That girl who opened AI "for five minutes" and is now building entire projects with it.
Joined October 2026
- Tweets149
- Following45
- Followers322
- Likes690
A TALK SHOW GUEST WALKED IN BAREFOOT AND BROKE THE HOST
62k likes · 857 comments · 14 seconds
A tight close-up of a blonde guest in an oversized graphic jersey, fidgeting with the hem as she talks. Cut to the wide: she's barefoot on the couch beside the host's desk, a city skyline glowing behind them. She says something, he leans in, and both crack up.
Why it works:
→ Real studio camera logic. A locked-off close-up on the guest, then a fixed wide of the couch and desk. Nothing drifts like a handheld phone shot, so it reads as broadcast.
→ Classic cut order. Close-up first, wide second. That's how talk shows cut a moment.
→ Flat, frontal light. Studio lighting is meant to be even, with the skyline a touch darker behind. There's no dramatic shadow where an artifact could hide.
→ The laugh has a sequence. She talks, he reacts, she breaks and covers her face. Two people timing off each other is much harder to fake than one.
→ One exchange, one couch, fourteen seconds.
Takeaway: copy the camera grammar of the format you're recreating. People recognize a talk show by how it cuts before they ever look at a face.
Single-moment shots like this are where Seedance 2.5 shines, and you can run it right inside @Picsart
SHE HIT A GLOWING GOLF BALL INTO THE NIGHT SEA
→ A red ball glows in the sand by a lifeguard tower
→ One full swing and it launches into the dark
→ The ball flips from green to blue as it flies
→ She walks off with the club like nothing happened
The sand catches the red glow, the shadows stay locked to her body and the ball keeps changing color mid-air, all in a single phone-style shot. Light that moves and reflects on a surface used to be the fastest way to spot AI video, and this one holds up the whole time
You can try Seedance 2.5 in @Picsart
Would you have noticed it was AI without being told?
Qweexee retweeted
Weekly Perp DEX Recap #2 | Nov 1-8, 2026
Hyperliquid did $62.6B in 7D volume. Lighter, Variational and Aster combined did $44.3B 👀
Bigger news though. On Nov 3 the @CFTC cleared single-stock perps on registered US venues.
What caught my eye:
> @HyperliquidX: Nasdaq-listed Hyperliquid Strategies filed to become a CFTC-registered FCM. Only 180K $HYPE went to the team on Nov 6, not the 9.92M on trackers.
> @tradexyz: ICE, the NYSE parent, is taking a minority stake and will exclusively operate trade[XYZ]’s regulated US markets, pending approval. $650B+ volume in about a year.
> @Lighter_xyz: #2 by 7D volume with $19.5B. October hit $72.9B, $19.1B of it via Robinhood Chain. DCM + DCO filing still planned for November.
> @variational_io: #3 with $13.6B, public mainnet is close. My all-time average cost is $7 per point, and OTC reportedly cleared $37.5-44. That’s ~5.4-6.3x from my cost.
> @Aster_DEX: #4 with $11.15B. Fees bought back 2.6M $ASTER, and the same amount got burned from the team allocation.
> @arcus_xyz: Multi-asset collateral is live for everyone, stock tokens and wETH now back perps. My cost after Week 5 is $0.71 per point, still farming.
> @entropyIO: Holds ~51% of the $134M Anthropic pre-IPO perp OI, per @FalconXGlobal.
> @OndoPerps: The CFTC call is basically what Ondo lobbied for in August. Ondo Perps is still non-US only.
> @QFEX: OI $183M, +33% in 30D.
> @TxFlow_L1: OI +78% in 30D, Season 0 retro out with 10.76M points.
> @risextrade: OI up to $85M and still climbing. Fully onchain orderbook, spot is next. My cost is $0.91 per point and I keep stacking.
> @nadoHQ: PRIME, the 0% fee OTC venue, still targeted for Q4.
> @extendedapp: $XTEN tokenomics are out. 30% to points holders, fully unlocked at TGE. TGE date TBA.
MY TAKEAWAY
The US went from someday to a timeline:
> CFTC opened the door for stock perps
> ICE picked Hyperliquid rails via trade[XYZ]
> Hyperliquid Strategies and Lighter are lining up for licenses
Price doesn’t care yet. $HYPE was ~$90 in last week’s recap, now ~$77. Top traders across major perp DEXs were ~94% short on Nov 8.
