Pinned Tweet
Replying to @PabloReports
So are you saying the deported people were just on welfare and didn't have a job?
Rage Against The Stream retweeted
🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump's own intelligence director told him before the war exactly how it would go, and every prediction landed...
-Tulsi Gabbard warned in the Oval Office that killing Iran's supreme leader would likely produce a MORE hardline regime open to acquiring nuclear weapons
-She said Tehran would rush to close the Strait of Hormuz and destabilize global energy markets
-She said Iran would strike U.S. forces and partners across the region
-Military leaders separately warned of casualties, munitions shortages and readiness problems for an overstretched force
-Trump DISMISSED the concerns in those meetings, and Hegseth and Caine said repeatedly they would navigate any complications...
-The tally at the 6 months: an estimated 3,000 Iranians and 18 American servicemembers dead, 756 U.S. troops wounded, damaged bases, drained oil reserves and shrunken stockpiles
-Bessent announced the goal is to collapse the regime under a campaign named Operation Economic Outcast
Go down that list line by line.
The IRGC now runs Iran, Mojtaba Khamenei sits above it with hardliners in every security post, parliament is drafting NPT withdrawal legislation, and the strait carries a fifth of its prewar traffic.
That is literally Gabbard's briefing, delivered in order, and right on schedule.
Vance argued for the other path, telling Trump that Iran might trade away its nuclear program at the table and that failure there would only strengthen the case for striking later.
He lost the argument to a Pentagon promising "decisive options."
Asked in June why he took a temporary deal, Trump pointed to internal polling showing nearly 80% of Americans wanted the war over REGARDLESS of terms.
Six weeks later, support sits at 31%, gas is a dollar higher, and the strategy is still unclear, seemingly fluctuating between Truth Social tantrums and confused aides leaking contradictory reports, with no real end in sight.
Source: The Wall Street Journal / Writer: Daniel
Rage Against The Stream retweeted
🇺🇸🇮🇷 Stephen Walt gave Tucker his unfiltered take on why the US went to war with Iran.
He said it wasn’t because Iran was about to get a nuke or launch some imminent attack.
The real trigger was Netanyahu’s visit to the White House. Netanyahu convinced Trump the regime was teetering and a short, sharp campaign would make it collapse.
Walt argued Trump was already feeling invincible after the Maduro operation in Venezuela and saw a chance to solve a 40-year problem before leaving office. An administration full of yes-men didn’t push back hard enough.
Walt also noted that previous American presidents had rejected similar pitches from Netanyahu. This time Trump said yes, and it turned out to be far longer and messier than advertised.
Source: TCNetwork / Writer: Sol
Rage Against The Stream retweeted
🇺🇸 Seriously!??! A cop wouldn't let this father stop his car from rolling away
They pulled him for speeding, and his reason?
He was rushing to get his daughter to hospital
Writer: Ian
Rage Against The Stream retweeted
🇺🇸 Flock Safety protects its privacy fiercely while selling tech that puts cameras on every street.
Yet when elected officials spend our tax dollars at their lobbying events, suddenly filming them is the problem?
Hell no.
If the public has to live under more surveillance, the people buying the cameras don’t get a free pass to operate in secret.
Ben Jordan is flipping the whole debate back on them.
Writer: Val
Rage Against The Stream retweeted
Replying to @basinmusic @flocksafety
everyone one of us should sue flock and the government for invasion of privacy and illegal surveillance without a warrant. 200 million lawsuits would look pretty nice.
Rage Against The Stream retweeted
Do you feel that your Senators from your State care about the well-being of you and your fellow citizens?
Please use Reply to give a different answer or add context.
Please Re-tweet to help get a decent sample of opinions.
2%Yes. Absolutely they Care
10%They care a little bit.
88%No They don't care at all
3,604 votes • Final results Rage Against The Stream retweeted
Why aren't all 52 Republican Senators calling out Leader Thune for not allowing President Trump to make recess appointments?@SenateGOP
Rage Against The Stream retweeted
Replying to @Timcast
Not even remotely what I said. Of course.
But if you can manage physics, then the following is true:
1 - The shot could NOT have been taken with a .30-06 from the Lossee bldg with a -10 degree slope and a 10-degree offset. Otherwise, a through-and-through
2 - Once you accept #1 above to be true, then there had to have been a shot taken from a different location, which (try to stay with us here) means there was a second person involved. Almost certainly from the Sorensen building.
3 - Let me know where you lost the plot?
Rage Against The Stream retweeted
Its my opinion (just my opinion) that every one of the Senators who voted for Thune to be the Majority Leader - knew in advance that a big part of his agenda was to stall/block the America First movement.
They elected him anyway.
Rage Against The Stream retweeted
The 9/11 commission reports that all 4 black boxes on the planes that hit the Twin Towers were lost
This is the first time in history for this to happen
Multiple NYC firefighters claimed to have recovered them
The hijackers’ passports were found intact, but not the Black Boxes
Rage Against The Stream retweeted
Replying to @SteveLovesAmmo
A house by me had a uhaul park in the garage and its contents, down to the light fixtures and appliances, stolen. The flock camera that was installed on the only street out of that area wasn’t allowed to be used in the investigation. Total BS it’s for crime.
Rage Against The Stream retweeted
Replying to @SteveLovesAmmo
Rage Against The Stream retweeted
Dear @SenateGOP Senate Republicans:
It really pisses off your constituents when you gavel in Pro Forma sessions to block Pres Trump from recess appointments.
Respectfully - STOP DOING IT!!
Rage Against The Stream retweeted
Replying to @KanekoaTheGreat
This fervent 'gospel' that it was Tyler Robinson and couldn't possibly have been anyone or anything else feels like the Corona Virus didn't come from a lab b.s. all over again.
Rage Against The Stream retweeted
Replying to @KanekoaTheGreat
Aren’t you embarrassed to put out shit like this?
Candace is not the FBI; it’s the FBI everyone should be demanding evidence from. And so far, they came up with nothing substantial. They have videos of random, unindentifiable people. They have ballistics that does not match. They have some text messages that no one is allowed to technically examine.
The burden of proof is not on Candace; it’s on the FBI. And they’ve got nothing. So as long as they refuse doing the real investigation and catching the whole organization behind this (and yes it was organized, it wasn’t just one random guy with no political opinions), we can speculate whatever we want.
Rage Against The Stream retweeted
Just so we are clear - if you are only 80% convinced that Tyler Robinson killed Charlie, and you are a juror in the trial, your verdict is "innocent due to reasonable doubt". Not "guilty due to overwhelming evidence".
Candace Owens says there's a 0% chance that Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk based on the evidence released so far, while Andrew Wilson says there's a 75–85%.
PBD: "What is the likelihood that you think Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kirk and kill them based on the evidence right now?"
Andrew: "I don't know. I'd say 75-85%"
Candace: "0%. I'm at zero. With what we've seen in terms of the evidence, I'm at 0%"
Rage Against The Stream retweeted
Replying to @Timcast
Wrong, and the reduction ad absurdism is why everyone thinks that the official narrative supporters aren’t operating in good faith.




















