8th Generation Canadian (since 1765). Fossil-fuel burning family guy with a background in aerospace engineering & Oil & Gas. AB Business Owner. Not a DM guy.

YEG/YYC/YQM/YYZ
Joined October 2009
Replacement “theory”
Don't worry it's still just an conspiracy theory.
5
16
371
Why did the BBC crop the photo? Ah. I see….
470
7,788
221
75,198
1,824,561
I was at the game and noticed the same thing. Empty rows in the bowl. Lots of them.
My buddy was at the Oilers game last night. He said the lower bowl was only 3/4 full. In that city, new building with no idea how long you have left to watch McDavid? Crazy to see. People must be feeling the pinch in their pocket books these days.
1
1
2
115
This guy is a nutjob. A society that elects a person like that will see significant negative consequences
"I would love it if the governments around the world got together and taxed @ElonMusk's wealth." Manitoba's NDP Premier Wab Kinew, announcing new rent controls in Winnipeg today.
39
36
4
270
2,316
Each question is a vote. Each voter made up to 10 votes
Elections Alberta noted in advance that the province had 3,148,343 eligible voters. The problem is that the numbers below add up to 4,352,679 votes cast. So not only were there 1,204,336 more votes cast than eligible voters, which is bad enough, but I guess we're also supposed to believe that 100% of the 3M+ eligible voters cast a ballot. Can someone explain how blatant electoral fraud isn't involved?
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The image's 4,352,676 figure is labelled "valid votes across all 10 questions", so each ballot is counted once per question. Elections Alberta reported 837,791 advance votes and 519,082 special ballots, out of 3,148,343 eligible electors. ca.news.yahoo.com/alberta-refere…
41
Retard of the day 🥇
1,125
4,395
128
68,985
510,352
juan pablo retweeted
"Don't be fooled by the idea you can send a message with your vote." Read that again. A prime minister, in a democracy, telling you your vote isn't a message. Your vote is the ONLY message you get. That's the whole deal. That's democracy. What he means is: your vote counts when it's the one he wants. Vote his way and it's "vote like Canada depends on it." Vote your conscience and it's "a dangerous bluff." He doesn't want your voice. He wants your obedience.
123
652
34
2,149
19,349
"rupturing what they built" is exactly what the Liberal Government has been doing for over a decade, turning Canada into a 3rd world socialist parasite. BTW, the constitution of Canada provides every Canadian the ability to vote for their province to leave Canada.
powerful words from Jason Kenney here: "I ask people as they're considering voting, put their minds forward to November 11th [and] the sacrifices of Albertans who lie below gravestones with the maple leaf on them. We do not have the right to rupture what they built and what they sacrificed for."
1
2
23
409
Karma on steroids.
What we know: 1. She's a member of the French left-wing party and an activist, one of the biggest advocates for opening up migration to North African peoples. 2. She owns a small chic boutique in an upscale spot, she stood in her shop trying to save it from looting and theft telling them that she's a famous activist. 3. She told them I'm so-and-so, the activist for asylum, I'm with you, I've defended you and your entry and stay in France, they spat on her, knocked her down, and trampled her with their feet, good thing she's still alive. 4. And they looted the whole shop, losing all the struggle and work of her lifetime in a moment. Standing there stunned, not believing that these thieving, rabble-rousing, criminal, barbaric hordes are the ones she's spent her whole life defending, and advocating for them to invade her country and destroy it
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
La mujer de la fotografía es una manifestante que intenta impedir el saqueo del establecimiento. Ella no es la propietaria. Es un supermercado de la cadena Franpix. En el vídeo completo de puede ver. instagram.com/reel/DenbGUyid…
1
27
A very good analogy.
It's illegal to bring a plant into our country because it might upset the ecosystem but bringing in millions of people from the 3rd world is supposed to make it better.. right
3
29
431
juan pablo retweeted
In the entire history of the American presidency, it would be almost impossible to identify a more destructive and divisive individual than @barackobama. I recall seeing him on Charlie Rose's show in 2004 and predicting that he'd become president because of the idiocy of so many members of the electorate. "I voted for the black guy. I'm so enlightened and progressive. I don't care that he is an enemy of our foundational principles."