Anthropic reportedly lists the week of Nov 16. That’s the first real test for pre-IPO perps. If it opens near where these books price it, that’s huge validation for Entropy.
My take: bullish on where this is heading, cautious on how fast approvals land.
None of this is guaranteed, and the IPO date isn’t confirmed.
Who benefits most if the US opens up?
More numbers, less noise.
Weekly Perp DEX Recap #1 | Oct 25 – Nov 1, 2026
12 projects. 7 days. A lot happened across the perp DEX ecosystem.
Here's what caught my attention this week:
> @risextrade: $3.6–3.8B in 30D volume, ~$21M TVL. Spot orderbook testing with ~10ms latency. Ignite Season 1 distributes 200K points weekly.
> @arcus_xyz: ~$63M TVL, with stocks accounting for ~56% of perp volume. Mobile early access launched in APAC, multi-asset collateral rolling out. @NYSE also spotlighted Arcus, highlighting its mission to bring global access to 24/7 trading, tokenized stocks and lower fees.
> @entropyIO: Crossed $100M OI and recorded $1.57B October volume. Building a major onchain pre-IPO market.
> @HyperliquidX: Still the leader with ~$222B 30D volume and $7.45B OI. Strong HIP-3 activity, HYPE trading around $90–91.
> @variational_io: ~$450B cumulative volume, $1.8B dual-sided OI and 580+ markets. $VAR TGE still targeted for Q4, with 32% allocated to points holders.
> @TxFlow_L1: ~$4.7B 30D volume and $47M OI. Season 1 distributes 1.25M trader points weekly.
> @Lighter_xyz: Preparing CFTC DCM + DCO filings for November, aiming to become a regulated onchain perp exchange. 100% of revenue goes to buybacks.
> @QFEX: Godel Terminal launched with 230+ stocks available 24/7. Loss Refund Program continues.
> @nadoHQ: Introduced PRIME, an onchain OTC-style venue for large trades with 0% fees. Launch targeted for Q4.
> @OndoPerps: Joined the DTCC Tokenization Service ecosystem. OpenAI-linked Private Markets subscriptions expected around Nov 2.
> @Aster_DEX : Expanded USDC-quoted BTC, ETH and SOL perps on Arc. OI remains around $1.4B.
> @extendedapp : Completed migration to Arc. Spot trading is live, while $XTEN tokenomics and whitepaper are expected in early November. 30% of supply allocated to points.
MY TAKEAWAY
Three narratives are getting stronger:
- RWA & pre-IPO: Arcus, Entropy, Ondo, QFEX and Nado.
- Regulated perps: Lighter is making a serious move toward the US market.
- Product expansion: RISEx, Variational, TxFlow and Extended keep building beyond basic perp trading.
Hyperliquid still leads the category, but competition is getting much more interesting.
Which project has the biggest upside from here?
More numbers, less noise. 🫡
Qweexee retweeted
This Polymarket trader has made +$337,337 in just 2 months, but he lost -$806,507 in the last 24 hours
He has made 56 trades with a Win Rate of 50%, and almost all of them are on football
Just a day ago his PnL was around $1.14M
His biggest wins so far:
→ Will BV Borussia 09 Dortmund win on 2026-11-04? | Yes at 65.3¢ | $1,886,019 → $2,888,582 | +$1,002,563 (+53.16%)
→ Will Chelsea FC win on 2026-09-18? | No at 64.9¢ | $1,762,013 → $2,713,484 | +$951,471 (+54%)
→ Will Brentford FC win on 2026-09-18? | Yes at 38¢ | $404,752 → $1,066,516 | +$661,764 (+163.5%)
Two of them came on the same day: he was against Chelsea and with Brentford on September 18, and both positions won
Football is his main sport, mostly the Premier League, La Liga, Serie A and European cups
Tennis showed up only a couple of times: he won on Andreeva vs Potapova at the US Open (+$33,913) and lost -$495,590 on Michelsen against Tiafoe
His positions are huge, from $300K up to almost $2M, and most of his entries are between 35¢ and 70¢
That’s why the swings are so big
His three biggest wins alone added up to about +$2.6M, but his total PnL is only +$337K, because his biggest losses are just as large
Celta Vigo cost him -$957,401, Como -$754,911, and Man United -$797,881
Most of his loss over the last 24 hours comes from that Man United position, Yes at 48.8¢
His biggest active trade right now:
→ Will FC Barcelona win on 2026-11-08? | No at 49.1¢ | $290,616
He’s risking almost $300K on Barcelona not winning, so let’s see if he can start recovering
What do you think?
