Abigail Nobel retweeted
“One of the most frequent arguments made by ‘brain death’ defenders is that the body of a ‘brain-dead’ individual is not a body but a corpse, even when it may seem alive
because a ventilator masks its death.”
Dr. Doyen Nguyen explains why this idea is false:
1. The ventilator can only push oxygenated air into the lungs. It cannot cause the body to absorb the oxygen into the bloodstream, deliver it into the many cells of the body, undergo metabolism, and yield carbon dioxide to exhale. Only a LIVING organism can do these things.
2. If a ventilator could cause the appearance of life, logically then, if we
connected a ventilator to the corpse of a person whose death was determined by the traditional criteria, we would
expect the ventilator to cause what it is alleged to be capable of: to give
the appearance of life in a dead entity. This does not happen however.
Moreover, why do people only use this argument — that ventilators mask death — in the context of brain death?
There are many critically ill people on ventilators in ICU, but no one ever says that people with severe infections or multiple organ failure are actually dead, and that their ventilators are fooling doctors and nurses into thinking they are alive.
Severely neurologically injured people labeled “brain dead” look alive because they ARE alive. Technology can only sustain life, not produce it.
The hearing from Nomination #3 was such a target-rich environment, we’re back for more.
Nomination #4 for the MHF Defender Award highlights two simple ideas.
A #healthcare program must make practical sense in the #realworld, and it must be funded.
Read about the outrageous #Michigan bill no one's heard of.
mihealthfreedom.org/2026-nom…
Abigail Nobel retweeted
The FTC just threatened to take 24 of the biggest hospital systems in America to court for hiding their prices.
Hospitals have been required to post prices since 2021. Plenty of them "complied" by dumping enormous files nobody can read, or posting a number for a procedure that leaves out the surgeon, the anesthesiologist and the facility fee.
The FTC's letters shut that down. They call the CMS price transparency rules "a regulatory floor" and say compliance with them is not a safe harbor under the FTC Act. A posted price that leaves out physician or facility fees can mislead patients about the true cost of care, which can make it deceptive under federal law.
The letters focus on non-emergency care scheduled in advance. That's the care you could actually shop for, if anyone would tell you the price.
Chairman Andrew Ferguson: "Healthcare providers must disclose their prices to consumers and must do so starting today. If they do not, then the FTC will take them to court." He also said the FTC has already opened price transparency investigations against hospitals.
The need is obvious. An August review of 2,000 hospitals found only 49.4% were complying with the rule. More than 500 hospitals got CMS warnings between April and June. The same day the letters went out, CMS finalized a new rule to make the published price data easier to actually use.
When people can finally see prices, the results speak for themselves. A Johns Hopkins study this year found the cash price for Keytruda beat every insurance contract at one in five hospitals. The same drug had anywhere from 9 to 21 different negotiated prices at a single hospital.
Every gas station in America posts its price on a sign twenty feet tall. Hospitals needed a federal warning letter.
We've posted ours since day one. The cost of the drug plus a flat fee, before you pay.
forestparkpharmacy.com, check the price checker, transfer today to save.
See ya.
The hearing from Nomination #3 was such a target-rich environment, we’re back for more.
Nomination #4 for the MHF Defender Award highlights two simple ideas.
A #healthcare program must make practical sense in the #realworld, and it must be funded.
Learn about the outrageous #Michigan bill no one's heard of.
mihealthfreedom.org/2026-nom…
The horrifying, hidden face of communism.
The Taipei Times reports that more Taiwanese people are going missing in China.
Since 2024, 453 Taiwanese people have had been reported “missing, detained for questioning or suspected of having their freedom of movement restricted from Jan. 1, 2024, to Friday to 453, the Mainland Affairs Council said in its weekly report issued on Saturday.”
One of these people was a nurse who was questioned by Chinese state security personnel about a military hospital where she had previously worked.
When asked whether any of the Taiwanese reported missing in China might have had their organs removed, a government official said that authorities “do not know.”
“The Taoyuan District Prosecutors’ Office last month indicted seven people following an investigation into a suspected human trafficking ring that allegedly attempted to capture people to take to China for organ harvesting. The group allegedly recruited people with promises of high-paying jobs. Three people were deceived, but were never transported out of Taiwan.”
It is unclear whether these human traffickers were working for the CCP, or whether criminal organizations are now becoming part of the supply chain that provides prisoners to the CCP for forced organ harvesting.
@MDsAgainstFOH @DAFOH_India @JanJekielek @AndreasWeb49965
Such a workaround - and a total waste of time.
No one enforces transparency like customers spending money.
Just put the money in patient hands, CMS.
Human nature will take over.
