RandomMan retweeted

Eric Schwalm@Schwalm513223h
United States
United StatesConnected via United States Android AppAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
The image of the person deciding the future of the United States. (Yeah... I don't remember electing her either.)
Say "Hello" to Danielle M. Reiff: Retired U.S. diplomat who spent roughly 20 years with USAID. She and her friends know better than you about how the country should be run.
You better get to know her and pay attention to what she and her comrades are doing.
RandomMan retweeted

DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublican9 Nov 2025
United States
United StatesConnected via United States App StoreAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
I encourage you to watch this video to the end to understand just what a massive effort this is. This is the master plan being laid out -- reinventing US governance from the bottom up.
The man speaking in this video, Stephen Heintz, is the architect and is the president of the Rockefeller Brothers Fund. He is also part of the New Pluralists, who @SKDoubleDub33 and @iamlisalogan exposed as being directly linked to the color revolution involved ex-USAID employees.
RandomMan retweeted
Sitting at the very top of the stadium, angry.
Not for the memorial, but that the stage we are at… rumors swirl, official narrative becomes largely unbelievable…
It is the realization that we do not trust any part of our government. It’s rotted to the core in nearly every part.
And as I sit here, contemplating the life of Charlie Kirk… I’m jaded by the simple fact that no one is telling the truth. No one is being held accountable. Fraudulent elections, rotted judiciary, rotted fbi, rotted DOJ, rotted congress… all while smiles of how much we are winning…
Not one person arrested. Tina Peters still in jail. Law-fare continues and judges still saying, “there is no evidence” while mountains of evidence is presented. Children still groomed, education still infiltrated by this evil indoctrination… a country in nearly absolute disrepair.
We closed a border. Yay. We taxed other countries. Yay. Crime is down. Yay.
RECAP: They killed millions with the COVID hoax, forcing ventilators on unsuspecting victims. They denied treatments like ivermectin, of course until Pfizer could create “Pfixermectin”. They filled our families with poison and fired, ridiculed and ostracized anyone that would not take it.
They stole our elections, one by one, state by state until they had enough density to persecute and steal the lives and fortunes of Americans. Then they stole our voice, cancelled, bullied and ridiculed those that stood up. They used a media apparatus to inflict the pain with lies and slander. They said, you have no proof… and yet we have plenty.
They raped, trafficked and groomed our women and children. When men stood up, they said it was toxic masculinity. They said “how dare you stand”
The lies are too numerous to count. The narrative too evil to ignore. Then they assassinated Charlie. Let that sink in.
Mr. President,
Enough is enough… arrest them all, ban machines. Ban mail in ballots. Start with the first promise you ever made…
“Together, we will determine the course of America and the world for years to come.
We will face challenges. We will confront hardships. But we will get the job done.”
We must give the people back their voice and that starts with not just a bold and virtuous vision, yet with bold action. There are problems and there are symptoms. This represents a unique opportunity to work the problem that gives people the ability to eliminate the rot, a symptom of a captured nation and captured states.
We love you Mr. President. We love Charlie. We love and serve our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.
It’s time to give us back what was never theirs to take. Restore it.
@realDonaldTrump
RandomMan retweeted
This seditionist plot that @DataRepublican has uncovered and documented with ironclad proof is potentially the biggest political news story of any of our lifetimes, and the legacy media is completely incurious about it.
Worse, the Washington Post is running front page top cover for the plotters' nefarious scheme.
You think you hate journalists enough....
RandomMan retweeted
Read this carefully. DataRepublican has done the digging, and what she found should concern every American.
According to her research, here's who is involved:
Renew to Thrive (R2T) is a group tied to about 200 former USAID officials. Danielle Reiff and Paul Zeitz play key roles in it.
United Democracy Alliance (UDA) is the umbrella over R2T. She says it quietly coordinates protest groups like 50501 and Indivisible and decides when and how protests happen. You'll hardly find it mentioned anywhere in public.
Harvard professor Erica Chenoweth studies how protests topple governments. DataRepublican credits her with the idea for UDA.
National Security Leaders for America is a group of about 1,600 former military, intelligence and diplomatic officials led by retired Rear Admiral Michael E. Smith. She says they put UDA into action.
Their goal, in plain English: they wrote a list of "red lines." If the federal government crosses one, like using the Insurrection Act against protesters, they plan to declare our government illegitimate. Then they work on what a "rewritten" government would look like. A governor doesn't even have to sign on. All one has to do is refuse federal troops.