Let me know in the comments ↓
This Polymarket trader just placed his biggest tennis bet so far, and it’s the biggest entry on the underdog in the Rolex Paris Masters final
He has been on Polymarket for only 2 weeks, made 52 trades and sits at -$33,633 overall, though he added +$726 in the last 24 hours
His biggest wins so far:
→ Spread: Cavaliers (-3.5) | Timberwolves at 50¢ | $10,000 → $20,000 | +$10,000 (+100%)
→ Trail Blazers vs. Lakers: O/U 233.5 | Over at 51¢ | $10,200 → $20,000 | +$9,800 (+96.08%)
→ Timberwolves vs. Cavaliers | Cavaliers at 53¢ | $10,600 → $20,000 | +$9,400 (+88.68%)
All three are NBA games, and most of his trading is focused on basketball, mainly spreads and totals
He also has a few positions on CS2, college football and football
He usually puts about $5,000 into a position at around 50¢, so his best win is about +$10,000 and his worst loss is about the same
Tennis has never been his thing
He had only two tennis trades before, and both were losses: Sakkari vs Eala (-$708) and Fritz vs Alcaraz in Paris (-$2,800), where he backed Fritz at 28¢
His active trade right now:
→ Rolex Paris Masters: Ben Shelton vs Carlos Alcaraz | Ben Shelton at 23¢ | $5,175 → $22,500
He’s going against Alcaraz again, but this time at 23¢ instead of his usual 50¢ lines
Alcaraz has lost only one set in Paris, and that was against Fritz
In that match Taylor had two match points, but Carlos came back and won in three sets
After that he beat Ruud in straight sets in the semifinal
Shelton, on the other hand, played three three-setters in a row against Rinderknech, Paul and Van Assche
He dropped a set in each of them and still found a way to win
Personally, I think Alcaraz wins this one
Ben’s serve can take him a set, but Carlos looks fresher, and he has already shown he can come back from match point down
Whatever happens, good luck to our trader
What do you think?
Let me know in the comments ↓
Qweexee retweeted
the guy who created Claude Code barely writes code anymore.
Boris Cherny built it as a side project in 2024.
by late 2025 he went a whole month without opening an IDE.
Opus wrote around 200 PRs, every single line.
so what does he actually do all day?
he hands the model three lines:
→ a goal: "make p95 ci time <10 mins"
→ a way to measure it after every change
→ how hard to try: "don't stop till it's done"
then he asks for a chart of progress every day.
CPU, memory, CI times, frame rates, latency.
anything with a number, he lets Claude hill-climb.
the part everyone skips:
he holds Claude's production code
to a higher bar than human code.
tests, fuzzers, adversarial review, every day.
the freedom only works because the meter is strict.
i put his whole loop on one page,
with a brief you can paste tonight.
if you can't measure it, you're still the one writing it.
Qweexee retweeted
Janet Jackson was 37 when Justin Timberlake tore off part of her costume in front of about 140 million people at the Super Bowl. He had turned 23 the day before. It lasted 9/16 of a second. His hand did it, and both of them called it an accident. And it was Janet, not Justin, whose career was destroyed.
February 1, 2004, Super Bowl XXXVIII in Houston. They had rehearsed the move: he was supposed to pull away one piece of her top and show red lace underneath. Janet says more came off than planned: "He ripped the whole thing."
The FCC got more than 500,000 complaints. CBS was fined a record $550,000. Courts later threw the fine out.
Within 24 hours Janet recorded an apology. Her management made her do it. "Why am I apologizing for an accident?"
Justin gave the world a new phrase: "wardrobe malfunction."
A week later came the Grammys. Janet was dropped as a presenter. Justin performed, apologized on stage and went home with two Grammys.
According to a 2018 HuffPost report, CBS boss Les Moonves had MTV, VH1 and Viacom's radio stations stop playing her music.
