@PredatoryReport

The Predatory Journals List. Also at 🦋 https://xitter.cf/t.co/HJvXmX9air

 Global
predatoryjournals.org
Joined January 2022
  • Tweets1.1K
  • Following86
  • Followers4.3K
249Media
Predatory Journals retweeted
nature
@NatureSep 21
Artificial-intelligence systems can generate hypotheses, design experiments and analyse data — but humans still need to decide what makes sense go.nature.com/4yGdbK4

AI co-scientists are revolutionizing how research is done

Nature - Artificial-intelligence systems can generate hypotheses, design experiments and analyse data — but humans still need to decide what makes sense.

nature.com
25
186
26
544
53,737
Predatory Journals retweeted
Spotting@SpottingthespotSep 19
#papermill #fraud at its best! All (!!) the authors of this paper were added during the revision process, replacing the 6 original authors! Unbelievable. @ElsevierConnect is rotten to the core! Thousands of such papers are being published.👇 doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.202…
2
9
3
52
21,837
🚨 Peer review crisis alert! When journals reject good science simply because they can’t find enough reviewers, the whole integrity of research is on the line. the-scientist.com/when-revie… #AcademicPublishing #PeerReview #ResearchIntegrity #SciencePolicy

When Reviewer Scarcity Becomes a Reason for Rejection, Scientific Integrity Is at Risk | The...

If journals reject papers due to review shortages, the peer review process itself becomes compromised.

the-scientist.com
3
9
13
1,318
Predatory Journals retweeted
Predatory Journals@PredatoryReportMay 26
🚨 Researchers are pushing back against AI-generated “hallucinated” citations in scientific papers and platforms like @arxiv are starting to crack down. ☢️ nature.com/articles/d41586-0…

Researchers who use hallucinated references to face arXiv ban

Nature - The preprint server is the latest to impose stiff penalties on authors who contribute to AI ‘slop’ — but not everyone is convinced it’s the right approach.

nature.com
1
7
1
10
1,517
Predatory Journals retweeted
MA Oviedo-Garcia@maoviedogarciaSep 17
I find this kind of profiles deeply intriguing 🤔 🔹1427 verified peer reviews @webofscience 🔹Sudden increase in reviewer's citations 🔹1.79 average verified peer reviews per day in 2025 🔹2024-2026➡️99.43% out of 1427 peer reviews
1
5
14
494
Predatory Journals retweeted
MA Oviedo-Garcia@maoviedogarciaMay 23
#MiniReviewMill 85 #FakeReview #CoerciveCitation @qeios @MDPIOpenAccess Reviewers 🔹Domitilla Magni @Unicatt 🇮🇹 @UoLondon 🇬🇧 🔹Anonymous 🔷6 verbatim review reports 🔷Articles to be cited: - 9 Domitilla Magni’s - 6 Manlio Del Giudice’s (Magni’s frequent co-author) 🧵
1
3
3
6
2,393
The Journal Sleuth All about equipping yourself about the basic skills of identifying fake journals... In under an hour! For everyone in academia! Link to the full playlist: youtube.com/playlist?list=PL… #research @ARanganathan72 @ScienceMagazine @ScienceNews
6
9
1,812
Predatory Journals retweeted
MA Oviedo-Garcia@maoviedogarciaMay 10
#ReviewLikeATweet #StrangerThings @MDPIOpenAccess Round 1 🥇 2 words @Vaccines_MDPI 🥈 11 words @diagnostic_mdpi 🥉 20 words @Sus_MDPI 📜 30 words @IJERPH_MDPI Is this compatible with a thorough review of the original manuscript❓ ⬇️ (links)
1
4
1
7
2,204
Predatory Journals retweeted
MA Oviedo-Garcia@maoviedogarciaApr 18
#MiniReviewMill 80 #FakeReview #CoerciveCitation @MDPIOpenAccess @PLOSONE @WileyGlobal Reviewers 🔹Shi Yin Hebei Agricultural University 🇨🇳 🔹Anonymous 🔷16 review reports 🔷21 Shi Yin’s articles to be cited 🧵
1
2
1
8
1,809
Predatory Journals retweeted
Retraction Watch@RetractionWatchApr 14
"Academic fraud may be the symptom of a much more systemic problem." voxweb.nl/en/academic-fraud-…

‘Academic fraud may be the symptom of a much more systemic problem’ - Vox magazine

OPINION - It is not surprising that a case of scientific fraud occasionally comes to light, according to associate professor Empirical Political Science Alex Lehr. ‘Many of us are doing our stinking...