Why do I believe her? She doesn't ask you to take her word for it. She posts their own calls in their own voices, names names, and shows how the groups connect. She has been doing this kind of careful digging for a long time, and she shows her work every time.
Listen to the audio in her post for yourself. Then ask why former officials are planning for the "day after" our government.
DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublicanOct 20United States
United StatesConnected via United States App StoreAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
🚨🚨THE DEMOCRACY FILES, PART 2: WHEN AND HOW TO DECLARE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ILLEGITIMATE 🚨
Some questioned whether a group of 200 ex-USAID officials could actually pull off their ambitions to rewrite the Constitution.
Here, they describe exactly how it works. They aren't working alone.
The videos all come from Renew to Thrive (R2T) group and associates. Danielle Reiff and Paul Zeitz play key roles within R2T.
R2T sits inside a much, much larger umbrella called United Democracy Alliance (UDA), which is an extremely hush-hush control plane of leaders from major "blocking" NGOs such as 50501 and Indivisible fulfilling various functions. UDA decides when protests get deployed, timelines, how to respond, all that.
R2T's role within UDA is concerned with "the day after tomorrow" - in other words, their function is to conceive what a rewritten American government will look like after the rest of UDA fulfills its purpose. As will be shown, Erica Chenoworth is credited with conceiving UDA in the first place under the Horizons "Big Tent" initiative.
Note here that National Security Leaders for America (NSL4A) is credited for operationalizing UDA. NSL4A is a group of 1,600 ex-military, intelligence, and diplomatic officials. They are led by Rear Admiral Michael E. Smith (Ret). NSL4A also played a key role in the "illegal orders" messaging which targeted Pete Hegseth. Zeitz is also a member of NSL4A.
It must be emphasized that the choice of a military-oriented organization to coordinate NGOs across domestic protests is an interesting one all in itself - especially in an umbrella conceived by a regime change expert like Chenoworth.
You will have a hard time finding any mentions of UDA in the public. They are extremely hush-hush and selective who they talk to.
Mike Smith himself makes a personal appearance in other calls, coordinating Insurrection Act exercises and roleplaying with R2G as one of the participants.
As the audio transcript shows, they have outlined a sequence of "redlines" in which case the federal government should be declared illegitimate. Invoking the Insurrection Act against "peaceful" protesters is one of the most discussed redlines. I will post the illegitimate criteria below, but basically, almost any effective pushback against NGOs is a measure of illegitimacy according to them.
Important to understand:
The audio shows they shopped this idea around governors, but the reality is that governors do not have to explicitly sign on to the pact to play their role in the coup. All they have to do is refuse troops in their state and let UDA / R2G do the work of dissolving the federal government.
RandomMan retweeted
It’s not every day you stumble across a recording in which U.S. citizens discuss plans to declare the federal government illegitimate.
Here’s one particularly alarming excerpt:
“If the federal government’s deemed to be illegitimate … then the governors become the leading governing authority under the current republic framework of our Constitution.”
And then there’s this one:
“I really want to emphasize this is not a concept for a secession. No one is talking about leaving the United States.”
Of course they’re not “talking about leaving the United States”; they’re talking about a planned transfer of governing authority outside the constitutional process—replacing the authority of the federal government with governors and outside networks.
I hope this turns out to be a deep fake or a bad practical joke—because if it’s real, it’s unbelievably frightening.
Either way, it’s a good reminder to vote carefully in November.
DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublicanOct 20United States
United StatesConnected via United States App StoreAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
🚨🚨THE DEMOCRACY FILES, PART 2: WHEN AND HOW TO DECLARE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ILLEGITIMATE 🚨
Some questioned whether a group of 200 ex-USAID officials could actually pull off their ambitions to rewrite the Constitution.
Here, they describe exactly how it works. They aren't working alone.
The videos all come from Renew to Thrive (R2T) group and associates. Danielle Reiff and Paul Zeitz play key roles within R2T.
R2T sits inside a much, much larger umbrella called United Democracy Alliance (UDA), which is an extremely hush-hush control plane of leaders from major "blocking" NGOs such as 50501 and Indivisible fulfilling various functions. UDA decides when protests get deployed, timelines, how to respond, all that.
