Funny how the standards at Manchester United seem to change depending on who is in charge. 🤔 Amorim was criticised for failing to beat 10-man Everton. Carrick has failed to win against 10 men on multiple occasions. Different reactions. Amorim was criticised for not giving academy players enough opportunities. Carrick has reportedly used fewer academy players than any United manager since Ferguson. Silence. Amorim’s points return was treated as a sackable offence despite a difficult run of fixtures. Carrick has taken fewer points despite a supposedly easier schedule. Silence. Amorim was blamed for damaging United’s reputation after losing a two-goal lead. Carrick has now suffered that same historic embarrassment. Silence. Amorim’s win rate was used as evidence that he wasn’t good enough. Carrick’s permanent-manager record has also been poor, yet the excuses keep coming. So what exactly are we measuring here? Results? Tactics? Academy development? Standards? Or simply how much we like the manager? You cannot demand accountability from one manager and suddenly become patient when another produces similar or worse outcomes. I didn’t agree with everything Amorim did, and I’m not saying he was the answer. But if the same standards don’t apply to Carrick, then we need to admit that the problem was never just about standards. Manchester United cannot rebuild on double standards. Either the expectations apply to everyone, or we’re not serious about holding anyone accountable.🔴💔 I hate our fanbase.