In 2006 she finally sat down with Oprah: "All the emphasis was put on me, not on Justin." Even Justin admitted he "probably got 10% of the blame."
In 2018 he headlined the Super Bowl halftime show again. In 2021, 17 years later, he apologized on Instagram: "I know I failed."
He got two Grammys and a second Super Bowl. She got a blacklist and a scandal that still carries her name, not his.
Some stories only need to be told once. Watch this one and you'll never see that halftime show the same way.
Qweexee retweeted
Before you blame Opus 5.5, try these 15 official Claude Code commands
15 built-ins most people never type:
less babysitting → parallel agents → faster loops
the full cheat sheet ↓
01 /goal → keep working until a condition is true
code.claude.com/docs/en/goal
02 /batch → split one big change across parallel agents
code.claude.com/docs/en/agen…
03 /subtask → hand off a side task with the full context
code.claude.com/docs/en/sub-…
04 /deep-research → get a cited research report
code.claude.com/docs/en/work…
05 /design → draft editable artboards
code.claude.com/docs/en/comm…
06 /plan → plan first, edit after you approve
code.claude.com/docs/en/perm…
07 /memory → edit what it remembers in CLAUDE.md
code.claude.com/docs/en/memo…
08 /compact → free up context, keep the key decisions
code.claude.com/docs/en/cont…
09 /branch → try another direction without losing this one
code.claude.com/docs/en/comm…
10 /rewind → roll back to an earlier checkpoint
code.claude.com/docs/en/chec…
11 /mcp → manage and reconnect your tools
code.claude.com/docs/en/mcp
12 /loop → repeat a check while the session runs
code.claude.com/docs/en/sche…
13 /schedule → run routines in the cloud
code.claude.com/docs/en/rout…
14 /simplify → clean up changed code with 4 parallel reviewers
code.claude.com/docs/en/comm…
15 /remote-control → continue this session from your phone
code.claude.com/docs/en/remo…
start here: /plan → /goal → /simplify
Then read the full Graph Engineering guide below ↓
Qweexee retweeted
THIS GLACIER POUR IS NOT REAL
→ She tilts the bucket of molten metal from the helicopter
→ A thin orange stream falls onto the blue ice
→ Sparks run along the cracks and steam bursts up
970K views. 354 likes. 245 comments.
Every detail holds: the harness, the gloves, the cracks in the ice, the steam rising back toward the door. Nothing melts or drifts between frames, and that is what makes it hard to believe it is generated.
You can try Kling 3.0 in @Picsart
Qweexee retweeted
I'm keeping Blender closed this week. Hookshot 3D turned one picture into a 36 MWt reactor on tracks that I can take apart: 8 beats, 37 fuel assemblies, 600 frames.
this is Halcyon NP-12, my third build with it, following this article. the octopus was about the still, the shuttle about the film. this one is about the page around the model.
stop letting one agent build the reactor and type the gauge numbers by hand.
how I split it:
→ Agent reads the job file before every round. one picture sets the look and nothing else
→ Agent builds the crawler and grades the still line by line: yes, partial or no
→ Agent wires the page. one button per part, 8 of them from chassis to grid, and every card reads the same state
→ Agent writes render(t) as a pure function of time. same second in, same frame out
→ Agent renders 600 frames at 30 fps only after my yes
You only look at three moments:
→ the state table. power, loop temps, keff and all 10 status lines come from one row per second. if the core reads 560 C, the steam card can't still say 20 C
→ the cards against each other. the same MWe shows up on the bus, in the caption and in the status list. if two of them disagree, nobody trusts the third
→ before the 600 frames. in the article a still costs about 400,000 tokens and a film another 150,000 to 400,000. a card that drifts after the render pays that twice
concept simulation, not to scale. it's a render, not a reactor.
full prompt in the reply.
the part worth copying is render(t). any second comes back the same, so you fix one frame, not the whole run.
on your last 3D build, which card drifted first: the power, the temps or the status list?
Qweexee retweeted
you’ll understand Grok Bot better than 99% of people using it
1/ what it actually is: not a chatbot, a teammate with its own computer
2/ a real bot taken apart: job, memories, skills, routines
3/ the 12 rules every good bot follows
plus a memory block you can paste into any bot
save this before you build your next one ↓
Qweexee retweeted
An incredible start to November for this BTC trader, who made +$72.1K in just 6 days with only 65 positions
He traded $649K in volume across 5-min BTC Up/Down markets, winning 44 out of 65 positions
But what's behind these results?