R2T's role within UDA is concerned with "the day after tomorrow" - in other words, their function is to conceive what a rewritten American government will look like after the rest of UDA fulfills its purpose. As will be shown, Erica Chenoworth is credited with conceiving UDA in the first place under the Horizons "Big Tent" initiative.
Note here that National Security Leaders for America (NSL4A) is credited for operationalizing UDA. NSL4A is a group of 1,600 ex-military, intelligence, and diplomatic officials. They are led by Rear Admiral Michael E. Smith (Ret). NSL4A also played a key role in the "illegal orders" messaging which targeted Pete Hegseth. Zeitz is also a member of NSL4A.
It must be emphasized that the choice of a military-oriented organization to coordinate NGOs across domestic protests is an interesting one all in itself - especially in an umbrella conceived by a regime change expert like Chenoworth.
You will have a hard time finding any mentions of UDA in the public. They are extremely hush-hush and selective who they talk to.
Mike Smith himself makes a personal appearance in other calls, coordinating Insurrection Act exercises and roleplaying with R2G as one of the participants.
As the audio transcript shows, they have outlined a sequence of "redlines" in which case the federal government should be declared illegitimate. Invoking the Insurrection Act against "peaceful" protesters is one of the most discussed redlines. I will post the illegitimate criteria below, but basically, almost any effective pushback against NGOs is a measure of illegitimacy according to them.
Important to understand:
The audio shows they shopped this idea around governors, but the reality is that governors do not have to explicitly sign on to the pact to play their role in the coup. All they have to do is refuse troops in their state and let UDA / R2G do the work of dissolving the federal government.
RandomMan retweeted
DOJ official defends Trump's noncitizen voter probe on '60 Minutes,' accuses show of editing out her answers | Fox News
Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon defended the Trump administration's investigation into noncitizen voters ahead of the midterm elections during CBS' "60 Minutes" on Sunday.
"There are people who feel that the point is to sow distrust about the whole election system. There are very few people who are noncitizens who end up voting — very, very few. And so, therefore, what's the purpose?" Lesley Stahl, host of "60 Minutes," asked Dhillon.
Dhillon responded, "The point is actually the opposite of what you were saying. It's not to sow distrust. The distrust is there. And so, all of these kinds of crimes are being prosecuted now for the first time really, in volume. And look, even the Biden administration prosecuted 13 people for noncitizen voting."
Stahl interrupted and said the numbers were "tiny."
"So Lesley, we've been in office for less than two years. We've had investigations ongoing for over a year, and it takes time. There are literally thousands of them out there that we are looking at," Dhillon responded.
Dhillon pledged in July that the Trump administration will pursue every provable case of illegal voting under what she described as a "broken windows" enforcement strategy, marking a sharp shift from prior administrations as the DOJ intensifies scrutiny of voter rolls following revelations that noncitizens were registered to vote in New Jersey.
Dhillon told Fox News Digital at the time the department's approach is to investigate every credible lead and prosecute every case supported by the evidence, rejecting what she described as the prior view that only widespread fraud or election-altering misconduct warranted federal action.
Her statement came after Democratic New Jersey Gov. Mikie Sherrill revealed that thousands of noncitizens ended up on the state's voter rolls through the motor-voter system.
The "60 Minutes" host asked if there were plans to send Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents to polling locations.
Dhillon said there were "no plans" to do so.
Dhillon dismissed concerns that President Donald Trump would challenge the results of the midterms as "paranoia," Stahl said during a voice-over moment in the segment.
The "60 Minutes" host asked Dhillon, "So would you consider a noncitizen voting an irregularity that would lead to a challenge of the vote?"
"I think that would lead to the person's vote being challenged, but not the entire election," Dhillon said.
Stahl went on to ask if Dhillon could rule out a challenge to a state vote.
"Well, I don't know what is going to happen, but I can tell you that absent some shocking contingency that is unexpected, there should be no interruption in the usual course of counting and certifying the results in the states," Dhillon responded.
"Every illegal vote cancels out the vote of a lawful American citizen," a DOJ spokesperson said in a statement to Fox News Digital. "In 2020, Iowa's 2nd Congressional District race was decided by six votes. The Department is now bringing more than double that amount of election fraud cases every week. Every federal race also shares the ballot with state and local contests, which are often decided by even narrower margins. Voting by noncitizens and other ineligible voters is a federal crime, and the Department will enforce the law whether a case involves one illegal ballot or hundreds. These prosecutions protect the integrity of our elections and deter others from breaking the law. That is exactly what Americans expect from their Justice Department."
