Professor of Molecular Epidemiology at University of Bristol specialising in Mendelian randomisation, Nutrition, Cancer and Cleft

Joined April 2018
“..the recently dead are more or less erased and often not mentioned for fear of upsetting us. I can tell you now— mention away. Most of us want to hear their names and remember them with you. If we do get upset, well, we are mostly upset already.” thetimes.com/life-style/heal…
16
1
62
11,654
Sarah Lewis retweeted
You can tell Ozempic and Mounjaro are popular…in our Timpson shops we have seen a 680% increase in the number of free holes in customers belts we’ve been doing this year.
81
460
57
7,898
522,032
Sarah Lewis retweeted
Young people in care are being moved around constantly, often because local authorities are trying to save money. But what they’re forgetting is that the trauma this causes will inevitably put even more pressure on their services further down the line. The consequences can be devastating, with many struggling with their mental health and, as we’ve seen recently, far too many falling into incredibly difficult circumstances and tragically taking their own lives. We have to stop looking at the short-term cost and start looking at the long-term human cost. You cannot save money by creating more trauma. #facts
9
66
4
175
2,286
Government can improve the guidance on student loans, but students don’t often have a choice about taking them if they want to go to uni. That the government feels they can change the terms of the loan after students have taken them is a scandal apple.news/AyOE7QGBsSC-53faZ…
102
Government can improve the guidance on student loans, but students don’t often have a choice about taking them if they want to go to uni. That the government feels they can change the terms of the loan after students have taken them is a scandal apple.news/AyOE7QGBsSC-53faZ…
1
3
230
Sarah Lewis retweeted
Lots of replies suggesting 6 marks is too much for review. HODs of English are going seriously wrong if they’re only looking at papers close to the boundaries. Much better to check for exam paper imbalances and outliers than JUST close to the boundary (1/2)
Any advice from secondary teachers. Friend’s daughter was 2 marks off a 6 for English Language and 6 marks off a 6 for both History and English Literature. Is it worth them asking for remarking/checking for missed marks? Not sure if these are too far away. Thank you!
10
7
1
44
25,367
Sarah Lewis retweeted
I tell this story every year - but I’ve had a single paper move up from 44 to 96. 52 whole marks. DO NOT trust the marking if you expected your child or your student to do much better. Do not only review if you’re close to the grade boundary.
1
2
23
1,708
Sarah Lewis retweeted
A degree in England now costs over £9,500 a year in tuition alone 🇬🇧 In Germany it's free. In France it's a couple of hundred euros a year. In Norway it's free. In Scotland it's free, if you're Scottish. Three years of much the same lectures, and only here do you walk out owing more than most graduates earn in a year. We're the outlier in Europe and we discuss it like it's the natural order of things.
57
231
13
990
45,001
Sarah Lewis retweeted
This time of year, we put our 16-year-olds through a coming-of-age ritual. We make them sit in rows and write down things they have spent the last two years trying to memorise. We pit them against the clock, and prevent them from talking to each other. We tell them that this is the most important thing that they will ever do and their future life depends on it. We don’t just do this once. For most of them, we make them sit in rows and write things down between twenty and thirty separate times in the space of about six weeks. Maths, English, History, French, Biology….Again and again, they have to keep at it. Each time, we tell them how important it is and they better not have an off-day or be ill. Then we take their papers and we rank them. For some, the result will be accolades and glory. For others, failure and retakes. We know for sure that this will always be true, because these rituals that we call exams are designed to rank them. A third will always fail. There would be no top grades if we didn’t also have the bottom. It isn’t possible for them all to pass. And yet, every year, we talk as if this was not true. We pretend that it would be possible for them all to succeed, if only they and their teachers worked harder. Politicians talk about raising standards and accountability. We pretend that the problem is them not working hard enough, not an exam system designed so that hundreds of thousands fail. We blame them, not the exams. For the truth is that we have a coming-of-age ritual for our teenagers which involves a third of them being told they haven’t met the grade, that they are not good enough. We launch them into adult life telling them that they will carry the stigma of not understanding quadratic equations for ever. We put them all through intense stress, and then when some of them cave in we say they have anxiety and send them to see a therapist. And then we’re surprised when many of them say they just can’t carry on, that they don’t see the point. They don’t see potential in the future for themselves. We need to take a step back and ask ourselves why we do this to our teenagers. For the problem isn’t our young people. It’s not their fault that a third of them fail and many are chronically stressed. The problem is what we make them do. We’ve designed a coming-of-age system with a very high cost in human misery. Every year a new crop of teens will come of age, and despite their distress we just push them harder. We need to ask ourselves whether this is really the best we can do for our teenagers. We urgently need to think again.
34
103
21
446
52,705
Sarah Lewis retweeted
Evidence always outweighs opinion. Universities should be champions of independent thought, not followers of fashion. Our commitment to freedom of speech is tested only by those we disagree with. Anything else is confirmation bias.
1
23
121
1,998
As a nation we are much more successful in athletics than football, wish more of the money and resources was focussed on training future athletes.
57
Sarah Lewis retweeted
“According to the code, men are allowed to beat their wives as long as they do not use “obscene force” causing fractures, wounds or visible bruises, which the wife must prove in court. For this crime a man may be sentenced to only 15 days imprisonment.” theguardian.com/global-devel…
1
39
5
64
62,289
Sarah Lewis retweeted
On a Plan 2 Student loan? Why freezing the repayment threshold from 2027 to 2030 is, in my view, a breach of natural justice. A brief audio explainer
66
280
13
1,233
273,968
We’d all be better off if all graduates had higher disposable incomes to spend into the economy. Scrapping loans and paying the universities directly (as we used to do) would free up £12-16billion in graduate spending power. Keeping graduates poor is counterproductive.
88
210
7
2,144
50,313
Replying to @linmeitalks
Pre 2009 Nurses did on the job training for which they got paid. The labour govt then mandated it be a degree course. Now nurses have to have loans to pay for the training that they used to get paid for. Most can’t afford it & opt for low paid care work. Now that’s a scandal
3
6
336
9,547
Sarah Lewis retweeted
And don’t get me started on the Osborne decision to abolish maintenance grants. The poorest students now borrow the most, carry debt longest, and subsidise the richest families who can pay it off quickly. Sounds like a sensible tax system!
49
365
11
1,825
54,600
Dismayed to see you sharing such a misleading & potentially deeply frightening video, Kim. If someone is in 'unspeakable pain' at the end of life, they should see a palliative care doctor like me - & I can promise you there is always something I can do for your pain. (1/n)
Great to hear from @PrueLeith who knows all too well how the current status quo restricting choice at the end of life fails so many.
255
1,887
145
7,213
699,707
Fascinating first day in the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill committee, hearing evidence from experts (most of them pro assisted dying). Main takeaway: it really isn't clear what shape this Bill will be in when it comes back to the Commons. Issues that arose:
195
805
160
2,657
458,655