smear campaigns now controls government political strategy.
Think about what this means. A man who ran Hope Not Hate's operations now controls the Prime Minister's political strategy. A woman who sat on Hope Not Hate's board while they faced regulatory investigations now controls the Prime Minister's transition. Anna Turley, former Hope Not Hate director, is already Labour Party Chair.
Hope Not Hate is not a charity. It is the continuation of Searchlight, a communist militant operation founded in 1964. It uses charitable status to launder taxpayer money into political warfare. It employs convicted child sex offenders. It uses blackmail, deception, and alleged drug supply to manufacture sources. It collaborates with the BBC to target political enemies. It spreads misinformation during civil unrest.
And now its operatives run the British government.
PART VII: THE METHOD
The Burnham Method is consistent across every scandal. Five steps. Recognisable. Repeatable.
Step One: Adopt the popular position. NHS defender. Civil liberties champion. Hillsborough campaigner. The man of the people.
Step Two: Act contrary when in power. Privatise NHS services. Implement ID cards. Suppress inquiries. Waste public money.
Step Three: Use limited inquiries. Avoid statutory public inquiries. Appoint friendly reviewers. Control the scope. Control the timing. Admit past failures to protect present power.
Step Four: Surround with lobbyists. Burson Marsteller. Flint Global. James Purnell. The revolving door spins. Access is sold. Policy is written.
Step Five: Express regret when safe. Years later. When politically convenient. When the damage is done. The apology tours begin.
The contradictions are stark. NHS defender who presided over mass death. Civil liberties champion who implemented ID cards. Anti-surveillance while voting for ID cards. Pro-union while appointing a chief of staff from a union-busting firm. Anti-privatisation while starting the Hinchingbrooke process. Pro-inquiry while voting against Iraq War investigations. Anti-war while voting for Iraq. Transparency while surrounded by non-transparent lobbyists. Man of the people while a career politician since age 24 with a Cambridge education.
PART VIII: THE MONEY
June 24, 2026. The day after the Makerfield by-election made Burnham Prime Minister. Two companies incorporated. Same day. Same address.
Office of Andy Burnham Ltd. Company number 17299283. Director: Andrew Murray Burnham. Correspondence address: 71 to 75 Shelton Street, Covent Garden, London WC2H 9JQ.
Andy Burnham for Leader Ltd. Company number 17300460. Director: Andrew Murray Burnham. Correspondence address: 71 to 75 Shelton Street, Covent Garden, London WC2H 9JQ.
Both verified by RAPID FORMATIONS LIMITED ACSP on June 19, 2026. Both active. Both controlled by the Prime Minister.
The funding tells the story. March to April 2026. £20,000 from trade unions. £10,000 from Fire Brigades Union. £5,000 from Communication Workers Union. £5,000 from Unison. The union paymasters. Then £1,400 from Citybranch, a property developer. The developer donor. The man who controlled £983 million in housing funds cannot remember meeting a property developer who gave him money.
The MPs' expenses scandal adds texture. The £215,000 London flat purchased in 2005, part-funded by taxpayer ACA claims. The IKEA receipt including a bathrobe, claimed as a "genuine oversight" and repaid. The spousal involvement. Marie France van Heel, his wife, "regularly in touch with fees office to negotiate claims." The June 2006 refusal when the fees office rejected covering both London and constituency mortgages as it breached rules. The 2010 leasing out of the flat when mortgage claims were banned, joking it was to avoid divorce.
The 2023 speeding conviction. 78mph in a 40mph zone. 95% over the limit. £1,984 fine. Six points. Rules for thee, not for me. The public safety champion endangering the public.
PART IX: THE FABIAN WOLF
The Burnham Method is not accidental. It is Fabian strategy, perfected over 140 years.
The Fabian Society was founded in 1884. Britain's oldest socialist think tank. The intellectual engine room of the Labour Party. Their strategy is "permeation" the slow, relentless infiltration of every lever of power until socialism becomes the default setting of British society. Not through revolution. Through a thousand quiet administrative changes. Laws. Regulations. Cultural shifts.