"I set some fake news straight on @60Minutes tonight, though as usual they edit out 95% of the answers," Dhillon posted on X in response to a video of her exchange with Stahl.
CBS did not immediately return Fox News Digital's request for comment.
foxnews.com/media/doj-offici…
RandomMan retweeted

DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublican9 Nov 2025
United States
United StatesConnected via United States App StoreAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
Lest you think it is harmless, they outright admit their goal is to create new "socio-political economic governance systems."
If that's not a coup, I don't know what is.
RandomMan retweeted

DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublican9 Nov 2025
United States
United StatesConnected via United States App StoreAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
Note at the end of the video, the "we" in reference to organizing the February 5th protests - that was organized by Soros-backed groups 50501 and Indivisible. This is the first solid link I've found connecting the No Kings movement, State Department, and Soros together.
RandomMan retweeted

DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublican9 Nov 2025
United States
United StatesConnected via United States App StoreAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
🧵🚨 MAJOR BREAKING: International actors are involved in the State Department led color revolution 🚨🚨
This is not speculation; it’s straight from a recorded call.
Ex-USAID employees describe how, before January 20, they moved internal groups off government systems and into encrypted Signal chats, then quickly linked with foreign partners and NGOs after the inauguration. This attempt at creating a color revolution isn't new news; this part was already reported in NOTUS earlier this year.
But what's not reported is the international aspect. One participant explicitly frames it as "a global anti-authoritarian movement," connecting U.S. officials with "colleagues from around the world who have dealt with this directly."
They reference coordination with Johns Hopkins, "international democracy and conflict mitigation spaces," and efforts to mobilize across borders against what they perceive as domestic authoritarianism.
At what point does this become treason?
As always, patience as I pull together this thread.
👇
RandomMan retweeted

DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublicanOct 20
United States
United StatesConnected via United States App StoreAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
Replying to @DataRepublican @Petermarocco
Here's the drop: xitter.cf/DataRepublican/status/…
DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublicanOct 20United States
United StatesConnected via United States App StoreAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
🚨🚨THE DEMOCRACY FILES, PART 2: WHEN AND HOW TO DECLARE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ILLEGITIMATE 🚨
Some questioned whether a group of 200 ex-USAID officials could actually pull off their ambitions to rewrite the Constitution.
Here, they describe exactly how it works. They aren't working alone.
The videos all come from Renew to Thrive (R2T) group and associates. Danielle Reiff and Paul Zeitz play key roles within R2T.
R2T sits inside a much, much larger umbrella called United Democracy Alliance (UDA), which is an extremely hush-hush control plane of leaders from major "blocking" NGOs such as 50501 and Indivisible fulfilling various functions. UDA decides when protests get deployed, timelines, how to respond, all that.
R2T's role within UDA is concerned with "the day after tomorrow" - in other words, their function is to conceive what a rewritten American government will look like after the rest of UDA fulfills its purpose. As will be shown, Erica Chenoworth is credited with conceiving UDA in the first place under the Horizons "Big Tent" initiative.
Note here that National Security Leaders for America (NSL4A) is credited for operationalizing UDA. NSL4A is a group of 1,600 ex-military, intelligence, and diplomatic officials. They are led by Rear Admiral Michael E. Smith (Ret). NSL4A also played a key role in the "illegal orders" messaging which targeted Pete Hegseth. Zeitz is also a member of NSL4A.
It must be emphasized that the choice of a military-oriented organization to coordinate NGOs across domestic protests is an interesting one all in itself - especially in an umbrella conceived by a regime change expert like Chenoworth.
You will have a hard time finding any mentions of UDA in the public. They are extremely hush-hush and selective who they talk to.
Mike Smith himself makes a personal appearance in other calls, coordinating Insurrection Act exercises and roleplaying with R2G as one of the participants.
As the audio transcript shows, they have outlined a sequence of "redlines" in which case the federal government should be declared illegitimate. Invoking the Insurrection Act against "peaceful" protesters is one of the most discussed redlines. I will post the illegitimate criteria below, but basically, almost any effective pushback against NGOs is a measure of illegitimacy according to them.
Important to understand:
The audio shows they shopped this idea around governors, but the reality is that governors do not have to explicitly sign on to the pact to play their role in the coup. All they have to do is refuse troops in their state and let UDA / R2G do the work of dissolving the federal government.