And you'll save billions of taxpayer dollars in unnecessary middlemen, managed care, and fraud.
We don't need technology companies to come off the sidelines; @SurgeryCenterOK has been doing this since 1997.
If you want to learn more, contact @SurgeryCenterOK to learn how they have done this for almost 30 years!
Cash is still king.
Even in healthcare.
Especially in healthcare.
Paying a premium every month so you can pay more at the MRI.
A guy posted about his scan last night. The imaging center confirmed insurance approved it, and his copay would be four hundred and something dollars. Then he asked the obvious follow-up. What if I just pay cash? A few clicks later: $250.
Cheaper to leave the insurance card in his wallet. On a scan his insurance had already approved.
This isn't rare. It's the pattern every time somebody actually checks.
Medicare pays about $475 for an MRI at an independent imaging center. Cash prices at freestanding centers commonly run $400 to $1,200. Run the same scan through a hospital outpatient department and it can land anywhere from $1,500 to $3,500, plus a facility fee.
A Johns Hopkins study published this year compared hospitals' posted cash prices with their insurer-negotiated prices for the 20 drugs Medicare spends the most on. At up to half of hospitals, depending on the drug, cash beat the typical negotiated rate. At up to 81%, cash beat the highest one. The researchers' explanation was simple. Providers like getting paid up front with no claims, no denials and no waiting, so they price cash competitively.
Same story at the pharmacy counter. Another Hopkins study found Medicare Part D paid $27.85 a pill for omeprazole that costs about 80 cents over the counter. Across 19 common drugs available both ways, Medicare could have saved $406 million in one year just by paying the cash price.
So why does the insured price come out higher? Because a copay isn't a price. It's a number your plan sets based on its benefit design, and it has nothing to do with what the scan or the drug actually costs. Meanwhile the provider has to file a claim, wait on it, fight denials and pay staff to chase it. All of that cost lands in the insured price. Cash skips every step.
Insurance raises the cost of the MRI. It raises the cost of surgery. It raises the cost of a hospital stay. And it raises the cost of your prescriptions.
That's why we fired them. No claims, no copays, no middleman. The cost of the drug plus a flat fee, posted before you pay.
forestparkpharmacy.com, check the price checker, transfer today to save.
See ya.
Congratulations to everyone at Paragon!
Paragon turns five. Since 2021, we've produced hundreds of research papers, policy briefs, Prognoses, PICs, and congressional testimonies, and our work has helped produce meaningful policy change.
Our new 2025 Annual Report tells that story: ow.ly/UE1e50ZU0Io
Hello, Michigan small farmers!
I just introduced the Red Meat Inspection Exemption Act with @chelliepingree to allow small farmers to slaughter and process their own livestock for direct-to-consumer sales without federal interference.
This bill keeps Trump’s promise by reducing regulations on producers.
I am delighted to hear @DrLarryArnn support a policy I proposed in January.
Full description: Replace Medicaid Middlemen with an HSA: all of Michigan would benefit.
mihealthfreedom.org/medicaid…
Dr. Arnn's statement to simply give the poor money to buy their own healthcare comes in the context of Michigan's "Medicare-for-all" candidate for US Senate.
4 minutes from the end of today's @HCPodcasts Hillsdale Dialogues with @hughhewitt.
omny.fm/shows/hillsdale-dial…
If healthcare seems corrupt, please push back.
You just might succeed - as these people did.
If you want to understand why healthcare is so expensive, I'd start with a Supreme Court case about teeth whitening.
Around 2003, spas and small kiosks in North Carolina were offering teeth whitening for a fraction of what dentists charge.
So dentists complained to the state dental board. That dental board looks like this:
- 6 of 8 are practicing dentists, elected by other dentists
- 8 of the 10 who sat on the board during this period earned substantial fees from whitening
The board sent 47+ cease-and-desist letters, warning non-dentists that they're committing a crime by practicing dentistry without a license. The board also sent letters to mall operators, advising them to expel whitening kiosks.
All this worked! These kiosks shut down, prices stayed high, dentists stayed happy.
Regulatory capture like this exists all over in healthcare. What makes this case notable is that someone actually sued the NC dental board, in a case that went all the way to the supreme court.
In a 6-3 ruling, the SC ruled that if a board is run by those who participate in the market without proper supervision - that looks like a cartel, therefore, antitrust law applies.
I have to believe there are so many other potential cases like this in healthcare, just waiting to be pressed on. I'd love to see more of this.
