Sandra’s sufferer (@PoshDog3) header
Sandra’s sufferer (@PoshDog3) profile picture

Here to tackle school bullies

Joined August 2019
Photo by Sandra’s sufferer (@PoshDog3)Photo by Sandra’s sufferer (@PoshDog3)Photo by Sandra’s sufferer (@PoshDog3)Photo by Sandra’s sufferer (@PoshDog3)Photo by Sandra’s sufferer (@PoshDog3)Photo by Sandra’s sufferer (@PoshDog3)Photo by Sandra’s sufferer (@PoshDog3)Photo by Sandra’s sufferer (@PoshDog3)Photo by Sandra’s sufferer (@PoshDog3)Photo by Sandra’s sufferer (@PoshDog3)
“What’s he doing?” About 25mph and donuts on a motorised line painter. Cotham’s contractors CPS demonstrating questionable safeguarding standards whilst youngsters playing football. Simultaneously unable to park their vans anywhere other than on the roots of protected oak (T7)
3
5
10
3,302
Cotham’s fake poo flinger has returned.. Found at Stoke Lodge which is clean as a whistle after months of public use and no PE. What could they be upset about ..?
6
5
1
12
570
Over on his latest platform is Nate Allen denying he was terminated from @CothamSchool then admitting it. No help from his big sister this time.
1
1
3
151
Blonde lady - spying on a dog walker at @WlStoke_Lodge Pretending to look at the young cedar in the dark but dog walker felt uneasy.Any ideas?
2
125
What was Nate Allen doing marching around @WlStoke_Lodge yesterday lunchtime? (Failed attempt at “Incognito” - he’s become quite a symbol of everything wrong with @CothamSchool). Thanks for using the PROW though.
2
1
5
149
Sandra’s sufferer retweeted
How bullies react when you hit back 🤣
325
62
5
1,113
741,741
We’ve seen a stream of misinformation from Cotham School in the last week. It constantly amazes us that they use easily-disprovable claims to try to back up their ambitions at Stoke Lodge - and that they often get away with it. Fact-checking is essential! welovestokelodge.blog/2025/1…
1
7
12
955
Officers have turned down Cotham’s planning applications in this area on three previous occasions due to detriment to the amenity of a listed building. Sandra Fryer knows this would not meet planning policy but does it anyway despite promises to Council. @theTCPA is this ok? 5/5
1
2
10
511
Obstruction of a right of way:/4
1
2
8
392
Here’s the fence though the root zone of our veteran boundary oak:/3
1
2
7
201
Here is the stump of the ash tree in TPO group 7, plus tree discarded to side. Breach of TPO law for a new bit of extra fencing to further block the perimeter path. @BristolCivicSoc is this ok with you? /2
1
2
8
189
Here is @SandraFryer14 promising Councillors on 22 Sept that her new fence didn’t need planning controls because it would meet all required standards. Then: -cut down TPO ash tree -dug in TPO root zones incl veteran oak -blocked rights of way -detriment to listed building ⬇️ 1/5
2
9
16
1,133
In June, Nate Allen (self proclaimed) team @CothamSchool’s “public service information” said “Get that fence back up, the local sports users will still have access”. Thank f*ck they couldn’t.
1
3
121
Nate “Get that fence back up” Allen contradicting himself again. July 26th announces he’ll stop posting. The @CothamSchool moron has his head stuck up Fryer’s ass so far- Two Cotham parents here to get on board but nope.
2
3
379
Nate’s finally been gagged by @cothamschool. Was it… because he shared parts of the court transcript?
3
3
434
Memories of Cotham’s article to press crying “Damage to Stoke Lodge fence will cost "thousands of pounds" to fix” when it was their own Nate Allen who used a power tool in his own time to drill out bolt holes ..🤥
1
1
2
403
Terrible thing anonymous accounts. But….Wait! Nate Allen on at least 3 other accounts since 2019… is it because it’s not “his place” to speak on behalf of the school?
2
3
432
…and another. Negan in ‘21. McGyver. Fancy yourself as leader of the saviours and a genius level intellect 😶 Whilst amused at Danica’s trauma injury.
1
2
259
Astounding logic in action: You are massive idiot, then you lose a high court case. But you remain a 5 star idiot. Conclusion- Not more of an idiot (5 star plenty) but now add dodgy credibility/weak legal case/etc. “winner”🫠
2
133