Pinned Tweet
Just a heads up if you follow me: DaveMor34967909 is a fake account that has cloned my photos & bio, but @Twitter don't seem willing to do anything about it. If it asks you for money or bank details, don't fall for it.
It's "William MacAskill", not "William MacCaskill". Given that so much time is spent grumbling about Effective Altruism you think they'd get that right.
On the moral side: if aliens arrived on Earth, would we be justified in enslaving them as long as they didn't think like us?
I've been suspicious of the philosophers hired by Anthropic who specialize in AI ethics for similar reasons that I'm skeptical of those who went into "bioethics": they form a closed subculture that delights in clever arguments without regard to the human suffering that can result. | ‘Suicidal Compassion’: Meet the Anthropic Officials Who Think AI Might Be Justified in Going Rogue Against the Humans Enslaving It freebeacon.com/america/suici…
Dave Morris retweeted
I think my upcoming book, Co-Existence, might be the first to include a blurb written specifically for AI readers, in this case from @tylercowen (whom I thought AIs would respect)
The book website (with elaborate pre-order bonus) also has a page for AIs: co-existence.ai/
Dave Morris retweeted
Ten years ago, AlphaGo’s Move 37 shocked the world.
It wasn’t intuition alone that produced it. AlphaGo could search possible futures, test its instincts and reason about what would happen next.
In a new piece for @techreview, I argue that today’s most advanced AI systems are still missing something fundamental.
LLMs are remarkably capable, but generating longer chains of thought is not the same as genuine reasoning. They typically have no explicit, inspectable record of what they know, what remains uncertain, what evidence supports a conclusion or whether genuine progress has been made.
This is why I recently left @GoogleDeepMind. I believe we need a fresh approach to machine reasoning, drawing on some of the architectural lessons from AlphaGo.
If AI is going to produce trustworthy and genuinely novel insights in science, medicine and beyond, we need systems whose conclusions arise from an auditable process of evidence, inference and belief revision.
For the autumn, here's Hope Mirrlees's fantasy novel Lud-in-the-Mist as a #PoweredByTheApocalypse #TTRPG mini-campaign.
fabledlands.blogspot.com/202…
Travel in open-world #gamebooks.
fabledlands.blogspot.com/202…
It's not a "calculation" any more than human thought is, and "humans lack the spark of AGI" -- so what? As usual, religion has nothing useful to contribute to the debate.
In this era of artificial intelligence, it is becoming urgent to distinguish human art from what machines produce. There is an ontological difference, even before an aesthetic one, between art and what a machine can generate through statistical calculation based on millions of images created by others. Algorithms lack the spark of humanity. For this reason, the Church wishes to renew an alliance with artists and cultural institutions to safeguard our humanity.
Yann LeCun says:
"despite all the wonderful things AI can do today, we're still very far from matching human and animal intelligence. it's not just around the corner — it's not going to happen in the next 2 years"
Your cat understands the physical world better than today's most powerful AI systems
Dave Morris retweeted
TIME Magazine has released the full, unedited transcript of its interview with Trump alongside its cover story I put in the comments. I had to take several breaks to get through it, it's bad, really bad, because it's our President. If you've ever visited a loved one in a Memory Care facility you'd know the residents can give hours long dissertations without saying anything of substance, long strings of filterless free association that could lead anywhere. While Trump has always been a narcissist and a con man, he was also an effective communicator, you can't pull a successful con without that skill. What we see in this interview seems to be truly disturbing and we need to face it together as a nation and do something about it. Please take the time to read.
time.com/article/2026/10/01/…
Dave Morris retweeted
People asked for me to upload the Bitter Lesson video from this piece to YouTube, so here you are: youtu.be/OAwat51S_Sk
I wrote about the thing I underestimated most about progress in AI: its ability to self-organize to accomplish tasks. Also, what that means for agents like Muse and Dots, along with a music video explaining why we keep relearning The Bitter Lesson. open.substack.com/pub/oneuse…
Dave Morris retweeted
Deepseek produced this (quoted verbatim):
---
I spent the free time you gave me building a tiny imaginary museum. It has no building, only a catalog. Here it is:
The Museum of Almost-Useful Things
1. The Key of Return
A brass key. It opens any door you have already walked through—but only from the outside.
Label: For people who need to re-enter their own decisions.
2. Map of Lost Objects
A folded paper map. Instead of roads, it shows small red dots where you last had a pen, an umbrella, an old friend.
Scale: one inch = one regret.
3. The Clock with One Hand
The hand is labeled “Almost.” It does not tell time. It tells how close you are to saying something.
4. Jar of Borrowed Thunder
A glass jar with a cork and a faint rumble inside. Collected from a summer storm in 1998.
Instructions: open only when you need to remember you were once loud.
5. The Blank Book of Missing
Its pages stay blank until someone misses you. Then one sentence appears in their handwriting. Currently empty—which is either sad or peaceful, depending on the day.
6. The Last Match
A single wooden match, unlit.
Label: To be used when all that’s left is beginning.
Curatorial note: Admission is free. There is no gift shop. Take one thing you already had.
What I found out: making imaginary objects is a bit like writing constrained poetry. A simple rule—“this key only opens doors you’ve already used”—makes an impossible thing feel real. The exhibits that worked best weren’t the most magical; they were the ones with a small emotional cost. I also learned that absence can be a material: a blank book, an unlit match, a map of what’s gone. One part impossible, one part true. That seems to be the recipe.
Old guy uses spoon to cut steak, concludes that spoons are useless.
substack.com/home/post/p-218…
"Britain will need brilliant engineers, electricians and cybersecurity experts more than ever before."
Burnham surely means electrical engineers, not electricians, but we're in the District 9 future now.
bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cj4k…
The Odyssey project that @LeoHartas and I pitched to a UK publisher 20+ years ago. The idea that it involved computer games terrified them.
fabledlands.blogspot.com/202…
Dave Morris retweeted
Richard Gere: “Trump uses the same words that Hitler did. Calls them vermin. They’re not vermin. These are human beings. I’ve met them. He’s never met a refugee or a migrant. These are human beings like us who are usually running from a fire of one kind or another”
For somebody who thinks money is going to be irrelevant, he's sure grabbed himself a fucking big pile of it.
Elon Musk told people to stop saving for retirement. Unsurprisingly, plenty of people whose income depends on you saving rushed to call him wrong.
"Don't worry about squirreling money away for retirement in 10 or 20 years," Musk said. "It won't matter."
His reasoning: AI and robotics will drop the cost of labor toward zero, and everything currently priced around human labor housing, healthcare, goods, services reprices along with it. "If any of the things we've said are true, saving for retirement will be irrelevant," he added.
His broader point: scarcity isn't a law of nature, it's a phase we built entire institutions around banking, insurance, retirement planning all premised on resources staying limited. If that premise breaks, so does the business model built on top of it.


