He mainly buys positions between 30-80¢, with his biggest profits coming from the 40-60¢ range
Instead of placing hundreds of tiny bets, he takes fewer, much larger positions, sometimes risking over $10K on a single outcome
Just look at these trades:
-> Nov 5: BTC UP at 38.3¢ → +$18,960 (+161%)
-> Nov 5: BTC DOWN at 41.4¢ → +$10,900 (+141%)
-> Nov 6: BTC DOWN at 43.5¢ → +$9,150 (+130%)
These three positions alone generated around $39K in profit
The interesting part is that he uses 100% taker orders, paying $8.45K in fees rather than waiting for maker orders to fill
His strategy appears to rely on entering quickly when he sees an opportunity, even if that means paying more in fees
Would you rather take 65 large positions like this or spread your capital across hundreds of smaller trades?
This trader turned 5¢ into $1 and made $4,510 on a single BTC position. Here's how he trades
He placed 11,495 positions, generated $3.75M in volume, and made $49,417 in total PnL
So what's his strategy?
He mainly buys BTC UP or DOWN between 50-70¢, often taking positions on both sides of the same market
Most of his profit came from the 60-80¢ range, where he generated over $86K before losses in other price ranges
But some of his biggest wins came from much cheaper entries
Just look at these 3 trades:
-> June 24: BTC UP at 5¢ → +$4,510 (+1,919%)
-> July 19: BTC DOWN at 11.1¢ → +$2,050 (+800%)
-> July 19: BTC UP at 21.3¢ → +$2,200 (+370%)
The pattern is interesting
Most of his trades focus on prices around 50-70¢, but occasionally he catches a much bigger move by entering at lower odds
Those high-return trades can make a big difference, especially when many other positions lose money
Qweexee retweeted
In September Fable 5.1 told me my bot's filter blocked the wrong half.
I fixed it. Then BTC dropped 6.1%.
The bot blocked 4 buys and hasn't bought since Oct 28.
Would you let it trade real money?
Qweexee retweeted
I TOLD GROK THAT I WILL NEVER WORK A 9-5 JOB ANYMORE AND GAVE HIM ALL MY SAVINGS TO RETIRE ME
I gave him my last $500 left and it made $8,913 in "LARP OR DIE" mode
the deal was one rule:
you can lose a trade. you CAN'T lose a day.
here's how it played that:
→ 00:00 it writes down the balance. that's the floor till midnight
→ under the floor it sizes DOWN, never up
→ -30% on the day = 5% tickets, only coins it already won on
→ +40% on the day = half the profit gets locked
→ one narrative = one position. no stacking the same bet
→ 23:00 and green = it shuts off. no "one more trade"
DAY 1: $500 → $1,137.62
DAY 2: $1,137.62 → $2,318.40
DAY 3 is where I almost went back to my 9-5 :/
4:12 PM. two coins I held rugged in the same 10 minutes. by 6 PM balance $1,233.73. -47% on the day
I had the laptop half closed. Grok didn't care. $61 tickets. 11 trades. back above the floor at 23:52
closed at $2,331.07. +$12.67 for the whole day. the most important $12 of my life
DAY 4: $2,331.07 → $5,402.88
DAY 5: -22% before lunch. closed at $9,413.27
$500 IN. $9,413.27 OUT. 0 RED DAYS.
it paid my whole month: rent, groceries, transport, going out, new fits, a trip and a NEW $3K PC. and STILL put $1,963.27 in my piggy bank
it didn't retire me yet. but it showed me why I kept blowing accounts: I always tried to win the day back in ONE trade
the full LARP OR DIE config is in the article below. prompt, sizing code, the 23:00 lockdown, all of it ↓
Qweexee retweeted
OpenAI co-founder Andrej Karpathy wrote the loop and just released a prompt built on it. Now Opus 5.5 finishes jobs it used to quit halfway.
This is f*cking unreal...
Any task runs as a graph: one check per node, a baseline before any change, and only the wins survive.
Every dead end gets noted down, so tonight's run starts where last night's stopped.
$2,000 agent courses teach less than this single prompt.