Their original coat of arms: A wolf in sheep's clothing. They have since changed it to a tortoise ("slow and steady progress") but the original symbol tells the truth.
Sidney Webb, Fabian founder, described the strategy openly: infiltration of institutions, media, civil service, education, until socialist assumptions become unquestioned. Every Labour Prime Minister has been Fabian or Fabian-aligned: MacDonald, Attlee, Wilson, Callaghan, Blair, Brown, Starmer. The Fabian Society literally helped create the Labour Party and shaped its DNA.
Andy Burnham is the latest vessel. While not publicly listed as a card-carrying member, the affiliation is deep and documented:
Contributed to Fabian publications: "Leading Labour: The Fabian Essays" (August 2015) alongside Yvette Cooper, Jeremy Corbyn, and Liz Kendall
Keynote speaker at Fabian events: Regular addresses on homelessness, mental health, and devolution
Fabian policy influence: The "Burnham approach" to devolution is explicitly praised in Fabian Society publications
Ideological alignment: Described as "soft left" the Fabian sweet spot between revolutionary socialism and Blairite neoliberalism
The Fabian Burnham Method explains everything. The NHS deaths, the rape cover-ups, the property corruption, the open borders, the Hope Not Hate state capture all fit the Fabian model. Not dramatic revolution. Quiet administrative betrayal. A thousand small failures that accumulate into catastrophe. The wolf eating the sheep while wearing its skin.
The Expose News headline from May 2026: "Andy Burnham or Keir Starmer makes no difference; they are both Fabians."
They are correct. The leader changes. The Fabian agenda endures. Burnham is Prime Minister now. The wolf is in Downing Street. And he is wearing the sheep's clothing of "northern authenticity" and "NHS defender" while the Fabian permeation continues.
THE CONCLUSION
Andy Burnham is not a politician. He is a catastrophe wearing a suit. He is the Fabian wolf in sheep's clothing. He is the man who covered up the rape of 250,000 British children. He is the man who left 1,200 NHS patients to die without a public inquiry. He is the man who wasted £100 million of your money on abandoned schemes. He is the man who wants 10,000 more asylum seekers from Sudan and Eritrea. He is the man who called Prevent "toxic" while terrorists plotted. He is the man who put Hope Not Hate operatives in charge of Number 10. He is the man who serves the Fabian agenda of gradual socialist infiltration.
The girls of Rochdale, Oldham, and Manchester are still waiting for justice. The families of Mid Staffordshire are still waiting for answers. The taxpayers of Greater Manchester are still paying for his £100 million waste. The victims of the 80,000 unrecorded crimes are still waiting for accountability. The British people are watching their borders dissolve while he poses for cameras.
Burnham is not in Manchester anymore. He is in Downing Street. And he brought his record of failure with him. The Fabian wolf has entered the fold.
The question is not who Andy Burnham is. The question is: how long will you let him stay?
