To your bank claim, Participating in UK RLN experimentation and Project Rosalind pilots isn't commercial production adoption across every UK bank.
Dave, you're agreeing with my exact point on backend fiat conversion and 12-month license locks. The debate here is that Feggy thinks that 2.6M treasury gets exhausted and forces open-market spot buys via 'TWAP algorithms'. He doesn't understand rolling 12-month lock expirations.
It’s still has to be adopted by enterprises on mass scale which is an unknown. Your little friend here thinks institutions will have to market buy QNT when the 2.6mil treasury is exhausted. That’s literally what he’s saying.
Never get comfortable anything can happen is this landscape. Deals are temporary. The tech is real but you fundamentally misunderstand the treasury and the licenses.
That’s funny coming from you when you said "institutional prime brokers" and "TWAP algorithms” lmfaoo you’re just guessing it’s sad to see we all want our bags to be the next one. Just giving you a dose of skepticism is all.
Quant's tokenomics don't 'fail' because corporate reserves satisfy fiat SaaS licenses they function as designed. What fails is your theory that a private B2B company forces live spot market orders for every fiat contract.
Haha yeah there it is. I hope your followers wise up and realize you have zero clue what you’re doing.
Show one piece of documentation or API spec mentioning TWAP execution for enterprise license generation, or admit you're making up backend architecture. it’s funny to see you stumble keep going.