Questions for @ElectionsAB and @ABDanielleSmith. Info for: @johnrbolton01 @CoryBMorgan @ikwilson For mail in ballots why is there no requirement to provide proof of citizenship? Especially given there is a specific question about immigration? You people really that incompetent?
Mark retweeted
A women is seen relieving herself on the side of a busy road in Lake Louise, just ahead of the Fairmont Chateau Lake Louise Hotel. Publicly peeing and or defecating in busy streets on the side of the road is unacceptable. It’s disrespectful for everyone and it is unhygienic.
Mark retweeted
But if you owe $5,000 in income taxes, they will track and harass you like a pack of hounds.
'Not in the public interest': Liberals won't try to recoup $34 million paid by 'green slush fund' to ineligible projects calgaryherald.com/news/polit…
Mark retweeted
The Liberal government stacked a board with Liberal insiders.
That board got to choose which companies got your tax money for grants.
They funnelled tax dollars into their businesses. They funded bogus projects. They got caught.
Now, the Liberal government says they won’t try and get your money back.
They said it’s not in the public interest.
The Liberal Insider Club. You’re not in it, but you pay for it.
Mark retweeted
What is wrong with Canadians? Either insanity or stupidly fits anyone preferring the Liberals. They prefer to smear Pierre rather than look at real facts. No budget in over a year. A $76 billion deficit. Carney talks about a US invasion to the NY Times rather than debating in Parliament. Housing builds and building permits are down after Carney promised a boom in home builds. Last week bad news from Brampton about the possible sale of Stalantis. Today Stelco in Hamilton announced 350 are being laid off indefinitely.
What will it take for these Carney lovers to face ŕeality. Canada is in deep economic trouble. The only ones to blame are the Trudeau and Carney governments. Not Trump. Not Pierre.
Tomorrow no booze will be going to the US. More job losses will probably happen.
Mark retweeted
I said this, I said this, I said this, months ago!
This prick is going to tap into the $750,000,000 CPP.
Seniors! Read this!
A bit at a time, he's going to pilfer the CPP for Brookfield projects to enrich himself.
The asshole won't sleep until we are all broke and EU members.
NEWELL: CPP is the latest on Carney’s chopping block westernstandard.news/opinion… #
Mark retweeted
"Financial wizard"
Budget Officer says Carney on track to miss operating budget target
westernstandard.news/news/bu…
Mark retweeted
BREAKING: President Donald J. Trump announces complete and permanent American security control over Greenland, and excludes any adversary from Greenland and the surrounding region.
Mark retweeted
🚨 IF IT’S NOT A CAMPAIGN, WHY DOES IT LOOK LIKE ONE?
Thomas Lukaszuk says it’s not.
Elections Alberta says it’s not.
So who’s paying for all the signs?
We may never know because apparently the rules only apply to one side.
And people call this democracy.
Mark retweeted
The CBC made American news today
The person responsible for the directive receives a paycheque funded by the very taxpayers who experienced the pain and loss of the devastating 9/11 attacks and the War in Afghanistan that followed
This CBC employee should be fired, and CBC leadership must immediately issue an apology
Mark retweeted
Liberal Bill C-11 to force US streaming companies into a CRTC algorithm was the red line that made @MarkJCarney walk away from the trade deal?
Why, to win a by-election in Québec a week from now?
Mark retweeted
Before you Canadians judge Trump remember what Carney wrote in his book.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The quote attributed to Mark Carney does not appear in his 2021 book Value(s). It is a paraphrase taken from a critical National Post review by Peter Foster (June 2021), rather than Carney’s own words.
•snopes.com/fact-check/can…
Foster’s original review: nationalpost.com/opinion/peter-…
```
Mark retweeted
Replying to @ryangerritsen
@theJagmeetSingh who are you? Did you do something for Canada? Sorry but I don't remember you.
Mark retweeted
Replying to @jkenney
How do you like these apples Jason?
Answers to your questions
⏬️⏬️⏬️⏬️⏬️
Here you go Jason.
Some of the assumptions built into your questions are incorrect or overstated. Independence would involve serious negotiations and real transition issues, but many of these are solvable policy question, not automatic barriers.
1. Alberta already has pipelines crossing other jurisdictions. An independent Alberta would negotiate transit and market-access agreements, as landlocked countries around the world do.
2. Separation would require constitutional negotiations. The Supreme Court has already established that a clear democratic mandate creates a duty for all parties to negotiate in good faith.
3. Calgary and Edmonton are municipalities, not provinces, and have no automatic constitutional right to remain in Canada. First Nations are different: treaty and Aboriginal rights would have to be addressed through negotiation.
4. Treaty rights cannot simply be reassigned or ignored. Independence negotiations would need direct, respectful agreements with First Nations and continuity of protected rights.
5. NATO’s 5% target is not simply a requirement to spend 5% of GDP on a standing military. Alberta would determine its own defence model, alliances and spending priorities.
6. Alberta would not simply be handed a bill to “buy” every federal acre. Federal assets, liabilities and lands would be part of the overall negotiated settlement.
7. Investor uncertainty is a legitimate concern. The best protection is a lawful, negotiated transition preserving contracts, property rights, courts, banking and predictable timelines.
8. Polling about hypothetical relocation is not the same as actual mass emigration. Citizenship, pensions, mobility, credentials and tax continuity would all need to be settled before separation.
9. Alberta could use the Canadian dollar, negotiate another monetary arrangement, or eventually establish its own currency. Each option has advantages and trade-offs.
10. Canada’s existing trade agreements would not automatically transfer. Alberta would need to negotiate continuity or replacement agreements, ideally before independence took effect.
11. IATA interline agreements are agreements between airlines, not countries. Alberta becoming independent would not suddenly prevent international flights or airline connections.
12. I have not seen reliable evidence establishing that all Albertans born outside the province would be denied citizenship. Citizenship rules would be determined by Alberta’s eventual constitution and laws, and could provide citizenship to existing residents regardless of birthplace.
Got any more questions?
Mark retweeted
One Law for Separatists, Another for Federalists?
One Set of Rules for All: Elections Alberta’s Crisis
cnm5000.substack.com/p/one-l…

