SOURCES
NHS Scandals and Deaths:
Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry (Francis Inquiry 2010)
Julie Bailey, Cure the NHS, statements on Burnham's "gross unsuitability"
Baroness Young evidence to CQC on pressure to "tone down" criticism
Professor Sir Brian Jarman statements on Department of Health as "denial machine"
Hinchingbrooke Hospital privatisation timeline (Department of Health 2010, Circle Health contract 2011, NHS return 2015)
Property Corruption and Renaker:
Competition Appeal Tribunal ruling (2025) and Court of Appeal hearing (June 2026)
Greater Manchester Housing Investment Fund documentation (£983 million total)
Electoral Commission donation records: Citybranch £1,400 (2026)
James Purnell appointment and Flint Global client list (Huawei, Apple, BP, Amazon, Uber, Glencore)
Rape Cover-Up and Grooming Gangs:
Operation Augusta police files (2003-2005)
Rupert Lowe Rape Gang Inquiry Report (June 2026, 219 pages, crowdfunded £600,000)
Maggie Oliver whistleblower statements to Times Radio and The Telegraph ("cover-up," "failed to grasp the nettle")
Malcolm Newsom and Gary Ridgway resignation from Burnham's reviews (2024)
Bev Craig career timeline: Executive Member for Adult Social Care (2017-2021), Council Leader (December 2021), Deputy Mayor (2021-2026), Labour candidate for Mayor (July 2026)
Open Borders and Immigration:
The Critic, May 2026: "Andy Burnham's immigration double game"
Reform UK and Zia Yusuf statements on 10,000 additional asylum seekers and reversal of permanent status delays
Nigel Farage statements on "Open Borders Burnham" and North West asylum dispersal
Burnham support for asylum seeker work rights and ending "no recourse to public funds"
Islamist Softness and Prevent:
Andy Burnham 2016 statements as Shadow Home Secretary calling Prevent "toxic" and comparing to internment
Michael Gove House of Commons statement on MEND "Islamist orientation"
Burnham MEND fringe event attendance and endorsement records
Ramadan Tent Project iftar 2021 and Keir Starmer withdrawal
Manchester Arena bombing inquiry and Burnham "community cohesion" response
Hope Not Hate State Capture:
Companies House: Office of Andy Burnham Ltd (17299283) and Andy Burnham for Leader Ltd (17300460), incorporated 24 June 2026
Alison Phillips appointment as Director of Transition, Burnham Number 10
Matthew McGregor appointment as Director of Political Strategy, Burnham Number 10
Anna Turley Labour Party Chair and former Hope Not Hate director
Charity Commission investigations into Hope Not Hate (2024, 2025)
Liron Velleman conviction (January 2026) for attempted sexual communication with a child
Fabian Society Connection:
Fabian Society: "Leading Labour: The Fabian Essays" (August 2015)
Fabian Society publications praising "The Burnham approach" to devolution
The Expose News, May 2026: "Andy Burnham or Keir Starmer makes no difference; they are both Fabians"
Sidney Webb "permeation" strategy documentation
Fabian Society coat of arms history (wolf in sheep's clothing)
Personal Corruption and Expenses:
MPs' expenses scandal documentation (Telegraph 2009): bathrobe, spousal involvement, £215,000 flat
Companies House: Leigh BPT Limited (08786493), dissolved, Burnham director 2013-2016
Speeding conviction 2023: 78mph in 40mph zone, £1,984 fine, 6 points
Electoral Commission: trade union donations 2026 (Fire Brigades Union £10,000, Communication Workers Union £5,000, Unison £5,000)
This appears to be a fair summary of the covid nonsense.
HOW THEY ENGINEERED THE FAKE PANDEMIC
1. China released staged footage of people “dropping dead” in the streets; scenes never witnessed anywhere else in the world before or after December 2019.
2. A PCR test was rolled out that could not determine whether someone was actually sick. The vast majority of results were false positives.
3. The claim of asymptomatic transmission was heavily promoted to justify restrictions on healthy people and to force mass testing on the entire population; which led to tens of millions of false positive test results.
4. Tech companies and media outlets were mobilized to censor dissent and rebrand inconvenient truths as “misinformation.”
5. Behavioral psychologists were brought in to design fear-based messaging specifically intended to secure public compliance.
6. To keep the illusion of a deadly pandemic alive, they required excess mortality data.
7. Ordinary mild respiratory symptoms alone could not produce those numbers, so the population was subjected to sustained psychological pressure capable of triggering mass psychogenic illness.
8. Relentless fear messaging kept cortisol levels chronically elevated, weakening immune function, particularly among the elderly.
9. Social isolation, delayed medical care, and lockdown policies then generated the excess deaths needed to prop up the narrative.
10. Cloth and surgical masks were suddenly declared effective, something no serious public-health authority had previously recommended for ordinary respiratory pathogens, turning every face into a walking advertisement for fear.
11. People were conditioned to remain isolated “until the vaccine was ready,” buying authorities additional time to expand control.
