Psifour retweeted
wow matt krater Luke and mechanic are shitcoiners now like Roger Ver?
the final boss in bitcoin is your own ego.
Psifour retweeted
Isn’t it funny that all the people working around the clock FOR FREE to do security audits on hundreds of Bitcoin projects are the same people BIP110ers have been calling scammers, spammers, grifters, shitcoiners, liars, pedos, etc for months?
Isn’t it funny that there are no BIP110ers on the red team?
Isn’t it funny that the people who are *actually* saving the Bitcoin ecosystem have been constantly slandered and vilified by the people who *claim* they are “saving bitcoin”?
Isn’t it funny??
Shoutout to @callebtc, @Rob1Ham and the many other red teamers who for some inexplicable reason are saving bitcoin even though they’re shitcoin spammer scammers.
We may never know their true motivations…
Every model tested was capable of identifying the bug using only information from the original reddit post about lost funds (and the related firmware repo).
When coupled with even a passing understanding of HWWs and their options for entropy, the same prompt expanded to allow all tested models to produce a functional PoC that could brute force the complete space.
While I agree with the sentiment, the world has changed and most people have access to at least one model that is capable of one-shotting things like this now. I can't begin to predict what this means for responsible disclosure and incident response standards over the next few years. What a delightfully terrifying time to be alive!
LLMs are just Infinite Monkey Theorem, except we execute every monkey that doesn't reliably produce meaningful output. It is up to you to determine if a "next word prediction" machine that is smart enough to avoid getting culled is a form of intelligence or not.
Let's take a look at what we are selling here.. maybe they found a way to win the stegonagraphy war or beat information theory.. ohh, it fails to do anything to the three most common uses of arbitrary data (two untouched the last already has a workaround).
Well I'm sure it does something to reduce the harm from them.. ohh, it removes the only harm-reduced way to store data.
Hmm, I'm not sure this proposal does anything to prove those experts wrong, but hey I'm sure it will succeed as PoW is the real measure that can't be Sybil attacked.. shit, this has <1% hashrate supporting it.
Well, we gave it a shot, enjoy your virtue signal shitcoin.
Ironically, Core is uniting Bitcoiners from all over the world around BIP-110.
More and more people are recognizing what they see as a clique of self-appointed "experts" downplaying protocol abuse, insisting nothing can be done to prevent it, and dismissing legitimate concerns through gaslighting.
Instead of engaging with those concerns, they attack Bitcoin's organic immune system.
👇💯🎯
BIP-110 Math
1 extra bytes per 255 or 510 bytes of data 15-40%
Having less than 1% if hashrate is "winning"
And a consensus fork to reduce data that stops 0/3 of the most common data inclusion tools on day 1 is a "success"
How could anyone have possibly predicted that this fork proposal was not effective at mitigating data inclusion. ALL of the most common data inclusion tools (Ordinals, Stamps, and Runes) were either unimpacted or are already patched.
The worst part is that @lifofifo still has all these other opcodes to choose from xitter.cf/i/status/1983600008634…
Also, how do we add software that has BIP-110 support to the list? 🤣
Ordinals are now BIP-110 ready.
github.com/ordinals/ord/pull…
If you tell a mechanic to bolt wings to your car because there is some philosophical value in a flying car, they are correct to remind you that it is a car and that there are laws of physics that make it unable to be a plane without compromising the things that make it a car.
If you tell a developer to add ineffectual censorship to the network (not just your node as we have that without bip 110), they are correct to remind you that this is a non-permissioned system and attempting to regulate arbitrary data in this way is no more sane then trying to make your car be a plane.
In both cases, being upset that the mechanic or developer doesn't wish to be part of your insanity and taking the existence of physics or information theory as a personal attack will forever say more about you than about them.
Once again, you guys are confusing technical with philosophical.
Yes, many of the Bitcoin devs have far more technical knowledge than plebs do about the inner workings of Bitcoin and the code.
That doesn't necessarily mean they also understand Bitcoin fully conceptually, or what Bitcoin should/should not be.
We've been trying to make this argument from day 1 of the debate. Bitcoin (the community) is massive, with all sorts of skills and disciplines brought to the table, from technology, to coding, to economics, to strategy, to philosophy.
It IS NOT simply this little bubble of developers who write the code (as important as they are).
This has, and remains, one of the primary wedge-issues in this debate. And, one of the big problems (which brings the hostility) is that many of the devs have been arguing with an attitude of.... 'that doesn't matter, we're the ones in control.' and 'You plebs have no say and are irrelevant because you don't know how to code.'
"We made sure to coordinate with our Counter Terrorism unit after the incident so that we could respond quickly if the driver was determined to have been British. We were ready and willing to punish the terroristic act of a Brit running over immigrants, but it turned out to be a small oopsie whoopsie of a Somali immigrant just being in the car while is rolled gently into a few pedestrians."
To my British friends, the "sun may never set", but it is astounding how low it has managed to fall in the sky.
To my non-British friends who think I m being unfair in this characterization. UK police have consistently upcharged British citizens recently if they have even dared to suggest publicly or on social media that their small island nation can't sustain these immigration levels. I have no question in my mind what the report would read if that condition was true and they were a Brit.
We’re investigating a serious collision that took place in Ealing Broadway earlier. Five people were injured after being struck by a car.
The driver has been arrested.
If you saw anything or have footage of the incident, please contact us on 101 giving the reference 4607/27JUN.
ALT Police were called to Ealing Broadway, Ealing at 14:29hrs on Saturday, 27 June to a report of a car colliding with multiple pedestrians. A total of five pedestrians were injured. Two were treated at the scene and three were taken to hospital. At this time, it is believed they have all suffered non-life-threatening or life-changing injuries. The car involved did not stop at the scene but was stopped in nearby Grange Park a short time later. The driver, a 34-year-old Somalia-born British man, was arrested on suspicion of dangerous driving and attempted murder. Due to the nature of the incident, local officers were in contact with officers from Counter Terrorism Policing London as they conducted their initial enquiries. While investigators are keeping an open mind as to any potential motive, the incident is not being treated as terrorism. Anyone with information or relevant footage is asked to contact the police on 101, providing the reference 4607/27JUN.
Just nuked my DMs on accident (after not checking them for months as I was scared to use my last pin attempt..), if I've failed to respond to something.. assume your DM was in the inferno and hit me back.
Had a few champagne socialist influencers over for a sleepover and next thing you know Cuba's leaders are asking themselves..
This Post is from a suspended account. Learn more