Pulse Templar ✠ retweeted
European banks often block transfers to Bitcoin exchanges.
That’s why we offer Confidential SEPA.
You send euros to an IBAN in your own name, so your bank sees a transfer to yourself rather than to a Bitcoin exchange 🕵️♂️
Now available on Bull Bitcoin for SEPA transfers.
My Swiss bank blocked my attempt to buy CHF 1,000 of Bitcoin.
Reason? "For your protection. Transactions involving cryptocurrencies carry significant risks, and we’re unable to process this payment."
The same bank is perfectly happy to offer credit cards charging around 12% interest and other forms of consumer debt.
So risking CHF 1,000 of my own money is considered irresponsible...
…but taking on tens of thousands of francs in interest-bearing debt is a perfectly acceptable financial decision.
Interesting how "protecting customers" seems to depend on which financial product you're choosing. 🤡🌍
Introducing Griffin, the first model to pass the video Turing test.
48% of people who talked to it live thought it was a real human. Previous systems have had a pass rate <3%. It is #1 on NVIDIA's benchmark for full-duplex AI video.
It’s the first Human Interaction Model (HIM).
Pulse Templar ✠ retweeted
The scale of what is happening on #PulseChain is absolutely DISGUSTING.
The same handful of operators appear to be running bots that front run and sandwich transactions, quietly extracting value from users while most people have no idea what is happening behind the scenes.
And here’s the part that should really concern people: one of the bridges constantly promoting itself to PulseChain users appears to have bracketed its own users’ transactions on more than one occasion.
They are NOT alone. Wait until you see what the Validator Hosting Services are secretly doing, including allegedly using your MEV profits to prop up their dead coins.
MANY of you are being played while the very people extracting value point at whales and others and scream “extractor.”
I watch this activity firsthand. The public deserves to know exactly what is happening inside these blocks, how it works, and who is actually benefiting from it.
This is NOT what #PulseChain users signed up for.
Pulse Templar ✠ retweeted
A French engineer who lives quietly in Paris has spent 30 years writing software that the entire internet now runs on without knowing his name.
He wrote the code that streams every YouTube video, every Netflix show, every TikTok clip. He wrote the code that runs the virtual servers underneath AWS, Google Cloud, and Microsoft Azure. He calculated more digits of pi than anyone in history. He has no Twitter. He has no marketing. He just keeps shipping.
His name is Fabrice Bellard.
Here is the story, because almost nobody outside the systems programming world knows what one man has built.
Fabrice was born in 1972 in Grenoble, France. He studied at École Polytechnique, the top French engineering school. He never went to Silicon Valley. He never built a startup empire. He just wrote code.
In 2000 he started a project called FFmpeg, an open-source multimedia framework for encoding, decoding, and streaming video. He was 28. The project did one thing nobody else had done well. It handled every video and audio format that existed, in one library, on every operating system. He led it himself for years.
Today FFmpeg is the invisible engine of the internet. YouTube uses it. Netflix uses it. VLC uses it. Chrome and Firefox use parts of it. Every Android phone, every iPhone, every smart TV, every video editing tool you have ever touched runs FFmpeg somewhere underneath. If you have watched a video on a screen in the last 20 years, Fabrice's code processed it.
He was not done.
In 2003 he started QEMU, a machine emulator and virtualizer. He wrote it solo until version 0.7.1 in 2005. QEMU lets you run any operating system on any other operating system. It became the foundation of modern virtualization. KVM, the Linux kernel hypervisor, runs on top of QEMU. Every major cloud provider, AWS, Google Cloud, Microsoft Azure, IBM Cloud, runs virtual machines on infrastructure built around it. The Quick Emulator is the most cited piece of cloud infrastructure code on Earth.
He kept going.