voxweb.nl
1
17
1
33
4,835
Predatory Journals retweeted
Ramón A. Feenstra@R_FeenstraJan 28
¿Hay alternativa a la locura de precios de las APCs de la ruta de "oro" del acceso abierto?📖 En @Revista_REDOC, analizamos las revistas de filosofía en España: un ecosistema que supone una alternativa real a las APCs. 👇 redc.revistas.csic.es/index.… #CienciaAbierta #OpenAccess #RRI
12
21
2,747
Predatory Journals retweeted
MA Oviedo-Garcia@maoviedogarciaJan 24
#MiniReviewMill 68 #FakeReview #CoerciveCitation @MDPIOpenAccess Reviewers 🔹Miqdam T. Chaichan @uottechnology1 🇮🇶 @Soharuniv 🇴🇲 🔹Salam J. Yaqoob @ujaen 🇪🇸 🔷5 almost verbatim review reports 🔷4 Miqdam T. Chaichan’s articles to be cited 🧵
1
5
1
8
2,884
Scientific Reports @SciReports is full of fake and low quality papers. #Predatory 🧐⚠️
Spotting@Spottingthespot6 Dec 2025
This AI generated piece of crap published only roughly 3 weeks ago has already been retracted! As long as enough media pays attention to it, retractions can go fast.... Go figure! A lot still to be retracted by @SpringerNature , for sure in @SciReports 👇 doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-2…
3
22
3
85
14,187
⚠️🚨 Science of the Total Environment has been removed from Web of Science in Nov. 2025 after retractions due to review-fraud and quality failures. Its publisher @ElsevierConnect raked in massive profits while “mega-publishing” suspect papers. 🤑🤡 english.elpais.com/science-t…

The fall of a prolific science journal exposes the billion-dollar profits of scientific publishing

One of the 15 publications that put out the most studies globally has been expelled from the indexing system for irregularities. Its publisher, Elsevier, has a 38% profit margin that reached $1.5...

english.elpais.com
1
17
2
39
4,941
Predatory Journals retweeted
MA Oviedo-Garcia@maoviedogarcia8 Dec 2025
#CoerciveCitation @qeios @MDPIOpenAccess Reviewers 🔹Meisam Mahdavi @ujaen 🇪🇸 @unb_oficial 🇧🇷 🔹Anonymous 🔷3 review reports 🔷5 Meisam Mahdavi’s articles to be cited 🧵
2
2
6
1,464
🧪 After 25 years, a landmark study claiming the herbicide Glyphosate/Roundup was “safe” has been officially retracted, due to ghost-writing and clear conflicts of interest. What was once scientific “proof” now collapses. #Science #Glyphosate #Retracted ☣️ theguardian.com/us-news/2025…

Science journal retracts study on safety of Monsanto’s Roundup: ‘Serious ethical concerns’

Paper published in 2000 found glyphosate was not harmful, while internal emails later revealed company’s influence

theguardian.com
1
3
9
3,143
1/6 🚨 Springer Nature is retracting an entire book on machine learning. Why? It was full of plagiarized content, nonsensical claims, and had no proper peer review. 🤯 Retraction Watch: 1 Springer’s credibility: 0
Retraction Watch@RetractionWatch16 Jul 2025
Springer Nature to retract machine learning book following Retraction Watch coverage The move comes two weeks after we reported on the book’s fake references. retractionwatch.com/2025/07/…

Springer Nature to retract machine learning book following Retraction Watch coverage

A screenshot from June 26 shows the book had been accessed 3,782 times. Springer Nature is retracting a book on machine learning that had multiple references to works that do not exist, Retraction …

retractionwatch.com
6
15
2
46
6,036
Predatory Journals retweeted
MA Oviedo-Garcia@maoviedogarcia25 Oct 2025
#MiniReviewMill 58 #FakeReview #CoerciveCitation Reviewers 🔹Monica Butnariu➕Ionel Samfira➕Sarac Ioan University @life_timisoara 🇷🇴 🔹Anonymous 🔷24 verbatim review reports 🔷47 Monica Butnariu’s works to be cited H/T Reese Richardson (database)➕another sleuth (key) 🧵
1
9
3
14
9,893
Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology (E-ISSN: 2576-8484) is now in @Scopus, yet: ⚠️ Published 12 papers in 2023 → 1,186 in 2024 → 1,068 in 2025. ⚠️ Lists 1,079 editors across 85 countries. ⚠️ Former publisher Edelweiss Publications is on Beall’s List. @Scopus doing great!
3
7
1
16
2,537
Predatory Journals retweeted
nature
@Nature15 Sep 2025
Scientific societies, journals, editors and researchers are pushing back against mean-spirited peer reviews go.nature.com/4ncswwY

‘Lipstick on a pig’: how to fight back against a peer-review bully

Nature - Scientific societies, journals, editors and researchers are pushing back against mean-spirited peer reviews.

nature.com
10
26
6
78
21,406
Load more