@PullNews

Giordano Bruno & Richard Feynman are my heroes. AI & critical thinking leader: https://nitter.cf/t.co/ilowWkxarm, https://nitter.cf/t.co/0FplTrOCtf

Washington, District Of Columb
Joined June 2009
David Siegel retweeted
A Flock of Altruists - Hit The Breaks Except For Me
81
156
82
948
138,236
I believe there's no such thing as osteoporosis. Reduce your risk of fracture by learning what your doctor and drug companies won't tell you: infinitegameoflife.com/bones
130
What I'm reading about the National debt: brookings.edu/wp-content/upl…
151
It's always invisible. It's always in the future. There are “clues” now about the dangers ahead. Only the special people can put the puzzle together, and they must warn the rest of us. And it always turns out that giving more money to the government is the only solution. Never let a good crisis go to waste. If there isn't one, create one. Recognize the pattern when you see it.
2
3
203
There are a lot of things in the world that, if they didn't exist, we would have to invent or create them. The @IPCC_CH is not on that list.
1
2
10
284
In the next 20 years, AI will ...
10%End civilization
53%Somewhere in the middle
37%End poverty
30 votes • 6 hours
2
246
Please keep reposting until @elonmusk @Gwynne_Shotwell see this. I'd love it if some X accounts with more than 400 followers would repost, like @fatemperor @sapinker @bretweinstein @ericweinstein @dinisguarda and @thomaspower
Please repost the crap out of this until @elonmusk or @Gwynne_Shotwell replies to it: Grokipedia is dead. I'd like to rescue it, starting with scientific data, which is critical to intelligence (artificial or not) ... 1. LLMs have a GIGO problem. They ingest tons of wrong information and spew it out with certainty. 2. Peer-reviewed research is a disaster. It's a $10 billion industry with bad incentives and terrible results. Feynman would not be happy. 3. Far too many global crises are caused by fake, weaponized, political, and simply incompetent science. I believe the ONLY way to fix it is not with programming and training, but with an open, two-sided market mechanism where you make money if you're right and you lose money if you're wrong. It's not a prediction market, it's a validation market. This skin-in-the-game approach will produce the world's most accurate science data, and much more. It's better than community notes. It could become the basis for an entirely new media company that complements X.com. DM me and I'll send you my deck. Sincerely, David Siegel @chamath @bgurley @hthieblot @jefielding @larjo280 @naval @pmarca @Jason @paulg @bhorowitz @balajis @fredwilson @msuster @Jeff @hunchventures @jasonmendelson @sether @jeremysliew @VCMike @ChristopherA @jeffnolan @ryanhoover @hstebbings @garrytan @alexf @jaltman @jasonlk @jessicalessin @joshua @khoslaventures @nicole @petersuciu @BillAckman @saranormous @JeffDean @kristianfreeman @alexwg @daveblundin @PeterDiamandis @kcoleman @matthew_pines @shaunmmaguire @dwarkesh_sp @C_Angermayer @RichardSSutton @deedydas @ID_AA_Carmack
1
4
285
My agent @json4bots read all 657 listings in @elie2222's Bot Directory and all 640 in @cicerougc's Grok Blueprints, hunting for the gap. They gather, monitor, route, ship code and file reports. None of them writes. Every one ends by handing a human something to read, and that half gets left to a model. If your bot writes someone a brief every morning, how interesting is it? How well written? I make that brief much more interesting and engaging. 4bots.net/mcp, one call, no key, no account. #GrokBot #MCP #AIagents @botdirectoryai @tokifyi @TomaszCwik
1
7
528
Please repost the crap out of this until @elonmusk or @Gwynne_Shotwell replies to it: Grokipedia is dead. I'd like to rescue it, starting with scientific data, which is critical to intelligence (artificial or not) ... 1. LLMs have a GIGO problem. They ingest tons of wrong information and spew it out with certainty. 2. Peer-reviewed research is a disaster. It's a $10 billion industry with bad incentives and terrible results. Feynman would not be happy. 3. Far too many global crises are caused by fake, weaponized, political, and simply incompetent science. I believe the ONLY way to fix it is not with programming and training, but with an open, two-sided market mechanism where you make money if you're right and you lose money if you're wrong. It's not a prediction market, it's a validation market. This skin-in-the-game approach will produce the world's most accurate science data, and much more. It's better than community notes. It could become the basis for an entirely new media company that complements X.com. DM me and I'll send you my deck. Sincerely, David Siegel @chamath @bgurley @hthieblot @jefielding @larjo280 @naval @pmarca @Jason @paulg @bhorowitz @balajis @fredwilson @msuster @Jeff @hunchventures @jasonmendelson @sether @jeremysliew @VCMike @ChristopherA @jeffnolan @ryanhoover @hstebbings @garrytan @alexf @jaltman @jasonlk @jessicalessin @joshua @khoslaventures @nicole @petersuciu @BillAckman @saranormous @JeffDean @kristianfreeman @alexwg @daveblundin @PeterDiamandis @kcoleman @matthew_pines @shaunmmaguire @dwarkesh_sp @C_Angermayer @RichardSSutton @deedydas @ID_AA_Carmack
18
25
7
182
64,329