The ResearchHub Journal retweeted
@DrEdCaddye presenting to the Breathwork Lab @BSMSMedSchool his homehope.org talk from last month in Boulder, Colorado.
1st pic = 1st @RHubJournal (@ResearchHub/@ResearchHubF) paper: doi.org/10.55277/rhj.a7ortio…
The ResearchHub Journal retweeted
@RHubJournal getting a nice makeover. Check out our breathwork/movement publications with them (links below). S/O to @ResearchHub & @ResearchHubF.
The ResearchHub Journal retweeted
Another day, another preprint submitted to @ResearchHub's new @RHubJournal, powered by @ResearchHubF. This time a case study w/@DrEdCaddye, @Rarebarracuda & @FBrzeszczynski. Big up on this amazing (breath)work.
The ResearchHub Journal retweeted
Nature talked about it. And now I believe that @breath_Guy and I are the first to publish in the @ResearchHub @RHubJournal - the future of science!
nature.com/articles/d41586-0…
The ResearchHub Journal retweeted
Currently working on revisions for our @ResearchHub preprint & hopefully the 1st publication in @RHubJournal. Peer-reviewers compensated by @ResearchHubF.
The ResearchHub Journal retweeted
Who wants to review the 1st ever manuscript submitted to @ResearchHub & @ResearchHubF's new journal @RHubJournal, led by @DrEdCaddye.
researchhub.com/paper/917858…
Cc: @brian_armstrong @hubermanlab @DrAndyGalpin @Dr_Epel @wendybmendes @foundmyfitness @PeterAttiaMD @thereadystate
The ResearchHub Journal retweeted
Thanks for the @ResearchHub shoutout @MushtaqBilalPhD!
In addition to paying peer reviewers for their time and expertise, the @RHubJournal is accepting submissions for its first issue.
Learn more: researchhub.com/researchhub-…
The ResearchHub Journal retweeted
DeepSeek R1 is making headlines in the news and is being compared to OpenAI's o1. However, many have not read the preprint.
We invite you to evaluate the DeepSeek R1 preprint at @ResearchHub, and reward high-quality contributions with 150$ (in RSC).
researchhub.com/paper/916140…
The ResearchHub Journal retweeted
2024: A Breakthrough Year for ResearchHub
Hot off the press and delivered straight to the inboxs of our community members.
Curious about what we accomplished last year & what 2025 holds? Dive into the full newsletter below to find out more. 🧵
The ResearchHub Journal retweeted
Traditional metrics like the journal impact factor often fail to accurately reflect quality and can be influenced by various biases. Our newly launched, open-access @ResearchHub journal adopts the PRC model, while paying peer reviewers. nature.com/articles/d41586-0…
The ResearchHub Journal retweeted
I reviewed this interesting preprint for @GigaScience on @ResearchHub
The authors propose a new clustering method for high-dimensional biological data, applicable to flow/mass cytometry, scRNA-seq + multiplex imaging.
Check the preprint + my review:
researchhub.com/paper/667084…
The ResearchHub Journal retweeted
Update - 10 | 2024/12/29
We built a demo app to ensure easy use of paper submission and workflow customization. What's next? We will up our game to produce analytics and utility tools for the community. Stay tuned for more updates.
Join the waitlist and be one of the first who can get hands-on with the app and help us do more human evaluations, pushing the boundaries of how Human and AI can accelerate science together.
Link: airtable.com/app99lquhfWKuYz…
First milestone is up. Let's recap what we have achieved in the past 10 days: We have established a working Multi-Agents Infrastructure for AI Editors and Peer Reviewers driven by various SOTA LLM models. We have scanned through batches of scientific preprints and manuscripts, producing 200+ AI-generated editorial comments, reviewer personas, paper analyses, error identification, and ratings. All data is well recorded through our metadata tracing workflow. Keep an eye on the upcoming dataset release.
The ResearchHub Journal retweeted
Follow along with the daily updates on our AI peer review experiment. 🧵
blog.researchhub.foundation/…
The ResearchHub Journal retweeted
👉🏼 @ResearchHub
Make it stop @Nature
Stop paywalling science.
I’m a researcher at a scrappy start up with limited budget, and every day I encounter papers behind a pay wall that literally slows down the pace at which I can consume information in my field.
If you’re a researcher bothered by this problem, give it a share or start posting papers you couldn’t access.
We can use our voices for change.
#StopPaywallingScience
The ResearchHub Journal retweeted
An experimental journal is paying peer reviewers the equivalent of US$150 per review in a specially developed cryptocurrency go.nature.com/4iu4U4Q
The ResearchHub Journal retweeted
1⃣ Earlier this year, we published a @vita_dao @ResearchHub joint review paper on popular longevity biomarkers.
Following a rigorous open peer review on the ResearchHub platform, we're posting our revised version --
researchhub.com/post/3716/lo…
The ResearchHub Journal retweeted
If the usual $150 is not enough, and you're up to the challenge, consider this bounty with up to $700 reward in $RSC for peer reviewing a preprint and discussing the proposed equations. WARNING: Math Involved.
researchhub.com/paper/841510…
The ResearchHub Journal retweeted
Reminder that you can earn $RSC on @ResearchHub by contributing to science
- Write peer reviews
- Answer scientific questions
- Submit interesting pre-prints
One professor in Brazil told us they are earning more writing peer reviews on ResearchHub than in their day job.
Congratulations to @brian_armstrong and @joycesticks’ @ResearchHub on crossing $1.00 / token ($RSC). Big milestone in advancing the pace of open science and the incentive for all to contribute. 🧬 📈
The ResearchHub Journal retweeted
What are your top 5 picks for scientific disciplines that require acceleration in 2025? Share your Top 5 Picks and earn a chance to grab up to 500 $RSC Grant @ResearchHub
researchhub.com/question/368…
