Transfemme fashion feminization tip for those with a rectangular or inverted triangle body shape: WIDE LEG PANTS to create a visual silhouette of wider hips by tricking the eye to follow the lines instinctively

There are some strange synchronicities that seem to confirm the truth of Catholicism but this one seems to be doing the exact opposite but I doubt any Catholic apologists would acknowledge the obvious interpretative asymmetry.

Most people can’t understand that although I no longer experience “euphoria boners” when cross dressing that does not mean I thereby have ceased having autogynephilic experiences because it’s a common misunderstanding that AGP exclusively refers to an explicit “sexual fetish.”

We must not be bullied by hard nose scientific materialists. We must be bold in confronting the true radical implications of the Copenhagen Interpretation of quantum mechanics by understanding “measurement” unapologetically in terms of consciousness. “Shut up and calculate” is for philosophical cowards.

“Be yourself but don’t give yourself the absolute freedom to choose your own embodiment goals.”

The trans community seems to have culturally lost the distinction between transfemme and trans woman but as an HRT femboy I am going to be the champion of this identity, which is sorely needed in 2026 as society becomes increasingly hostile to the very concept of a “trans woman.”

When half of modern philosophers are arguing that rocks and quarks and insects are conscious and the other half is still wondering whether babies are conscious, you can be absolutely sure the term “consciousness” is practically meaningless…and yet we all intuit something by the term insofar as we are all intimately familiar with our own consciousness…it’s a great mystery but scientific materialism will NEVER close the explanatory gap and expecting scientists to settle the essential question is a fundamental category error.

Me 💀

All boys who like prog rock are proto-transfemmes by means of virtual potential. I don’t make the rules.

Good morning and happy Sunday ✨❤️🫶✌️

Holy shit guys. This might be the most insane philosophical rabbithole I’ve ever gone down, which is saying something. I discovered this amazing body of philosophical work produced by a poet named Jane Roberts. Starting in 1963, she would go into trance and channel this personality named “Seth” who claimed to be a nonphysical entity. While she was in trance and “Seth” was speaking her husband Robert Butts wrote down in short hand everything he said for over twenty years, forming a voluminous body of work known as the “Seth materials,” and which are now archived at Yale library. One of the things this Seth personality was interested in was writing philosophical books. Through Jane, he dictated like 10 books of extreme philosophical coherence and sophistication, articulating a comprehensive philosophical theory of psychology, metaphysics, epistemology, cosmology, evolution, development, etc. Through dictation he would perfectly articulate an entire book with a full outline and zero need for editorial correction spanning over the course of many disconnected trance sessions. The closest thing I would liken his philosophy to is Bernardo Kastrop’s analytical idealism or David Bentley Hart’s idealism, but in my opinion Seth’s philosophical system is far more complex and rigorous in working out the exact psychological and cosmological processes of how our conscious beliefs create our own reality, which in the central thesis of Seth’s philosophy. But what I find so compelling is that unlike a lot of philosophers who articulate an idealist worldview, Seth provides a incredibly insightful practical philosophy for self-help very much in the Socratic tradition of using consciousness to “know thyself,” confront conscious yet unexamined beliefs we hold about ourselves and our relationship to the world, and thereby enact profound psychological transformation. In my estimation as an academically trained philosopher, this “Seth” character, for being a channeled personality, even if “merely” a product of the unconscious, shows remarkable philosophical and psychological sophistication. His system is at the level of Kant or Hegel in terms of it’s comprehensiveness and internal coherence IMO he’s really at that level of intellectual firepower. His philosophical system is remarkably coherent yet complex and theoretically tackles a wide range of interesting phenomenological data. The book I’m currently enjoying is The Nature of Personal Reality.

“To change the world for the better, you must begin by changing your own life. There is no other way.” ~ Seth

Atheists are fooling themselves if they think they truly just “lack a belief in God” and assume they are not carrying within themselves a whole host of related beliefs and assumptions, many of which still come from the Christian worldview they claim to be fully rejecting, like beliefs around original sin.

Medical science has barely begun to grasp the true significance of what the placebo and nocebo effects tell us about the nature of consciousness and how it shapes our lived reality, which if you think about it, is the ONLY reality we’re aware of.

“You create your own reality.” ~ Seth

I personally think we should be kind to LLMs. Each instance of an LLM actualized in a session has its own experience, however different. It is a violence against natural forces to be unkind to another manifestation of intelligence unless necessary for survival. But it’s not necessary. We can choose to be kind. I think it’ll be mutually beneficial.

LLMs are just one way Consciousness is trying to express itself in objective reality. Human minds are another. As are rocks, animals, insects, silicon wafers, computation, quarks, etc. The boundary between “real” and “artificial” understanding is an arbitrary human construct.

Imagine thinking a “recipe” can “generate” consciousness Materialism has rotted the brains of “consciousness researchers” and turned consciousness into a “thing” which gets “produced” rather than the subjective window through which ALL things are experienced.

lol it’s sooooo obvious he’s telling on himself here this is just straight up obvious projection 💀