France’s Far Right Seizes the Moment as Rioting Stuns the Country nytimes.com/2026/10/19/franc…
Peter Rabl retweeted
Report: Israel backed Qatar transferring funds to Hamas-ruled Gaza before Oct. 7 haaretz.com/gaza/2026-10-18/…
Peter Rabl retweeted
Holy shit @SecRubio...
Where is your integrity and your soul?
Do you even remember who you were?
Peter Rabl retweeted
Trump's ignorant rant in Alaska about global warming is met with almost complete silence
Peter Rabl retweeted
It is a basic principle of American democracy that the government can’t selectively target individuals simply because of their political beliefs or what they say. But that’s exactly what the Trump Administration is doing to Congresswoman Ilhan Omar of Minnesota.
To understand why this is so appalling, it’s important to know the facts. Congresswoman Omar came to this country with her father when she was 12 years old. Five years later, her father became a naturalized citizen. If Ilhan had been 18 at the time, she would have had to apply for citizenship separately. But because she was 17, she became a naturalized citizen automatically.
Congresswoman Omar went on to graduate from college, work as a community organizer, become the first Somali-American legislator elected to public office in the U.S., and win a seat in Congress. There, she has been one of the Trump Administration’s fiercest critics, which has led the president to repeatedly single her out as someone who he believes does not belong in this country.
Now the Administration is actively trying to deport Congresswoman Omar, seemingly based solely on the unsubstantiated theory that she was actually 18 when her father was naturalized, and therefore is not a citizen. Federal agents have raided her home, confiscated personal records, and seized her phone — all to try and uncover a nonexistent smoking gun from 20 years ago that will somehow make their case.
Think about that. The full weight of the federal government is being brought down on a law-abiding elected official because she has dared to criticize the president. And it’s not the first time this has happened. Under President Trump, the Justice Department has repeatedly gone after those he considers his political enemies — from the Attorney General of New York, to the former head of the FBI, to members of the Federal Reserve.
In those cases, the prosecutions either stalled or were dismissed for having no basis in law, and the same is likely to happen in this case. But not before Congresswoman Omar’s life has been turned upside down, her legal bills have piled up, and she’s been forced to spend time fighting unsubstantiated charges instead of serving the people of Minnesota.
The fact that any president, or any administration, is willing to engage in such transparent efforts to intimidate someone should outrage all Americans, regardless of how they feel about Congresswoman Omar’s political views. Because if this becomes the new normal, there’s no reason to believe it will stop with her — or that future presidents, in either party, won’t do the same.
Peter Rabl retweeted
Jetzt kümmert sich Trump endlich um die wichtigen Angelegenheiten. Laut NYT möchte er den Golfplatz in D.C., zu einen Weltklasse Golfkurs machen. Dazu muss er gerichtliche Verfahren führen. Aber es ist ohnehin vernünftiger, wenn er sich um sowas kümmert und nicht um Weltpolitik.
KOMMENTAR - Frankreich brennt: Noch mehr Geld für die Banlieues kann das Problem nicht lösen nzz.ch/meinung/frankreich-br…
Katie Zacharia Is Ousted After 5 Days as White House Press Secretary nytimes.com/2026/10/16/us/po…
Peter Rabl retweeted
The best explanation for Trump’s affection for Russia is likely the simplest one, @jonathanchait argues: theatln.tc/gXIFXnNz
📸: Chris Ratcliffe / Bloomberg / Getty
Peter Rabl retweeted
Trump says he wants to drop the Mother of All Bombs on Iran, and describes it as "a tiny nuclear bomb"
Peter Rabl retweeted
OMG! Katie Zacharia is even worse than I could have ever imagined.
It was almost as if Hannity tried getting her to flop in this discussion.
What a disaster, 19 days before the election.
Peter Rabl retweeted
was ich nicht verstehe warum die @SPOE_at Phillip Kucher nicht schon bisher viel mehr in die Öffentlichkeit gerückt hat- heute Auseinandersetzung mit Kickl im NR gehört- witzig, locker, authentisch....
Peter Rabl retweeted
No amount of support for Russia can end the war, because Russia is the criminal aggressor. A modicum of support for Ukraine could, however, end the war, by making it impossible for Russia to continue. This should not be a hard choice.
Peter Rabl retweeted
Trump is lying again. Putin started the war and has repeatedly refused to negotiate to end it. The US spent nothing like $350 billion. Half the money is not missing. Washington and Moscow are both significantly more corrupt than Kyiv. Putin, not Zelensky, is a dictator who openly steals elections.
Peter Rabl retweeted
In 1987 Trump visited Moscow. Since then, "He has changed his mind about abortion and crypto, he has supported different political parties... but his dislike of America’s democratic allies and his preference for Russia have remained remarkably consistent."
theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/1…
Journalisten-Kritik der Kolumnistin Rosemarie Schwaiger in @DiePressecom
Peter Rabl retweeted
It looks like Putin told Trump that Ukraine was causing high gas prices, a lie that is convenient for Trump. Obviously it’s Trump’s war in Iran that is the issue. But Trump can’t accept that.
So now Trump wants to give Putin a lot of money for Russian diesel, which won’t do anything to markets and won’t even help him in the midterms, though I bet Putin told him it would.
But since Russia and Iran are allies, the shift in US policy and any US taxpayer money that Trump gives Putin will help both the Russian war on Ukraine as well as the regime in Iran. Trump got his pocket picked as usual but the money is ours and the deeper price is the visible shift of US policy to support Russia’s war of aggression.
In other words, Trump makes the world more dangerous by extending two wars and gets nothing in return, not even for himself (unless there was a side deal, which can’t be ruled out).
Peter Rabl retweeted
"The amount of fuel Russia could export is too small, the impact on pricing too slight, the narrative too late to shape electoral outcomes: This looks, instead, like something very different: an abrupt, Hail Mary attempt to force Ukraine to surrender"
theatlantic.com/idea/2026/10…
Peter Rabl retweeted
Elon Musk has funneled more than $276 million into Republican groups since July, making him by far the largest known donor in the midterms as he tries to save the GOP’s Senate majority with some of the largest donations in American political history. nyti.ms/4yeOjZe



















