Make the state play by their own rules | ideologically homeless | Google jury nullification
Checking my list in Geneva, CH
Joined August 2021
- Tweets14.5K
- Following401
- Followers269
- Likes162K
RandomRadome retweeted
I don't know why people would be shocked at this concept.
Even if we set aside every single gun market specific factor:
The economy is still in the toliet, inflation is still wild, everyone is bitching about struggling to find work, gas has gone back and forth from 3.80 to 4.90 a gallon here every other day.
And guns are an EXPENSIVE hobby.
RandomRadome retweeted
Apparently transplants thought the idea of hurricane cakes were “insensitive” and now Publix no longer has them readily available and you have to special order them what is happening to my country of Florida
🚨 BREAKING 🚨
ATF Releases NFA guidance in response to the Texas NFA lawsuit:
"Effective October 9, 2026, ATF will no longer require individuals to seek ATF approval under the NFA before making or transferring short-barreled rifles, short-barreled shotguns, silencers, and “any other weapon[s]” as defined in 26 U.S.C. § 5845(e). ATF will also no longer require such items to be registered in the National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record. These policies apply uniformly to anyone otherwise subject to these requirements, not just to the plaintiffs in the litigation."
RandomRadome retweeted
I’ve been shitting on Social Security for years now, and every single time, I’m told ad fucking nauseam:
“It’s MY money! I paid into it!”
Really? Then why would we need to raise taxes on everyone else just to give you “your” money?
Because it’s NOT your money. Your money was spent almost as soon as it came in. Today’s workers are paying for yesterday’s retirees.
It’s a massive, government run Ponzi scheme. And now, one of the largest generations in American history is collecting benefits.
In a traditional Ponzi scheme, this is where everything implodes: when there aren’t enough new investors coming in to pay off the old ones.
But there’s one crucial difference.
This one is backed by the federal government.
And when there aren’t enough new people paying into the system, the government has something Bernie Madoff never had:
The power to force the next generation to pay more, at gunpoint.
Exactly like I’ve been saying for years.
RandomRadome retweeted
Trump wants to eliminate a tax incentive for employers to hire foreigners over American grads, and this is how the shameless whores in the Narrative industry are framing it.
The Trump administration proposed charging universities up to $100,000 for each international student they recommend to work in the U.S. after graduation, a cost that experts say could be passed on to students. wapo.st/4hOfFzy
RandomRadome retweeted
Tired of this excuse. First of all, social security is not something you “pay into.” If it were, you wouldn’t need younger people to “pay into it” in order to get your check. But you do. Because this is a Ponzi scheme, not a retirement account. What you really mean to say is that your money was stolen from you — which it was — and now you want to steal from younger people to get restitution. That’s the actual case you’re making and it’s exactly as morally deranged as it sounds.
Second, your generation continually for decades voted for politicians who would keep the scheme going. You might not have invented social security, but you damn sure made certain it kept going. Why should younger people have to pay the price for the shitty policies you supported?
Third, you “paid into” social security in a different time. The country is now bankrupted and 40 trillion dollars in debt, and basic things like housing are prohibitively expensive. It wasn’t like that when you were young, because your generation of leadership created this problem.
So the theme here is that there are a bunch of problems you guys either created or contributed to. You can choose to pay the price for that now, or force your grandchildren to pay the price so you can live comfortably until you die and leave them holding the bag. You’ve chosen the latter, and I think that’s wrong. Simple as that.
RandomRadome retweeted
If you are regulating a filament based on how it is marketed, with it magically becoming a "firearm precursor part" based on that marketing, then you are not regulating guns but rather speech.
These people hate free speech as much as gun rights.
San Diego County is suing filament maker Polymaker, alleging its "Come and Make It" marketing made 3D-printer filament a regulated "firearm precursor part." It seeks up to $2,500 per violation; the complaint says it doesn't seek to ban filament sales.
youtu.be/edT9_PhWLeQ
RandomRadome retweeted
Great.
Another reckless withdrawal from an Islamic country.
It's Afghanistan all over again 🫠
🚨 BREAKING: The United States has WITHDRAWN ALL B-1 Lancer bombers from the UK's RAF Fairford base following the major security incident and suspected terror plot — they're now headed to the US, per WSJ
THE UK NEEDS LAW AND ORDER. BADLY.
The fact we have to do this in an ALLIED WESTERN NATION is seriously concerning
The UK has released ALL SIX terror suspects, one of which is a dual Iranian national.
Thank God the would-be attack never got fully carried out 🙏🏻
KEEP OUR TROOPS AND INTERESTS SECURE 🇺🇸
47 has recently slammed the UK for releasing the suspects
RandomRadome retweeted
Form 1 guidance when?
🚨BREAKING🚨
Solicitor General John Sauer just notified Congress “that @TheJusticeDept [will not] file an appeal” in GOA’s victory against the NFA, Silencer Shop v. ATF.
ATF cannot force GOA members to register suppressors or short barrels EVER AGAIN. This is PERMANENT! 🇺🇸
RandomRadome retweeted
"Enshittification" is a sort of "safe horny" term for what is really just outright impoverishment and declining living standards due to economic insolvency from deindustrialization, demographic decline, hyperinflation, etc.
You are just de-developing and becoming poor.
RandomRadome retweeted
Several counties in California still take longer than 120 days to issue a carry permit (which also violates CA law, not just the Second Amendment), and others charge thousands of dollars for one. Rob Bonta has done nothing on either issue. In fact, he is helping defend Santa Clara in our lawsuit on high fees.
How about you write a bill letting us sue county sheriffs and other personnel in their personal capacity for violating the constitution and California law in those ways?
The Governor just signed my bill to allow people to sue ICE, Border Patrol, and other federal agents for violating people’s constitutional rights. Starting immediately, people can sue federal agents retroactive to abuse occurring in March 2025. I was the first state lawmaker in the country to introduce such a bill, and it’s now law. The era of impunity is ending.
It’s currently nearly impossible to sue federal agents, due to an awful Supreme Court ruling a few years ago. States have the ability to authorize these lawsuits by providing that people can sue officials and agents at all levels of government equally — local and state officials can already be sued so federal officials will now be treated the same. That’s what the No Kings Act, SB 747, does.
We’re reinstating the rule of law. We’re creating real accountability. No one — not Trump, not ICE, no one — is above the law.
The reason you’re never going to hear anything else about the Les Vegas shooting is because a belt fed machine gun was used. Any Infantry soldier worth his salt knows the rate of fire of an M240B. Furthermore, it’s nearly impossible to maintain such rates of fire when a bumpstock, especially from a prone position. Even a very experienced shooter would find it difficult to do, especially given the tension and stress of the moment.
RandomRadome retweeted
Flock is the ChatGPT of the policing world.
In a couple years cops will have no idea how to solve crimes, investigate, aks questions, and follow leads. They just type what they need in the search box and call it a day.
Glorified errand runners.
RandomRadome retweeted
If a state created a 4 hour civics course (that you have to pay for) before you can register to vote, the Ninth Circuit would strike it down on an expedited basis, even if a district court were to uphold it. The law wouldn't last a month. They'd also condemn it as racist, classist, etc. in their opinion striking it down.
Yet everyone knows with certainty, barring a change in the majority, that it will uphold this 4 hour training course requirement for gun ownership. That result is not even in doubt, the only question is whether SCOTUS would grant cert on the issue to reverse them after.
That difference in treatment is disgraceful. Just as disgraceful is that the Ninth Circuit doesn't even care that we can see their blatant bias against the Second Amendment.