Abigail Nobel retweeted
Claims that children are losing health coverage don't match new Census data. The child uninsured rate edged down from 6.1% in 2024 to 5.8% in 2025. ow.ly/1Rbi50ZU0Hy
Abigail Nobel retweeted
“Strength Rejoices in the Challenge.” 🇺🇸
.@SECWAR “To meet this critical need, we are partnering with a new crop of premier higher-ed institutions, including Louisiana State University (LSU), Liberty University, Tuskegee University, Mississippi State University, and Hillsdale College.
These schools have stepped forward to answer the call to duty and establish new “Corps of Cadets” in partnership with the War Department.
So, today—at my direction—we formally establish a program to assist these universities and colleges. It’s called America’s Corps of Cadets.
This flagship effort is central to our goal of increasing the number of patriotic leaders of character commissioning into the Joint Force.”
Abigail Nobel retweeted
Replying to @AndreaBee00722
@AndreaBee00722 makes a great point that any healthcare reform must lower the costs of insurance premiums for the public to support it.
She is a wealth of knowledge about hospitals, GPOs and what the price of services are at hospitals.
She geniunely wants to improve healthcare in the US and she is worth a follow.
I always appreciate when I interview people with deep industry knowledge and good intent.
Please follow her. @HeathVeuleman @DutchRojas @anish_koka @DrDiGiorgio @crappiedoc
Abigail Nobel retweeted
Correction: they cancelled coverage for 760,000 phantoms! These were fake enrollments created by corrupt call centers and brokers to rip off taxpayers in a poorly designed program.
No SSNs, no claims, a fully subsidized premium, and no contact EVER with the insurer.
CMS cancelled federal marketplace coverage for more than 760,000 people and blocked new agents and brokers from offering coverage for 2027. Officials cited concerns about improper enrollment though unauthorized enrollments have dropped significantly. | Forefront
@Katie_Keith | @oneillinstitute
healthaffairs.org/content/fo…
I'm please to present the 3rd nominee for the MHF 2026 Defender Award.
Our data in the hands of strangers immediately raises concerns: privacy, consent, control, access, costs. We take Nomination #3 for the MHF 2026 Defender Award from just such a question, asked in committee hearing where it counts.
Many will recall that Governor Whitmer called for live, real-time access to patient health information during state COVID tracking in 2020.
Michigan took a big step toward that goal when the House Health Policy Committee heard House Bills 4037 and 4038.
One question opened the door to an essential fact.
mihealthfreedom.org/2026-nom…
Abigail Nobel retweeted
More than twenty states have now sued the same nine companies over insulin prices. Florida filed this week. Texas, California, Utah, Minnesota, Michigan, Iowa, Missouri, Oregon, Delaware, Indiana, Massachusetts, Kansas, Arkansas, Mississippi, Kentucky, Illinois and Arizona got there first.
Red states, blue states, and every single complaint describes the same scheme with the same defendants.
The defendants are always three manufacturers who make over 90% of the world's insulin, three PBMs who process roughly 80% of American prescriptions, and the rebate aggregators that sit between them. Florida named those too. Zinc, Ascent and Emisar, the offshore entities the rebate money gets routed through.
The mechanism, per Florida's complaint: manufacturers inflate the published list price, pay a cut back to the PBM, and get rewarded with preferred formulary placement. Both sides make more money every time the sticker price goes up. A Lilly executive testified that on a $280 vial of Humalog, roughly $210 goes back to the PBMs. That's 75% of the price of insulin functioning as a payment for permission to be covered.
Insulin costs around two dollars to manufacture.
If you want to know how locked in this is, look at what happened when somebody tried to break it. Novo Nordisk cut the list price of its insulin Levemir by 65%. Coverage for the drug collapsed from about 90% down to 35%. The PBMs dropped it because a cheaper drug pays them less. Novo discontinued it entirely.
Their CEO told a Senate committee in September 2024 that this is exactly why he won't cut list prices on his other drugs. His position was that a high list price is more likely to get patients access, because the middlemen only cover what pays them well. He also testified that 74 cents of every dollar the company brings in goes back to PBMs and insurers.
Sanders showed up to that hearing with written commitments from all three major PBMs promising they wouldn't drop coverage if Novo lowered prices. The CEO still wouldn't do it. He'd already learned what happens.
And the people who get charged against the inflated number are the ones with the least protection. Uninsured patients. People sitting in a deductible. Anyone on percentage coinsurance. The fake price was built to fund the rebate, and the patients with the worst coverage are the ones who pay it.
We don't take rebates. Nobody pays us for placement, and there's no list price to inflate because there's no middleman here to inflate it for. You pay what the drug costs plus a flat fee.
forestparkpharmacy.com, check the price checker, transfer today to save.
See ya.























