PROTECT NJZ

Another question from a Bunnie: "How is it possible for HYBE (ADOR) to submit FAKE evidences? Isn't it illegal? For example, the CCTV footage is not from the incident. That should be illegal, fake evidence, right? Shouldn't the court publish a statement saying the evidences are fake?" Since injunction trials move fast, judges don’t have the time to do deep investigations at this stage. That means there’s room for manipulated or misleading evidence to be submitted. But if it gets exposed, it can seriously backfire on the party that tried to pull it off. If one side throws in false or misleading evidence, the other side is expected to call it out and provide proof that it’s fake. Getting caught submitting false evidence isn’t just embarrassing—it comes with real consequences. We’re talking perjury charges (if they lied in sworn documents), evidence tampering charges, loss of credibility (making it harder for the court to believe anything they say), and even court sanctions, like having their claims thrown out or being hit with fines. That’s why, instead of straight-up fabricating evidence, most parties play it sneaky—using selectively edited, misleading, or out-of-context materials to make their case look stronger. This makes it crucial for the opposing side to have sharp legal representation to pick apart and expose the deception. So, to answer the question… Yes, technically, fake evidence can be submitted in an injunction trial, but if caught, the consequences are brutal. What’s more common is strategic manipulation of evidence, which puts the pressure on the other side to uncover the truth.