Greatest History Predictor | geopolitics | summarizing Videos and opinions of Predictive History 📖
Joined June 2025
- Tweets1.3K
- Following44
- Followers84.6K
- Likes38
Pinned Tweet
Four books. One way of thinking.
How to read any person.
How to win the game of success.
What the world looks like in 2035.
How to prepare for what's coming.
Same framework.
Different applications.
The complete library. 40% off.
echoofhistory.gumroad.com/l/…
Children are natural learners. 🧠
The idea: Giving kids more freedom to explore and follow their curiosity may be just as important as formal education.
The Collapse is already happening in France 😳
⚠️🔴 À REGARDER JUSQU'À LA FIN
JE NE PEUX PAS DÉCRIRE CE QUE JE VIENS DE VIVRE À MARSEILLE.
#17octobre
What really separates the powerful from everyone else?
A provocative theory suggests that the willingness to cross moral boundaries may matter more than intelligence or hard work.
Could corporations become the new nation-states?
A look at a future where tech giants like Google and Meta could wield power traditionally held by governments.
Does everyone have a price?
A thought experiment explores the difference between being willing to cross a moral line and actually being able to do it.
Are political decisions driven by strategy or loyalty?
A debate on Trump’s leadership and the role of those around him.
Two different perspectives on Trump’s political strategy.
Is his approach driven by long-term planning or short-term decisions?
A look at group identity and divisions and why differences within groups can sometimes be greater than those between them. 👀
A different perspective on the Iran war and how religious beliefs may play a role alongside geopolitics. 🌍
Who is really driving U.S. policy in the Middle East? 🇺🇸🇮🇱
Professor Jiang lays out his view on the dynamic between Trump, Israel and Iran arguing that Trump is reacting to events rather than controlling their direction.
Professor Jiang poses a wild thought experiment: If you had Thanos’ Infinity Gauntlet, which group would you eliminate?
Two very different answers follow.
Nick immediately asks the one question that changes the debate: “What’s the evidence?” 👀
The conversation about the Rothschilds quickly turns into a live fact-check and the claim starts falling apart.
“America needs a dictator.”
The reasoning? A broken political system, extreme polarization and elites they believe no longer represent the people.
Something is returning to China.
Messianism.
It has happened before.
After the Opium Wars, when China was humiliated and the economy collapsed,
a man declared himself the younger brother of Jesus Christ.
The Taiping Rebellion followed.
Twenty million dead.
The conditions that produced it are reassembling right now.
Economic collapse. Mass unemployment.
Floods and natural disasters.
Young people with empty lives and nothing to believe in.
That combination always produces the same thing.
Someone stands up and says: follow me.
And once it starts it is almost impossible to stop.
Because the elites see it as a tool they can use for their own power.
They always think they can control it.
They never can.
People keep asking how we make sure
AI is used for the common good.
It won't be. And the reason is structural.
AI only works at scale.
Scale requires concentrated power.
And here is what we know about institutions:
the more power you give one,
the less empathy it has.
Look at city planning.
Robert Moses redrew New York
with a blueprint and absolute authority.
He destroyed neighborhoods that worked because they looked messy on paper.
That's how powerful people see the world.
Top down. Simplified. Legible.
Talk to them about human creativity or spirituality and they stare at you.
So who gets AI?
Whoever already has power.
And they will use it the way they have used everything else.
Learn the Frameworks to notice which Jobs are needed in the Future:
echoofhistory.gumroad.com/l/…
