@EdKrassen nobody’s redefining it, it’s history of usage is public information you clown. You know exactly what you mean when you say it. Classic case of plausible deniability, you’re hiding like a coward behind ambiguity and gaslighting everybody while you’re at it. Pathetic.

The Pentagon’s Public Affairs Office is in full swing through you people trying to manipulate and misdirect everybody @RyanMcbeth were you there? Directly involved? Have receipts?

It’s funny how everything JUST occurred and you’re out here with zero firsthand information throwing around “liar!” Like some school child. You fit the description perfectly of a Pentagon Public Affairs Officer. Why should anybody believe you.. exactly?

He brought on a legitimate intel guy, has legitimate emails, and all the evidence one could possibly have, and conducted an interview to explore it all, with feds taking all of his intel seriously, panicking, and this is your bizarre take? You’re projecting dude.

Ah yes, the old ‘Give the government that fails every audit more money and they’ll surely do better!’ Completely coherent and logical argument… yes… big brain time, big smooth brain, but big nonetheless… right guys? Right?