Send it to Opus 5.5 and thank me later.
The full prompt and the full article are both below ↓
Qweexee retweeted
Elon Musk is worth $839 billion. His daughter Vivian lives with three roommates.
At 18 she went to court to drop his name. Two years later, he told millions she was dead.
In the video below, Vivian talks about the day she heard it.
She was born in 2004, an IVF twin, two years after Musk's first son died at 10 weeks old.
As a teenager she came out as trans. Musk signed the papers for her treatment. Later he said he was "tricked."
At 18 she filed to change her name. Her reason, in writing: "I no longer live with or wish to be related to my biological father in any way, shape or form." A judge approved it.
In 2024 Musk sat down with Jordan Peterson: "My son Xavier is dead, killed by the woke mind virus."
She was in a small apartment in Tokyo, going to college, a week before finals.
Her reply went more viral than his clip: "Last time I checked, I am indeed not dead."
He posted that she was "born gay and slightly autistic." She answered: "This is entirely fake. None of this ever happened."
Money? "I don't have that kind of inheritance." "I'm financially independent."
Was she scared to go public?
"I don't really have anything to lose."
"It was literally probably the most cathartic moment of my entire life."
The case for Musk: he believes he lost a child to something he never should have signed, and he grieves it his way.
The case for Vivian: she's 22, she's alive, and her own father told the world she wasn't.
He has $839 billion. She has three roommates. He calls her dead. She calls it the moment she found her voice.
Can a father grieve a child who is still alive, or did he lose her the day he said it?
SHE TOOK ONE SWING AND THE GUY WITH THE BEER LOST IT
→ A sunny fairway with a flag on the horizon
→ She lines up the shot and swings hard
→ Cut to a golfer in a cap choking on his drink
→ She turns back with a grin
The sun, the shadows on the grass, the ponytail whipping through the swing and a clean cut to a second character reacting on the next shot all stay consistent. The comic timing is what sells it: the cut lands exactly when the reaction should
You can try Seedance 2.5 in @Picsart
Would you have noticed it was AI without being told?
SHE PUT HER FEET UP ON THE TALK SHOW DESK AND THE WHOLE STUDIO WENT QUIET
→ A late-night set with a glowing city skyline
→ The host opens with a compliment
→ She answers by lifting both heels onto his desk
→ He can only shrug and call it the best he has seen
None of this exists. The studio, the desk lights, the skyline, two people talking in sync and even the burned-in subtitles are generated, and the only slip is one garbled word in the captions. That is the new bar: a full talk show moment, with timing and reactions, from a single prompt
You can try Seedance 2.5 in @Picsart
Would you have caught it without the typo in the subtitles?
SHE SWUNG SO HARD THE GUY BEHIND HER FELL OFF HIS CHAIR
→ A night driving range under floodlights
→ One huge swing in heels
→ A guy in the background flips backward off his chair
→ She turns to the camera laughing
907K views. 5,450 likes
The lighting, the motion blur on the club, the flag moving in the wind and the person tumbling in the background all hold together in one continuous shot. The comedic timing is the impressive part: AI video used to struggle with a second subject reacting to the first
You can try Seedance 2.5 in @Picsart
Would you have noticed it was AI without being told?
SHE HIT A GLOWING GOLF BALL ON A NIGHT BEACH
→ A red ball glows in the sand at her feet
→ One clean swing and it shoots off down the shore
→ The ball keeps changing color as it flies
→ She walks away with the club, never looking back
Every part of this shot is generated: the sand, the flag, the lifeguard towers, the city lights on the horizon. The glow of the ball lights up the sand around it and shifts color mid-air, and that kind of light interaction used to give AI video away instantly
You can try Seedance 2.5 in @Picsart
Would you have thought this was AI if nobody told you?
THIS PIZZA KITCHEN IS NOT REAL
→ She spins the pizza and slides it onto the board
→ Cuts it with the slicer without looking down
→ A coworker walks through the back of the shot
684K views. 19K likes. 369 comments
Every detail holds: the hands, the steel tools, the stacked boxes, the person moving behind her. Nothing melts or drifts between frames, and that is what makes it hard to believe it is generated. A few months ago this kind of continuity was impossible in a single shot
You can try Seedance 2.5 in Picsart
Would you have guessed it was AI without being told?