In 2001 he won the International Obfuscated C Code Contest with a small C compiler that grew into TCC, the Tiny C Compiler. TCC can compile and boot a Linux kernel from source in under 15 seconds. In 2004 he calculated the most digits of pi ever computed at the time, using a personal desktop computer and an algorithm he derived himself called Bellard's formula. In 2011 he wrote a complete PC emulator in pure JavaScript that runs Linux in your browser, a project called JSLinux that engineers still cannot believe is real.
In 2019 he released QuickJS, a small but complete JavaScript engine that fits where V8 cannot. In 2021 he released NNCP, a neural network based lossless data compressor that immediately took the lead on the Large Text Compression Benchmark.
Then he turned his attention to large language models. He built TextSynth Server, a web server with a REST API for running LLMs locally. He released ts_zip and ts_sms, compression utilities that use language models to compress text and short messages at ratios traditional algorithms cannot reach. He released TSAC, a very low bitrate audio compression system. In December 2025 he released Micro QuickJS, a new JavaScript engine for microcontrollers, separate from QuickJS, designed for environments with almost no memory.
Fabrice co-founded a telecom company called Amarisoft in 2012, where he serves as CTO. Amarisoft builds 4G and 5G base station software used by carriers and labs around the world. He has been running it for over a decade while continuing to ship personal projects from his own home page at bellard dot org
He has no Twitter. He has no Instagram. He gives almost no interviews. His personal website is a flat list of projects with no styling, no fonts, no marketing copy. Just titles and links.
A quiet French engineer who never moved to Silicon Valley wrote the code that quietly runs the internet.
He is still shipping.
Netherlands new tax system 2028
Stocks: 36% realized gains tax
Crypto: 36% unrealized gains tax
Physical gold: 36% unrealized gains tax
Physical silver: 36% unrealized gains tax
The debasement trade is punished. The ladder is being pulled up. It's over
Pulse Templar ✠ retweeted
The Rothschilds are manipulated Christianity by funding a new bible version that changes the meaning to favour Israel as it is today.
Pulse Templar ✠ retweeted
THE GLOBALIST CULT HAVE A PROBLEM - WE HAVE DISCOVERED THEIR ELECTRONIC DIRECTED ENERGY ASSAULT WEAPONS DEPLOYMENT - THEY ARE TRYING TO HIDE THE EVIDENCE FROM THE COURTS - LETS SEE HOW MANY COURTS THEY CAN HIDE IT FROM - [email protected]
Pulse Templar ✠ retweeted
ANGSTWEKKEND: In Dublin, Ierland, werden moslimmannen gezien die meerdere vuurwapens meebrachten en ze verstopten in een moskee.
Dit zijn letterlijke soldaten, die hun eigen moskeeën gebruiken als militaire bases. Dit is een religieuze veroveringsoorlog, en ze wachten gewoon op het juiste moment om toe te slaan.
@geertwilderspvv
Pulse Templar ✠ retweeted
🧨 Ethereum shorts on Bitfinex just went nuclear. 🧨
Over the last two weeks, ETH short positions jumped roughly 13,000% — from about 771 ETH to more than 101,000 ETH.
That’s an unusually large pile-up of bearish bets. If ETH starts moving up from here, those shorts could get squeezed hard.
Why I asked those sites to fix their PulseChain pages.
A lot of articles still say PulseChain was a "snapshot" — that Ethereum's state was copied and loaded onto a new chain.
That is not what happened.
PulseChain is a hard fork of Ethereum mainnet.
Same genesis as Ethereum.
Same history from block 0.
No new genesis. No snapshot. No halt.
The fork activates at PrimordialPulseBlock 17,233,000.
You can check genesis yourself:
ipfs.scan.pulsechain.com/blo…
Hash:
0xd4e56740f876aef8c010b86a40d5f56745a118d0906a34e69aec8c0db1cb8fa3
That is Ethereum's genesis. PulseChain starts there.
"Snapshot" was the easy word. It helped people picture token copies showing up in the same address. I get why it spread. But it describes the wrong machine.