RandomMan retweeted

DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublicanOct 19
United States
United StatesConnected via United States App StoreAccount-level information, not a live location or per-post device.
If you don't know who @Petermarocco is - he is the DOGE administrator who actually ended USAID. We worked together. He's a grizzled veteran, tougher than nails, knows all the USAID bodies. He's not easy to shake.
But I showed Pete the next clip I'm dropping tonight, and his reaction was "holy crap" followed by "Seriously, that tape is straight up coup" followed by a discussion of how to get the materials over to the DoJ.
I'm working on getting this out in some publicly consumable format - I can't just mirror 250 GB of scraped data on my website (there are legality reasons). I'm also looking into sharing the data with media contacts.
RandomMan retweeted
Congratulations to the self-appointed guardians of democracy on their latest alleged masterstroke: win an election, provoke the president into a constitutional confrontation, then declare his government illegitimate for responding.
Absolutely fucking brilliant. Somebody give these people a Nobel Prize in manufactured emergencies.
The alleged roadmap that @DataRepublican has found begins with Democrats sweeping the 2026 midterms. DSA activists then become the "foot soldiers" in sustained confrontations with Trump's administration, pushing toward a "doomsday scenario" involving the Insurrection Act, potentially in 2027.
And here's where the No Kings crowd deserves a standing ovation for sheer, breathtaking hypocrisy.
The president exercises constitutional authority during the confrontation they've allegedly been working to provoke. Suddenly, Washington loses legitimacy, Democratic governors become alternative political authorities, and the 2028 election becomes a referendum on whether America's existing governing structure should survive.
What an extraordinary fucking coincidence.
The movement screaming about kings is accused of preparing to exploit presidential power to advance a political transformation that includes proposals to abolish the Senate.
Apparently, democracy is sacred right up until its institutions become inconvenient.
The allegations also identify United Democracy Alliance as a coordinating force behind No Kings, Indivisible, and 50501. Roughly 7,000 documents, thousands of transcripts, and hundreds of recordings reportedly support the investigation. Those records still need to establish whether this astonishingly cynical operation was actually planned.
Because if they do, the implications are absolutely damning.
Imagine the arrogance required to deliberately provoke a constitutional crisis, exploit the government's response, and then present yourself as the heroic defender of the very republic you've been working to destabilize.
And imagine the contempt for ordinary Americans required to expect them to swallow that steaming pile of bullshit.
The No Kings crowd allegedly has a fascinating new theory of democratic government: when the voters and Constitution won't deliver your revolution, manufacture a fucking emergency and call yourself the rescue squad.
(article below)
RandomMan retweeted
This is a MUST READ: it’s a post from a French Citizen: Brivael Le Pogam, this is the best description of what has occurred in France I have seen, read his words:
Le Pogam: “To every American, and to everyone watching France burn from abroad:
Do not blame the French people for this.
We never asked for it. We never voted for it. And the one time we were clearly asked, we said no.
Here are the numbers your media won't show you.
70% of the French say there are too many immigrants in France today.
79% want a tougher immigration policy.
77% disapprove of the government's record on immigration.
83% want foreign criminals and long-term unemployed foreigners sent home.
And no, it's not just the old. 69% of French 18 to 24 year olds support suspending legal immigration for three years.
This is not a fringe. This is the French people.
In 2005, we were asked if we wanted the European Constitution. 55% voted no. Three years later, our politicians passed the same text under another name, through parliament, without ever asking us again.
That is modern France in one sentence. The people say no. The elites do it anyway.
So who is responsible? The politicians who lied to us. A class of leaders formed in the same schools, the same forums, the same networks, loyal to each other before they are loyal to their nations.
In 2017, at Harvard, Klaus Schwab, founder of the World Economic Forum, bragged about his Young Global Leaders program in four words: "We penetrate the cabinets." He added that it was true in France. Emmanuel Macron was one of his Young Global Leaders.
It's the same project in Brussels with Ursula von der Leyen and in Paris with Macron. Borders treated as an obstacle. Nations treated as relics. The people treated as a problem to be managed.
What you are watching in France is not the French people failing. It is the end of the globalist project, an abject, quasi-communist dream of a world run by unelected planners. It is collapsing everywhere in Europe at once, and the West has to cut this cancer out before it takes the rest of the body with it.
The peoples of Europe don't want this. They never did.