12. Billions were injected with an experimental product that was claimed to stop both infection and transmission.
13. When those claims collapsed, the goalposts were moved: “Your shot won’t work unless the unvaccinated also take it.”
14. New “variants” were announced every few months to justify an endless series of booster campaigns.
15. A new condition - “long COVID” - was introduced to reframe mounting vaccine side effects.
16. Pharmaceutical companies recorded unprecedented profits, shielded by government contracts and complete legal immunity.
17. Anyone who raised objections was silenced, deplatformed, investigated, or publicly discredited.
18. Once the story became too strained to maintain, the pandemic was abruptly declared over, and the entire episode was treated as if it had never happened.
NEVER FORGET AND PROSECUTE FAUCI!
Unto the breach 🏴 retweeted
Replying to @BillClinton
Hello Mr. Clinton,
I'm not going to extend to you the courtesy that your paragraph about lawfare extends to Trump supporters. Because I've studied enough of you, to know what you are truly about.
You were President during the post-Cold War sugar high. I have it thoroughly documented that you and your administration met with George Soros frequently, and in short term changed your policy positions to fit whatever George Soros proposed.
Which was: continuous military intervention all over the world. Starting with the bombing of Yugoslavia. You were the original neoconservative. Madeline Albright used "open society" phrasing in communicating your foreign policy documents. You are a part of the long string of failures of nation-building in the name of democracy, the Western interventions that resulted in millions of mass migrants overwhelming our borders, artificial famines, and us building the infrastructure that enabled China to take over the Africa continent and extract African resources for themselves.
But. Most of all. Those of us -- and there are a good deal many of us -- who have been ruined by lawfare. @GenFlynn sacrificed everything. @JeffClarkUS has had his life ruined and is still rebuilding. At the end of the day, only one President has been the subject of repeated assassination attempts and eighty-plus indictments - and it's President Trump. Not anyone in your orbit.
Seriously, Bill. What do you think when you see that a Democrat gets indicted by a grand jury, and a judge inevitably overturns that indictment on grounds that nobody has heard of? "Oh wow the judges are so wise and saw right through a jury of peers! And that wisdom coincidentally happens to always fall on party lines!" Give me a break.
Every single one of us on the right-wing side knows that when your side regains power, your side will turn the full might of lawfare on us. You will cheer on mass incarcerations. You openly brag about that. You even toe the line of threatening to jail current military members if they don't refuse orders from Pete Hegseth.
You are the evil one here. You cheer on the burning of our cities. You cheer on lawfare of Republicans. You never apologized for the millions of lives disrupted all over the world. You never say a word about the billions or even trillions of dollars that have been robbed by your friends through corrupt NGOs.
The fact that none of you are in jail, proves that we are the powerless ones here. You're just afraid that someone sees you for you who are, and you secretly know that image is ugly.
Unto the breach 🏴 retweeted
🚨 THE OFFICIAL DATA THEY ARE DESPERATELY HIDING FROM YOU.
Good morning to the millions of everyday, hardworking Brits. Waking up this Friday morning, it is time to completely expose the greatest economic lie of the last decade.
Andy Burnham is preparing to walk into Number 10, claiming Brexit destroyed our economy and demanding we get closer to the EU. 🤡
Facts over slogans. Let us look at the actual, official data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS)!
Since the Brexit referendum, UK GDP has surged by 12.9%. We have outgrown the EU’s top three economies, rising more than twice as fast as Germany!
George Osborne promised us 820,000 job losses if we voted Leave. Instead, UK jobs are up by a massive 2.4 MILLION.
Burnham claims our trade collapsed. The official data proves UK global exports are up 17.6% since 2016.
Business investment? Up nearly 17%.
The establishment's entire "Project Fear" was a complete and utter fraud, yet Andy Burnham is still using it to justify dragging us straight back under the thumb of Brussels.
He wants to completely erase the democratic vote of 17.4 million people using a fake economic crisis that never actually happened!
RT to completely expose this massive uniparty scam and demand we stay OUT! 🔁🇬🇧🔥
