It is a basic principle of American democracy that the government can’t selectively target individuals simply because of their political beliefs or what they say. But that’s exactly what the Trump Administration is doing to Congresswoman Ilhan Omar of Minnesota. To understand why this is so appalling, it’s important to know the facts. Congresswoman Omar came to this country with her father when she was 12 years old. Five years later, her father became a naturalized citizen. If Ilhan had been 18 at the time, she would have had to apply for citizenship separately. But because she was 17, she became a naturalized citizen automatically. Congresswoman Omar went on to graduate from college, work as a community organizer, become the first Somali-American legislator elected to public office in the U.S., and win a seat in Congress. There, she has been one of the Trump Administration’s fiercest critics, which has led the president to repeatedly single her out as someone who he believes does not belong in this country. Now the Administration is actively trying to deport Congresswoman Omar, seemingly based solely on the unsubstantiated theory that she was actually 18 when her father was naturalized, and therefore is not a citizen. Federal agents have raided her home, confiscated personal records, and seized her phone — all to try and uncover a nonexistent smoking gun from 20 years ago that will somehow make their case. Think about that. The full weight of the federal government is being brought down on a law-abiding elected official because she has dared to criticize the president. And it’s not the first time this has happened. Under President Trump, the Justice Department has repeatedly gone after those he considers his political enemies — from the Attorney General of New York, to the former head of the FBI, to members of the Federal Reserve. In those cases, the prosecutions either stalled or were dismissed for having no basis in law, and the same is likely to happen in this case. But not before Congresswoman Omar’s life has been turned upside down, her legal bills have piled up, and she’s been forced to spend time fighting unsubstantiated charges instead of serving the people of Minnesota. The fact that any president, or any administration, is willing to engage in such transparent efforts to intimidate someone should outrage all Americans, regardless of how they feel about Congresswoman Omar’s political views. Because if this becomes the new normal, there’s no reason to believe it will stop with her — or that future presidents, in either party, won’t do the same.
450
3,318
86
17,382
204,633
106
3,834
72
46,916
413,780
juan pablo retweeted
You set-up, framed, and spied on an incoming President. You should set this one out Hussein.
It is a basic principle of American democracy that the government can’t selectively target individuals simply because of their political beliefs or what they say. But that’s exactly what the Trump Administration is doing to Congresswoman Ilhan Omar of Minnesota. To understand why this is so appalling, it’s important to know the facts. Congresswoman Omar came to this country with her father when she was 12 years old. Five years later, her father became a naturalized citizen. If Ilhan had been 18 at the time, she would have had to apply for citizenship separately. But because she was 17, she became a naturalized citizen automatically. Congresswoman Omar went on to graduate from college, work as a community organizer, become the first Somali-American legislator elected to public office in the U.S., and win a seat in Congress. There, she has been one of the Trump Administration’s fiercest critics, which has led the president to repeatedly single her out as someone who he believes does not belong in this country. Now the Administration is actively trying to deport Congresswoman Omar, seemingly based solely on the unsubstantiated theory that she was actually 18 when her father was naturalized, and therefore is not a citizen. Federal agents have raided her home, confiscated personal records, and seized her phone — all to try and uncover a nonexistent smoking gun from 20 years ago that will somehow make their case. Think about that. The full weight of the federal government is being brought down on a law-abiding elected official because she has dared to criticize the president. And it’s not the first time this has happened. Under President Trump, the Justice Department has repeatedly gone after those he considers his political enemies — from the Attorney General of New York, to the former head of the FBI, to members of the Federal Reserve. In those cases, the prosecutions either stalled or were dismissed for having no basis in law, and the same is likely to happen in this case. But not before Congresswoman Omar’s life has been turned upside down, her legal bills have piled up, and she’s been forced to spend time fighting unsubstantiated charges instead of serving the people of Minnesota. The fact that any president, or any administration, is willing to engage in such transparent efforts to intimidate someone should outrage all Americans, regardless of how they feel about Congresswoman Omar’s political views. Because if this becomes the new normal, there’s no reason to believe it will stop with her — or that future presidents, in either party, won’t do the same.
467
4,671
79
32,922
200,480
That’s a tell.
Fun fact: Not a single mosque was damaged during the riots in France
31
456
It’s sad because it was predicted, but there was money to be made
2
37
393
Help me with this. How do you get to approve the sale of a company, actively kill its market, then hold it accountable for jobs. Since the sale of Stelco, the Feds have actively moved the steel market out of Canada by pissing off Stelco's US steel customers and paying China to use Chinese steel. The Feds now want Stelco to lose money by paying to keep workers they have no work for, because "they agreed"
Nothing like breaching a contract and then accusing the people who accuse you of breaching a contract of being bullies.
33
Elon Musk introduces amazing technology faster than the LGBT... crowd adds letters and symbols.
Turns out the future does have flying cars
2
120
juan pablo retweeted
Replying to @elonmusk
Can we start with this.
7
1
55
3,667
Forced Sale? To who? Ah, taxpayers. The Socialist agenda
Ottawa warns Stelco owner to protect Canadian jobs or face forced sale 🍁 torontomorning 🍁 “Link to full article in the 1st comment” 👇
18
329
juan pablo retweeted
Maybe we should start a competitor to Amazon 🤔
amazon is blocking grok @bots from ordering, and elon's answer is just have your bot buy it somewhere else. one of my grok bots only handles my amazon returns, so i'm watching this one closely. would you switch stores for your bot? 🛒 Elon, i think its time for an X Shop? 👀
21,706
19,248
3,659
204,206
9,000,432
juan pablo retweeted
Replying to @SenWarren
My grandfather built McCormick Spices from nothing after your ancestors tomahawked his wife and kids. I'll be damned if you take another scalp from my family fortune!
2,658
8,212
1,071
116,911
8,342,798