So when you see our town halls burning, don't say "the French chose this."
The French never chose this.
They were forced into it.
If you're French and you agree, repost this so the world hears it from us.
If you're American, look at us carefully. Then choose differently on November 3rd.”
Hope that wakes you up…
Vote RED 🇺🇸
RandomMan retweeted
Holy fucking shit. Barack Obama has discovered that government power can be abused! Somebody alert the Smithsonian. Apparently, it took a federal investigation involving Ilhan Omar for the former president to experience this miraculous constitutional awakening.
Obama now declares that government cannot selectively target people for their political beliefs. Beautiful sentiment. Where the hell was this passionate devotion to civil liberties during the Russia investigation, the FISA abuses involving Carter Page, the FBI search of Mar-a-Lago, Trump's criminal prosecutions, and the taxpayer-funded January 6 television extravaganza?
Trump endured years of investigations, lawsuits, prosecutions, and congressional spectacles. His lawyers faced professional disciplinary proceedings. January 6 defendants faced raids, staggering legal expenses, and prison sentences. The political and personal consequences were enormous.
Through all that, Obama somehow managed to keep his constitutional sermons remarkably restrained.
Then federal agents came knocking at Ilhan Omar's door, and suddenly the fucking republic was in danger.
What an extraordinary coincidence.
And the hypocrisy gets uglier. Senator Elissa Slotkin has openly discussed sending a deterrence message to young Republicans contemplating government service. Imagine the political culture we've created when the prospect of legal and professional consequences becomes part of the calculation for entering public service.
Now Obama wants to lecture the country about protecting political participation from government intimidation.
The sheer, breathtaking fucking audacity.
A constitutional principle means something only when it protects people you despise. It has to survive changes in presidents, congressional majorities, and political fortunes.
Obama's sudden outrage invites one devastating question: Why did this principle become such an urgent national emergency only when Ilhan Omar needed defending?
After years of political warfare, America's latest constitutional miracle is Barack Obama discovering that the machinery of government has a reverse gear.
And apparently, the son of a bitch only objects when it starts moving toward his friends.
(article below)
RandomMan retweeted
🚨 My fellow infidels…
The stunned reaction from conservatives to scenes of Islamist student mobs and foreign sabotage networks in France is almost comical, considering we’re witnessing similar radicalization in America.
The escalation of extremist movements is rapidly spreading on college campuses and in high schools.
Our $79 BILLION dollar Dept of Education continues to fund these institutions, enabling the normalization of terrorism.
In France, the iconic statue of Joan of Arc has now been draped in a keffiyeh.
Barely anyone noticed when students in America draped Ben Franklin and George Washington statues in terror scarves, then chanted for the destruction of our country.
Campuses didn’t lose one dime in federal funding.
While our Dept of Education remains fixated on college athletes and enriching their coaches, the ideological war for the next generation is intensifying.
We are financing the “fundamental transformation” that President Barack Hussein Obama fantasized about.
If we don’t put serious counterterrorism and national security professionals in the Dept of Education who understand the stakes, we will bankroll the mobilization of student al-Qaeda.
@potus
@NCTC_Official
@StephenM
RandomMan retweeted
Democrats are screaming about the weaponization of government while newly disclosed records show Jack Smith's investigation obtained personal information on more than 639,000 Republican voters, donors, and supporters.
The fucking audacity is breathtaking.
Names. Home addresses. Birth dates. Employers. Political affiliations. Financial and donation information. Some records reportedly dated back to 2005, a full decade before Trump descended that escalator.
What the hell did someone's Republican donations in 2005 have to do with investigating the 2020 election?
That's a question Jack Smith and his defenders should be forced to answer.
Instead, we're treated to the magnificent spectacle of Hakeem Jeffries suddenly discovering the dangers of political persecution.
When Smith indicted Trump, Jeffries declared that "no one is above the law" and demanded that the legal process proceed without political interference.
Now, with Ilhan Omar under investigation, Jeffries is warning about the "corrupt weaponization" of federal power against Trump's adversaries.
Well, isn't that fucking convenient?
When Smith was collecting Republican information on an industrial scale, Democrats defended his investigation. Now that one of their own faces scrutiny, they're practically climbing the Capitol dome to scream about constitutional protections.
Where was this sudden passion for civil liberties when hundreds of thousands of Republican Americans had their personal information swept into federal investigative files?