A snapshot is: freeze state, start a new chain.
A hard fork is: keep the original chain, change the rules at a block, continue.
Those are not the same thing. One implies a new beginning. The other is a continuation.
This matters more now than it did in 2023, because this is what AI reads.
Models do not pull truth out of the client. They read the internet. Ranked blogs, explainers, "what is PulseChain" pages. If those pages all say snapshot, the model says snapshot. Then the next article quotes the model. Then the next model trains on that. The error compounds.
I watched this happen. Ask an AI what PulseChain's fork was, and it will often give you the blog version — snapshot, new chain, state copied onto genesis — instead of the client version. Shared genesis. Full history. Hard fork at 17,233,000.
The official sources were never unclear. go-pulse, the node docs, the explorer. The secondary layer flattened it.
So I asked the sites that still say snapshot to update. Not to score points. So the public record matches the chain, and so the next thing that learns from the web learns the actual design.
If you write about PulseChain, please use hard fork. Point at genesis. Point at 17,233,000. The shorthand already did enough damage.
Today The Netherlands received the #Pulsechain tablets! Let's GO!🔥
PulseChain is the no.1 cypherpunk chain.⚡️👾
Fast. Decentralized. Unstoppable.
Built for the future, not the hype.
Privacy swap 👉@LibertySwapFi
Wanna help? 👉@RSGriffinFDN
#PLS #HEX #INC #pDAI #PLSX #pDAI
I am a numbers guy. I am a #Pulsechain guy.
ethereum:0xa882606494d86804b5514e07e6bd2d6a6ee6d68a
Pulse Templar ✠ retweeted
Two Dutch teenagers with a metal detector dug up enough NATO weapons to arm a hundred men.
Nineteen crates of brand new pistols, explosives and sniper rifles, half a metre under a forest floor. Police called it wartime rubbish. The Prime Minister said he couldn't explain it for reasons of national security. It was Operation Gladio, NATO's secret army, funded by the CIA and British intelligence.
Pulse Templar ✠ retweeted
Specifically for our community. I asked AI to analyze Hex, PulseChain, PulseX, and ProveX under this new SEC guidance.
And to all of you who've been publicly claiming that Richard abandoned us? Well, your statements might have helped the legal position of the tokens. So thank you!
Quick walkthrough of today's SEC crypto FAQ:
1.1 A token can separate from its investment contract without the network meeting the SEC's definitions of functional or decentralized. What matters is whether you did what you said you'd do, as you defined it. (which runs the risk of disincentivizing disclosure, as others like @lex_node suggested)
1.2 A typical staking receipt token is either a receipt for a digital commodity or a digital commodity itself. Either way, it's not subject to an investment contract in the described situations.
1.3 A staking receipt token is different from traditional financial instruments because it doesn't transfer ownership or control. It's just evidence (that the asset is yours).
2.1 If you want to avoid investment contract status, don't promote the potential for profits. Beyond that, "potential utility, features, and capabilities with indefinite aspirational statements likely would not, without more," put you within the securities regulatory perimeter. 👀
2.2 If OpCo B assumes Issuer A's promises to further the network, the token stays subject to the investment contract (not sure what suffices as "assume" in this case)
2.3 What can projects do after functionality without re-engaging in the essential managerial efforts? "Secure, maintain, improve, or enhance such a system or its functionality, or to facilitate network effects, whether through sponsoring or funding development projects or other similar activities."
2.4 You can make new statements about your network once it is functional* and has no central party without creating a new investment contract, in most cases.
*(defined in FN49 of March guidance as "the system’s native crypto asset can be used on the system in accordance with the programmatic utility of the system.")
2.5 So long as the network is functional* (see above), announcing a buyback is not an essential managerial effort. If not yet functional, pitching buybacks can be essential managerial efforts.
2.6 Secondary trading platforms of crypto assets are not promoters under securities law unless they meet the Rule 405 requirements (in the second screenshot)