Where was the outrage over the scope, necessity, and justification for collecting it?
The deeper scandal is the precedent Democrats were perfectly comfortable defending. Once federal investigators accumulate sprawling records of Americans' lawful political activities, every citizen has reason to demand answers about the limits of that power.
But Democrats only seem interested in those limits when their own political allies are involved.
They cheered the machinery. They defended its reach. They mocked anyone questioning it.
And now they're demanding safeguards against the very power they spent years defending.
The people who applauded the weapon are suddenly terrified of standing in front of it.
And they expect the rest of us to fucking applaud their courage.
(article below)
RandomMan retweeted
If you would like to support my work and arm yourself with the intellectual firepower to see through the regime’s illusions, please join the vanguard:
Direct Support (Buy Me a Coffee): If you simply want to fuel the operation directly, please consider buying me a coffee. Your donations are directly funding my upcoming relocation, allowing me to strike back against the cultural rot from a position of maximum strength.
👉 Support via Buy Me a Coffee:
buymeacoffee.com/saggezza
I leave you with a timeless truth to carry into the fight:
"A government which does not trust its citizens to be armed is not itself to be trusted." ~ Niccolò Machiavelli – born 1469
Fortune favors those who refuse to apologize for their ambition and forge their own path with unwavering resolve.
RandomMan retweeted
True story:
In 1962, doctors in Massachusetts looked at a newborn boy named Rick Hoyt and told his parents to lock him away in an institution. His umbilical cord had twisted around his neck during birth, cutting off oxygen to his brain and leaving him a quadriplegic with severe cerebral palsy.
"He will be a vegetable for the rest of his life," the physicians said.
His father, Dick Hoyt, looked at the way Rick’s eyes tracked movement across the room and refused to believe the diagnosis. He and his wife brought Rick home, read to him, taught him the alphabet, and treated him like any other boy.
When Rick turned eleven, a group of engineers at Tufts University built a specialized computer that allowed him to select letters on a screen by tapping the side of his head against a metal switch. Skeptics doubted he would understand how to use it. Everyone crowded around the monitor, waiting for his first words—expecting "Hi Mom" or "Hi Dad."
Instead, Rick tapped out two words: "Go Bruins."
It was the year the Boston Bruins were in the Stanley Cup Finals. Rick had understood every word spoken around him for eleven years.
Four years later, a local five-mile charity run was organized for a classmate who had been paralyzed in a sporting accident. Using his computer, Rick typed a message to his father: "Dad, I want to do that."
Dick Hoyt was thirty-seven years old, out of shape, and had never run more than a mile at a time. Still, the next morning, he gripped the handles of Rick’s heavy, clunky wheelchair and pushed his son across all five miles, wheezing across the finish line next to last.
That night, Dick was iced down and aching when Rick called him over to the computer screen and tapped out the sentence that altered the trajectory of both their lives:
"Dad, when I’m running, it feels like I’m not handicapped."
Dick Hoyt made a silent vow in that room: if speed made his son feel free, he would lend Rick his own body for as long as his heart could beat.
Dick began training before dawn every day, strapping a hundred-pound bag of cement into the wheelchair while Rick was at school just to build his lungs. Over the next four decades, father and son completed 1,130 endurance races together—including 32 Boston Marathons, a 3,735-mile run and bike across the United States in 45 days, and six grueling Ironman Triathlons.
During an Ironman, Dick would swim 2.4 miles in open water while towing Rick behind him in a small rubber boat tied to his waist, immediately transition to a custom two-seater bicycle to pedal both of them 112 miles, and then strap on running shoes to push Rick 26.2 miles to the finish line.
At the height of their racing years, elite marathoners asked Dick why he never entered a single race alone just to see how many trophies he could win without pushing over a hundred pounds of extra weight.
Dick didn't hesitate. "I have zero desire to take a single step out there by myself," he said. "I am only lending Rick my arms and legs. He is the one lending me his heart."
Most people hit a wall in life because they are only fighting for their own comfort. Self-interest is a fragile fuel; the moment pain, exhaustion, or failure sets in, the mind looks for an exit because it is easy to negotiate with your own excuses.
True endurance is unlocked the moment your discipline becomes the vessel for someone else’s survival, dignity, or freedom. When the people you love depend on your strength, exhaustion loses its vote. Find a mission larger than your own comfort, and you become nearly impossible to break.
















